cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Wahab Aznul Hidaya
Contact Email
wahabaznulhidaya@um-sorong.ac.id
Phone
+6281248582845
Journal Mail Official
jurnaljustisi@um-sorong.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Pendidikan No. 27 Kota Sorong
Location
Kota sorong,
Papua barat
INDONESIA
JUSTISI
Published by Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong
ISSN : 19797532     EISSN : 26860821     DOI : https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v10i2
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Justisi provides a forum for publishing research articles, reviewer articles from academics, analyst, practitioners who are interested in providing literature on Legal Studies in all aspects. Scientific articles covering among them : 1. Criminal Law; 2. Civil Law; 3. Constitutional Law; 4. State Administrative Law; 5. Internasional Law; 6. Legal Comparison.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 292 Documents
 26   27   28   29   30 
Diversion and Juvenile Narcotics Sentencing: Indonesia and Japan Comparison under Pancasila Justice Mulyadi Alrianto Tajuddin; Jumriani Nawawi; Jaco Barkhuizen
JUSTISI Vol. 12 No. 2 (2026): JUSTISI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/js.v12i2.5456

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the policy of diversion and criminalization of children in narcotics cases in the juvenile criminal justice system in Indonesia, and compare it with practices in Japan to identify systemic problems that hinder rehabilitative orientation. This study uses normative legal methods with legislative, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The analysis focused on the provisions in Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System and Law No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, as well as their comparison with the welfare-oriented juvenile justice system in Japan. The novelty of this research lies in the placement of Pancasila justice as an evaluative framework in analyzing the design of the juvenile criminal justice system, so that diversion is not understood solely as a procedural mechanism, but as a systemic principle that must integrate rehabilitation and social reintegration. The findings of the study show that the failure to implement diversion in narcotics cases against children is more due to normative restrictions and fragmentation of goals between criminal justice subsystems, rather than solely by technical implementation issues. This study concludes that policy reconstruction is needed by placing rehabilitation as the main response and imprisonment as the ultimate remedium, in order to realize child protection that is in line with human values and social justice within the framework of Pancasila justice.
Restoration of Property Rights over Destroyed Land: Comparative Legal Analysis of Indonesia and the Philippines Adya Nurnisa; Retno Saraswati; Ana Silviana
JUSTISI Vol. 12 No. 2 (2026): JUSTISI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/js.v12i2.5505

Abstract

This study aims to identify and analyze a comparison of the models for restoring property rights over land affected by destruction implemented by Indonesia and the Philippines, with a view to improving the legal system governing destroyed land in Indonesia in the future. This study employs a doctrinal research method using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. This study involves the collection and inventory of regulations regarding destroyed land in both Indonesia and the Philippines, followed by a descriptive analysis. The novelty of this study lies in the conclusion that Indonesia needs to adopt a legal certainty framework for destroyed land using a hybrid model namely, judicial reconstruction and administrative reconstruction The results of this study indicate that current regulations on lost land in Indonesia provide an opportunity for original titleholders to reclaim lost land within a one-year period; if they cannot prove ownership, it is not recognized as such. In contrast, unlike the Philippines, which uses a hybrid model to guarantee and recognize its citizens’ property rights through judicial and administrative reconstruction, provided they possess “legal title” registered with the Land Registration Authority. The conclusion of this study indicate that the current policy framework for land loss in Indonesia should take into account models for restoring property rights following land loss or damage that exist in other countries, such as the Philippines. This is to ensure that property rights

Page 30 of 30 | Total Record : 292

 26   27   28   29   30 

Filter by Year

2018 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 12 No. 2 (2026): JUSTISI Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): JUSTISI Vol. 11 No. 3 (2025): JUSTISI Vol. 11 No. 2 (2025): JUSTISI Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): JUSTISI Vol. 10 No. 3 (2024): JUSTISI Vol. 10 No. 2 (2024): JUSTISI Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024): JUSTISI Vol. 9 No. 3 (2023): JUSTISI Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023): JUSTISI Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023): JUSTISI Vol 8, No 1 (2022): Januari 2022 Vol. 8 No. 3 (2022): JUSTISI Vol. 8 No. 2 (2022): JUSTISI Vol. 8 No. 1 (2022): JUSTISI Vol. 7 No. 2 (2021): Juli 2021 Vol 7, No 2 (2021): Juli 2021 Vol 7, No 1 (2021): Januari 2021 Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): Januari 2021 Vol 6, No 2 (2020): Juli 2020 Vol. 6 No. 2 (2020): Juli 2020 Vol 6, No 1 (2020): Januari 2020 Vol. 6 No. 1 (2020): Januari 2020 Vol. 5 No. 2 (2019): Juli 2019 Vol 5, No 2 (2019): Juli 2019 Vol. 5 No. 1 (2019): Januari 2019 Vol 5, No 1 (2019): Januari 2019 Vol. 4 No. 2 (2018): Juli 2018 Vol. 4 No. 1 (2018): Januari 2018 Vol 4, No 2 (2018): Juli 2018 Vol 4, No 1 (2018): Januari 2018 More Issue