cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Bayu Sujadmiko
Contact Email
bayu.sujadmiko@fh.unila.ac.id
Phone
+6281394194918
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
Gedung C. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lampung. Jl. Prof. Dr. Sumantri Brojonegoro No. 1 Bandar Lampung, 35145
Location
Kota bandar lampung,
Lampung
INDONESIA
Cepalo
Published by Universitas Lampung
ISSN : -     EISSN : 25983105     DOI : https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal ini memiliki visi untuk menjadi jurnal ilmiah di bidang ilmu hukum yang sesuai dengan kearifan lokal Provinsi Lampung, yang akan di analisis secara komprehensif dengan perundang-undangan Nasional atau Internasional dan kondisi sosiologis. Misi dari Cepalo adalah untuk mempublikasikan hasil penelitian ilmiah di bidang ilmu hukum baik dalam skala nasional, maupun skala internasional. Cepalo pada dasarnya berisi topik tentang hukum, sistem hukum, hukum dan ekonomi, sosiologi hukum, antrophologi hukum, kebijakan publik, hukum internasional, hukum adat, hukum administrasi, hukum agraria, hukum islam, hukum bisnis, hukum pidana, hukum kesehatan, filsafat hukum, hukum kesehatan, hukum tekhnologi dan budaya. Namun tidak membatasi pokok bahasan mengenai studi hukum komparatif dan tidak menutup kemungkinan bagi penelitian yang bertemakan tentang kearifan lokal.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 113 Documents
 8   9   10   11   12 
RECOGNITION OF INDIGENOUS LAND RIGHTS WITHIN THE ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIAL GOVERNANCE (ESG) FRAMEWORK: A LEGAL COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INDONESIA AND THAILAND Muh. Zulkifli Muhdar; Sri Amlinawaty A. Muin; Salmawati Salmawati; Ruetaitip Tungkasamitra Chansrakaeo
Cepalo Vol 10 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/cepalo.v10no1.4841

Abstract

This study offers a comparative analysis of the recognition and protection of indigenous land and natural resource rights within the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) framework in Indonesia and Thailand. Using a normative legal method with statutory and comparative approaches, it examines how national legal and institutional systems integrate indigenous rights and how ESG functions as a mechanism for mitigating agrarian and environmental conflicts. The findings show that Indonesia has a stronger legal basis for recognizing indigenous rights through the 1945 Constitution and Constitutional Court Decision No. 35/PUU-X/2012, but faces inconsistent implementation of the Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) principle, while Thailand demonstrates more advanced ESG reporting and transparency yet lacks explicit legal protection for indigenous communities. This study positions ESG as a system of social risk governance and underscores the need for stronger synergy among national law, financial institutions, and indigenous participation to achieve inclusive and equitable ESG implementation in Southeast Asia.
LEGAL PLURALISM AND CUSTOMARY CRIMINAL LAW: COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES FROM INDONESIA AND SOUTH AFRICA IN POST-COLONIAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEMS I Made Wirya Darma; I Gede Agus Kurniawan; Jan Alizea Sybelle
Cepalo Vol 10 No 2 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/cepalo.v10no2.5049

Abstract

This study examines legal pluralism in the regulation of customary criminal law through a comparative analysis of Indonesia and South Africa. Using a normative legal method with conceptual, comparative, and statutory approaches, it explores how both countries integrate customary criminal law into their national criminal justice systems. The findings show that both jurisdictions reflect a post-colonial commitment to legal pluralism by incorporating restorative justice grounded in indigenous legal traditions. Indonesia recognizes customary criminal law through Articles 2 and 66 of the New Criminal Code, while South Africa does so through Section 211 of the Constitution and the Traditional Courts Act. Although both systems seek to promote restorative justice and reduce recidivism, they differ in their institutional design and implementation. Indonesia adopts a hierarchical model in which customary sanctions supplement state law, whereas South Africa grants greater autonomy to customary courts. The study recommends implementing comprehensive Government Regulations and harmonizing Regional Regulations in Indonesia to strengthen legal certainty. It also recommends revising South Africa's Traditional Courts framework to improve judicial oversight, gender representation, and evidentiary standards while ensuring compliance with constitutional human rights protections.
ESTABLISHING PROVISIONAL REGIONAL PEOPLE’S REPRESENTATIVE COUNCIL: A NOTION TO ADDRESS VACANCIES DURING THE TRANSITION IN LOCAL ELECTION Ali Imran Nasution; Ahmad Reihan Thoriq
Cepalo Vol 10 No 2 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/cepalo.v10no2.5104

Abstract

This study examines the constitutional implications of vacancies in the Regional People’s Representative Council (DPRD) following the separation of national and local elections. The projected vacancies after the 2029 term require a legitimate transitional mechanism. Using normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and historical approaches, the study finds that term extensions, interim replacements (PAW), and by-elections face significant constitutional and practical limitations. As an alternative, it proposes establishing a Provisional Regional People’s Representative Council (DPRDS). By maintaining the legislative composition from the previous election, the DPRDS preserves local governance continuity while upholding democratic legitimacy and constitutional principles.

Page 12 of 12 | Total Record : 113

 8   9   10   11   12 

Filter by Year

2019 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 10 No 2 (2026) Vol 10 No 1 (2026) Vol 9 No 2 (2025) Vol 9 No 1 (2025) Vol 8 No 2 (2024) Vol 8 No 1 (2024) Vol 7 No 2 (2023): Issue In progress (August 2023) Vol 7 No 2 (2023) Vol 7 No 1 (2023) Vol 6 No 2 (2022) Vol 6 No 1 (2022) Vol 5 No 2 (2021) Vol 5 No 1 (2021) Vol 4 No 2 (2020) Vol 4 No 1 (2020) Vol 3 No 2 (2019) Vol 3 No 1 (2019) Vol 2 No 2 (2018) Vol 2 No 1 (2018) Vol 1 No 1 (2017) More Issue