cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Ramadhita
Contact Email
sakina@uin-malang.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
sakina@uin-malang.ac.id
Editorial Address
Fakultas Syariah UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang Jl. Gajayana 50 Kota Malang
Location
Kota malang,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Sakina: Journal of Family Studies
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
ISSN : -     EISSN : 25809865     DOI : -
Core Subject : Religion, Humanities, Social,
Religion Humanities Social Sciences
Journal of Family Studies merupakan sarana komunikasi dan publikasi ilmiah yang berasal dari riset-riset mahasiswa di bidang hukum keluarga dengan berbagai aspek dan pendekatan
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 443 Documents
 41   42   43   44   45 
Toxic Online Relationships in Muslim Marriage: Reconstructing Prophetic Digital Ethics in Indonesian Islamic Family Law Mokhammad Samson Fajar; Muhammad Nur; Dian Ayuwita
Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 10 No 2 (2026): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies
Publisher : Islamic Family Law Study Program, Sharia Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/jfs.v10i2.28037

Abstract

This article examines toxic online relationships in Muslim marriages in Indonesia and reconstructs a maqāṣid-based Prophetic Digital Ethics framework as a normative standard for Indonesian Islamic family law. Employing normative legal research with conceptual, statutory, case, and maqāṣid al-sharīʿah approaches, the study analyzes legal materials through grammatical, systematic, teleological, and maqāṣid-oriented interpretation. The analysis focuses on emerging forms of technology-facilitated abuse within marriage, including digital surveillance, cyberbullying, gaslighting, doxing, oversharing of domestic conflicts, and threats to disseminate intimate content. The findings demonstrate that these behaviors should not be understood merely as communication problems but as forms of ḍarar maʿnawī (non-material harm), violations of muʿāsharah bi al-maʿrūf, and potential indicators of shiqāq when they generate persistent conflict and undermine marital trust. The study further shows that such practices intersect with multiple Indonesian legal regimes, including the Marriage Law, the Compilation of Islamic Law, the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, the Sexual Violence Crime Law, the Personal Data Protection Law, and the Domestic Violence Law. The principal contribution of this article lies in proposing a maqāṣid-based Prophetic Digital Ethics model that operationalizes the values of amānah, satr, raḥmah, ṣidq, tabayyun, and anti-tajassus into normative and institutional guidelines for Muslim family governance. By integrating Islamic legal principles with contemporary digital challenges, the model provides a coherent framework for prevention, mediation, victim protection, and judicial assessment, thereby extending the scope of Indonesian Islamic family law to address technology-facilitated harm in marital relationships.
Reconstruction of the Concept of Nafkah in the Gig Economy Era: A Comparative Study on the Financial Responsibility of Husbands toward Wives and Children Miftakur Rohman; Ubainul Asror; Amirul Khoir
Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 10 No 2 (2026): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies
Publisher : Islamic Family Law Study Program, Sharia Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/jfs.v10i2.28707

Abstract

The rapid expansion of the gig economy has challenged the conventional foundations of family maintenance (nafkah) in Islamic family law, which traditionally presuppose stable employment and predictable income. Existing studies have extensively examined gig work from labor law and social protection perspectives, while Islamic family law scholarship remains largely detached from the realities of platform-mediated employment. Consequently, no comprehensive framework has been developed to address the implications of income volatility for maintenance obligations. This study aims to reconstruct the concept of nafkah by developing an Adaptive Nafkah framework that redefines the legal rationale (‘illat) of maintenance from fixed employment to productive capacity. Employing a comparative normative legal approach, the study analyzes maintenance regulations in Indonesia, the United States, and the United Kingdom through comparative functionalism and legal content analysis, complemented by a doctrinal examination of fiqh principles. The findings reveal that all three jurisdictions inadequately address the fluctuating income patterns characteristic of gig workers, resulting in significant legal uncertainty in maintenance determination. To overcome this limitation, the study proposes an Average Earning Algorithm (AEA) grounded in the fiqh maxim al-mashaqqah tajlib al-taysir, enabling maintenance obligations to be calculated according to actual earning capacity while preserving family welfare objectives. The proposed model provides a more adaptive, equitable, and legally coherent mechanism than conventional fixed-income approaches. This research contributes to the renewal of fiqh muamalah by introducing the Adaptive Nafkah theory, advances comparative family law through a functional bridge between Islamic and secular maintenance systems, and offers a practical framework for reforming maintenance adjudication in the era of digital labor markets.
From Provider to Partner: Reconstructing the Legal Concept of Livelihood Obligation in Indonesian Islamic Family Law through the Lens of Gender Justice and Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah Muhammad Danil; Vito Dasrianto; Elva Mahmudi; Asfar Hamidi Siregar
Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 10 No 2 (2026): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies
Publisher : Islamic Family Law Study Program, Sharia Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/jfs.v10i2.29511

Abstract

The persistence of the husband’s exclusive maintenance obligation in Indonesia’s Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) no longer reflects the contemporary reality in which a growing number of women serve as primary breadwinners. This study examines the normative inadequacy of the existing legal framework and reconstructs the concept of marital maintenance through the perspectives of gender justice and Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah. Employing a qualitative library-based approach, the research integrates classical fiqh analysis with Fazlur Rahman’s Double Movement hermeneutics, Faqihuddin Abdul Kodir’s Qirā’ah Mubādalah, and Jasser Auda’s maqāṣid framework. The findings reveal four systemic limitations in the classical doctrine of nafkah: the presumption of unilateral male economic agency, the subordination embedded in the ṭā‘ah–nafkah nexus, the absence of proportional responsibility, and the lack of legal recognition for wives who become primary providers. These limitations create a normative gap that undermines legal certainty, gender justice, and the objectives of Islamic law in contemporary Indonesia. The study proposes a reconstruction model based on mushārakah naẓariyyah (proportional shared responsibility), grounded in the principle of ta‘āwun (mutual cooperation), which redefines financial responsibility according to the spouses’ respective capacities. The principal contribution of this article lies in developing an integrated maqāṣid-based framework that bridges classical Islamic jurisprudence with contemporary socio-economic realities and provides normative guidance for reforming Indonesian Islamic family law toward a more equitable and context-responsive legal system.

Page 45 of 45 | Total Record : 443

 41   42   43   44   45 

Filter by Year

2017 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 10 No 2 (2026): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 10 No 1 (2026): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 9 No 4 (2025): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 9 No 3 (2025): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 9 No 2 (2025): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 9 No 1 (2025): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 8 No 4 (2024): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 8 No 3 (2024): Sakina: Journal of Family Stidues Vol 8 No 2 (2024): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 8 No 1 (2024): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 7 No 4 (2023): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 7 No 3 (2023): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 7 No 2 (2023): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 7 No 1 (2023): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 6 No 4 (2022): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 6 No 3 (2022): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 6 No 2 (2022): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 6 No 1 (2022): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 5 No 4 (2021): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 5 No 3 (2021): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 5 No 2 (2021): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 5 No 1 (2021): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 4 No 4 (2020): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 4 No 3 (2020): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 4 No 2 (2020): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 4 No 1 (2020): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 3 No 4 (2019): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 3 No 3 (2019): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 3 No 2 (2019): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 3 No 1 (2019): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 2 No 4 (2018): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 2 No 3 (2018): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 2 No 2 (2018): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 2 No 1 (2018): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 1 No 2 (2017): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 1 No 1 (2017): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies More Issue