cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Ramadhita
Contact Email
sakina@uin-malang.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
sakina@uin-malang.ac.id
Editorial Address
Fakultas Syariah UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang Jl. Gajayana 50 Kota Malang
Location
Kota malang,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Sakina: Journal of Family Studies
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
ISSN : -     EISSN : 25809865     DOI : -
Core Subject : Religion, Humanities, Social,
Religion Humanities Social Sciences
Journal of Family Studies merupakan sarana komunikasi dan publikasi ilmiah yang berasal dari riset-riset mahasiswa di bidang hukum keluarga dengan berbagai aspek dan pendekatan
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 433 Documents
 40   41   42   43   44 
Implementation of Progressive Law in Post-Divorce Alimony Rights in Obscuur Libel Verdict (Case Study of Decision No. 2276/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Bgl) Falakh, Mokhamad Fajrul
Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 9 No 4 (2025): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies
Publisher : Islamic Family Law Study Program, Sharia Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/jfs.v9i4.19674

Abstract

The case that occurred at the Bangil Religious Court with Number: 2276/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Bgl. In the lawsuit, the plaintiff sued cumulatively with the support of the wife after the divorce and child support. However, the Panel of Judges rejected all lawsuits about alimony rights filed by the plaintiff against the defendant and only granted the divorce lawsuit because of the lawsuit about obscuur libel alimony rights. The analysis used using the perspective of progressive law Sajtipto Rahardjo is related to justice in deciding divorce cases with the right to support the wife and children after the divorce which was rejected on the grounds of the obscuur libel lawsuit. The purpose of this study is to analyze and describe how the decision Number: 2276/Pdt.G/2023/PA. Bgl whether it is in accordance with positive law in Indonesia and uses the perspective of Prarogresive Law of Satjipto Rahardjo. The result of this investigation is that the verdict is not in line with the positive law and the progressive law of Satjipto Rahardjo. In deciding a case, it is not only based on dogma-normatives but also must consider justice and conscience in decideing. The decision does not meet the elements in the perspective of Satjipto Rahardjo's Progressive Law, namely flexibility, social justice, human rights, and change. This can be seen from the decision which only looks at the formal aspect of the lawsuit, does not give the rights that should be given to the wife and children, does not provide justice to the victim, and does not provide a change for the better after the case is decided.
Reorienting Jamāluddīn ‘Aṭiyyah’s Maqāṣid al-Usrah in the Regulation of Polygamy in the Indonesian Compilation of Islamic Law Musadad, Ahmad; Choiri, Muttaqin; Qomaro, Galuh Widitya; Fauzi, Alfa Zaidanil; Imamuddin, Imamuddin; Pujiati, Tri
Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 9 No 4 (2025): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies
Publisher : Islamic Family Law Study Program, Sharia Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/jfs.v9i4.19984

Abstract

This article discusses the reconstruction and reorientation of polygamy regulations in the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), specifically Articles 55–59, through the philosophical framework of maqāṣid al-usrah developed by Jamāluddīn ‘Aṭiyyah. This research is crucial given that the KHI, having been in force for over 30 years, requires a new reading (the expedient of re-interpretation) to preserve the values of maqāṣid in facing contemporary social dynamics. This qualitative study, utilizing a library research method and content analysis, aims to explore the maqāṣid values and evaluate their alignment with Indonesia’s positive legal norms. The analysis results indicate that the KHI implicitly integrates three core dimensions of ‘Aṭiyyah’s maqāṣid al-usrah, namely taḥqīq al-sakīnah wa al-mawaddah wa al-raḥmah, tanẓīm al-’alāqah bayn al-jinsayn, and tanẓīm al-jānib al-mālī li al-usrah, primarily through the key requirement of acting justly (Article 55 Paragraph 2) and the necessity of obtaining permission from the Religious Court (Article 56). ‘Aṭiyyah’s concept, which demands psychological and emotional justice (al-’adālah al-nāfsi-yah wa al-wijdāni-yah), provides a strong foundation for reorienting the interpretation, shifting the focus from formal procedure to the substance of the objective. The article recommends adding ethical and social clauses (such as psychological assessment) and explicitly integrating the maqāṣid al-usrah principles into the KHI, so that Islamic family law can serve as a contextual, humanistic, and solution-oriented guide in realizing substantive justice and protecting family sakīnah.
Judicial Formalism and Women’s Economic Rights After Divorce: A Feminist Legal Study of a Religious Court Decision Umah, Rahma Khofifah Khoirun; maftukhin, Maftukhin
Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 9 No 4 (2025): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies
Publisher : Islamic Family Law Study Program, Sharia Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/jfs.v9i4.19522

Abstract

Religious court adjudication in divorce cases in Indonesia continues to exhibit a strong reliance on judicial formalism, often at the expense of substantive gender justice. One manifestation of this tendency is the rejection of post-divorce economic claims by former wives, particularly in cases involving civil servant salaries. This study examines a Religious Court decision that denied a former wife’s claim to a one-third allocation of her ex-husband’s salary, despite her demonstrated economic vulnerability following divorce. The research aims to critically analyze the judicial reasoning underlying this rejection and to assess the extent to which women’s economic rights are accommodated within religious court practice from a Feminist Legal Theory perspective. Employing a normative juridical method, the study integrates a case-based and conceptual approach through an analysis of court decisions, statutory regulations, and feminist legal scholarship. The findings reveal that the judges’ reasoning is predominantly procedural and formalistic, focusing narrowly on the husband’s economic capacity while disregarding the wife’s non-monetary contributions during marriage, such as domestic and reproductive labor. This approach effectively marginalizes women’s lived experiences and reinforces gendered economic inequality after divorce. The study contributes to Islamic family law scholarship by demonstrating how judicial formalism can undermine the protective function of post-divorce economic rights. By applying Feminist Legal Theory as a critical analytical tool, this research highlights the need for a more substantive, gender-responsive interpretation of family law to ensure equitable outcomes for economically vulnerable women, particularly former wives of civil servants.

Page 44 of 44 | Total Record : 433

 40   41   42   43   44 

Filter by Year

2017 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 9 No 4 (2025): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 9 No 3 (2025): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 9 No 2 (2025): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 9 No 1 (2025): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 8 No 4 (2024): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 8 No 3 (2024): Sakina: Journal of Family Stidues Vol 8 No 2 (2024): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 8 No 1 (2024): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 7 No 4 (2023): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 7 No 3 (2023): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 7 No 2 (2023): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 7 No 1 (2023): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 6 No 4 (2022): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 6 No 3 (2022): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 6 No 2 (2022): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 6 No 1 (2022): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 5 No 4 (2021): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 5 No 3 (2021): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 5 No 2 (2021): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 5 No 1 (2021): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 4 No 4 (2020): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 4 No 3 (2020): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 4 No 2 (2020): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 4 No 1 (2020): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 3 No 4 (2019): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 3 No 3 (2019): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 3 No 2 (2019): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 3 No 1 (2019): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 2 No 4 (2018): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 2 No 3 (2018): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 2 No 2 (2018): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 2 No 1 (2018): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 1 No 2 (2017): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 1 No 1 (2017): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies More Issue