cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Hezron Sabar Rotua Tinambunan
Contact Email
jurnalsuarahukum@unesa.ac.id
Phone
+6285726365956
Journal Mail Official
jurnalsuarahukum@unesa.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Ketintang Gedung K1.02.04, Ketintang, Gayungan, Kota SBY, Jawa Timur 60231
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Jurnal Suara Hukum
Published by Universitas Negeri Surabaya
ISSN : 2656534X     EISSN : 26565358     DOI : 10.26740
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Suara Hukum memiliki standar untuk perilaku etis yang diharapkan oleh semua pihak yang terlibat dalam tindakan penerbitan: penulis, editor jurnal, peer reviewer dan penerbit. Jurnal Suara Hukum adalah jurnal peer-review, diterbitkan dua kali setahun di bulan Maret dan September oleh Departemen Hukum, Universitas Negeri Surabaya. Jurnal suara hukum telah memiliki akun Google scholar dengan tautan https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&authuser=1&user=clJJoeIAAAAJ Jurnal Suara Hukum saat ini berstatus belum terakreditasi.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 173 Documents
 14   15   16   17   18 
Human Rights Implications of Buy Now Pay Later Usage among Teenagers: A Comparative Legal and Policy Analysis of Indonesia and Oman Sri Astutik; Subekti Subekti; Dwi Cahyono; Nurhayati; Ali Mannagalli
Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Suara Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jsh.v8n2.p631-661

Abstract

The development of financial technology (fintech) has given rise to the Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) payment innovation, which allows consumers to make instant purchases of goods and services with deferred payments. Although this service enhances financial access and digital consumption, its convenience poses new risks, especially for teenagers who tend to lack adequate financial literacy. The phenomenon of increasing BNPL usage among teenagers raises serious questions regarding the protection of human rights, particularly the right to consumer protection, the right to economic education, and the right to be free from exploitative financial practices. This research aims to analyze the human rights implications of BNPL usage among teenagers through a comparative legal and policy approach between Indonesia and Oman. The study employs qualitative methods with a comparative legal and policy analysis approach, involving the analysis of national legislation, government policies, financial institution reports, and academic literature related to children's rights and digital consumer protection. The research results indicate that Indonesia has a rapidly developing fintech regulatory framework but has not yet fully emphasized the aspect of human rights protection for young users. On the other hand, Oman tends to be more cautious by applying Sharia principles and strict regulations in digital finance, thereby providing better protection for teenagers from the risk of consumer debt. Both countries, despite differing legal and social contexts, face the same challenge: balancing digital innovation with the protection of young users' fundamental rights. This research recommends strengthening financial literacy, regulating age limits for BNPL usage, and integrating human rights principles into national fintech policies in both countries
Pretrial Justice through Rawlsian Fairness: Comparative Human Rights Perspectives from Indonesia and the United Arab Emirates Takkas Marudut; Hibnu Nugroho; Angkasa Angkasa; Setya Wahyudi
Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Suara Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jsh.v8n2.p809-851

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the pretrial mechanism from the perspective of Justice as Fairness by John Rawls thru a comparative study between Indonesia and the United Arab Emirates, as well as to reconstruct a Pretrial Justice model oriented toward strengthening the protection of human rights. The research uses a normative juridical method with legislative, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The research results show that pretrial detention is a fundamental instrument for maintaining the balance between state authority in law enforcement and the protection of individual rights. Indonesia has shown progressive development thru the expansion of pretrial objects, while the United Arab Emirates implements a more preventive judicial oversight model thru the involvement of judges from the early stages of the criminal process. Based on these findings, the research reconstructs the Pretrial Justice Based on Rawlsian Fairness model, which is built on six pillars: equal basic liberties, fair equality of opportunity, proportional limitation of state authority, judicial independence, accountability of law enforcement officials, and the availability of effective legal remedies. This model emphasizes the importance of harmonizing the Criminal Procedure Code with the development of the Constitutional Court's jurisprudence and international human rights standards to build a more preventive, consistent, and accountable judicial oversight system, thereby achieving substantive procedural justice while strengthening the protection of human rights within Indonesia's criminal justice system.
Blockchain-Based Halal Traceability: A Human Rights Framework for Muslim Consumer Protection in Indonesia and Malaysia Zulham Zulham; Zalina Zakaria; Fuji SM Bako; Wan Luzni Rimelahas; Lailan Sofinah Harahap
Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Suara Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jsh.v8n2.p741-774

Abstract

The digitalization of halal supply chains creates legal challenges concerning traceability, consumer protection, and cross-border integrity in Indonesia and Malaysia. This study examines the legal position and integration of blockchain as a state’s positive obligation tool to fulfill Muslim consumers’ right to information and freedom of religion, while proposing an ideal regulatory framework. Using normative legal research with comparative and conceptual approaches, the study analyzes primary and secondary legal materials qualitatively. The findings indicate a regulatory gap concerning the evidentiary status of blockchain data and fragmented traceability governance, which undermines the proactive protection of consumers' spiritual and information rights. Functional harmonization rooted in a human rights framework is proposed to strengthen legal certainty, public verification rights, institutional accountability, and cross-border halal supply-chain integrity without replacing existing certification authorities

Page 18 of 18 | Total Record : 173

 14   15   16   17   18 

Filter by Year

2019 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023): Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023): Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 4 No. 2 (2022): Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022): Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021): Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol 3, No 1 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2021) Vol 2, No 2 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2020) Vol 2, No 1 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2019) Vol 1, No 2 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2019) Vol 1, No 1 (2019) More Issue