Angkasa Angkasa
Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Transforming Credit Guarantees in Indonesia: Legal Reform and Digital Innovation at Askrindo Aldehita Purnasanti Maulida; Angkasa Angkasa; Suhadi Suhadi; Abu Bakar Munir
Journal of Law and Legal Reform Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): January, 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jllr.v7i1.38585

Abstract

Credit guarantee institutions play a pivotal role in expanding financial inclusion, particularly for Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs), which contribute over 60% to Indonesia’s GDP and employ approximately 97% of the national workforce (Kemenkop UKM, 2024). PT Asuransi Kredit Indonesia (Askrindo), a state-owned enterprise under the Indonesia Financial Group (IFG), serves as a key factor in mitigating credit risk and facilitating access to financing through its guarantee schemes. This study critically examines the legal reform of credit guarantee mechanisms in Indonesia by analyzing the regulatory framework governing Askrindo and its ongoing digital transformation. The research highlights regulatory fragmentation across the Insurance Law (Law No. 40/2014), OJK regulations, and Ministry of Finance policies, which often results in operational inefficiencies and legal ambiguities in claim settlement and risk management. Concurrently, Askrindo’s digital initiatives—such as the implementation of e-guarantee platforms, AI-based credit scoring, and integration with national MSME databases—have significantly improved service delivery and data transparency. Empirical data from Askrindo’s annual reports (2020–2024) indicate an 18.7% increase in guaranteed credit volume following digital adoption, with a notable reduction in manual processing time by 42%. However, unresolved legal disputes related to 12.3% of defaulted claims underscore the urgency of harmonizing digital innovation with legal accountability. Interviews with regulators and Askrindo executives further reveal gaps in consumer protection, audit mechanisms, and legal clarity surrounding digital guarantees. Using a law and economics approach, this article argues that Indonesia’s credit guarantee system requires a comprehensive legal reform that aligns regulatory oversight with digital innovation. Important suggestions include creating a single set of laws for digital guarantees, requiring clear information sharing, and adding real-time audit trails to improve accountability and protect MSME beneficiaries.
Pretrial Justice through Rawlsian Fairness: Comparative Human Rights Perspectives from Indonesia and the United Arab Emirates Takkas Marudut; Hibnu Nugroho; Angkasa Angkasa; Setya Wahyudi
Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Suara Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jsh.v8n2.p809-851

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the pretrial mechanism from the perspective of Justice as Fairness by John Rawls thru a comparative study between Indonesia and the United Arab Emirates, as well as to reconstruct a Pretrial Justice model oriented toward strengthening the protection of human rights. The research uses a normative juridical method with legislative, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The research results show that pretrial detention is a fundamental instrument for maintaining the balance between state authority in law enforcement and the protection of individual rights. Indonesia has shown progressive development thru the expansion of pretrial objects, while the United Arab Emirates implements a more preventive judicial oversight model thru the involvement of judges from the early stages of the criminal process. Based on these findings, the research reconstructs the Pretrial Justice Based on Rawlsian Fairness model, which is built on six pillars: equal basic liberties, fair equality of opportunity, proportional limitation of state authority, judicial independence, accountability of law enforcement officials, and the availability of effective legal remedies. This model emphasizes the importance of harmonizing the Criminal Procedure Code with the development of the Constitutional Court's jurisprudence and international human rights standards to build a more preventive, consistent, and accountable judicial oversight system, thereby achieving substantive procedural justice while strengthening the protection of human rights within Indonesia's criminal justice system.