Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal
The Journal invites original research articles and not simultaneously submitted to another journal or conference. The whole spectrum of research in mathematics education are welcome, which includes, but is not limited to the following topics: Realistic Mathematics Education Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) is a teaching and learning theory in mathematics education that was first introduced and developed by Freudenthal. There are two important points in RME; mathematics must be connected to reality and mathematics as a human activity. RME is implemented three principles, they are: (1) guided reinvention and progressive mathematizing, (2) didactical phenomenology, and (3) self-developed model. Furthermore, the practice of RME also has its own characteristics, they are: (1) phenomenological exploration or the use of contexts, (2) the use of models or bridging by vertical instruments, (3) the use of students own productions and constructions or students contribution, (4) the interactive character of the teaching process or interactivity, and (5) the intertwining of various learning strands. A paper is eligible to be included in this topic if the paper accommodates these three principles and these five characteristics. Joyful Learning in Mathematics Education The main goal of mathematics education in school is the mathematization of the child’s thought process through joyful learning. Learning should be something joyful because it is a perpetual growth process and self-reflection. Mathematics teachers are expected to develop ideas to motivate students by joyful activities, such as discovering, exploring, constructing, designing, setting strategy, and solving problems that are wrapped in mathematics games, puzzles, and hands-on activities. Integrating ICT in Mathematics Education The advance of information and communication technology (ICT) has been the concern of all human life, including in education. When all students use technology, education must be the first one to utilize it for the sake of effectiveness and attractiveness. The researches (ideas of research) on related topics could be traced to the works of Paul Drijvers, Willem J. Pelgrum, Tjeerd Plomp, Jean-Baptiste Lagrange, Michèle Artigue, Colette Laborde, Luc Trouche, and published books in Springer or other publishers. STEM Education Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) has been major topic of discussion in the field of education, due to the most esteemed fields to respond to the demand of 21st century. STEM education will be an important knowledge for teachers to educate future high-quality workforce. STEM education can be implemented in any level of education. The main principle of STEM education is Engineering Design Process (EDP). This principle consists of cyclic process: (1) Identifying problem, (2) Researching the problem, (3) Developing possible solutions, (4) Selecting promising solution, (5) Building the prototype, (6) Evaluating the prototype, (7) Redesigning. The idea research of STEM Education can be explored in Breiner, Harkness, Johnson, and Koehler; Sanders; and Bybee. Lesson Study Lesson Study is a well-known approach originated from Japan for action research in classroom by teachers. It is an effective model for teachers to join their activities to improve their teaching. This approach emphasizes the improvement of students’ mathematical thinking which involves three steps namely Plan-Do-See. The research (ideas of research) on related topics could be traced to the works of Fernandez and Yoshida, Lewis and Wang-Iverson and Yoshida. Teacher-made Mathematics Teaching Aids Students at times struggle with mathematics due to the abstract concepts involved. To help address this issue teachers can use physical objects, such as teaching aids, to make the concepts more relatable and understandable. It also provides opportunity for students to understand and internalize basic mathematial concepts through concrete objects and situations. A paper is eligible for this topic if it comprehensively explains the mathematics teaching aid made by the teachers and the learning opportunities offered to the students. Clinical Supervision Having strong educational leadership is known to be a major factor in improving student learning. By providing vision and development opportunities, educational leaders can help facilitate the conditions necessary for teachers to perform at their best. A good supervision involves activities that aids, directs and informs teachers of what should be done or have been done and not merely finding faults in the teachers’ teaching. A paper is eligible for inclusion in the clinical supervision if it provides a comprehensive description and analysis of every stage in the supervision process Differentiated Instruction Differentiated instruction is a teaching theory based on the premise that instructional approaches should vary and be adapted in relation to individual and diverse students in classrooms. Many classes consisting of students with diverse learning abilities require a teacher capable of designing teaching strategies that accommodate all learning styles. Therefore, the scope of differentiated instruction is an important part of the focus and scope of the journal. Teacher Professional Development Teacher professional development is defined as activities that develop an teacher’s skills, knowledge, expertise and other characteristics. The definition recognizes that development can be provided in many ways, ranging from the formal to the informal. It can be made available through external expertise in the form of courses, workshops or formal qualification programs, through collaboration between schools or teachers across schools (e.g. observational visits to other schools or teacher networks) or within the schools in which teachers work. In this last case, development can be provided through coaching/mentoring, collaborative planning and teaching, and the sharing of good practices. Classroom Action Research Classroom action research is a reflective process which helps teachers to explore and examine aspects of teaching and learning and to take action to change and improve. It begins with a question or questions about classroom experiences, issues, or challenges. Generally, classroom action research is consisting of 4 steps, namely, planning, action, observation, and reflection. Authors could submit their work, with a comprehensive description and analysis of every step.
Articles
5 Documents
Search results for
, issue
"Vol 15, No 2 (2025)"
:
5 Documents
clear
Analysis of Mathematics Creative Thinking Ability in Each Gregorc Mind Styles with a Project-Based E-Learning Model
Munahefi, Detalia Noriza;
Mulyono, Mulyono;
Kartono, Kartono
Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal Vol 15, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : SEAMEO Regional Centre for QITEP in Mathematics
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.46517/seamej.v15i2.203
The difference in mind styles is one of the challenges to improving students' mathematical creative thinking ability—learning activities with a project-based e-learning model as an alternative to solve problems. The research aims to describe mathematical creative thinking ability in Gregorc mind styles with a project-based e-learning model. Gregorc mind style consists of concrete sequential (CS), abstract sequential (AS), concrete random (CR), and abstract random (AR). The mixed research method begins with quantitative research and then continues qualitatively. This research was conducted on vector material for class X high school students. The sampling technique is a probabilistic stratified sampling type where samples are taken in each Gregorc mind style with proportions according to their presence in the population. Students with CS mind styles dominated the results of the study. At the same time, students with AS mind styles were not found. The ANOVA test showed a significance value of 0,952 > 0,05, so there was no difference in mathematical creative thinking abilities in Gregorc's mind styles. However, every student with different mind styles has different achievement aspects of mathematical creative thinking ability. Therefore, three subjects were taken using each Gregorc mind style in the qualitative research stage. Students with the CS mind style can achieve the elaboration aspect well, but the originality aspect cannot be completed well. On the other hand, the originality aspect can be achieved very well by students with an AR mind style.
Evaluation of Integrated STEM Learning in STEM Institutions Based on Mathematics Learning Processes and Outcomes Using the CIPP Model
Maqruf, Agus;
Herman, Tatang
Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal Vol 15, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : SEAMEO Regional Centre for QITEP in Mathematics
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.46517/seamej.v15i2.363
This research was carried out at a STEM institution with a focus on evaluating the implementation of STEM Integrated learning. The aim of this research is to evaluate using the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) model for STEM Integrated learning and assess students' learning achievements in the field of mathematics studies, as well as evaluate the effectiveness of the STEM Integrated learning process in STEM institutions. The effectiveness of the learning process is assessed based on the level of achievement of learning objectives that have been set at the beginning of the learning period, namely in all aspects of STEM. This research adopts a qualitative approach using the CIPP model, which allows evaluation of aspects of context, input, process and product to achieve effective learning. Research participants involve students, STEM instructors. Primary data was collected through observation instruments, while secondary data was obtained from documentation and interviews. The results of the research show that the application of Integrated STEM learning in STEM-EC UPI can be categorized as good in the input component but can be categorized as quite good in the context, process and product components. This is due to the less-than-optimal mathematical aspects in the STEM Integrated approach in terms of instructor qualifications and aspect assessment results. mathematics students.
Students’ Mathematical Connection Ability on Quadratic Function with Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) Approach
Wijayanti, Ardhina;
Ibrahim, Ibrahim
Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal Vol 15, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : SEAMEO Regional Centre for QITEP in Mathematics
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.46517/seamej.v15i2.371
Students need to be able to make mathematical connections because it helps them learn math more thoroughly, retain it longer, and help solve problems. This study aimed to determine whether RME learning can improve students' mathematical connection skills. This type of research is experimental research with a nonequivalent control group design. This study used two groups as test subjects, each with 32 students, selected through a cluster random sampling technique. The data collection instrument used in this research is the mathematical connection ability test. The data analysis techniques used were an Independent Sample T-test, an effect size test, test results of each indicator of mathematical connection ability, and daily journal notes. The results showed that students who learned RME learning were more proficient in making mathematical connections than those who learned using conventional learning. In addition, the experimental group students experienced increased self-confidence and courage to express their ideas and see the surrounding events as part of the mathematical concepts they had learned.
Students' Pseudo-Thinking in Solving the Area of Obtuse Triangles: A Mindset-Based Perspective
Adhitya, Yusuf;
Wahyudin, Wahyudin;
Prabawanto, Sufyani
Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal Vol 15, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : SEAMEO Regional Centre for QITEP in Mathematics
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.46517/seamej.v15i2.474
The research aims to describe the different characteristics of students’ pseudo-thinking in solving areas of obtuse triangles based on their mindset. The categorization of pseudo-thinking is based on the Vinner and Subanji frameworks, while the mindset is categorized according to the Dweck framework. The research was conducted in one of the Junior High Schools in the Kebumen district with 111 students. The study employs a qualitative, grounded theory design. Data were collected through the math test, the mindset questionnaire, and the interview. The data were analyzed using a process that consists of open, axial, and selective coding to identify patterns of reasoning among students. The study found that students with a growth mindset exhibit both true and false pseudo-thinking, whereas students with a fixed mindset exhibit only true pseudo-thinking. Students with a growth mindset tend to engage in pseudo-thinking by misapplying the Pythagorean Theorem. On the other hand, fixed-mindset students often perform pseudo-thinking by using the incorrect formula. GMS is often overconfident in its old knowledge, leading to incorrect decisions, while FMS tends to focus solely on memorizing formulas and settings without reflection. This study is significant because it highlights how students’ mindsets influence their problem-solving abilities, particularly in geometric problems. Educators can use the insight gained from the study to develop effective learning strategies and help students grasp mathematics more deeply.
Analysis of Student’s Metacognitive Errors in Working on PISA-Like Math Problem on Number Content
Alya, Hanayuki;
Aryani, Jenny Nurika;
Salsabila, Aliyyah;
Putri, Ratu Ilma Indra;
Susanti, Elsa;
Simarmata, Ruth Helen
Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal Vol 15, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : SEAMEO Regional Centre for QITEP in Mathematics
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.46517/seamej.v15i2.487
This study aims to analyze the forms of metacognitive errors made by junior high school students in solving questions developed by the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) on number content. Metacognitive skills are part of a higher-order thinking process that includes awareness and control of one's own thinking process, including strategy planning, monitoring implementation, and evaluating results. In the context of PISA-like math problem that require contextual and complex problem solving, these skills are crucial. This study employed a qualitative approach using a case study design. The research subjects consisted of three VIII grade students who were identified according to the categories of high, medium, and low mathematical ability. The main instruments were PISA-like math problem and interview guidelines based on metacognitive indicators. Data were obtained using written assessments and comprehensive interviews, then examined through qualitative descriptive analysis. The results showed that all students, regardless of mathematics ability level, made metacognitive errors. The most dominant errors occurred at the planning and evaluation stages. Students with low ability had difficulty understanding the problem, identifying relevant information, and designing a solution strategy. While students with medium and high abilities tend not to evaluate steps and results optimally. The results underscore the significance of enharing metacognitive abilities in mathematics education to foster reflective thinking and tackle complex problems.