cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Ali Akbar
Contact Email
aliakbar.kaligrafi@gmail.com
Phone
+622187798807
Journal Mail Official
jurnalsuhuf@gmail.com
Editorial Address
https://jurnalsuhuf.kemenag.go.id/suhuf/about/editorialTeam
Location
Kota adm. jakarta timur,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
SUHUF: Jurnal Pengkajian Al-Qur'an dan Budaya
Published by Lajnah Pentashihan Mushaf Al-Qur'an
ISSN : 19796544     EISSN : 25486942     DOI : https://doi.org/10.22548/shf.v12i2.481
Core Subject : Religion, Humanities,
Religion Humanities
FOCUS: SUHUF aims to increase understanding of the Quran through the publication of academic articles and research results. SCOPE: SUHUF publishes studies on the mushaf, translation, interpretation, rasm, qiraah, and other Quranic sciences, and pays special attention to the study of the Quran in the context of Indonesia and Southeast Asia.
Arjuna Subject : Seni dan Humaniora - Studi Agama
Articles 302 Documents
 27   28   29   30   31 
Meninjau Kembali Hak-hak Penyandang Disabilitas dalam Ranah Profesional Mohammad Ulil Rosyad; Nur Rofiah; M. Darwis Hude; Dinan Kiasati
SUHUF Vol 19 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Lajnah Pentashihan Mushaf Al-Qur'an

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22548/shf.v19i1.1523

Abstract

Persons with disabilities are often positioned within medical and charitable paradigms, which limit recognition of their capacities in public spaces, including the world of work. As a conceptual basis for fulfilling the professional rights of persons with disabilities, this article analyzes Surah ‘Abasa (80): 1–4. This study employs a qualitative approach through library research and applies the Socio-Religious Model of Disability (SRmD) by integrating the concepts of ahliyyah and maqasid asy-syari‘ah into the social model. The findings show that Surah ‘Abasa (80): 1–4 presents the neglect of Abdullah ibn Umm Maktum as related to a social perspective that evaluates a person based on bodily condition and social position. While the phrase “‘abasa wa tawalla” criticizes exclusion, “yazzakka” indicates that persons with disabilities possess the potential for self-development, knowledge acquisition, and social contribution. Therefore, the mention of “al-a‘ma” does not signify incapacity; rather, it affirms that physical limitation does not remove a person’s dignity, agency, ahliyyah, and professional capacity. The fact that Abdullah ibn Umm Maktum served as a muazzin, imam, and leader in Medina further strengthens the argument that persons with disabilities are entitled to employment access, reasonable accommodation, media adaptation, inclusive facilities, and legal protection.
Kesenjangan Metodologis dalam Tafsir Mahasin Al-Ta’wil Melani Novita Anggraini; Hanik Rosyida; Yusuph Dauda Gambari
SUHUF Vol 19 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Lajnah Pentashihan Mushaf Al-Qur'an

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22548/shf.v19i1.1538

Abstract

This study examines the consistency and methodological implications of isra’iliyyat in Tafsir Mahasin at-Ta’wil by al-Qasimiy within a contemporary context, focusing on the aspect of methodological consistency that remains relatively understudied. The problem addressed is the extent to which al-Qasimiy is consistent in applying the rules for using isra’iliyyat in his tafsir practice, as well as its methodological implications for the development of tafsir studies. This research employs a qualitative approach using descriptive-analytical and critical analysis methods through library research, focusing specifically on the narrative verses in surah Al-Kahf. The results indicate a methodological gap between tafsir theory and practice. Conceptually, al-Qasimiy applies highly strict precautionary principles. In practice, he is dominantly consistent in holding to these rules by providing criticism of the quoted isra’iliyyat narratives. However, an inconsistency gap is also found when he adopts a lenient stance (mutasahil) by accepting isra’iliyyat stories without any critical remarks. These findings bring two significant implications for contemporary tafsir studies. First, the sharpness of al-Qasimiy’s analysis successfully maintains the credibility of his work as a primary reference in Qur’anic studies. Second, this inconsistency gap encourages academics to avoid blind imitation (taklid) of any tafsir work. This encourages a critical reading approach to test the consistency between methodological formulations and their tafsir results at a practical level.

Page 31 of 31 | Total Record : 302

 27   28   29   30   31 

Filter by Year

2008 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 19 No 1 (2026) Vol 18 No 2 (2025) Vol 18 No 1 (2025) Vol 17 No 2 (2024) Vol 17 No 1 (2024) Vol 16 No 2 (2023) Vol 16 No 1 (2023) Vol 15 No 2 (2022) Vol 15 No 1 (2022) Vol 14 No 2 (2021) Vol 14 No 1 (2021) Vol 13 No 2 (2020) Vol 13 No 1 (2020) Vol 12 No 2 (2019) Vol 12 No 1 (2019) Vol 11 No 2 (2018) Vol 11 No 1 (2018) Vol 10 No 2 (2017) Vol 10 No 1 (2017) Vol 9 No 2 (2016) Vol 9 No 1 (2016) Vol 8 No 2 (2015) Vol 8 No 1 (2015) Vol 7 No 2 (2014) Vol 7 No 1 (2014) Vol 6 No 2 (2013) Vol 6 No 1 (2013) Vol 5 No 2 (2012) Vol 5 No 1 (2012) Vol 4 No 2 (2011) Vol 4 No 1 (2011) Vol 3 No 2 (2010) Vol 3 No 1 (2010) Vol 2 No 2 (2009) Vol 2 No 1 (2009) Vol 1 No 1 (2008) More Issue