Corruptio
The Journal Corruptio is an international journal of anti-corruption published by the Law Faculty of Universitas Lampung as a platform for academicians, researchers, and practitioners to publish their authentic articles or reviews regarding communication and development of the criminal law, legal comparison, and interdisciplinary related to corruption. The scope of the Journal Corruptio is the result of research or conceptual studies on the criminal law consisting of law in general, sociology, anthropology, psychology, and corruption. The Journal Corruptio publishes two issues in a year, on January and July that provides open accessed journal in attempts for all published content in the journal is available for free without charged fees toward users and their institutions. The Journal Corruptio opens access directly to the completed substance based on the principle of free research availability to support significant global knowledge exchange. The Corruptio Journal is a platform for academicians, researchers, and practitioners to publish their authentic articles or reviews regarding communication and development of the criminal law, legal comparison, and interdisciplinary related to corruption. The scope of the Journal Corruptio is the result of research or conceptual studies on the criminal law consisting of law in general, sociology, anthropology, psychology, and corruption. Scope and Focus of the journal consist as follows: a. Law enforcement Law enforcement is an effort to enforce the function of law and norms in the society. Generally, law enforcement aims to act as a behavioral guidance of the society’s behaviour. In the Journal Corruptio, law enforcement discusses topics on concept of law enforcement and rehabilitation. These discussions on law enforcement are applied on corruption cases, behavioral, and philosophy in Indonesia. b. Prevention Law consist of 2 (two) natures which are prevention and repression. The scope of Journal Corruptio, leans to law’s function of preventing. Prevention means the law acts as preclusion against crimes, specifically crimes of corruption. Prevention in the Journal Corruption is executed through dissemination, socialization, and other platforms to insert values that could hinder corrupt behaviors for example, corruption, collusion, nepotism, money laundering. c. Protection Law protection defines an aegis towards the human rights of the society in order to enjoy their rights to its fullest. In the Jounal Corruptio, protection highlights protection towards witnesses in order to provide them security and convenience during their trial process of giving facts and evidential statements.
Articles
74 Documents
<![CDATA[Legal Analysis of Corruption Prevention through State Officials’ Asset Declarations ]]>
<![CDATA[Ibipurwo, Guruh Tio]]>
<![CDATA[ Corruptio Vol 6 No 1 (2025) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25041/corruptio.v6i1.4420
<![CDATA[Corruption prevention in Indonesia remains weak due to inadequate enforcement of asset disclosure obligations for state officials. Although asset reporting is vital for transparency and accountability, it functions mainly as a formal compliance tool without strong sanctions. Comparative experiences from Denmark and Spain show that effective prevention requires comprehensive legal frameworks combining administrative and criminal penalties to ensure compliance and deter corruption. Indonesia’s current framework, limited to administrative sanctions, lacks coercive power. Strengthening it through explicit legal provisions aligned with international standards such as the UNCAC and OECD guidelines is essential to enhance accountability and reinforce corruption prevention.]]>
<![CDATA[Corruption Verdict on Embezzlement of Village Funds in the Department of John Rawls's Fairness Perspective ]]>
<![CDATA[Labaka, Albri]]>
<![CDATA[ Corruptio Vol 6 No 2 (2025) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25041/corruptio.v6i2.4302
<![CDATA[This article examines judicial authority in adjudicating village fund corruption, analyzing Decision Number 11/Pid.Sus-TPK/2023/PN through a normative juridical approach and John Rawls’s fairness perspective. While the Panel of Judges applied Article 3 of the Anti-Corruption Law, the three-year sentence is disproportionate given state losses of approximately IDR 1.95 billion, the Defendant’s public office, and the lack of restitution. The ruling highlights a tension between procedural legality and substantive justice, emphasizing the need for judges to exercise social sensitivity, apply public reason, and consider the socio-structural impact on vulnerable communities. A holistic approach ensures that judicial decisions are legally valid, ethically sound, and socially responsive, reinforcing the moral authority of the courts and protecting marginalized groups.]]>
<![CDATA[Corruptio Legis in Indonesian Legal Politics: A Legisprudential Analytical Approach ]]>
<![CDATA[Pelengkahu, Muhamad]]>
<![CDATA[ Corruptio Vol 6 No 2 (2025) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25041/corruptio.v6i2.4450
<![CDATA[This study conceptualises Corruptio Legis as a form of structural corruption operating within Indonesia’s legislative process, where formally valid procedures conceal substantive distortions of law, justice, and constitutional democracy. Using Wintgens’ legisprudence, Ekins’ theory of legislative intention, and Tuori’s ratio–voluntas framework, the analysis identifies key patterns of distortion, including legislative subordination to party elites, transactional lawmaking, and the marginalisation of public deliberation. Case studies of the stalled Asset Confiscation Bill and the Job Creation Law illustrate how oligarchic political interests displace public reason in lawmaking. The study proposes a four-step Corruptio Legisprudential Diagnosis Formula and advocates a Legislative Impact Assessment grounded in this framework to ensure that legislation is guided by rational deliberation rather than power-based interests.]]>
<![CDATA[Powers Of Nigeria's Anti-Corruption Institutions In Combating Bribery: Law And Practice ]]>
<![CDATA[Bullu, Saphy Lal]]>
<![CDATA[ Corruptio Vol 6 No 1 (2025) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25041/corruptio.v6i1.4487
<![CDATA[This paper assesses the efficacy of Nigeria's anti-corruption institutions—the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission and the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission—in curbing bribery activities that are well-controlled at all levels. Each institution plays its major role in making sure the purposes of its establishment are well met. However, the impression of corruption persists in Nigeria, damaging the nation's reputation and fostering an image of profound moral decay. Findings show that, since 1999, successive Nigerian administrations have sought novel anti-corruption measures. The Transparency International Corruption Report ranges from 2020 to 2023; Nigeria's ranks were between 136 and 140. Such records indicate that the war against corruption is a limited in progress. The current position of Nigeria ranks 140th out of 180 countries, with a score of 26/100, demonstrating that corruption remains a significant issue despite the presence of numerous anti-corruption agencies. This article employs qualitative and quantitative methods to analyse existing data and assess the effectiveness of Nigerian institutions in combating bribery. Such methodology assists in identifying gaps in enforcement, institutional weaknesses, and the impact of political interference as key barriers to success. Recommendations include strengthening legal frameworks, enhancing transparency, and promoting public awareness to foster a culture of accountability within Nigeria.]]>
