STAATSRECHT: Indonesian Constitutional Law Journal
STAATSRECHT: Indonesian Constitutional Law Journal (ISSN: 2549-0915) is a national journal published by Center for the Study of Constitution and National Legislation (POSKO-LEGNAS) UIN Jakarta, INDONESIA. The focus is to provide readers with a better understanding of Constitutional Law and present developments through the publication of articles, research reports, and book reviews. STAATSRECH specializes in Constitutional Law and is intended to communicate original researches and current issues on the subject. This journal warmly welcomes contributions from scholars of related disciplines. It aims primarily to facilitate scholarly and professional discussions over current developments on legal issues in Indonesia as well as to publish innovative legal researches concerning Indonesian laws and legal system. Published exclusively in English, the Review seeks to expand the boundaries of Indonesian legal discourses to access English-speaking contributors and readers all over the world. The Review, hence, welcomes contributions from international legal scholars and professionals as well as from representatives of courts, executive authorities, and agencies of development cooperation. The Review basically contains any topics concerning constitutional law. Novelty and recency of issues, however, is a priority in publishing. The range of contents covered by the Review spans from established legal scholarships and fields of law such as privacy laws and public laws which include constitutional to various approaches to legal studies such as comparative law, law and economics, sociology of law and legal anthropology, and many others. Specialized legal studies concerning various aspects of life such as commercial and business laws, technology law, natural resources law and the like are also welcomed. It aims primarily to facilitate scholarly and professional discussions over current developments on legal issues in Indonesia as well as to publish innovative legal researches concerning constitutional law. Published exclusively in English, the Review seeks to expand the boundaries of Indonesian legal discourses to access English-speaking contributors and readers all over the world. The Review, hence, welcomes contributions from international legal scholars and professionals as well as from representatives of courts, executive authorities, and agencies of development cooperation. The Review basically contains any topics concerning Indonesian laws and legal system. Novelty and recency of issues, however, is a priority in publishing. The range of contents covered by the Review spans from established legal scholarships and fields of law such as privacy laws and public laws which include constitutional and administrative law as well as criminal law, international laws concerning Indonesia, to various approaches to legal studies such as comparative law, law and economics, sociology of law and legal anthropology, and many others. Specialized legal studies concerning various aspects of life such as commercial and business laws, technology law, natural resources law and the like are also welcomed.
Articles
6 Documents
Search results for
, issue
"Vol 7, No 1 (2023)"
:
6 Documents
clear
<![CDATA[Legal Politics of Tax Reposition with Zakat Payments in Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Putra, Gilang Rizki Aji]]>
<![CDATA[ STAATSRECHT: Indonesian Constitutional Law Journal Vol 7, No 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UIN JAKARTA ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15408/siclj.v7i1.35635
<![CDATA[This research examines and analyses the repositioning of zakat to reduce taxable income by paying zakat to increase public awareness of paying zakat. Zakat and taxes for Muslims are a double burden that must be met. To minimize these two obligations, a policy was created where the zakat that has been paid can reduce Taxable Income (PKP). The approach method in this research is sociological juridical, the data used is primary data and secondary data, the data collection technique is field study and literature study, while the data analysis technique uses qualitative analysis. The results of the research show that the regulation of reducing taxable income by paying zakat as an effort to increase public awareness of paying zakat is that zakat that has been produced through zakat institutions authorized by the government can be used as a deduction from taxable income (PKP) so that the tax that must be paid is reduced. The repositioning of reducing taxable income by paying zakat to increase public awareness is feasible considering the low level of public attention to paying zakat. People who initially objected to the double burden, namely obligations in the form of taxes and zakat, can carry out their responsibilities to pay taxes and zakat in tandem.]]>
<![CDATA[State Institutional Law: Dualism in the Development of the Tax Court in Indonesia Between the Supreme Court and the Ministry of Finance ]]>
<![CDATA[Yunus, Nur Rohim]]>
<![CDATA[ STAATSRECHT: Indonesian Constitutional Law Journal Vol 7, No 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UIN JAKARTA ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15408/siclj.v7i1.35454
<![CDATA[This article discusses the dualism in developing the Tax Court in Indonesia, which involves the Supreme Court and the Ministry of Finance. The research background includes the complexity of the tax justice system and challenges in coordination between the two institutions. The aim of the research is to identify the benefits, weaknesses and potential risks of this dualism coaching system. The research method used is qualitative with a literature and legislation approach to analyze the legal framework and its practical implementation. The research results show that the dualism coaching system provides a variety of approaches, but also creates the potential for conflict, uncertainty and waste of resources. This article concludes by stating the importance of improving coordination between the Supreme Court and the Ministry of Finance in order to increase efficiency and effectiveness in developing the Tax Court and ensuring legal certainty in resolving tax disputes in Indonesia.]]>
<![CDATA[Independence of the Tax Court in the Constitution of the Indonesian Republic ]]>
<![CDATA[Anggraeni, RR Dewi]]>
<![CDATA[ STAATSRECHT: Indonesian Constitutional Law Journal Vol 7, No 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UIN JAKARTA ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15408/siclj.v7i1.35433
<![CDATA[This article discusses the Tax Court's independence in relation to the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. In order to maintain its independence, the Tax Court faces complex obstacles, such as political interference and limited resources. The purpose of this study is to analyze the implications of Article 24 Paragraph (1) of the NRI Constitution on the Tax Court's independence, as well as the Tax Court's function and authority in maintaining its independence. To obtain a comprehensive understanding of these issues, the research method employs a qualitative strategy that combines literature studies and legislative analysis. The research findings indicate that Article 24 Paragraph 1 of the NRI Constitution provides a solid constitutional basis for the Tax Court's independence. However, political interference and limited resources continue to be obstacles to implementation. Through its function and authority, the Tax Court has a significant obligation to maintain its independence by ensuring a fair, transparent, and objective trial process. This article concludes by emphasizing the significance of the Tax Court as an autonomous institution in maintaining justice in the Indonesian tax system.]]>
<![CDATA[The Position of Mahkamah Syar-iyah in Indonesian Judicial System ]]>
<![CDATA[Aji, Ahmad Mukri]]>
<![CDATA[ STAATSRECHT: Indonesian Constitutional Law Journal Vol 7, No 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UIN JAKARTA ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15408/siclj.v7i1.35634
<![CDATA[Mahkamah Syar'iyah memiliki kedudukan dalam sistem peradilan di Indonesia sebagai pengadilan agama yang memiliki kewenangan khusus dalam memeriksa, mengadili, memutus, dan menyelesaikan perkara yang meliputi bidang ahwal al-syakhsyiyah (hukum keluarga), muamalah (hukum perdata), dan jinayah (hukum pidana) yang didasarkan atas syari’at Islam. Mahkamah Syar'iyah berada di bawah Mahkamah Agung dan memiliki kewenangan di wilayah Provinsi Aceh. Mahkamah Syar'iyah merupakan pengembangan dari Pengadilan Agama dengan perubahan kewenangan yang meliputi perkara jinayat.Dalam sistem peradilan di Indonesia, Mahkamah Syar'iyah memiliki kedudukan yang sama dengan pengadilan-pengadilan lainnya, seperti Pengadilan Negeri, Pengadilan Tinggi, dan Mahkamah Agung. Namun, Mahkamah Syar'iyah memiliki kewenangan yang lebih khusus dalam memeriksa dan mengadili perkara yang berdasarkan syari'at Islam. Kewenangan Mahkamah Syar'iyah diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2006 tentang Pemerintahan Aceh.Dalam pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan, kedudukan Mahkamah Syar'iyah dalam sistem peradilan di Indonesia harus diperhatikan dengan baik. Peraturan perundang-undangan harus dapat memberikan pengaturan yang jelas mengenai kewenangan Mahkamah Syar'iyah dalam memeriksa dan mengadili perkara yang berdasarkan syari'at Islam. Oleh karena itu, dalam penyusunan naskah akademik peraturan perundang-undangan, perlu memperhatikan aspek-aspek yang berkaitan dengan kedudukan Mahkamah Syar'iyah dalam sistem peradilan di Indonesia.]]>
<![CDATA[The Role of Fisheries Courts in Adjudicating Fisheries Crime Cases ]]>
<![CDATA[Aprita, Serlika]]>
<![CDATA[ STAATSRECHT: Indonesian Constitutional Law Journal Vol 7, No 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UIN JAKARTA ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15408/siclj.v7i1.35776
<![CDATA[Indonesia sebagai sebuah negara kepulauan yang sebagian besar wilayahnya terdiri dari laut, memiliki potensi perikanan yang sangat besar dan beragam. Potensi perikanan yang dimiliki merupakan potensi ekonomi yang dapat dimanfaatkan untuk masa depan bangsa, sebagai tulang punggung pembangunan nasional. Pemanfaatan secara optimal diarahkan pada pendayagunaan sumber daya ikan dengan memperhatikan daya dukung yang ada dan kelestariannya untuk meningkatkan kesejahteraan rakyat, meningkatkan taraf hidup nelayan kecil dan pembudi daya-ikan kecil, meningkatkan penerimaan dari devisa negara, menyediakan perluasan dan kesempatan kerja, meningkatkan produktivitas, nilai tambah dan daya saing hasil perikanan serta menjamin kelestarian sumber daya ikan, lahan pembudidayaan ikan serta tata ruang. Hal ini berarti bahwa pemanfaatan sumber daya perikanan harus seimbang dengan daya dukungnya, sehingga diharapkan dapat memberikan manfaat secara terus menerus. Salah satunya dilakukan dengan pengendalian usaha perikanan melalui pengaturan pengelolaan perikanan.]]>
<![CDATA[The Urgency of Corruption Crime Courts in the Indonesian Justice System ]]>
<![CDATA[Burhanuddin, Burhanuddin]]>
<![CDATA[ STAATSRECHT: Indonesian Constitutional Law Journal Vol 7, No 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UIN JAKARTA ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15408/siclj.v7i1.35777
<![CDATA[Korupsi merupakan masalah serius yang menghambat pembangunan di Indonesia. Untuk menanggulangi korupsi, Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi didirikan sebagai lembaga khusus dengan peran penting dalam sistem peradilan di Indonesia. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mendiskusikan urgensi Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam penegakan hukum dan pemberantasan korupsi di Indonesia. Fokus penelitian ini adalah menggali kedudukan, peran, serta tantangan yang dihadapi Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam sistem peradilan Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan literatur dan analisis perundang-undangan. Data diperoleh melalui studi pustaka berupa analisis teks undang-undang, jurnal, dan publikasi ilmiah terkait Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Melalui pendekatan literatur dan analisis perundang-undangan, penelitian ini mengidentifikasi bahwa Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi memiliki kedudukan yang strategis dalam penanganan kasus korupsi di Indonesia. Pengadilan ini memainkan peran vital dalam memberantas korupsi dengan mengadili para pelaku tindak pidana korupsi, sehingga memberikan efek jera kepada pelaku lainnya. Artikel ini menyimpulkan bahwa Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi memegang peran penting dalam upaya pemberantasan korupsi di Indonesia. Meskipun dihadapkan pada berbagai tantangan, Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi tetap menjadi elemen kunci dalam menjaga integritas dan keadilan dalam sistem peradilan Indonesia. Oleh karena itu, peran serta masyarakat dan pemerintah dalam mendukung lembaga ini sangat diperlukan untuk menciptakan tata kelola pemerintahan yang bersih dan transparan di Indonesia.]]>
