cover
Contact Name
Abdul
Contact Email
alanzaelani50@gmail.com
Phone
+6281329041666
Journal Mail Official
journalmoralitylegalculture@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Ir. Sutami Street, No. 36A, Surakarta, Jawa Tengah 57126- Phone 0271-642595
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Journal of Morality and Legal Culture
ISSN : 27464555     EISSN : 27464563     DOI : 10.20961
ournal of Morality and Legal Culture is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Doctoral of Legal Science Program, Faculty of Law, University of Sebelas Maret. It published twice times a year (July and December). This Journal aims primarily to facilitate scholarly and professional discussions over current developments on legal issues in Indonesia as well as to publish innovative legal researches concerning Indonesian laws and legal systems. It provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. Published exclusively in English and/or Bahasa Indonesia (will be considered), the Review seeks to expand the boundaries of Indonesian legal discourses to access English-speaking contributors and readers all over the world. Novelty and recency of issues, however, are a priority in publishing. The scope of the articles published in this journal deals with a broad range of topics in the fields of Civil Law, Criminal Law, International Law, Administrative Law, Islamic Law, Constitutional Law, Environmental Law, Procedural Law, Anthropological Law, Health Law, Law and Economics, Sociology of Law and another section related contemporary issues in Law (Social science and Political science). Journal of Morality and Legal Culture is an open-access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution (for libraries or individuals). Users (for libraries or individuals) are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
Articles 24 Documents
Developing E-Commerce Regulatory Standards for Online Dispute Resolution Muthia Sakti
Journal of Morality and Legal Culture Vol 2, No 1 (2021): Journal of Morality and Legal Culture
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmail.v2i1.62296

Abstract

Disputes involving losses or defaults suffered Prolong the process and create uncertainty for the company or the disputing parties. Consequently, alternative dispute resolution facilitates the dispute resolution process for online transactions. One is to provide alternative dispute resolution via Online Dispute Resolution (ODR). The Method study employs the descriptive-analytic approach to acquire in-depth data that will be meaningful. This study intends to examine the opportunities and challenges faced by buyers in using Online Dispute Resolution. Concluded Although juridically, the Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution Law do not regulate ODR, Some forms of legal discovery that can be done are interpretation and analogy to explain the provisions of the articles in the Arbitration Law and Alternative Dispute Resolution.
Challenge Indonesia's Regulation of International Crime in Illegal Logging Yuniar Ariefianto
Journal of Morality and Legal Culture Vol 2, No 1 (2021): Journal of Morality and Legal Culture
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmail.v2i1.62299

Abstract

Wild Logging is difficult to eradicate because it is not only a matter of how the law must be enforced but also because it involves many issues, such as the participation of law enforcement officers. The study employs the descriptive-analytic approach to acquire in-depth data that will be meaningful. Examine the challenges of transnational crime related to illegal logging. The conclusion, Illegal Logging falls under the category of Transnational Crime because its activities frequently involve more than one nation, both in terms of preparation, planning, and supervision, as well as in terms of the damage it causes.
The Constitutionality of the TAP MPR’s Decisions in the Legislative Hierarchy Brillian Gustama; Sholahuddin Al-Fatih
Journal of Morality and Legal Culture Vol 2, No 1 (2021): Journal of Morality and Legal Culture
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmail.v2i1.48204

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the influence of TAP MPR in Indonesia. Placement of MPR Provisions in Law No. 12 of 2011 on the hierarchy of Legislation in Indonesia becomes one of the problematics that needs to be discussed, on the grounds of the position of MPR provisions that are under exactly the Constitution of 1945. This is based on the position of the MPR Decree itself which will automatically become a reference to the rules under it, in accordance with the theory of stairs put forward by Hans Kelsen. Although from the point of view of the position of MPR determination is still understandable if Hans Nawiasky theory is used as the basis. But in terms of testing itself of course this will raise a big question mark for all of us because in the Constitution of 1945 institutions or institutions that have the right to conduct a test of the Law is the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court, but within its own scope the Provision of MPR is outside the juridical territory of the two Institutions themselves. Therefore, there needs to be a solution if at any time the MPR Decree is not in accordance with the basis of the 1945 Constitution so that there will be no defects in one of the legal sources of the State of Indonesia.
The Legal Policy of the Minimum Wage for Workers' Adequate Subsistence Anis Rukmawati
Journal of Morality and Legal Culture Vol 2, No 1 (2021): Journal of Morality and Legal Culture
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jmail.v2i1.66467

Abstract

This legal study seeks to determine wage policies through minimum wages in Government Regulation 36 of 2021 concerning Wages in order to provide workers with a decent standard of living and to identify legal certainty guarantees. This is a prescriptive type of normative legal research employing a statute-based methodology. Utilized types of legal materials include primary and secondary legal materials. The technique used to collect legal materials is called "literature collection. In the study technique, the technique used for analyzing legal materials is deduction. The study's findings indicate that the minimum wage outlined in Government Regulation Number 36 of 2021 concerning Wages is insufficient to provide a decent standard of living for workers. First, the formulation has eliminated the indicator for the decent living needs component. Second is the decline in worker or laborer participation in determining the minimum wage. Thirdly, the upper and lower limits now incorporate new variables. Fourth, the formula only offers the option of using the inflation rate or economic growth. Regulation No. 36 of 2021 has failed to provide legal certainty. This is based on 3 benchmarks, the first of which is Firstsharmony between regulations. Second, the content of the rules is unclear, resulting in multiple interpretations. Thirdly, laws from worlusesr are rejected when issuing orders/labor.

Page 3 of 3 | Total Record : 24