cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Sheila Kusuma Wardhani Amnesti, SH, MH
Contact Email
amnesti@umpwr.ac.id
Phone
+6281390228710
Journal Mail Official
amnesti@umpwr.ac.id
Editorial Address
Program Studi Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Purworejo Jl. KH Amhmad Dahlan No. 3 Purworejo
Location
Kab. purworejo,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
AMNESTI : Jurnal Hukum
Published by Universitas Muhammadiyah Purworejo
ISSN : 26563029     EISSN : 27750604     DOI : 10.37729/amnesti
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
AMNESTI: Jurnal Hukum is a Journal of Legal Studies developed by the Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Purworejo. This journal published biannually (March and October). The scopes of Amnesti, but not limited to, are: Constitutional Law Criminal Law Civil Law Islamic Law Environmental Law Human Rights International Law Intellectual Property Law and also interconnection study with Legal Studies
Arjuna Subject : Seni dan Humaniora - Seni dan Humaniora (Lain-Lain)
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "vol. 8 no. 2 (2026)" : 5 Documents clear
Environmental Justice in the Enforcement of Ride-Hailing Regulations: Transforming Informal Taxi Services Toward Low-Emission Urban Mobility Julius T Mandjo; Muhamad Khairun Kurniawan Kadir
Amnesti: Jurnal Hukum Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Purworejo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37729/amnesti.v8i2.7912

Abstract

The development of application-based transportation platforms (ride-hailing) in Indonesia has significantly transformed urban mobility. However, the registration process for platform driver-partners remains largely administrative and does not involve standardized physical vehicle inspections, creating a category of “illegal taxis,” namely, officially registered vehicles that may not comply with statutory operational and emission standards. This study analyzes this issue from an environmental justice perspective and evaluates whether transportation law enforcement is aligned with Indonesia’s commitment to achieving Net Zero Emissions by 2060. The study employs normative juridical and socio-legal methods using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The findings indicate that the absence of physical vehicle inspections produces three dimensions of environmental injustice: distributive injustice, because environmental and health costs are borne by the public; procedural injustice, due to unequal regulatory burdens between licensed transportation operators and platform partners; and recognition injustice, because vulnerable groups face greater risks of transport poverty. Law Number 22 of 2009 concerning Road Traffic and Transportation, Minister of Transportation Regulation Number 118 of 2018, Presidential Regulation Number 55 of 2019, and Presidential Regulation Number 79 of 2023 incorporate emission standards into vehicle roadworthiness requirements, but their implementation remains ineffective. This study proposes a transformative legal paradigm integrating legal certainty, environmental protection, and just transition principles so that law enforcement against illegal transportation supports responsible, safe, and sustainable urban mobility.
Reconstructing Communal Intellectual Property Protection for Traditional Maritime Technology to Support Blue Investment in Tomini Bay Nurul Fazri Elfikri; Akbar Hidayatullah Daud; Waode Mustika
Amnesti: Jurnal Hukum Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Purworejo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37729/amnesti.v8i2.7930

Abstract

The transformation of the maritime sector towards a blue economy in Teluk Tomini, Gorontalo Province, is often characterized by a top-down approach that may ignore the local wisdom of coastal communities. The Gorontalo fishing community possesses traditional technologies, katinting and Soma pajeko, classified as Communal Intellectual Property (KIK). Although recognized under Government Regulation No. 56 of 2022, this KIK has not been integrated into marine space utilization permits and maritime investment schemes. This normative legal research, using legislative, conceptual, and comparative approaches with studies of Kenya and Peru, aims to analyze the implications of regulatory gaps and formulate an ideal legal reconstruction model. The results show that the absence of specific regulations triggers overlapping claims, risks of biocultural piracy (biopiracy), and legal uncertainty, thereby reducing investor interest. Furthermore, the absence of a KIK appraisal agency creates obstacles to bank financing. As a solution, progressive legal reconstruction is formulated through the concept of Securing Blue Investment in Gorontalo Province. This model integrates four main elements: (1) a sui generis Perda based on living law in accordance with the 2023 National Criminal Code; (2) local governments as legal trustees through Maritime KIK Centers; (3) institutionalization of Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS) contracts based on Prior Informed Consent, managed by Regional Public Service Agencies (BLUD); and (4) legalization of KIK certificates as objects of banking fiduciary security. This concept transforms KIK protection from passive cultural preservation into an active legal shield, ensuring investor legal certainty and economic justice for traditional fishermen.
Implementation of Corporate Social and Environmental Responsibility under Law Number 40 of 2007 (A Case Study of PT Bridgestone Sumatra Rubber Estate Samuel Mangaranap N P Silaban; Martono Anggusti; Jusnizar Sinaga
Amnesti: Jurnal Hukum Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Purworejo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37729/amnesti.v8i2.8131

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) implementation by PT Bridgestone Sumatra Rubber Estate (BSRE) in accordance with Article 74 of Law Number 40 of 2007 and Government Regulation Number 47 of 2012. The study employs a normative-empirical legal research method, utilizing data from literature reviews and interviews analyzed qualitatively. CSR effectiveness is assessed based on five indicators: legal compliance, targeting accuracy, community participation, program sustainability, and community impact. The findings indicate that, regarding legal compliance, PT BSRE has implemented CSR by allocating budgets and executing programs outlined in the company's work plan. In terms of targeting accuracy, programs covering the environment, infrastructure improvements, social assistance, and disaster response have addressed some community needs; however, interview results reveal that needs related to education, skills, employment opportunities, and economic empowerment have not been optimally met. Community and government participation in program planning remains limited, as CSR implementation tends to rely on proposals and immediate needs. Regarding sustainability, some programs remain routine and short-term in nature, limiting the long-term impact on community self-reliance. Thus, PT BSRE’s CSR initiatives are considered reasonably effective, having fulfilled legal obligations and delivered tangible benefits in environmental, infrastructure, and social sectors, yet they fall short of optimal performance regarding participation, sustainability, economic empowerment, and long-term community impact.
The Constitutionality of the 2025 Indonesian National Armed Forces Law from the Perspective of the Rule of Law and Democracy Ni Kadek Putri Julia Dewi; I Gusti Bagus Suryawan; Indah Permatasari
Amnesti: Jurnal Hukum Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Purworejo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37729/amnesti.v8i2.8140

Abstract

The enactment of Law Number 3 of 2025 concerning the Indonesian National Armed Forces has generated considerable controversy, as it has been regarded as potentially inconsistent with the principles of the rule of law and democracy. Furthermore, the legislative process did not fully satisfy the three essential elements of meaningful participation. The amendment to Article 47, which expands the number of civilian positions that may be occupied by active military personnel to fourteen positions, has also raised concerns regarding the potential re-emergence of the Dual Function of the Armed Forces (Dwifungsi ABRI) doctrine. Accordingly, this study aims to examine whether the enactment of Law Number 3 of 2025 concerning the Indonesian National Armed Forces complies with the principles of proper law-making and whether the substance of Article 47 is consistent with the principles of the rule of law and democratic governance in the post-Reform era. This study employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and historical approaches. The findings indicate that the legislative process was inconsistent with the Law on the Formation of Laws and Regulations and the principle of meaningful participation and was not fully aligned with the objectives of the 1998 Reform of the Indonesian National Armed Forces. Therefore, a comprehensive evaluation of the legislative process undertaken by the Government is necessary to ensure that the formation and implementation of the law remain consistent with the principles of the rule of law, democratic governance, meaningful public participation, and the objectives of military reform.
The Application of Article XXI of the GATT and the Violation of the Non-Discrimination Principle in Tariff Policy under Executive Order 14323 Adri Naufal Saniy; Sulthan Aldrian; Muhammad Ammar Farhan
Amnesti: Jurnal Hukum Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Purworejo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37729/amnesti.v8i2.8210

Abstract

The DS640 dispute between Brazil and the United States raises important questions in international trade law concerning the limits of WTO members’ authority to impose tariff measures on national-security grounds under Article XXI of the GATT 1994. The United States imposed additional tariffs on Brazilian steel products through the Section 232 mechanism, claiming that the measures protected national-security interests, whereas Brazil argued that they violated the principle of non-discrimination and the United States’ bound-tariff commitments. This article examines the legality of the tariff measures through three principal GATT disciplines: most-favoured-nation treatment under Article I, national treatment under Article III, and bound-tariff obligations under Article II. The study concludes that the tariffs are discriminatory because selective exemptions were granted to certain countries without an objective basis related to product differences, thereby contravening Article I. The measures also reflect protection of the United States’ domestic steel industry, which is inconsistent with Article III. In addition, the additional tariffs exceed the bound rates recorded in the United States Schedule of Concessions and therefore violate Article II. The national-security justification under Article XXI is considered inapplicable because the measures do not satisfy the “emergency in international relations” standard articulated in Russia – Traffic in Transit. Accordingly, the article argues that the United States’ measures in DS640 are inconsistent with its multilateral obligations and underscores the role of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body in preventing the national-security exception from being used as an instrument of protectionism.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2026 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 11 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2019) More Issue