cover
Contact Name
Habibi Al Amin
Contact Email
habibi.alamin@gmail.com
Phone
+6285695956797
Journal Mail Official
burhaniyahshakhsiyah@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Universitas Hasyim Asy'ari Tebuireng, Jl. Irian Jaya No.55, Cukir, Kec. Diwek, Kabupaten Jombang, Jawa Timur 61471
Location
Kab. jombang,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
SHAKHSIYAH BURHANIYAH : Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Islam
ISSN : 24778664     EISSN : 27984451     DOI : https://doi.org/10.33 752/sbjphi.v9i1
Core Subject : Religion, Social,
Focus and Scope Shakhsiyah Burhaniyah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Islam welcome papers from academicians on theories, philosophy, conceptual paradigms, academic research, as well as religion practices. In particular, papers which consider the following general topics are invited. Marriage Inheritance Testament (washiah) Divorce Property in marriage Childcare Women and children rights The rights and obligations of family Endowments (wakaf) Marriage and Gender Fiqh and Usul Fiqh Indonesia and Islamic Law Islamic Law and Pesantren Tradition
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 51 Documents
TAFSIR AHKAM : : Logika Hukum Penetapan Kewajiban Nafkah dan Kadar Nafkah Perspektif Al-Qur’an dan Hadits al amin, habibi
SHAKHSIYAH BURHANIYAH: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Islam Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): Shakhsiyah Burhaniayh: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Islam
Publisher : LPPM UNHASY

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33752/sbjphi.v10i2.10019

Abstract

The point of this research is to figure out the arguments for and against using legal logic in cases about alimony. The research method used is legal normative research. Data analysis employs the Ahkam interpretation method. The research data consists of Ahkam interpretations regarding maintenance, specifically: (Qs. An Nisa’:34), QS. At-Talaq[65]:6, (HR. Bukhari), (HR. An-Nasa’i and Ibn Majah). The results of this study conclude that the differences in legal logic in cases of alimony obligations and the amount of alimony between one school of thought and another are indicated by the differences in opinion between schools of thought, which simultaneously demonstrate the richness of Islamic fiqh methodology. Each imam, using their own framework of usul fiqh, interprets the primary sources (the Quran and Hadith) through different lenses, considering fiqh principles (such as custom, public interest, necessity, analogy), and sometimes prioritizing different principles, for example, the absolute protection of a wife's rights versus the ease for a husband facing economic difficulties. This is what shapes the pattern of legal reasoning and produces variations in legal rulings that remain within the bounds of Sharia, offering relevant alternative solutions for various conditions and eras.