cover
Contact Name
Rico Nur Ilham
Contact Email
radjapublika@gmail.com
Phone
+6281238426727
Journal Mail Official
radjapublika@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl.Pulo Baroh No.12 Lancang Garam Kecamatan Banda Sakti Kota Lhokseumawe, Aceh
Location
Kota lhokseumawe,
Aceh
INDONESIA
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS)
Published by CV. RADJA PUBLIKA
ISSN : -     EISSN : 2808487X     DOI : https://doi.org/10.54443/ijerlas
This journal accepts articles on results of the research in fields of Education, Cross Culture, Law, Environmental Empowerment which are the latest issues from the results of activities or practical implementations that are problem solving, comprehensive, meaningful, latest and sustainable findings with clear goals and visionary in various activities that have innovation and creativity. So that they do not just replicate the same activities in different places but must have to measurable results and impacts for society and support the achievement of the goals set in modern human development.
Articles 55 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025)" : 55 Documents clear
JUDICIAL DISCRETION IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROCESS IN INDONESIA (A Study at the Cianjur District Court) Anissa Larasati; Faizin Sulistio; I Nyoman Nurjaya
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i2.2676

Abstract

The influence of public attention on the criminal trial process is currently affecting the judiciary under the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, where all layers of society consistently follow the development of news related to ongoing trials in specific legal jurisdictions. This article focuses on discussing the nature of public attention, emphasizing that it should not affect the judges' rulings in criminal cases, as well as the discretion of judges in formulating legal considerations in cases that attract public attention during the decision-making process. Our findings indicate that in making legal considerations for criminal case rulings, the panel of judges must always adhere to the formal procedural law established in the criminal trial process, reinforced by the application of the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code, relevant criminal laws in the trial, and the Supreme Court regulations. The primary guidance for judges in formulating legal considerations for legal decisions must be based on at least two pieces of evidence proven during the trial, coupled with the conviction of the presiding judge, and supplemented by the judge's authority to exercise discretion in order to ensure clear and just resolution of the criminal case. In conclusion, we recommend that judges must continue to uphold their independence in making legal considerations and delivering sound legal judgments.
REFORMULATION OF THE PENAL MEDIATION ARRANGEMENT IN TRAFFIC OFFENSES Yudhi Darmansyah; Faizin Sulistio; Abdul Madjid
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i2.2693

Abstract

The implementation of penal mediation within the Indonesian legal system presents a promising alternative to traditional criminal proceedings, especially in cases involving traffic accidents caused by negligence. Penal mediation offers a non-litigation mechanism that prioritizes rehabilitation, the restoration of relationships between victims and offenders, and the promotion of peace. While traffic accidents cause significant harm to victims, involving them in the mediation process helps clarify the offender's responsibilities and provides an opportunity for restorative justice. Moreover, penal mediation can help prevent the negative consequences of imprisonment, which not only affects the offender but also their family and society at large. However, the absence of specific legislation governing penal mediation within the Criminal Justice System poses challenges, making it difficult for law enforcement officials to provide legal certainty in cases involving traffic violations under the Traffic Law. Therefore, it is essential for future reforms to address these gaps, ensuring that penal mediation can be effectively implemented in traffic accident cases to achieve more humane and restorative outcomes.
THE AUTHORITY OF THE REGIONAL SUPERVISORY COUNCIL IN TAKING NOTARIAL PROTOCOLS WITH A 25-YEAR TERM Fauzan; Herlindah; Wisnuwardhani, Diah Aju
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i2.2731

Abstract

This doctrinal legal research aims to analyze the authority of the Regional Supervisory Council (Majelis Pengawas Daerah/MPD) in retrieving notarial protocols that are 25 years old or older, as regulated under Article 63 paragraphs (5) and (6) of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning the Amendment to Law Number 30 of 2004 on the Office of Notary. The study employs a statutory and conceptual approach, analyzed through legal interpretation and deductive syllogism methods. The findings indicate a normative ambiguity in Article 63 paragraph (5) regarding the authorized recipient of such protocols and a disharmony between this provision and Article 30 letter c of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation Number 24 of 2020. The latter merely authorizes MPD to determine the storage location of the protocols without explicitly granting the authority to retrieve them. This discrepancy potentially weakens MPD’s supervisory function and creates a legal vacuum concerning the responsibility for the preservation of notarial archives. Therefore, regulatory reform through harmonization of implementing regulations is necessary to ensure consistency with the legislative mandate, thereby safeguarding the legal protection, continuity, and security of state documents in the form of notarial protocols
THE PROBLEM OF EXECUTION IN DISTRICT COURT AGAINST OVERLAPPING COURT DESCISION (A Study at the Cianjur District Court) Bagus Mizan Albab; Abdul Rachmad Budiono; Sihabudin
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i2.2766

Abstract

Execution is a crown for a court especially for the head of district court to execute the court decision. In principle, execution does not need to be submitted through the district court if the losing party or defendant is willing to voluntary perform or fulfill the performance of the court decision (article 195 paragraph 1 HIR of article 206 paragraph 1 RBG). The petition of execution may only be filled against a court decision that meets the requirement for execution. In the practice law field, the problem with the implementation of execution of overlapping court decision with the similar or same object, same party, but have different court decisions. The research method used is normative juridical and the data used includes relevant legal regulation, court decisions and relevant legal literature. Therefore, towards this issue, this journal will discuss and convey solutions related to the issue of execution and its resolution strategy, with the aim that the court decision will be able to be executed (executable judgment).
THE IMPACT OF CIVIC EDUCATION ON SOCIAL BEHAVIOR CHANGES AND CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS OF GEN Z AT BANYUWANGI STATE POLYTECHNIC Ninik Sri Rahayu Wilujeng
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i2.4254

Abstract

Civics education is a key factor in shaping the social and critical behavior of the younger generation in the digital era. It is known that Gen Z's social behavior lately when giving criticism on social media can be said to be impolite. In addition, they are also less concerned about the environment. This study aims to analyze the impact of civics education on the social behavior and critical thinking of Gen Z (students) at Banyuwangi State Polytechnic. This research method uses a quantitative approach with a survey method of 150 students, data collected through a Likert-scale-based questionnaire that measures aspects of social concern, public participation, and critical thinking. The results show a significant positive correlation between the level of understanding of civics education on social behavior and critical thinking skills of students (Gen Z). The highest correlation coefficient is found in the relationship between understanding of Civics Education and Critical Thinking Skills with r = 0.921 (p < 0.01). This finding confirms that in-depth and integrated civics education in the campus curriculum can encourage the birth of more aware, proactive, and critical thinking citizens. Practical implications include the importance of strengthening contextual civics education modules and learning based on case studies, interactive, and relevant to current issues among students (Gen Z).