cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Sherly Adam
Contact Email
jurnalsanisa@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jurnalsanisa@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura. Jalan Ir. M. Putuhena, Kampus Poka, Ambon, Maluku 97233, Indonesia.
Location
Kota ambon,
Maluku
INDONESIA
SANISA: Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa Hukum
Published by Universitas Pattimura
ISSN : -     EISSN : 27762289     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
SANISA: Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa Hukum merupakan media peer-review yang dikelola dan diterbitkan oleh Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura. SANISA: Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa Hukum mempublikasikan karya-karya kreativitas ilmiah di bidang ilmu hukum, diterbit dua kali setahun pada bulan April dan Oktober. Tujuan jurnal ini adalah untuk menyediakan tempat bagi Mahasiswa untuk menerbitkan hasil kreativitas dibidang penelitian atau ulasan artikel yang asli maupun Pengabdian Masyarakat. Jurnal ini menyediakan akses terbuka langsung ke kontennya berdasarkan prinsip bahwa membuat penelitian tersedia secara bebas untuk umum mendukung pertukaran pengetahuan global yang lebih besar. SANISA: Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa Hukum tersedia dalam bentuk online. Bahasa yang digunakan dalam jurnal ini adalah bahasa Indonesia dan bahasa Inggris. Ruang lingkup artikel yang dimuat dalam jurnal ini membahas berbagai permasalahan di bidang Hukum Pidana, Hukum Perdata, Hukum Tata Negara, Hukum Internasional, Hukum Administrasi, Hukum Lingkungan, Hukum Islam, Hukum Adat dan bagian lain yang terkait dengan isu kontemporer di bidang ilmu hukum
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 45 Documents
 1   2   3   4   5 
Implementasi Konvensi Hak-Hak Anak 1989 ( United Nations Convention On the Right of the Child ) Terhadap Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Anak Di Belarusia Sinay, Susan Laura; Wattimena, Josina Augustina Yvonne; Noya, Ekberth Vallen
SANISA: Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa Hukum Vol 5, No 1 (2025): Volume 5, Nomor 1, April 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/sanisa.v5i1.3025

Abstract

Introduction: Child protection is all efforts made to create conditions so that every child can exercise their rights and obligations for the proper development and growth of children physically, mentally and socially. Child protection is a manifestation of justice in a society, thus child protection is sought in various fields of state and social life. Child protection activities have legal consequences, both in relation to written and unwritten law The Convention of Rights of the Child was ratified by the United Nations General Assembly on November 20, 1989, and entered into force on September 2, 1990. The Convention on the Rights of the Child is an instrument that formulates universal principles and legal norms regarding the position of children. As such, the Convention on the Rights of the Child is an international human rights treaty that incorporates civil, political, economic and cultural rightsPurposes of the Research:  Analyze and discuss the form of sanctions against perpetrators of violations of children's rights in Belarus and analyze and discuss the regulation of the protection of children's rights based on the 1989 United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.Methods of the Research: This type of research is normative juridical where the research is carried out by collecting primary, secondary and tertiary data obtained using literature studies. The data that has been collected is analyzed qualitatively in which the description is arranged systematically based on legal disciplines to achieve clarity of the problems to be discussed.Results / Findings / Novelty of the Research: The results of this study indicate that violations of children's rights in Belarus that have occurred have not been responded to properly, the State as an actor has not yet carried out its role and function as a protector of its citizens. The perpetrators of violations have not yet been prosecuted, therefore it is necessary to affirm human rights observers to continue to oversee violations of children's rights that occur in Belarus
Penyerangan Terhadap Warga Sipil Oleh Organisasi Papua Merdeka Dan Pertanggungjawabannya Ririhena, Putri Jean Patricia; Tahamata, Lucia Charlota Octovina; Leatemia, Wilshen
SANISA: Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa Hukum Vol 5, No 2 (2025): Volume 5, Nomor 2, Oktober 2025 (in progress)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/sanisa.v5i2.3665

Abstract

Introduction: the armed conflict in Papua is one of the most complex humanitarian and security issues in Indonesia. The involvement of the Free Papua Movement (OPM) in attacks on civilians has resulted in loss of life and significant losses, both material and moral. These actions are not merely political resistance but have gone beyond the pale, targeting those who should be protected by law: civilians not participating in hostilities.Purposes of the Research: : the purpose of this article is to determine and analyze whether the acts of attacks on civilians carried out by the Free Papua Organization (OPM) can be qualified as violations of International Humanitarian Law (IHL).Methods of the Research: The method used is normative juridical, employing a legislative approach, a case approach, a historical approach, a conceptual approach, and a literature study approach.Results / Findings / Novelty of the Research: : the results of the study show that the attacks on civilians by the Free Papua Organization (OPM) constitute a serious violation of International Humanitarian Law (IHL), particularly against the principle of distinction and the principle of proportionality as regulated in the 1949 Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocol II of 1977
Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Kejahatan Pencurian Data Pribadi di Media Sosial (Facebook) Arey, Muhammad Syaf Nurdin; Hehanussa, Deassy Jacomina Anthoneta; Salmon, Harly Cilford Jonas
SANISA: Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa Hukum Vol 5, No 2 (2025): Volume 5, Nomor 2, Oktober 2025 (in progress)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/sanisa.v5i2.3664

Abstract

Introduction: The rapid development of information technology has triggered an increase in digital activities, including the collection and storage of personal data. On the other hand, the phenomenon of theft of personal data and personal identity has become rampant and has caused increasingly significant losses, both materially and immaterially. This study aims to examine legal protection against theft of personal data and personal identity in Indonesia and to examine the law enforcement mechanisms and obstacles faced in the process.The research method used is normative juridical, with a regulatory, conceptual, and comparative approach. Data sources come from literature studies of regulations, legal literature, and relevant court decisions. The results of the study show that personal data protection in Indonesia is still in the developing stage, marked by the enactment of Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection. However, there are still limitations to norms in terms of implementation, criminal sanctions, and strong supervisory institutions. In addition, law enforcement against theft of personal data faces various obstacles, including limited authority of law enforcement officers, low public awareness of the importance of protecting personal data, and the complexity of evidence in cases of cross-border cybercrime. International efforts, such as cross-secret cooperation and extradition of perpetrators, are also still not optimal due to differences in legal systems between countries. This study recommends strengthening technical regulations for implementing the PDP Law, increasing the capacity of independent supervisory institutions, educating the public about data security, and increasing international cooperation in combating cybercrime. Effective national legal protection of personal data is an important foundation in maintaining citizens' privacy rights and building trust in the digital ecosystem.Purposes of the Research: Analyze and explain law enforcement against the crime of personal data theft on social media (Facebook).Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative juridical, with a statutory and conceptual approach. Sources of legal materials used are primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials carried out in this research is through library research, namely by searching legal materials by reading, viewing, listening and now many are done by searching through the internet then the data will be analyzed using quantitative data analysis techniques, in an approach Quantitative related to the relationship of variables analyzed using an objective theory, then described to solve the main problem in this study.Results / Findings / Novelty of the Research: Law enforcement against personal data theft in Indonesia has a strong legal basis through the Personal Data Protection Law, the Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE) Law, and other relevant regulations. However, its implementation still faces various obstacles, such as technological limitations, inadequate investigative capabilities, and difficulties in tracking and gathering evidence in the cyber realm. The cross-border nature of cybercrime also presents jurisdictional challenges, necessitating strong international cooperation mechanisms for effective law enforcement
Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan (Putusan Nomor 312/Pid.B/2023/PN Amb) Samangun, Indriyani; Sopacua, Margie Gladies; Latumaerissa, Denny
SANISA: Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa Hukum Vol 5, No 2 (2025): Volume 5, Nomor 2, Oktober 2025 (in progress)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/sanisa.v5i2.3663

Abstract

Introduction: The crime of murder is a serious violation of the fundamental right to life. Often, these crimes are triggered by the consumption of alcoholic beverages, which affects the perpetrator's control. This was observed in Case Number 312/Pid.B/2023/PN Amb, where the defendant stabbed the victim while under the influence of alcohol.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to analyze the law enforcement process and the judge's legal considerations in sentencing the perpetrator of murder under the influence of alcohol in the decision Number 312/Pid.B/2023/PN Amb.Methods of the Research: This research uses a normative juridical method with a statutory, case, and conceptual approach. The data used are secondary data obtained through library research and analyzed qualitatively.Results / Findings / Novelty of the Research: The results show that the law enforcement process has proceeded in accordance with the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). The judge considered the elements of Article 338 of the Criminal Code to be proven. However, in the sentencing considerations, the judge used the defendant's drunkenness and spontaneity as mitigating factors, resulting in a sentence of 8 years in prison. This is considered relatively light compared to the maximum threat of 15 years and the fatal consequence of the loss of life, raising questions about the balance between legal certainty and substantive justice
Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Terhadap Putusan Bebas Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan (Studi Putusan Nomor : 454/Pid.B/2024/PN. Sby) Pedan, Yohanis Egi; Adam, Sherly; Latupeirissa, Julianus Edwin
SANISA: Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa Hukum Vol 5, No 2 (2025): Volume 5, Nomor 2, Oktober 2025 (in progress)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/sanisa.v5i2.3662

Abstract

Introduction: The judge's legal considerations are a stage in which the panel of judges comprehensively assesses the facts revealed during the trial process based on legal and non-legal considerations as the basis for a decision that embodies the value of justice.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to analyze and discuss the legal considerations of judges in acquittal verdicts for criminal homicide in verdict number: 454/Pid.B/2024/PN.Sby and to analyze and discuss acquittal verdicts for perpetrators of criminal homicide from the perspective of the objectives of criminal punishment.Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative legal research using a legislative approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. The legal materials used are primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The procedure for collecting legal materials is carried out through literature study, processed through editing, systematization, and qualitative analysis.Results / Findings / Novelty of the Research: The results of the study show that the judge's legal considerations regarding the perpetrator of the crime of murder in decision number: 454/Pid.B/2024/PN. Sby, based on the judge's legal considerations of all elements of the alternative charges under Article 338 of the Criminal Code, Article 351 paragraph (3) of the Criminal Code, Article 359 of the Criminal Code, and Article 351 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, which were brought by the public prosecutor against the defendant Gregorius Ronald Tannnur, were not legally proven. The reason for this was that the judge was convinced by the opinion of a driving safety expert that the victim was outside the lane of the car driven by the defendant and, based on CCTV footage that did not clearly show that the victim died as a result of murder or being run over by the defendant's car, the judge acquitted the defendant. An acquittal of a perpetrator of a criminal act of murder is contrary to the purpose of punishment if it is not based on strong evidence. If an acquittal is given because the judge was not careful in examining the evidence and witnesses or for other reasons that are not in accordance with the law, then this verdict can be considered unfair and can reduce public trust in the judicial system to provide justice and protect the community

Page 5 of 5 | Total Record : 45

 1   2   3   4   5 

Filter by Year

2021 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 5, No 2 (2025): Volume 5, Nomor 2, Oktober 2025 (in progress) Vol 5, No 1 (2025): Volume 5, Nomor 1, April 2025 Vol 4, No 2 (2024): Volume 4, Nomor 2, Oktober 2024 Vol 4, No 1 (2024): Volume 4, Nomor 1, April 2024 Vol 3, No 2 (2023): Volume 3, Nomor 2, Oktober 2023 Vol 3, No 1 (2023): Volume 3, Nomor 1, April 2023 Vol 2, No 1 (2022): Volume 2, Nomor 1, April 2022 Vol 1, No 2 (2021): Volume 1, Nomor 2, Oktober 2021 Vol 1, No 1 (2021): Volume 1, Nomor 1, April 2021