Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Article Per Year (5 Year)

All

Constitutionale

constitutionale
Website

Published by Universitas Lampung

ISSN : 27232492 EISSN : 27459322 DOI : https://doi.org/10.25041/constitutionale

Core Subject : Social,

Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

The Constitutionale Journal is a scientific journal which is the dissemination of constitution and the constitutional law universally. The Constitutional Journal publishes articles that consist of research or conceptual studies regarding the study of basic rights in state’s constitution, election law, (local) governmental law, juridical law, constitutional court, and legislation. This journal is a media intended for academics, practitioners and legal expertise in actualizing research, development and legal and constitutional analysis ideas. The Constitutional Journal is published by the Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung for two issues a year.

Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum

Articles 6 Documents

Search results for , issue "Vol. 1 No. 2 (2020)" : 6 Documents clear

The Retroactive Principle in Law No. 26 of 2000 concerning the court of human rights Ricky Tongam Marpahala Siahaan; Candra Perbawati; Ahmad Saleh
Constitutionale Vol. 1 No. 2 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lampung

Protection of human rights is a responsibility that must be carried out by the state, in this case the state must also resolve cases of human rights violations that have occurred. There are many cases of human rights violations that occurred in the past but cannot be resolved because there are no legal rules that govern at that time. The presence of Law Number 26 of 2000 concerning the court of human rightss is certainly a way for the government to resolve the problem of gross human rights violations in the past. The principle of retroactivity was included in Law Number 26 of 2000 concerning the court of human rightss so that gross violations of human rights that occurred in the past could be resolved. The retroactive principle in Law Number 26 of 2000 concerning the court of human rightss is considered to violate existing regulations in Indonesia, especially it is considered contrary to the 1945 Constitution. -Law Number 26 of 2000 concerning the court of human rightss. This research uses normative research methods. The data used are secondary data in the form of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The results of this study indicate that the application of the retroactive principle in Law Number 26 of 2000 concerning the court of human rightss does not contain elements that are absolutely contradictory to the Law. 1945 foundation.

The Urgency Of The Formation Of Village Regulations Concerning Customary Institutions In Creating Legal Protection For The Adat Community Of Ngadisari Village Sukapura Sub-District Probolinggo District Indah Dwi Qurbani; Muhammad Lukman Hakim; Tunggul Anshari S.N
Constitutionale Vol. 1 No. 2 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lampung

The existence of customary institutions in the village is important because it has a duty to assist the Village Government and as partners in empowering, preserving and developing customs. The Village Customary Institution can occupy its rank with official recognition from the Government through a Village Regulation. Ngadisari Village was chosen as the object of this research because it has its own uniqueness, this village has indigenous people who are still strong in maintaining the traditions of their ancestors' heritage. Meanwhile, Ngadisari village also has a customary institution that carries out customary functions and is part of the original village structure that grows and develops on the initiative of the village community. The research method used is a type of empirical research and using sociological approach. The order of village regulations regarding customary institutions in order to make Adat Institutions as an alternative to dispute resolution, maintain local culture and play a role in village development. In addition, this formalization effort is also needed to maintain the existence of customary villages, provide legal protection and help cooperation between traditional village institutions of Ngadisari and other village customary institutions. This is in accordance with the duties of the customary institutions in Permendagri Number 18 of 2018 concerning Village Community Institutions and Village Traditional Institutions.

Implication Of Provisions Article 58 Paragraph (2) Law Number 15 Of 2019 Concerning Amendments To Law Number 12 Of 2011 Concerning The Formation Of Laws And Regulations On The Mechanism Of Harmonizing, Unifying And Consolidating The Conception Of Draft Regional Regulations Muhammad Ali Badary
Constitutionale Vol. 1 No. 2 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lampung

Article 58 paragraph (2) of Law Number 15 of 2019 concerning Amendments to Law Number 12 of 2011 concerning the Formation of Legislative Regulations changes the position of the central government in the process of harmonizing, unifying and consolidating the conception of draft regional regulations. The formulation of norms and laying of norms of Article 58 paragraph (2) of Law Number 15 of 2019 has resulted in normative legal consequences on the authority of regional apparatuses which have been coordinating harmonization, unification and consolidation of the conception of draft regional regulations proposed by regional heads and also resulting in the position of the central government to participate in harmonizing the draft regional regulations initiated by the Regional People's Representative Council. This study aims to identify the normative problems posed by Article 58 paragraph (2) of Law Number 15 of 2019, especially with regard to the mechanism of harmonization, unification and consolidation of the conception of draft regional regulations. This type of research is a type of normative research and the approach used in this study is a statute approach, a conceptual approach, and an analytical approach. The results of this study indicate that Article 58 paragraph (2) of Law Number 15 of 2019 raises normative problems in at least two things, namely the institutional relationship between vertical agencies in the regions and local governments which both have the authority to harmonize, unify and consolidate the conception of draft regional regulations. The types of draft regional regulations are harmonized by the ministry or agency that administers government affairs in the field of Formulation of Legislation. This problem arises because the formulation of norms and the placement of the norms of Article 58 paragraph (2) of Law Number 15 of 2019 are inaccurate so that there needs to be a revision of the formulation or laying of norms regulating the authority of ministries or institutions that carry out government affairs in the field of Regulatory Formation. Legislation in the harmonization, unification and strengthening of the conception of draft regional regulations.

The Urgency of Amendment to Law Number 32 of 2002 concerning Broadcasting as the Legal Umbrella for OTT Services Neysa Tania; Rio Kurniawan
Constitutionale Vol. 1 No. 2 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lampung

Digitalization is a global phenomenon that has an impact on changing social conditions. The Broadcasting Bill itself is canceled to be a priority in the 2020 Priority National Legislation Program even though there is a lot of material contained in the law itself needs to be updated immediately according to the times. Therefore, the function of conducting this research is to seek answers in terms of legal certainty regarding the development of legal relations with technological developments in the era of digitalization and constitutional interpretation in the digitalization era that supports sustainable economic development and is in accordance with the Indonesian national identity. This study uses a quantitative juridical analysis method, which is in the form of in-depth research on legal materials and data as usual as normative law. Furthermore, the results of the analysis will be linked to the problems in this study to produce an objective assessment to answer the problems in the research. The results of the research show that the OTT services cannot be in the scope of Law Number 32 of 2002 concerning Broadcasting, therefore the Constitutional Court must play a strategic role in carrying out rapid and precise reforms so that statutory norms can be consistent with the development of society, especially due to developments. Digital technology. The most ideal and relevant constitutional interpretation of the Judicial Review case against this law would be: Consensualism, Prudential and Futuristic with an emphasis on legal certainty for Over the Top (OTT) services and on socio-economic impacts significant impact on the general welfare. It is necessary to revise the Broadcasting Law with the intention of maintaining national integration to establish a national broadcasting system that guarantees the creation of a just, equitable, and balanced national information order in order to realize social justice for all Indonesian people.

Original Intents: Individual Requirements for Candidates of Regional Representative Council Ganiviantara Pratama
Constitutionale Vol. 1 No. 2 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lampung

The main problem of this research is that there is no firmness regarding the diction of individual words in the Constitution which is useful as a condition for nominating Regional Representative Council or Dewan Perwakilan Daerah (DPD) membership. This indecisiveness has led to the composition of DPD membership being dominated by members of political parties. This journal aims to explore the meaning of the diction of words contained in the 1945 NRI Constitution, namely "Individual" which is clearly written in Article 22E paragraph (4) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia after the Constitutional Court Decision No30/PUU-XVI/2018. The meaning of the term “individual” in this article will determine the conditions for nominating members of the DPD so that they are more in line with the objectives of establishing the institution. This journal uses a statutory approach and a historical approach. The results of this discussion show that the original intense definition concluded by the author regarding the word "individual" in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia after the Constitutional Court Decision has the following meaning: an individual who does not have a political party background or political party management and really understands his / her region.

Executions of Fiduciaryry Guarantee Post Constitutional Court Decision No. Nomor: 18/Puu-Xvii/2019 Nowinri Hilgutshiany Marini Pratiwi Pitanuki
Constitutionale Vol. 1 No. 2 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lampung

The background that underlies the conduct of this legal research is the existence of a conflict of norms, namely in the Fiduciary Guarantee Act, direct execution can be carried out if the debtor has committed an injury (also called default), but in the Constitutional Court ruling Number: 18 / PUU-XVII / 2019 This is done immediately after the debtor is injured but requires a statement of voluntary interest from the debtor or through a judicial decision. The problem in this research is related to the essence of the execution of fiduciary guarantees, the development of the fiduciary guarantee execution arrangements before and after the Constitutional Court decision Number: 18 / PUU-XVII / 2019 the implications of the Constitutional Court decision Number: 18 / PUU-XVII / 2019 on the principles of simple, fast, and low cost. The type of research used in this research is juridical normative, using a statutory approach and a case approach, as well as primary and secondary legal materials which are analyzed by grammatical and systematic interpretation. The results of this study indicate that the essence of the execution of fiduciary guarantees is to sell fiduciary collateral as repayment of debtor's unfulfilled obligations. The creditor has the right to collect the debtor's achievements including to collect all instalments and other fees that have not been paid by the debtor, and has the right to execute the object that is used as collateral without having to return the excess price from the sale of the object. The execution of the fiduciary guarantee prior to the enactment of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18 / PUU-XVII / 2019 is based on the Fiduciary Guarantee Certificate which contains the words "FOR JUSTICE BASED ON ONE ALMIGHTY GOD". These words indicate that the fiduciary guarantee certificate has executorial power, that is, it has the same power as a court decision which has permanent legal force. The legal implication of the enactment of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18 / PUU-XVII / 2019 is that a trial must first be held regarding the execution of fiduciary guarantees as a condition for the execution of fiduciary.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6

Filter by Year

2020 2020

Filter By Issues

All Issue Vol 6 No 1 (2025): Issue In progress (January 2025) Vol 5 No 2 (2024) Vol 5 No 1 (2024) Vol 4 No 2 (2023) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020) More Issue

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name
Zulkarnain Ridlwan

Contact Email
constitutionale@fh.unila.ac.id

Phone
+6281369592059

Journal Mail Official
constitutionale@fh.unila.ac.id

Editorial Address
B. Building, Faculty of Law Universitas Lampung. Prof. Sumantri Brojonegoro St. No 1, Gedong Meneng, Bandar Lampung. Lampung-35145. Indonesia

Location
Kota bandar lampung,

Lampung

INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name Zulkarnain Ridlwan

Contact Email constitutionale@fh.unila.ac.id

Phone +6281369592059

Journal Mail Official constitutionale@fh.unila.ac.id

Editorial Address B. Building, Faculty of Law Universitas Lampung. Prof. Sumantri Brojonegoro St. No 1, Gedong Meneng, Bandar Lampung. Lampung-35145. Indonesia

Location Kota bandar lampung, Lampung INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Contact Name
Zulkarnain Ridlwan

Contact Email
constitutionale@fh.unila.ac.id

Phone
+6281369592059

Journal Mail Official
constitutionale@fh.unila.ac.id

Editorial Address
B. Building, Faculty of Law Universitas Lampung. Prof. Sumantri Brojonegoro St. No 1, Gedong Meneng, Bandar Lampung. Lampung-35145. Indonesia

Location
Kota bandar lampung,

Lampung

INDONESIA