cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Abdul Basid Fuadi
Contact Email
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id
Phone
+6281215312967
Journal Mail Official
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id
Editorial Address
Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6, Jakarta 10110 Telp: (021) 23529000 Fax: (021) 3520177 E-mail: jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id
Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Konstitusi
Published by Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia
ISSN : 18297706     EISSN : 25481657     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1841
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
The aims of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics in the fields of Constitutional Law and another section related contemporary issues in law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 8 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 7, No 5 (2010)" : 8 Documents clear
Pengujian Perppu oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Ni’matul Huda
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 7, No 5 (2010)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (458.362 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk754

Abstract

The authority to reviewing Perppu can not be obtained based on the interpretation of an institution or the situation that demanded the interpretation of a norm in the community, but must be strictly regulated in the constitution to the institution where authority was given, therefore there is no ‘juridical’ chaos in it.
Pelanggaran Sistematis, Terstruktur dan Masif: Suatu Sebab Pembatalan Kehendak Rakyat dalam Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Tahun 2010 Veri Junaidi
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 7, No 5 (2010)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (684.261 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk753

Abstract

PendahuluanMahkamah Konstitusi (MK) memiliki kewenangan dalam penyelesaian perselisihan hasil pemilu kepala daerah (pemilukada)1. Kewenangan tersebut muncul setelah perubahan ketiga atas Undang-Undang Nomor. 32 Tahun 2004 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah (UU Pemda). Undang-Undang Nomor. 12 Tahun 2008 hasil perubahan UU Pemda secara eksplisit memberikan kewenangan kepada MK dalam penyelesaian perselisihan hasil pemilukada. Pasal 236 menyebutkan bahwa dengan diundangkannya UU No.  12 Tahun 2008 maka kewenangan Mahkamah Agung (MA) dalam menyelesaikan perselisihan hasil pemilukada diserahkan kepada MK. ...
Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan dalam Sistem Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Indonesia Machmud Aziz
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 7, No 5 (2010)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1139.577 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk756

Abstract

PENDAHULUAN1.  Pengertian PengujianPengertian Kata “Pengujian” (toetsing/review) dalam konteks tulisan ini adalah pengujian undang-undang (UU) dalam  arti luas yaitu dalam arti formal dan material, sedangkan pengujinya (lembaganya) tidak hanya lembaga peradilan saja melainkan juga lembaga legislatif dan/atau ekskutif. Khusus untuk mengetahui apa yang dimaksud dengan pengujian UU melalui lembaga peradilan(judicial review) kita lihat dalam Kamus   Hukum. ...
Menegaskan Kembali Komitmen Negara Hukum: Sebuah Catatan Atas Kecenderungan Defisit Negara Hukum di Indonesia Wahyudi Djafar
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 7, No 5 (2010)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (749.551 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk757

Abstract

Bila dilacak akarnya, gagasan tentang negara hukum, adalah kelanjutan dari pemikiran tentang pembatasan kekuasaan, sebagai sealah satu prinsip dari konstitusionalisme-demokrasi. Inti dari pemikiran tentang negara hukum, adalah adanya pembatasan terhadap kekuasaan, melalui sebuah aturan yuridis—undang- undang. Seperti diungkapkan Andrew Heywood, menurutnya dalam ruang lingkup yang sempit, konstitusionalisme dapat ditafsirkan sebatas penyelenggaraan negara yang dibatasi oleh undang-undang dasar—inti negara hukum. Artinya, suatu negara dapat dikatakan menganut paham konstitusionalisme jikalau lembaga-lembaga negara dan proses politik dalam negara tersebut secara efektif dibatasasi oleh konstitusi. Sedangkan dalam pengertian yang luas, konstitusionalisme adalah perangkat nilai dan manifestasi dari aspirasi politik warganegara, yang merupakan cerminan dari keinginan untuk melindungi kebebasan, melalui sebuah mekanisme pengawasan, baik internal maupun eksternal terhadap kekuasaan pemerintahan (Heywood, 2002: 297). ...
Menimbang Gagasan Negara Hukum (Deliberatif) di Indonesia* Fahrul Muzaqqi
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 7, No 5 (2010)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (614.431 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk758

Abstract

In these recent years the idea of deliberative democracy appears as an alternative idea in the middle of discourse of democracy’s contest and configuration. Through its critics which are submitted into two dominant democratic traditions (also seeking to synthesize them), viz republicanism and liberal democracy, deliberative democracy makes serious efforts to pass theoretical tensions of those two democratic traditions over by formulating a communicative participation theory in an autonomous public sphere which whom is inclusive (multi-actors), free from pressures, discrimination and manipulation.Yet, the idea of deliberative democracy self if it is observed from many deliberation literatures and practices which are studied and implemented in many countries, it has at least two variants that are mutually exclusive. First, variant of impartialism which emphasize on normative principles including the attitude and action to be inclusive, autonomous (non-partisan) and holding on the argumentation which whom considers multi-perspectives and multi-actors in taking a decision or public policy. Inter-subjectivity of an opinion was emphasized very much relating to goodness and rightness of a decision. Second, the impartialism’s critics that realizes to the real of politics and criticizes the model of impartiality that is regarded as too utopian and idealistic in applying deliberation. Principles of reciprocity, continuity, inclusivity and heterogeneity of deliberation are taken as substitute of inter-subjectivity principle in impartiality model.This paper makes a try to investigate the origin of deliberative democracy idea in modern democratic tradition. Furthermore it analyzes development of two variants of deliberative democracy idea. Finally, it endeavors to contextualize the history of Indonesian idea of democracy especially in the idea of consensus discussion (musyawarah mufakat) which is the heart of Indonesian democracy. Of course this paper uses  more historical approach to explore them   all.
Mencermati Ratio Decidendi Mk Dalam Putusan Nomor 122/Puu-Vii/2009 Tentang Penderogasian Norma Hukum dan Sifat Putusan PTUN Widodo Ekatjahjana
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 7, No 5 (2010)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (421.331 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk751

Abstract

Ratio decidendi of the Constitutional Court that said he was not an organ that has an authority to review constitutional rights loss of applicant, beside contrary to constitutional protection principles, also contrary to functions of the Constitutional Court as the guardian of the constitution, the protector of citizen’s constitutional rights dan the protector of human rights. The Constitutional Court should avoid to put his legal reasoning (in his ratio decidendi) that verdict of administrative court has not a legal nature – erga omnes. He should become aware that an administrative dispute is a public dispute bound under public law principles.
Pemberhentian Jaksa Agung dan Hak Prerogatif Presiden Riri Nazriyah
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 7, No 5 (2010)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (552.574 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk752

Abstract

The rules of appointment and dismissal for the attorney generals  need to be regulated concretely in the law. It was not done solely by President but must be on the consideration of Parliament. Therefore, the implementation of its truly free from interference and political interests   of President. Term of office of the of the Attorney General should be established with certainty to avoid multi-interpretations that would lead to legal uncertainty.
Penguatan Demokrasi Lokal Melalui Penghapusan Jabatan Wakil Kepala Daerah Suhariza Suhariza
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 7, No 5 (2010)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (556.273 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk755

Abstract

Democracy at the local level becoming a necessity for achieving the goals of regional autonomy. Furthermore, the strengthening of democracy at the local level being the significant pillar in strengthening democracy at the national level. The strategic step to consolidate democracy at the local level particulary in terms of the regional head elections is by elimination the position of deputy regional head . This paper is describes the problems about the circumtances after head local election specially the relationship between Regional Head and Deputy Regional Head along with the idea about the eliminationof the position of Deputy Regional Head.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 8

 1 

Filter by Year

2016 2016


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 21 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 21 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 21 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 21 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 20 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 20 No. 3 (2023) Vol. 20 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 20 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 19 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 19 No. 3 (2022) Vol. 19 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 19 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 18 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 18 No. 3 (2021) Vol. 18 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 18 No. 1 (2021) Vol 17, No 4 (2020) Vol. 17 No. 4 (2020) Vol 17, No 3 (2020) Vol 17, No 2 (2020) Vol. 17 No. 2 (2020) Vol 17, No 1 (2020) Vol 16, No 4 (2019) Vol. 16 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 16 No. 3 (2019) Vol 16, No 3 (2019) Vol 16, No 2 (2019) Vol 16, No 1 (2019) Vol 15, No 4 (2018) Vol. 15 No. 4 (2018) Vol 15, No 3 (2018) Vol 15, No 2 (2018) Vol 15, No 1 (2018) Vol 14, No 4 (2017) Vol 14, No 3 (2017) Vol 14, No 2 (2017) Vol. 14 No. 1 (2017) Vol 14, No 1 (2017) Vol 13, No 4 (2016) Vol 13, No 3 (2016) Vol. 13 No. 2 (2016) Vol 13, No 2 (2016) Vol 13, No 1 (2016) Vol 11, No 4 (2014) Vol 11, No 3 (2014) Vol 11, No 2 (2014) Vol 11, No 1 (2014) Vol 10, No 4 (2013) Vol 10, No 3 (2013) Vol 10, No 2 (2013) Vol 10, No 1 (2013) Vol 9, No 4 (2012) Vol 9, No 3 (2012) Vol 9, No 2 (2012) Vol 9, No 1 (2012) Vol 8, No 6 (2011) Vol 8, No 5 (2011) Vol 8, No 4 (2011) Vol 8, No 3 (2011) Vol 8, No 2 (2011) Vol 8, No 1 (2011) Vol 7, No 6 (2010) Vol 7, No 5 (2010) Vol 7, No 4 (2010) Vol 7, No 3 (2010) Vol 7, No 2 (2010) Vol 7, No 1 (2010) Vol 12, No 4 (2015) Vol 12, No 3 (2015) Vol 12, No 2 (2015) Vol 12, No 1 (2015) More Issue