Verstek
Jurnal Verstek is a peer-reviewed journal published by Procedural Law Department, Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret three times a year in April, August, and December. This Journal aims primarily to facilitate undergraduate students paper over current developments on procedural law issues in Indonesia as well as to publish innovative legal researches concerning Indonesian procedural laws and legal system. It provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to public support a greater global exchange of knowledge. The scope of the articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics in the fields of Procedural Law, included but not limited to legal construction of procedural law, critical construction of procedural law in practice, trends and changes in procedural law, and the technical challenges faced in proedural law.
Articles
14 Documents
Search results for
, issue
"Vol 1, No 1 (2013)"
:
14 Documents
clear
<![CDATA[Penerapan Syarat Formil Dan Materiil Dalam Sebuah Surat Dakwaan Yang Dinyatakan Obscuur Libel Serta Persesuaian Pertimbangan Hakim Mahkamah Agung Dalam Menerima Permohonan Kasasi Dalam Putusan MA Nomor ]]>
<![CDATA[Wijayanti, Retno Putri]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 1, No 1 (2013) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (189.865 KB)
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v1i1.38798
<![CDATA[    The objective of this research are to analyze and answer the problems about the application of formal and material requirements in indictment letter which is obscuur libel in corruption case by the Makasar high court in renovation of central Maros market by Hj. Nurwati and to asses consideration used by supreme court judge in accepting cassation petition proposed by public prosecutor.   The result of study shows that public prosecutor in proposing indictment letter correspond to formal and material requirement of indictment letter based on KUHP. Makasar high court in stating indictment letter which is obcuur and libel is not corresponding to 143 clause of KUHP. Cassation petition by public prosecutor to acquittal verdict from Makasar high court is accepted by Supreme Court. Consideration conformity done by Supreme Court corresponds to KUHAP. This conformity consists of Makasar high court verdict which is contradictive each other, because there is wrong law application by Makasar high court, there is verdict beyond the limits of authority judex factie, and there is not accuracy of high court in judging which is not done based on law. Therefore the consideration of Supreme Court judge in accepting acquittal verdict of Makasar high court can be justified because there is not accuracy of high court judge in deciding case.     Key words: obscuur libel indictment, cassation, corruption ]]>
<![CDATA[Konstruksi Pembuktian Hakim Terhadap Pembebasan Dakwaan Primair Dalam Perkara Perjudian ]]>
<![CDATA[Sari, Putri Mei Fitria]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 1, No 1 (2013) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (178.121 KB)
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v1i1.38792
<![CDATA[     The purpose of this law writing is to determine the judge legal considerations of construction evidence acquit the defendant of proving that the primary charges in gambling proceedings in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code.     This study included to the normative legal research. The approach used is case approach method. The types of data used are secondary data with library materials, which is include: books, literature, legislation, official documents, research results in the form of reports and other sources related to this research. Data obtained and analyzed with content analysis.       This research resulted that the judge consideration acquit the defendant of the primary charges in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code for verification has been done with the evidence in accordance with the provisions and consideration of the judge in accordance with the evidence and conditions.         The benefit derived from this study is to provide input to the judge in order to give consideration to decide a criminal case, the judge is expected to assess all of the things carefully and meticulously. Thus, it is needed the necessary evaluation and periodic training for judges to improve performance in order to enhance the professionalism of a judge in order to uphold justice and the rule of law.       Keywords: evidence, the charge, the judge]]>
<![CDATA[Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menggunakan Alat Bukti Pemeriksaan Di Tempat Dan Kekuatan Pembuktiannya Dalam Pemeriksaan Sengketa Waris Di Pengadilan Agama Karanganyar (Studi Putusan Nomor : 0516/Pdt.G/2011/PA.Kra) ]]>
<![CDATA[Putut Eko Cahyono]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 1, No 1 (2013) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (232.309 KB)
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v1i1.38795
<![CDATA[ The aims of this research is to know the judge consederation on verdict case number : 0516/Pdt.G/2011/PA.Kra at Karanganyar relegion court. This is an empirical law research which is descriptif research. The kind of data used are primary and secondary data. This research reveals that Knowing situation of the land is the aim of using of checked unmovable things (i.e land) and the witness as evidences. Key words : legacy case, the power of evidence, on location checked, judge consideration.]]>
<![CDATA[Studi Penanganan Korupsi Mengenai Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Bandara Namniwel Dalam Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Ambon ]]>
<![CDATA[Ika Puji Lestari]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 1, No 1 (2013) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (192.563 KB)
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v1i1.38789
<![CDATA[ This is a normative legal research. The approach uses qualitative approach method. Using secondary data from references including books, literature, laws and regulations, official documents, research results are intangible reports and other resources related to this research. The Data obtained analyzed with the content analysis (content analysis,) against the verdict of all the demands of the judges (Onslag Van Alle Rechts Vervolging) corruption in the procurement of land for the Airport Namniwel. Legal resources gathering techniques used in library studies and references and the internet. Research analysis used the deductive syllogism is a collection of research sources to interpret the related norms, then the research sources processed and analyzed to answer the problems examined. The last stage is to draw conclusions from the studies that were processed, so that in the end can be known why the judge threw the verdict out of all the demands of the judges (Onslag Van Alle Rechts Vervolging) corruption in the procurement of land for the Airport Namniwel. Based on the research conclusions may be drawn that in dropped verdict off against the defendant Arifin Soamole, according to judge the defendant has been proven lawfully according to law do the deed charged him as arraignment one and second of arraignment prosecutors general, but deeds the defendant was not constitute a criminal act, as in an indictment one and second and of efforts to legal be done by the prosecutors against the ruling off of them are appeal, kasasi, and review (PK) but under terms of article 244 KUHAP, accused or public prosecutor entitled to ask appeal against judgment of a court first rate against the award except free. Keywords: the argument law judge, an instrument of evidence, corruption.]]>
<![CDATA[Penerapan Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 1997 Tentang Pengadilan Anak Dalam Kasus Pencabulan Di Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Negeri Boyolali ]]>
<![CDATA[Azis Indro Suharto]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 1, No 1 (2013) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (200.532 KB)
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v1i1.38786
<![CDATA[ This research aims to find out the indecency committed by the minor case in Boyolali First Instance Court jurisdiction. The objective is to find out the constraints the judge faces as well as the attempt of coping with such the constraints. The child is not the same as adult so that in the procedural process should be observed that it is different from that for adult. There should be a special court with the rules different from that of general court.This study was an empirical research type that was normative descriptive in nature using a case study. The location of research the writer used was Boyolali First Instance Court. The type of data used included primary and secondary data. Techniques of collecting data used were observation, interview and library study on both book and legislation. Those primary and secondary data were then analyzed qualitatively so that an accurate description was achieved concerning the result of research. Based on the research, it could be found that in the process of resolving the indecency crime with minor perpetrator in Boyolali First Instance Court, the judge handling the case had referred to the Act No.3 of 1997 about the Child Court. Thus, in this enactment of act, a strong legal foundation is obtained to differentiate the treatment to the child involved in a crime. Such the treatment differentiation was began during the examination process from investigation level to sentencing process in the trial that was conducted specifically corresponding to what governed in Child Trial Act. Keywords: Procedural, child trial, indecency, child.]]>
<![CDATA[Kekuatan Pembuktian Keterangan Ahli Perfilman Dan Keberhasilan Penuntutan Perkara Pelanggaran Undang-Undang Pornografi ]]>
<![CDATA[Dharmawan, Arif]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 1, No 1 (2013) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (215.497 KB)
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v1i1.38799
<![CDATA[    The results showed that the strength of proof in the case of expert information, circulation of VCD / DVD Porn is free and is not binding on the judge. In the case of Trafficking Pornographic VCDS / DVDs, this turned out to be the judge in deciding the accused not merely of a description of the expert witnesses in the Censorship from the Film. This can be seen the presence of the influence of an instrument of evidence information expert against freedom judge in air-drop the dealy against the defendant that can be found in rather judge. The role of an expert who came from the institutions censorship films in the investigation at a judicial trial against cases pengedaran VCD / DVD, porn is giving a description which is that of other about the importance of wants to use, license if circulate, and sells an album whose recordings VCD which have issued or produced by businessman recording, with the aim of commercial evidence in the form of VCD was DVD not pass censorship and explain the differences VCD that pass censor by who did not pass a sensor. This is because the judge is not a person skilled in all things. Judge may meet problems that cannot be solved on the basis of the science which they shall inherit it.    Keywords : Expert Information, Of Verifiable, Pornography, Ruling The Judge ]]>
<![CDATA[Pengabaian Saksi Verbalism Oleh Judex Factie Sebagai Alasan Pengajuan Kasasi Terhadap Putusan Bebas Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2627 K/Pid.Sus/2010 ]]>
<![CDATA[Utami, Mutiara Resky]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 1, No 1 (2013) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (226.297 KB)
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v1i1.38793
<![CDATA[    This research aims are to find out whether the verbalism witness overlooking by judex factie in evidence examination as justification for the public prosecutor in filing appeal to the supreme court in verdict of freedom in drugs case has met the penal procedural law as well as to find out the construction of the Supreme Court’s Judge in assessing the reason of public prosecutor’s appeal to the Supreme Court. This is a normative legal research using primary and secondary law materials. Technique of collecting data used was library study to collect the material law by means of reading legislations, official documents and literatures relevant to the problem studied. Technique of analyzing data used was deductive logic technique.The result of research showed that firstly, the reason of appeal to Supreme Court the Public Prosecutor filed had not met the provision of Article 253 clause (1) of Code of Criminal Procedure because the reason used was that beyond the juridical provision, namely the result of authentication. Secondly, the legal construction of the Supreme Court’s judge in investigating the case was corresponding to the provision because the appeal to the Supreme Court was filed against the verdict of freedom.      Keywords: Verbalism Witness, Justification, Psychotropics.]]>
<![CDATA[Permohonan Praperadilan Oleh Lembaga Swadaya Masyarakat (LSM) Selaku Pihak Ketiga Terhadap Berlarut-Larutnya Penyidikan ]]>
<![CDATA[Bayu Prastowo]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 1, No 1 (2013) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (199.216 KB)
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v1i1.38787
<![CDATA[ Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dasar kedudukan hukum Lembaga Swadaya Masyarakat (LSM) selaku pihak ketiga dalam pengajuan praperadilan dan untuk mengetahui dasar permohonan praperadilan yang didasarkan pada berlarut-larutnya proses penyidikan pada kasus tindak pidana korupsi. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan maka diperoleh kesimpulan Lembaga Swadaya Masyarakat (LSM) selaku pihak ketiga dalam pengajuan praperadilan pada kasus tindak pidana korupsi mempunyai kedudukan hukum dalam mengajukan praperadilan dalam perkara korupsi. Penyidikan perkara korupsi yang berlarut-larut jika dilihat dari sudut pandang hukum positifis dan progresif terdapat perbedaan pandangan. Menurut sudut pandang positifis berlarut-larutnya penyidikan bukan merupakan suatu bentuk penghentian penyidikan karena menurut KUHAP syarat disebut sebagai suatu penghentian penyidikan harus ada Surat Perintah Penghentian Penyidikan (SP3), sedangkan menurut sudut pandang hukum progresif berlarut-larutnya penyidikan dapat dikategorikan penghentian penyidikan secara tidak sah. Penghentian penyidikan tidak harus diartikan dengan adanya Surat Perintah Penghentian Penyidikan (SP3) tetapi dengan adanya suatu penyidikan yang berlarut-larut maka dapat dikategorikan penghentian penyidikan semu. Kata Kunci : Praperadilan, Pihak Ketiga, Penyidikan]]>
<![CDATA[Konstruksi Hukum Pembuktian Penuntut Umum Terhadap Surat Dakwaan Yang Disusun Secara Alternatif Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Sukoharjo ]]>
<![CDATA[Dinar Mahardiyanti Dewi]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 1, No 1 (2013) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (187.942 KB)
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v1i1.38788
<![CDATA[ This study aims to determine the prosecutor's rationale in drafting legal construction with alternative indictment in the case of under age molestation and the effect of prosecutor evidence against the indictment which made alternatives in proving the defendant's offense.This is prescriptive normative research, discovered the law in abstracto and in concreto on the prosecutor's rationale in drafting legal construction and the effect of prosecutor evidence in proving the defendant's offense. The data used is secondary data. With the sources primary legal materials, legal materials, secondary and tertiary legal materials. This research reveals that, the prosecutor's rationale in drafting legal construction with alternative indictment are the prosecutors uncertainty about the qualifications or the appropriate article to be applied on offense which done by defendant and to minimize the chances of escape of the defendant from the charges. Second, effect of prosecutor evidence against the indictment which made alternatives in proving the defendant's offense are facilitate judges in determining the the defendant guilt and Proven first indictment in indictment. Keywords: Alternative indictment, prosecution, under Age molestation ]]>
<![CDATA[Saksi Unus Testis Nullus Testis Dalam Perkara Persetubuhan Dengan Anak Studi Putusan Pengadilan Nomor ]]>
<![CDATA[Pradina, Tiara Eka]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 1, No 1 (2013) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (241.364 KB)
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v1i1.38796
<![CDATA[     The aims of this law writing is to find out the use and the value of evidence of unus testis nullus testis witnesses in the process of proving criminal intercourse with under age children in district court of Boyolali. This law writing included the type of normative legal research, using primary and secondary data sources, primary legal materials in the form of District Court Judges Decision of Boyolali No.09/Pid.Sus/2012/Pn.Bi. In this case, the data source used the Criminal Procedure Code (Criminal Code), the Child Protection Act No.23 of 2002 year, as well as other library materials. Technique of collecting the data used is through the collection of secondary data, performed literature study to collect and collate data relating to the matter under investigation. The data have been obtained after passing the data processing mechanism then determined the type of analysis, so that the data collected is more accountable. The results obtained from this study are the use of unus testis nullus testis witnesses can be used if the minimum requirement of proof has been reached, the witness statements, expert statements / letters and added the defendant's testimony evidence. In addition to a witness who was standing alone does not provide the strength of evidence is legitimate, but if it no longer stands alone and can be linked with other evidence, it certainly has a legitimate and independent power, which can be disabled with the other evidence in the form of a decharge witness or the expert testimony or alibi.      Keywords: Evidence, Intercourse Crime, Unus Testis Nullus Testis ]]>
