cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Abdurrahman Alfaqiih
Contact Email
jipro.fhuii@gmail.com
Phone
+62274898444
Journal Mail Official
jipro.fhuii@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Kaliurang Km 14,5 Sleman DIY
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
JIPRO : Journal Of Intellectual Property
Published by Universitas Islam Indonesia
ISSN : -     EISSN : 26542889     DOI : https://doi.org/10.20885/jipro
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Bahwa Journal of Intellectual Property yang disingkat JIPRO dihadirkan dan dikembangkan dalam rangka menjawab kebutuhan terhadap upaya disimenasi dan promosi segala hal berkaitan dengan ekspresi ide, kreativitas atau kekayaan intelektual dalam rangka meningkatkan kesadaran dan pemanfaatan atas ekspresi ide, kreativitas atau kekayaan intelektual guna meningkatkan kesejahteraan masyarakat secara luas berdasarkan pendekatan lintas disipin ilmu dan multidisiplin. Fokus JIPRO dilakukan pada semua bidang keilmuan yang bersifat interdisipliner dan multidisipliner yang berkaitan dengan ekspresi ide dalam hal kreativitas, inovasi atau kekayaan intelektual yang dapat memberikan nilai pengetahuan dan pemanfaatan dari kreatiitas, inovasi atau kekayaan intelektual itu sendiri guna meningkatkan kesadaran masyarakat akan pentingnya suatu penghargaan atas kreativitas, inovasi atau kekayaan intelektual yang mampu mendorong peningkatan kesejahteraan masyarakat.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "JIPRO, Vol. 1. No.1, 2018" : 5 Documents clear
Legal Possibility to Regulate Defensive Mark as Well-Known Mark Protection in Indonesia Putra, Renggi Ardya
JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property JIPRO, Vol. 1. No.1, 2018
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/jipro.vol1.iss1.art1

Abstract

Tingkat pelanggaran terhadap merek terkena dan merek termasyhur di Indonesia masih terbilang tinggi yang mana tindakan tersebut dilakukan pihak yang tidak memiliki hak yang digunakan untuk menjalankan bisnis dengan cara persaingan usaha yang tidak sehat di Indonesia. Hal tersebut berdampak pada timbulnya kesesatan dan kebingungan (likelihood of confussion) di masyarakat. Perlindunagan merek terkenal/termasyhur diatur dalam hukum internasional dan hukum nasional. Dalam hukum internasional, diatur dalam Paris Convention on Industrial Property dan Trade Related Aspect of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs). Selain itu, Organisasi Kekayaan Intelektual Dunia (WIPO) mengeluarkan Rekomendasi WIPO tentang Ketentuan tentang Perlindungan Merek terkenal. WIPO Recommendation on Provision on Protection of well-known Mark. Selain itu, Negara-negara memiliki independensi untuk memberlakukan ketentuan tentang perlindungan merek terkenal dengan undang-undang nasional. Salah satu jenis perlindungan adalah dengan mendaftarkan tanda ke pendaftaran merek defensive (Defensive Mark). Merek Defensif merupakan perlindungan yang tidak umum di dunia. Indonesia secara tidak langsung melindungi merek defensif. Faktor yang menghambat pemberlakuan merek defensif di Indonesia adalah ketidaksiapan merek local. Di sisi lain, pemberlakuan merek defensive di Indonesia akan meningkatkan kriminalisasi dan gugatan perdata terhadap merek lokal, karena perlindungan hukum terhadap pihak asing yang memperoleh merek terkenal atau merek terkenal dapat mengajukan gugatan dan penuntutan terhadap merek lokal yang tidak memiliki perlindungan merek dagang. Sehingga dapat menghambat pertumbuhan ekonomi di Indonesia, Hal itu membuat tanda defensif tidak mungkin diatur di Indonesia. Selain itu, kesadaran untuk mendaftarkan merek dagang di Indonesia masih rendah. Hal itu tercermin dengan pendaftaran merek dagang di Indonesia yang masih rendah jumlahnya.
Perlindungan Hukum Preventif Terhadap Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta Asri, Dyah Permata Budi
JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property JIPRO, Vol. 1. No.1, 2018
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/jipro.vol1.iss1.art2

Abstract

This research aims to get an overview of the legal protection of traditional cultural expressions in the Yogyakarta that will maintain several cultures from ownership claims by other parties or other nations. For this reason, efforts are needed so that the culture can be preserved from destruction and loss of culture due to claims of ownership by other parties. This research is a normative juridical research that takes data in the field as primary material. The result of this study is to protect against traditional cultural expressions which are communal, which is very different from the general intellectual property regime such as song copyrights, marks, patents which are very individualistic. The regulation regarding its proper protection component is carried out by using preventive protection as practiced by the Department of Culture of the Yogyakarta Province and the Culture and Tourism Office of Sleman Regency, namely by conducting cultural inventory and documentation, as mandated in Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright especially Article 38. Recording of non-material cultural heritage is considered important because some elements of cultural heritage do not begin to be threatened with extinction or potentially claimed ownership by other countries. Until 2016, 444 intangible cultural works were registered as Indonesian Intangible Cultural Heritage managed by the Directorate General of Culture, Ministry of Education and Culture. While the Yogyakarta Department of Culture has attempted to carry out an inventory of several cultures in Yogyakarta. There are 22 (twenty-two) cultural works recorded in Yogyakarta that have been designated as intangible cultural heritage of Indonesia.
Karakter Fiksi ‘Si Unyil’ Sebagai Objek Perlindungan Hak Cipta di Indonesia Medinah, Andi Sabriani
JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property JIPRO, Vol. 1. No.1, 2018
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/jipro.vol1.iss1.art3

Abstract

Fiction character is the depiction of the character of a story character who is turned on and controlled by the author himself. Fiction characters themselves are basically a form of ideas expressed either by writing or drawing. However, the idea must be realized in real form to obtain copyright protection. The basic concept of the Copyright law is that copyright only protects creation that can be read, heard, or seen by others. Reviewed Law No.28 of 2014 about copyright law, the regulation regarding the protection of fictional characters has not been independently regulated, that is, a fictional character has its own copyright without having to be in a copyrighted work. Based on the elements of a work considered as a creation in Article 1 numbers 2 and 3 of copyright law, fictional characters can be used as objects of copyright protection. Based on copyright law, legal protection for character creation can be done through recording, agreements, licenses, alternative dispute resolution, arbitration, or through litigation.
Keabsahan Kepemilikan Hak Cipta Koreografi di Lingkungan Dosen Institut Seni Indonesia Yogyakarta Khotimah, Viviyani
JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property JIPRO, Vol. 1. No.1, 2018
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/jipro.vol1.iss1.art4

Abstract

Ownership of choreographic copyright has been regulated in Article 40 of Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright. The effect of ownership of this Copyright is the same as the ownership of other works, which is the same as having exclusive rights in the form of moral rights and economic rights. Dance Department Lecturer at the Yogyakarta Indonesian Institute of Arts is an active party in the creation of choreography, but the ownership of the copyright is specifically regulated in Article 35 because of its status as a Civil Servant, where the creation of choreography done in official relations is considered as the creator is Government Institution except before there is an agreement related to copyright ownership. This provision has created its own problems in practice. This is what happened to the Dance Department Lecturer at the Indonesian Art Institute in Yogyakarta, because the choreography works created by the Lecturers was recognized as their copyright. In this context, it has the potential to cause copyright infringement as stipulated in Article 35 of Law No. 28 of 2014 about Copyright
Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Merek Terkenal di Indonesia (Studi Kasus Merek Pierre Cardin Perancis Vs Peirre Cardin Jakarta: Putusan Nomor 557 K/PDT.Sus-HKI/2015) Haryanto, Yulinda Ika Saputra
JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property JIPRO, Vol. 1. No.1, 2018
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/jipro.vol1.iss1.art5

Abstract

The purposes in this study are to analyze the Supreme Court decision on the cancellation of the trademark PIERRE CARDIN has been appropriate or not by trademark legislation in Indonesia, to assess the legal consequences of the cancellation of PIERRE CARDIN, and to assess potential remedies conducted by Pierre Cardin. This study is a normative empirical legal study. Secondary data consists of primary legal materials in the form of Act No. 15 of 2001 on Trademarks, Law No. 20 Year 2016 regarding Trademarks and IG and the Supreme Court decision No. 557 K / Pdt.Sus-IPR / 2015, while the secondary legal materials in the form of books and scientific journals. While the primary data is conducted by field research. The Supreme Court decision is deciding cases cancellation of the famous mark of PIERRE CARDIN not in accordance with regulations in Indonesia and the norm of international treaties regulating the Famous Mark. Judges tend to be rigid and not digging deeply law. Moreover, Directorate Mark as the parties who participated in trademark infringement less careful in carrying out checks on mere registration, resulting in double registration of the same brand but different owners. Because of law accepted by the brand which canceled its mark is barred from the General Register of Trademarks. The termination of legal protection of the mark is registered. Legal remedies that can be done by Pierre Cardin as the owner of famous brands are apply for Judicial Review, file a new lawsuit, and conduct License Agreement.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2018 2018


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue JIPRO, Vol. 8, No.2, 2025 JIPRO, Vol. 8, No.1, 2025 JIPRO, Vol. 7, No.2, 2024 JIPRO, Vol. 7, No.1, 2024 JIPRO, Vol. 6, No.2, 2023 JIPRO, Vol. 6, No.1, 2023 JIPRO, Vol. 5, No.2, 2022 JIPRO, Vol. 5, No.1, 2022 JIPRO, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2021 JIPRO, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2021 JIPRO , Vol. 3. No. 2, 2020 JIPRO , Vol. 3. No. 1, 2020 JIPRO, Vol. 2. No. 2, 2019 JIPRO, Vol. 2. No. 1, 2019 JIPRO, Vol. 1. No.1, 2018 More Issue