JIPRO : Journal Of Intellectual Property
Bahwa Journal of Intellectual Property yang disingkat JIPRO dihadirkan dan dikembangkan dalam rangka menjawab kebutuhan terhadap upaya disimenasi dan promosi segala hal berkaitan dengan ekspresi ide, kreativitas atau kekayaan intelektual dalam rangka meningkatkan kesadaran dan pemanfaatan atas ekspresi ide, kreativitas atau kekayaan intelektual guna meningkatkan kesejahteraan masyarakat secara luas berdasarkan pendekatan lintas disipin ilmu dan multidisiplin. Fokus JIPRO dilakukan pada semua bidang keilmuan yang bersifat interdisipliner dan multidisipliner yang berkaitan dengan ekspresi ide dalam hal kreativitas, inovasi atau kekayaan intelektual yang dapat memberikan nilai pengetahuan dan pemanfaatan dari kreatiitas, inovasi atau kekayaan intelektual itu sendiri guna meningkatkan kesadaran masyarakat akan pentingnya suatu penghargaan atas kreativitas, inovasi atau kekayaan intelektual yang mampu mendorong peningkatan kesejahteraan masyarakat.
Articles
69 Documents
<![CDATA[Legal Possibility to Regulate Defensive Mark as Well-Known Mark Protection in Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Putra, Renggi Ardya]]>
<![CDATA[ JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property JIPRO, Vol. 1. No.1, 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20885/jipro.vol1.iss1.art1
<![CDATA[Tingkat pelanggaran terhadap merek terkena dan merek termasyhur di Indonesia masih terbilang tinggi yang mana tindakan tersebut dilakukan pihak yang tidak memiliki hak yang digunakan untuk menjalankan bisnis dengan cara persaingan usaha yang tidak sehat di Indonesia. Hal tersebut berdampak pada timbulnya kesesatan dan kebingungan (likelihood of confussion) di masyarakat. Perlindunagan merek terkenal/termasyhur diatur dalam hukum internasional dan hukum nasional. Dalam hukum internasional, diatur dalam Paris Convention on Industrial Property dan Trade Related Aspect of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs). Selain itu, Organisasi Kekayaan Intelektual Dunia (WIPO) mengeluarkan Rekomendasi WIPO tentang Ketentuan tentang Perlindungan Merek terkenal. WIPO Recommendation on Provision on Protection of well-known Mark. Selain itu, Negara-negara memiliki independensi untuk memberlakukan ketentuan tentang perlindungan merek terkenal dengan undang-undang nasional. Salah satu jenis perlindungan adalah dengan mendaftarkan tanda ke pendaftaran merek defensive (Defensive Mark). Merek Defensif merupakan perlindungan yang tidak umum di dunia. Indonesia secara tidak langsung melindungi merek defensif. Faktor yang menghambat pemberlakuan merek defensif di Indonesia adalah ketidaksiapan merek local. Di sisi lain, pemberlakuan merek defensive di Indonesia akan meningkatkan kriminalisasi dan gugatan perdata terhadap merek lokal, karena perlindungan hukum terhadap pihak asing yang memperoleh merek terkenal atau merek terkenal dapat mengajukan gugatan dan penuntutan terhadap merek lokal yang tidak memiliki perlindungan merek dagang. Sehingga dapat menghambat pertumbuhan ekonomi di Indonesia, Hal itu membuat tanda defensif tidak mungkin diatur di Indonesia. Selain itu, kesadaran untuk mendaftarkan merek dagang di Indonesia masih rendah. Hal itu tercermin dengan pendaftaran merek dagang di Indonesia yang masih rendah jumlahnya.]]>
<![CDATA[Perlindungan Hukum Preventif Terhadap Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta ]]>
<![CDATA[Asri, Dyah Permata Budi]]>
<![CDATA[ JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property JIPRO, Vol. 1. No.1, 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20885/jipro.vol1.iss1.art2
<![CDATA[This research aims to get an overview of the legal protection of traditional cultural expressions in the Yogyakarta that will maintain several cultures from ownership claims by other parties or other nations. For this reason, efforts are needed so that the culture can be preserved from destruction and loss of culture due to claims of ownership by other parties. This research is a normative juridical research that takes data in the field as primary material. The result of this study is to protect against traditional cultural expressions which are communal, which is very different from the general intellectual property regime such as song copyrights, marks, patents which are very individualistic. The regulation regarding its proper protection component is carried out by using preventive protection as practiced by the Department of Culture of the Yogyakarta Province and the Culture and Tourism Office of Sleman Regency, namely by conducting cultural inventory and documentation, as mandated in Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright especially Article 38. Recording of non-material cultural heritage is considered important because some elements of cultural heritage do not begin to be threatened with extinction or potentially claimed ownership by other countries. Until 2016, 444 intangible cultural works were registered as Indonesian Intangible Cultural Heritage managed by the Directorate General of Culture, Ministry of Education and Culture. While the Yogyakarta Department of Culture has attempted to carry out an inventory of several cultures in Yogyakarta. There are 22 (twenty-two) cultural works recorded in Yogyakarta that have been designated as intangible cultural heritage of Indonesia.]]>
<![CDATA[Karakter Fiksi ‘Si Unyil’ Sebagai Objek Perlindungan Hak Cipta di Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Medinah, Andi Sabriani]]>
<![CDATA[ JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property JIPRO, Vol. 1. No.1, 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20885/jipro.vol1.iss1.art3
<![CDATA[Fiction character is the depiction of the character of a story character who is turned on and controlled by the author himself. Fiction characters themselves are basically a form of ideas expressed either by writing or drawing. However, the idea must be realized in real form to obtain copyright protection. The basic concept of the Copyright law is that copyright only protects creation that can be read, heard, or seen by others. Reviewed Law No.28 of 2014 about copyright law, the regulation regarding the protection of fictional characters has not been independently regulated, that is, a fictional character has its own copyright without having to be in a copyrighted work. Based on the elements of a work considered as a creation in Article 1 numbers 2 and 3 of copyright law, fictional characters can be used as objects of copyright protection. Based on copyright law, legal protection for character creation can be done through recording, agreements, licenses, alternative dispute resolution, arbitration, or through litigation.]]>
<![CDATA[Keabsahan Kepemilikan Hak Cipta Koreografi di Lingkungan Dosen Institut Seni Indonesia Yogyakarta ]]>
<![CDATA[Khotimah, Viviyani]]>
<![CDATA[ JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property JIPRO, Vol. 1. No.1, 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20885/jipro.vol1.iss1.art4
<![CDATA[Ownership of choreographic copyright has been regulated in Article 40 of Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright. The effect of ownership of this Copyright is the same as the ownership of other works, which is the same as having exclusive rights in the form of moral rights and economic rights. Dance Department Lecturer at the Yogyakarta Indonesian Institute of Arts is an active party in the creation of choreography, but the ownership of the copyright is specifically regulated in Article 35 because of its status as a Civil Servant, where the creation of choreography done in official relations is considered as the creator is Government Institution except before there is an agreement related to copyright ownership. This provision has created its own problems in practice. This is what happened to the Dance Department Lecturer at the Indonesian Art Institute in Yogyakarta, because the choreography works created by the Lecturers was recognized as their copyright. In this context, it has the potential to cause copyright infringement as stipulated in Article 35 of Law No. 28 of 2014 about Copyright]]>
<![CDATA[Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Merek Terkenal di Indonesia (Studi Kasus Merek Pierre Cardin Perancis Vs Peirre Cardin Jakarta: Putusan Nomor 557 K/PDT.Sus-HKI/2015) ]]>
<![CDATA[Haryanto, Yulinda Ika Saputra]]>
<![CDATA[ JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property JIPRO, Vol. 1. No.1, 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20885/jipro.vol1.iss1.art5
<![CDATA[The purposes in this study are to analyze the Supreme Court decision on the cancellation of the trademark PIERRE CARDIN has been appropriate or not by trademark legislation in Indonesia, to assess the legal consequences of the cancellation of PIERRE CARDIN, and to assess potential remedies conducted by Pierre Cardin. This study is a normative empirical legal study. Secondary data consists of primary legal materials in the form of Act No. 15 of 2001 on Trademarks, Law No. 20 Year 2016 regarding Trademarks and IG and the Supreme Court decision No. 557 K / Pdt.Sus-IPR / 2015, while the secondary legal materials in the form of books and scientific journals. While the primary data is conducted by field research. The Supreme Court decision is deciding cases cancellation of the famous mark of PIERRE CARDIN not in accordance with regulations in Indonesia and the norm of international treaties regulating the Famous Mark. Judges tend to be rigid and not digging deeply law. Moreover, Directorate Mark as the parties who participated in trademark infringement less careful in carrying out checks on mere registration, resulting in double registration of the same brand but different owners. Because of law accepted by the brand which canceled its mark is barred from the General Register of Trademarks. The termination of legal protection of the mark is registered. Legal remedies that can be done by Pierre Cardin as the owner of famous brands are apply for Judicial Review, file a new lawsuit, and conduct License Agreement.]]>
<![CDATA[Huququ al-Malakiyah al-Fikriyah fi al-Islam ]]>
<![CDATA[Ahmad Sadzali]]>
<![CDATA[ JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property JIPRO, Vol. 2. No. 1, 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20885/jipro.vol2.iss1.art1
<![CDATA[Akal merupakan salah satu anugerah terpenting bagi manusia yang diberikan oleh Allah. Perkembangan akal manusia telah menghantarkan kemajuan ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi yang sangat signifikan. Akhirnya, produk akal menjadi sesuatu yang bernilai tinggi, bahkan memiliki nilai ekonomis. Maka inilah yang kemudia dikenal dengan kekayaan intelektual. Karena nilainya itulah maka kekayaan intelektual membutuhkan suatu perlindungan agar tidak disalahgunakan. Dewasa ini, studi tentang hak kekayaan intelektual menunjukkan geliat yang cukup baik. Tulisan ini mencoba untuk memperkaya perspektif bagi studi-studi tentang hak kekayaan intelektual, dengan meneliti pandangan Islam terhadap hak kekayaan intelektual. Sebab selama ini studi tentang hak kekayaan intelektual sebagian besar masih didominasi oleh perspektif Barat. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa konsep hak kekayaan intelektual mengandung konsep hak, konsep kepemilikan, konsep pemikiran, serta konsep harta di dalam Islam. Dengan mengkaji konsep-konsep ini, maka terlihat jelas bahwa hak kekayaan intelektual mendapat pengakuan di dalam syariat Islam. Mayoritas ulama berpendapat bahwa kekayaan intelektual dapat dikategorikan sebagai harta atau yang memiliki nilai ekonomis. Dengan begitu, kekayaan intelektual juga termasuk dalam kategori sesuatu yang dapat dimiliki, sehingga membutuhkan perlindungan atas hak-hak kepemilikan. Namun meski demikian, syariat Islam juga menganjurkan agar kekayaan intelektual tersebut tidak selalu dinilai dari aspek materi saja, melainkan juga dari aspek immateri seperti keberkahan, sehingga dapat mendatangkan manfaat yang luas bagi kemaslahatan manusia.]]>
<![CDATA[Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Terhadap Perbatikan (Tinjauan Terhadap Batik Yogyakarta Dan Solo) ]]>
<![CDATA[Euis Sunaryo]]>
<![CDATA[ JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property JIPRO, Vol. 2. No. 1, 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20885/10.20885/jipro.vol2.iss1.art2
<![CDATA[One of the traditional knowledges in the arts and culture that is protected by Indonesia is Batik. Traditional batik with its classic motifs has been worked on for generations and is included in Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions. Not all batik is registered for copyright because batik that needs copyright protection under Article 11 paragraph (1) letter f of the 1987 Copyright Act is a new art of batik. The problem that arises is how the legal protection of Yogyakarta Batik and Solo Batik is applied as Traditional Knowledge and Intellectual Property Rights (IPR). The purpose of this research is to know and understand the legal protection that can be obtained by Batik Yogyakarta and Batik Solo as the application of Traditional Knowledge and Intellectual Property Rights (IPR). The main theory used in this thesis research is John Locke's theory of Natural Law which states that the concept of property has something to do with human rights with its statement 'life, liberty, property'. The research method used is empirical normative research with qualitative research carried out in the field (field research) and take a research method with a non-judicial case study approach. The conclusion of the research is legal protection for Batik Yogyakarta and Solo as Traditional Knowledge carried out by the State by inventorying traditional batik motifs and maintaining Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions.The legal protection of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) that can be applied to Yogyakarta and Solo Batik is through the Copyright, Trademark, Patent and Trade Secret regimes.]]>
<![CDATA[Kriteria Pembatasan Hak Cipta Lagu Dalam Praktik Covering Melalui Youtube ]]>
<![CDATA[Faghlaifi Naim]]>
<![CDATA[ JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property JIPRO, Vol. 2. No. 1, 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20885/jipro.vol2.iss1.art3
<![CDATA[This study aims to find out the Criteria for Song Copyright Restriction in Covering Practices through Youtube. The formulation of the problem proposed is namely : What is The Criteria for Song Copyright Restriction in Covering Practices through Youtube. This study included a normative research typology. This normative legal research is doctrinal legal research. also referred to as library research or document study. It is called doctrinal law research because this research is carried out or aimed only at written regulations or other legal materials. It is called doctrinal law research because this research is carried out or aimed only at written regulations or other legal materials. Primary legal material is material that has juridical binding powers, such as legislation, court decisions, and agreements. Secondary legal materials are materials that do not have juridical binding powers, such as: draft legislation, literatures, and journals. Tertiary legal materials are complementary to primary data and secondary data, such as dictionaries and encyclopedias. Analysis is carried out with approaches including: legislation, conceptual, historical, comparative, and philosophical. The results of this study indicate that there are criteria for copyright restrictions in the internal YouTube regulations that must be considered to practice music covering.]]>
<![CDATA[Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Cipta Batik Motif Ceplok Segoro Amarto Di Kota Yogyakarta ]]>
<![CDATA[Dyah Ayu Widyastutiningrum]]>
<![CDATA[ JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property JIPRO, Vol. 2. No. 1, 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20885/jipro.vol2.iss1.art4
<![CDATA[Ceplok Segoro Amarto motive batik is a batik with contemporary motives that are protected by copyright obtained automatically or by means of a mechanism for recording copyright. Dekranasda of Yogyakarta City as the copyright holder has moral and economic rights to duplicate and distribute Ceplok Segoro Amarto motive batik as stated in Article 9 of the Copyright Law. Even though it has been protected by copyright, in fact there is still a copyright infringement of Ceplok Segoro Amarto motive batik which is done by piracy by other parties without the permission of the copyright holder in an unlawful manner. This study aims to determine the legal protection of the copyright of the Segoro Amarto Ceplok motive batik as stipulated in Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2018 about Copyright. The formulation of the problem posed is: What is the legal protection of the copyright of Ceplok Segoro Amarto Batik motive in the city of Yogyakarta? The results of this study indicate that the Ceplok Segoro Amarto motive batik has been protected by copyright, both obtained automatically because it has been manifested in a tangible form and the motive itself has been recorded in the Ministry of Law and Human Rights. The occurrence of copyright infringement can be submitted to the settlement efforts by resolving through alternative dispute resolution, submitting a claim for compensation to the Commercial Court or filing a criminal claim. This study recommends the need for the Dekranasda of Yogyakarta City and Yogyakarta City Government to make an announcement to the general public that the Ceplok Segoro Amarto batik motif is one of the typical batik of Yogyakarta City and is protected by copyright under Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2018 about Copyright.]]>
<![CDATA[The Comparative Studies Of Compulsory License Regulation For Pharmaceutical Product Between Indonesia And India ]]>
<![CDATA[Tasa Gina Santoso]]>
<![CDATA[ JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property JIPRO, Vol. 2. No. 1, 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20885/jipro.vol2.iss1.art5
<![CDATA[Paten merupakan salah satu perlindungan yang diberikan oleh pemerintah kepada pemegang paten atas penemuannya. Perlindungan yang diberikan oleh negara adalah hak eksklusif yang berdampak terhadaphak monopoli dari pemegang paten. Hal tersebut membuat beberapa negara seperti Indonesia dan India yang merupakan negara anggota WTO dan juga negara berkembang menggunakan fleksibilitas paten. Salah satu pengunaan fleksibilitas paten adalah lisensi wajib. Lisensi wajib adalah jenis lisensi untuk menggunakan penemuan tanpa persetujuan pemegang paten yang diberikan dengan prosedur tertentu. Namun, ada pengecualian untuk memberikan lisensi wajib secara langsung seperti untuk produk farmasi karena terkait dengan kepentingan umum. Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini difokuskan pada (1) persamaan dan perbedaan antara peraturan Indonesia dan India mengenai lisensi wajib produk farmasi terutama dalam hal obat-obatan HIV / AIDS; dan (2) implikasi hukum dari regulasi mengenai lisensi wajib di Indonesia dan India terutama dalam hal pengobatan HIV / AIDS. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ada kesamaan antara Indonesia dan India sebagai anggota WTO mewajibkan untuk menerapkan lisensi wajib berdasarkan Perjanjian TRIPs yang mempengaruhi prinsip umum yang sama. Namun, masih terdapat perbedaan diantara para anggota terutama Indonesia dan India. Perbedaannya terkait dengan subjek yang memberikan lisensi wajib. Lisensi wajib untuk produk farmasidalam prakteknya di Indonesia belum diterapkan. Selanjutnya, peraturan tentang lisensi wajib untuk produk farmasi dalam perlindungan paten memberikan implikasi hukum bagi Indonesia dan India. Implikasi hukum terkait dengan kepastian hukum untuk lisensi wajib di Indonesia dan India, perlindungan bagi pihak-pihak yang terlibat dalam lisensi wajib, bentuk pemanfaatan lisensi wajib di Indonesia dan India.]]>
