cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Abdurrahman Alfaqiih
Contact Email
jipro.fhuii@gmail.com
Phone
+62274898444
Journal Mail Official
jipro.fhuii@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Kaliurang Km 14,5 Sleman DIY
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
JIPRO : Journal Of Intellectual Property
Published by Universitas Islam Indonesia
ISSN : -     EISSN : 26542889     DOI : https://doi.org/10.20885/jipro
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Bahwa Journal of Intellectual Property yang disingkat JIPRO dihadirkan dan dikembangkan dalam rangka menjawab kebutuhan terhadap upaya disimenasi dan promosi segala hal berkaitan dengan ekspresi ide, kreativitas atau kekayaan intelektual dalam rangka meningkatkan kesadaran dan pemanfaatan atas ekspresi ide, kreativitas atau kekayaan intelektual guna meningkatkan kesejahteraan masyarakat secara luas berdasarkan pendekatan lintas disipin ilmu dan multidisiplin. Fokus JIPRO dilakukan pada semua bidang keilmuan yang bersifat interdisipliner dan multidisipliner yang berkaitan dengan ekspresi ide dalam hal kreativitas, inovasi atau kekayaan intelektual yang dapat memberikan nilai pengetahuan dan pemanfaatan dari kreatiitas, inovasi atau kekayaan intelektual itu sendiri guna meningkatkan kesadaran masyarakat akan pentingnya suatu penghargaan atas kreativitas, inovasi atau kekayaan intelektual yang mampu mendorong peningkatan kesejahteraan masyarakat.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "JIPRO, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2021" : 5 Documents clear
Perlindungan Hak Cipta Terhadap Pencipta Lagu Dalam Penggunaan Video Parody Di Youtube Miranda, Chaileisya
JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property JIPRO, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/jipro.vol4.iss1.art4

Abstract

An interesting issue is how the Song Parody and Copyright in Settings in Indonesia. and the next issue is the Copyright Protection of the Inner Song Creator Use of Video Parody on YouTube. This study uses the approach: statute approach, and conceptual approach. Techniques for tracing legal materials using techniques document study (library research), and analysis of the study using qualitative analysis. Results research shows that Copyright Protection Against Songwriters In The use of parody videos on YouTube is based on UUHC, both creators and actors the show can file legal remedies by way of termination and in a civil manner. On termination, the Creator and Performer of the Original Song will report to the minister for parody songs on YouTube that violate copyright so that they cannot be accessed by the public based on article 55 UUHC with. Civilly both the Creator and Performer the original song can file a claim for compensation to the Commercial Court based on article 99 UUHC which must be preceded by peace efforts. Criminally only songwriters only original persons can file criminal charges based on article 113 paragraph 2 UUHC, Meanwhile, performers cannot file criminal charges based on UUHC, except for Article 315 of the Criminal Code if you think it's a parody of a song uploaded on YouTube This caused him to be defamed.
Hak Cipta Sebagai Jaminan Fidusia Puspitasari, Rina
JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property JIPRO, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/jipro.vol4.iss1.art1

Abstract

This research was conducted to assess the implementation of Article 16 paragraph (3) of Law Number 28 Year 2014 states that copyright can be used as an object of fiduciary guarantee. The the problem statement are: first, could a copyright can be categorized as an asset for the Authors and/or Copyright Holder in accordance with Article 16 paragraph (3) of Law No. 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright? Second, could copyright be determined as an asset for Authors and/or copyright holders which could be guaranteed as fiduciary rights? Third, how is the authority of a Notary in implementing Copyright as a Fiduciary Guarantee? The results of the research show that a copyright guaranteed by fiduciary can be executed for the execution of Article 29 of Law Number 42 of 1999 about Fiduciary the reason is the economic right of the copyright could be secured (it is an intangible object). Besides, related to the Notary, the authority of the Notary to make burden of fiduciary deed has already been mentioned on the Article 5 Section (1) about Fiduciary, thus there is no reason for the Notary to reject for creating deed of fiduciary with copyright as the object.
Analisis Persamaan Merek Terkenal Tidak Sejenis Ditinjau Dari Hukum Merek : (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 29 PK/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2016) Rohman, Arif
JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property JIPRO, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/jipro.vol4.iss1.art3

Abstract

The granting of a brand to a product of goods or services can also prevent unfair business competition, with the brand of a product or service being able to distinguish its origin, quality and guarantee that the product is original. A high-priced product is usually not because of the product itself, but the influence of the brand. In the case obtained by the author, the panel of judges is of the opinion that the lawsuit for the cancellation of the mark is not accepted because the goods in dispute are not of the same type. The Supreme Court argues that until now there has been no Government Regulation as a follow-up to Article 6 paragraph 2 of Law Number 15 of 2001 concerning Marks. Based on the plenary meeting of the civil chamber as outlined in the Circular Letter of the Supreme Court Number 03/BUA.6/HS/SP/XII/2015, it has been agreed that the lawsuit for the cancellation of a mark which has essentially different similarities, the lawsuit must be declared not accepted and the verdict -the previous Supreme Court decision regarding the same mark for goods of a different kind is no longer guided by the guidelines; is a cumulative-critical legal case study that is based on a collection of information, the existence of cause and effect to then draw conclusions; Based on the description of the legal analysis above, the authors draw two conclusions, namely: 1. The decision of the Panel of Judges is not quite right. 2. The legal consequences of the Supreme Court's Decision Number 29 PK/Pdt.SusHKI/2016 which was decided with a verdict that cannot be accepted in the last legal effort of the PK, has permanent legal force.
Perlindungan Hukum dan Implementasi Doktrin Fair Use Terhadap Costume Play (Cosplay) dalam Hak Cipta dan Desain Industri Ramadhan, Galih Dwi
JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property JIPRO, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/jipro.vol4.iss1.art2

Abstract

Cosplay 'Costume & Play' is a term that describes a pop-culture phenomenon about a person's creativity by creating and using a costume and its accessories to play a role based on references to fictional characters from comic books, animated films, and video games. Costumes and accessories used for cosplay are the work of human intellectuals which should be protected by intellectual property rights because in practice many parties get financial benefits from cosplay activities. There is no explicit regulation on the protection of intellectual works, especially Copyright and Industrial Design Rights for cosplay costumes and accessories. A normative juridical study is needed in understanding the legal provisions on cosplay using the Copyright Law and the Industrial Design Law.
Studi Putusan Pengadilan dalam Kasus Wahl Clipper Corporation Melawan Distributor Merek Wahl di Indonesia Julian P., Maeswadhita
JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property JIPRO, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/jipro.vol4.iss1.art5

Abstract

At the Central Jakarta District Court No. 57/Pdt.Sus- Merek/2015/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst. on December 17, 2015 which essentially rejected the Wahl Clipper Corporation lawsuit. The decision was strengthened by the result of cassation No. 444 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2016 on July 26, 2016 which essentially rejected the appeal filed by the Cassation Petitioner, namely Wahl Clipper Corporation itself. The case is still ongoing until the Review of Decision Number 1 PK/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2018 on January 16, 2018, the party who feels aggrieved, namely Wahl Clipper Corporation has new evidence that can strengthen the evidence that the Petitioner is really harmed by the Respondent ; The author wants to examine the problems in this Legal Case Study, namely: 1. Is the analysis of judges' considerations regarding well-known brands in Indonesia in the Wahl Clipper Corporation case correct based on Law No. 15 of 2001 concerning Marks and Law No. 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications? 2. What are the legal consequences of the court's decision on the famous trademark lawsuit Number 444 K/Pdt.Sus- HKI/2016 in Indonesia?; After discussing and analyzing the trademark cancellation lawsuit between Wahl Clipper Corporation and Harry Sudjono, it can be concluded as follows: 1. The Supreme Court's decision Number 444K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2016 regarding the Wahl Clipper Corporation's lawsuit against Harry Sudjono is inaccurate. 2. The decision of the Supreme Court Number 444K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2016 which was ruled by the decision to be rejected, has no legal consequences. Because the judge rejected the Cassation application for the cancellation of the Mark.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2021 2021


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue JIPRO, Vol. 8, No.2, 2025 JIPRO, Vol. 8, No.1, 2025 JIPRO, Vol. 7, No.2, 2024 JIPRO, Vol. 7, No.1, 2024 JIPRO, Vol. 6, No.2, 2023 JIPRO, Vol. 6, No.1, 2023 JIPRO, Vol. 5, No.2, 2022 JIPRO, Vol. 5, No.1, 2022 JIPRO, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2021 JIPRO, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2021 JIPRO , Vol. 3. No. 2, 2020 JIPRO , Vol. 3. No. 1, 2020 JIPRO, Vol. 2. No. 2, 2019 JIPRO, Vol. 2. No. 1, 2019 JIPRO, Vol. 1. No.1, 2018 More Issue