cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Muhammad Fuad Zain
Contact Email
fuad.zain@uinsaizu.ac.id
Phone
+6285731141751
Journal Mail Official
fuad.zain@uinsaizu.ac.id
Editorial Address
Fakultas Syariah UIN Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto Jl. Jend. A. Yani No. 40A Purwokerto 53126 Jawa Tengah - Indonesia
Location
Kab. banyumas,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Al-Manahij : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto
ISSN : 19786670     EISSN : 25794167     DOI : https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
AL-MANAHIJ is a scholarly journal of Islamic law studies. It is a forum for debate for scholars and professionals concerned with Islamic Laws and legal cultures of Muslim Worlds. It aims for recognition as a leading medium for a scholarly and professional discourse of Islamic laws. Al-Manahij covers textual and fieldwork studies of Islamic laws with various perspectives. The journal is published twice a year (every June and December), and each publication contains ten articles in the field of Islamic law, therefore in a year, the journal publishes twenty articles. The journal presents qualified scholarly articles, which always place Islamic law in the central focus of academic inquiry. This journal is a forum for debate for scholars and professionals concerned with Islamic law and Islamic legal cultures within local and challenging global contexts. The journal invites any comprehensive observation of Islamic law as a system of norms in Muslim society. The journal has become a medium of diffusion and exchange of ideas and research findings, so much so that researchers, writers, and readers have interacted in a scholarly manner.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 392 Documents
 36   37   38   39   40 
Reconstructing Mālikī Legal Thought Integration of Uṣul and Furu'  in al-Fakihani's Riyāḍ al-Afhām Ibrahim Sizgen; Memet Zeki Uyanık
Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Vol. 20 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24090/v20i2.16358

Abstract

Al-Fākihānī, a 14th-century Mālikī scholar from Alexandria, holds a significant place in the history of Islamic jurisprudence for his work, Riyāḍ al-Afhām fī Sharḥ ʿUmdat al-Aḥkām. This work not only represents a commentary on legal hadiths but also showcases the architecture of Mālikī legal reasoning, which interconnects textual authority, the theory of uṣūl al-fiqh, and the formation of applied jurisprudential norms. Diverging from previous studies that tend to position al-Fākihānī merely as a hadith commentator or a passive transmitter of school doctrine, this study offers a distinct perspective by reading him as an epistemic actor who reconstructs the relationship between legal theory and jurisprudential practice through mechanisms of intra-school ijtihād, tarjīḥ, internal critique and the principle of murāʿāt al-khilāf. Utilizing a qualitative library-based method and a textual-legal analytical approach toward Riyāḍ al-Afhām and Mālikī jurisprudential literature, this study finds that al-Fākihānī does not merely reproduce school authority. Instead, he actively selects, tests, and validates legal opinions by combining textual evidence, rational argumentation, and an awareness of the plurality of legal opinions. The primary merit of this research lies in its ability to demonstrate that murāʿāt al-khilāf, which is frequently positioned as a secondary principle, functions precisely as a crucial methodological instrument in maintaining the flexibility, coherence and adaptive capacity of Mālikī law. These findings offer a conceptual contribution to global Islamic legal studies by challenging the assumption that classical jurisprudence is static and imitative; conversely, the Mālikī tradition demonstrates internal mechanisms for critique, negotiation and legal renewal. Consequently, this study shapes the development of contemporary discourses on the codification of Islamic law, school pluralism, and the reconstruction of Islamic legal epistemology rooted in the classical tradition, which remain relevant to the problems of modern legal normativity.
From Compliance to Maqāṣid-Based Ethical Reasoning: Reconstructing Halal Governance through the Contextual Halal Legal Navigation Model Abdul Basith; Lutfi; Kerwanto; Musyafa Syamil Arroyan; Khodjaeva Dilafruz Izatilloevna
Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Vol. 20 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24090/mnh.v20i2.16395

Abstract

This study examines the reconstruction of Islamic legal reasoning toward halal regulation in a secular Muslim-minority state, analyzing Australia's regulatory framework (the Export Control Act 2020, Australian Standard AS 4696:2023) alongside fatwas and institutional guidelines issued by SICHMA, ICCV, ANIC, and AFIC between 2013 and 2024, through a doctrinal-analytical approach. Analysis of these regulatory documents and fatwas shows that the Islamic legal bodies examined have consistently responded to secular regulatory pressure reactively, without developing a coherent maqāṣid al-sharī’ah-based framework of reasoning, as evidenced by ANIC and AFIC's divergent positions on controlled atmospheric stunning in 2023. This pattern produces three institutional consequences, identifiable from the same data: communal confusion in the face of inconsistent certification, fragmentation of religious identity, and the erosion of the legitimacy of Islamic legal authority. Building on this analysis, the study proposes the Contextual Halal Legal Navigation Model (CHLNM), a maqāṣid al-sharī’ah-grounded framework integrating textual foundation, contextual awareness, maqāṣid orientation, and educational internalization, as a legal-theoretical contribution that repositions Islamic law not as a mechanism of administrative compliance but as an adaptive process of ethical formation responsive to secular regulatory contexts.  

Page 40 of 40 | Total Record : 392

 36   37   38   39   40 

Filter by Year

2007 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 20 No. 2 (2026) Vol. 20 No. 1 (2026) Vol. 19 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 19 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 18 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 18 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 17 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 17 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 16 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 16 No. 1 (2022) Vol 16 No 1 (2022) Vol 15 No 2 (2021) Vol 15 No 1 (2021) Vol 14 No 2 (2020) Vol 14 No 1 (2020) Vol. 14 No. 1 (2020) Vol 13 No 2 (2019) Vol 13 No 1 (2019) Vol 12 No 2 (2018) Vol. 12 No. 2 (2018) Vol 12 No 1 (2018) Vol. 12 No. 1 (2018) Vol 11 No 1 (2017) Vol. 11 No. 2 (2017) Vol 11 No 2 (2017) Vol. 11 No. 1 (2017) Vol 10 No 1 (2016) Vol. 10 No. 2 (2016) Vol. 10 No. 1 (2016) Vol 9 No 2 (2015) Vol. 9 No. 2 (2015) Vol 9 No 1 (2015) Vol 8 No 2 (2014) Vol 8 No 1 (2014) Vol 7 No 2 (2013) Vol 7 No 1 (2013) Vol 6 No 2 (2012) Vol 6 No 1 (2012) Vol 5 No 2 (2011) Vol 5 No 1 (2011) Vol 4 No 2 (2010) Vol 4 No 1 (2010) Vol 3 No 2 (2009) Vol 3 No 1 (2009) Vol 2 No 2 (2008) Vol 2 No 1 (2008) Vol 1 No 2 (2007) Vol 1 No 1 (2007) More Issue