cover
Contact Name
Reni Prastyani
Contact Email
reni-p@fk.unair.ac.id
Phone
+6282139399974
Journal Mail Official
vsehj@journal.unair.ac.id
Editorial Address
Department of Opthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga Jalan Mayjen Prof. Dr. Moestopo No. 47, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia 60131.
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Vision Science and Eye Health Journal
Published by Universitas Airlangga
ISSN : -     EISSN : 2809218X     DOI : https://doi.org/10.20473/vsehj.v1i2.2022.28-34
Core Subject : Health,
Vision Science and Eye Health Journal (VSEHJ) is a peer-reviewed open access scientific journal published by the Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga that welcomes original research, case reports, and scoping or systematic review manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists. VSEHJ focuses mostly on the case report and also welcomes original research and scoping or systematic review related to vision science and eye health that is relevant for the development of the theory and practice of ophthalmology fields. The scope for VSEHJ includes ophthalmology and visual sciences, including corneal or external disease, cataract or anterior segment, glaucoma, neuro-ophthalmology, orbit ocular pathology, pathology or oncology of oculoplastic or orbit, pediatric ophthalmology or strabismus, refractive management and intervention, retina or vitreous, uveitis, community ophthalmology. Each volume of VSEHJ consists of three numbers published every November, March, and July. The first number of volume one was published in November 2021. Articles published in VSEHJ include case reports, original research, and scoping or systematic review articles. Contributors for VSEHJ are researchers, lecturers, students, ophthalmology experts, and other practitioners that focus on ophthalmology worldwide, especially from Southeast Asia Region. Submissions are open year-round.
Articles 85 Documents
Histopathology of Rabbit Eyelid Laceration Healing With and Without Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Riza, Afdal; Boesoirie, Shanti F.; Caesarya, Sesy; Mardianty, Friska; Rahayu, Putri
Vision Science and Eye Health Journal Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): Vision Science and Eye Health Journal
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/vsehj.v5i3.2026.91-96

Abstract

Introduction: Effective management of eyelid trauma is essential to promote optimal healing and prevent cicatrix formation. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has been proposed as an adjuvant treatment that increases oxygen delivery to plasma and tissues, thereby enhancing wound healing. Purpose: This study aimed to compare the histopathological features of wound healing in palpebral lacerations in rabbit models treated with and without HBOT. Methods: Samples meeting the inclusion criteria were included in the study. The HBOT group received 100% oxygen at 2.5 atmospheres absolute (ATA) for 1.5 hours daily over three consecutive days. Both groups received topical fusidic acid. Palpebral tissue samples were collected on day four, followed by hematoxylin-eosin histopathological examination on day five. Parameters assessed included anti-inflammatory cell count, vascularization, and collagen fibril density. Data were analyzed descriptively and through hypothesis testing. Results: It demonstrated that the HBOT group had a significantly higher mean number of anti-inflammatory cells (133.17 ± 11.907) compared to the control group (111.50 ± 17.649; p = 0.032). Vascularization was lower in the HBOT group (11.83 ± 3.00) than in the control group (14.83 ± 3.312), although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.114). Collagen fibril density showed no significant difference between groups (p = 0.699). Conclusions: HBOT improved macroscopic wound healing and increased the presence of anti-inflammatory cells. Although differences in collagen density and vascularization were not statistically significant, HBOT showed a favorable trend in enhancing wound healing compared with standard treatment alone.
Global Trends and Local Gaps: A Bibliometric Analysis and Case Series of Neonatal Conjunctivitis in Southeast Asia Nurhidayat, Bimanda Rizki; Hibatulloh, Muhammad Farhan; Irwanda, Thalita Permata P.; Farhah, Anitya Izdihar; Devi, Rossi Silvia
Vision Science and Eye Health Journal Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): Vision Science and Eye Health Journal
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/vsehj.v5i3.2026.97-103

Abstract

Introduction: Neonatal conjunctivitis, or ophthalmia neonatorum, is a preventable disease but is frequently neglected, especially in developing regions such as Southeast Asia, due to limited data availability and public awareness. This study aims to investigate global research trends in neonatal conjunctivitis through bibliometric mapping while concurrently presenting clinical patterns through a localized case series from Indonesia. Case Presentation: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis was conducted using RStudio on 468 articles from the Web of Science database. Simultaneously, two clinically validated cases of neonatal conjunctivitis were documented to exemplify local diagnostic and management challenges. The bibliometric analysis indicated a substantial escalation in global research activity on neonatal conjunctivitis over the preceding two decades; however, it also revealed a pronounced underrepresentation from low- and middle-income nations. The case series provided insight into typical presentations of Neisseria gonorrhoeae (N. gonorrhoeae)-associated and empirically treated conjunctivitis, underscoring issues such as delayed diagnosis, inadequate prior treatment, and the critical significance of appropriate antibiotic administration and follow-up care. Conclusion: The uneven distribution of research efforts in high-income nations, coupled with enduring clinical deficiencies in Southeast Asia, underscores the urgent need to develop regionally tailored public health strategies. Enhanced antenatal screening, education for healthcare providers, and the establishment of standardized neonatal prophylactic protocols are essential to mitigate the incidence and long-term repercussions of neonatal conjunctivitis.
Beyond the Eyelid: Congenital Upper Eyelid Coloboma with Palpebro-Corneo-Conjunctival Adhesion in an Infant Felicia Fortunata; Yana Rosita; Dini Dharmawidiarini
Vision Science and Eye Health Journal Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): Vision Science and Eye Health Journal
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/vsehj.v5i3.2026.104-111

Abstract

Introduction: Congenital eyelid coloboma is a rare structural lid defect extending through all layers of the eyelid, with the potential to threaten the ocular surface and visual development. When accompanied by palpebro-corneo-conjunctival adhesion, surgical complexity increases substantially, as both eyelid reconstruction and corneal repair must be addressed concurrently. Case Presentation: An 11-month-old boy presented with a left upper eyelid coloboma since birth, with two-thirds palpebro-corneo-conjunctival adhesion extending to the posterior corneal stroma. Posterior lamellar reconstruction combined with anterior lamellar keratoplasty was performed under general anesthesia. At postoperative day one, sutures were intact with good graft apposition and minimal corneal edema. At day 11, the corneal graft was clear and well epithelialized with no signs of rejection. At four months, the graft remained intact; however, corneal clarity could not be fully assessed as the procedure was performed primarily for tectonic purposes. Margin reflex distance 1 (MRD1) was not obtainable due to an absent corneal light reflex secondary to corneal opacity. The reconstructed eyelid demonstrated good anatomical contour and stable position. Conclusions: This case demonstrates that combining posterior lamellar reconstruction with anterior lamellar keratoplasty is feasible in infants with extensive eyelid coloboma and corneal adhesion, with stable outcomes at four months postoperatively. The limited follow-up duration in this case does not yet allow for a definitive assessment of long-term graft outcomes. Ongoing monitoring by a multidisciplinary team, including a pediatric ophthalmologist for amblyopia surveillance and a glaucoma specialist for intraocular pressure assessment, will be critical going forward.
Meta-Analysis: Incision and Curettage Superior to Steroid Injection for Chalazion Treatment Aurilia Afia Bharata; Made Chindy Dwiyanti Marheni Putri; Delfitri Lutfi
Vision Science and Eye Health Journal Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): Vision Science and Eye Health Journal
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/vsehj.v5i3.2026.121-125

Abstract

Introduction: The most common inflammatory lesion of the eyelid, chalazion, can be treated in several ways. The optimal course of treatment is difficult to determine due to the high likelihood of recurrence. Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the outcomes and recurrence rates of chalazion treated with incision and curettage (I&C) compared with steroid injections. Methods: Publications were retrieved from PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. Data on successful intervention, recurrences, and time to resolution were analyzed using RevMan 5.4. Results: Twelve studies published between 2018 and 2022 were included in this review, comprising 1,122 participants. The subjects were patients with primary chalazion, some of whom had failed conservative treatment. Chalazion size is variable; in some studies, it is grouped into small, medium, and large. We found that 577 participants received I&C, with a success rate of 82.15%, and 545 received steroid injections, with a success rate of 73.58%. Our meta-analysis showed an odds ratio of 0.59 (p = 0.0004). After the first procedure, recurrence rates were reported in 3 of the 12 studies, ranging from 3.3% to 8% for I&C and from 10% to 34% for steroid injection (SI). Conclusions: This study found a significant difference between the two interventions, favoring I&C, although most included studies reported no significant differences. Treatment selection should therefore consider patient and clinician preferences, individual clinical factors, patient comfort and cooperation, potential side effects, and chalazion size, with steroid injection being more convenient and I&C showing a higher success rate.
Canal-Based Versus Excisional Goniotomy Combined with Phacoemulsification in Mild to Moderate Glaucoma Agnes Poppy Melina; Kadek Yudia Rustiandini Prasasti; Christina Sherly Damanik
Vision Science and Eye Health Journal Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): Vision Science and Eye Health Journal
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/vsehj.v5i3.2026.112-120

Abstract

Introduction: Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) is increasingly performed with cataract surgery in patients with mild to moderate glaucoma. The OMNI surgical system and Kahook dual blade (KDB) target the conventional aqueous outflow pathway, yet their comparative effectiveness remains uncertain. Purpose: To compare clinical outcomes of phacoemulsification combined with OMNI versus phacoemulsification combined with KDB in patients with mild to moderate glaucoma. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and ScienceDirect were searched for comparative studies evaluating phacoemulsification combined with OMNI versus KDB. The primary outcome was intraocular pressure (IOP)-related efficacy; secondary outcomes were reduction in glaucoma medications and surgical success. Pooled analyses used random-effects models. Results: Five comparative studies were included in the quantitative synthesis. IOP outcomes could not be quantitatively pooled because of inconsistent reporting. Meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference between OMNI and KDB in reduction of glaucoma medications (mean difference 0.22; 95% confidence interval −0.16 to 0.60) or surgical success (risk ratio 0.98; 95% confidence interval 0.77 to 1.26). Substantial heterogeneity was observed across studies, reflecting differences in study design and outcome definitions. Conclusions: Available comparative evidence did not demonstrate clear superiority of phacoemulsification combined with either OMNI or KDB for glaucoma medication reduction or surgical success in mild to moderate glaucoma. Both procedures remain reasonable adjunctive options during cataract surgery, although interpretation is limited by between-study heterogeneity.