cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
M Misbahul Mujib
Contact Email
misbahul.mujib@uin-suka.ac.id
Phone
+6281392409940
Journal Mail Official
supremasi.uinsuka@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Fakultas Syari'ah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Kalijaga; Jalan Marsda Adi Sucipto, Caturtunggal, Kabupaten Sleman, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 55281
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
ISSN : 23021128     EISSN : 27234207     DOI : https://doi.org/10.14421/sh
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
The focus and scope of SUPREMASI HUKUM: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum are legal Science, including the study of Law issues in Indonesia and around the world, either research study or conceptual ideas. Generally we are interested in all law studies such as following topics Civil Law, Criminal Law, Civil Procedural Law, Criminal Procedure Law, Commercial Law, Constitutional Law, International Law, State Administrative Law, Customary Law, Islamic Law, Agrarian Law, Environmental Law, Legal Theory and Legal Philosophy.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 223 Documents
 6   7   8   9   10 
Dasar Pertimbangan Putusan-Putusan Kasasi Hakim Agung Artidjo Alkostar terhadap Kasus Korupsi Tahun 2013-2015 Ahmad & Ari Bahiej & Arifin
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Vol 5, No 1 (2016): Supremasi Hukum
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/sh.v5i1.2010

Abstract

The results of this study concluded that the Justice Artidjo Alkostar in implementing the article in the Supreme Court is to first look at the elements of criminal acts committed by the defendant. Elements of crime have been met is then adjusted with a passage that has been indicted. In such adjustment, Chief Justice Artidjo Alkostar using grammatical interpretation. Besides the Chief Justice makes Artidjo Alkostar defendant who use public office (political corruption) to commit criminal acts of corruption as a consideration in aggravate the punishment for corruption (zero tolerance or a zero tolerance). But Justice Artidjo Alkostar in imposing a sentence that is still to include the spirit of fighting corruption and not applying the spirit of deciding a case with the fairest and faith not merely to convict.
Perlindungan Konsumen terhadap Hak Atas Informasi Harga Pada Menu Makanan, dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen (Studi Kasus di Warung Makan pada Kawasan Malioboro) Lindra & Wiji Darnela & Saraspeni
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Vol 5, No 1 (2016): Supremasi Hukum
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/sh.v5i1.2007

Abstract

This study concluded that the implementation of consumer protection for the right to update the prices on the food menu, food stall at Malioboro area is not in accordance with the Act 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection. Based on observations in the field, the consumer does not get its due in the form of pricing information which should be given by most businesses in the area of malioboro. In this case most businesses in the area of Malioboro has violated its obligations as entrepreneurs. it is evident from as regulated in Article 7 butur b Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection explained that the obligation of the consumer is "Providing accurate information, clear, honest, on the condition and guarantee of the goods and / or services and to give explanations use, repair and maintenance ".
Pemenuhan Hak-hak Narapidana Berdasarkan Asas Persamaan di Hadapan Hukum (Studi Kasus Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Klas II A Yogyakarta) Elviannisa & Faisal Luqman Hakim
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Vol 5, No 1 (2016): Supremasi Hukum
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/sh.v5i1.2003

Abstract

This study concluded that the Prison Class II A Yogyakarta has tried to apply the principle of equality before the law despite the obstacles and the fulfillment of the rights of prisoners, prison following the procedure for the fulfillment of the rights of prisoners in accordance with Government Regulation No. 32 of 1999 on the Terms and Procedures Patronage citizen rights Implementation Corrections for example still a right prisoners to obtain assimilation has not been fulfilled. Based on the results of interviews with prisoners by officers such as the difference in the closeness made officers.
Eksistensi Konvensi sebagai Sumber dan Praktek Ketatanegaraan di Indonesia Tri Suhendra Arbani
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Vol 5, No 1 (2016): Supremasi Hukum
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/sh.v5i1.2001

Abstract

Constitutional convention is one means for evaluation and improvement of the Constitution. Thus it can be said that the constitutional convention has a very strong position in the Indonesian legal system. Constitutional convention is part of the unwritten constitutional law norms that serve complementary, menyempurkan or even change and declare void substance written Constitution (UUD 1945) as the highest legal norms in the Republic of Indonesia. The Convention is not merely a habit that dialakukan by officials pemrintah but actually the constitution is a form of constitution is not written that has the function as a source of Constitutional Law and as the practice of state within a state, it can be seen from the practice that has been done by the leaders of nations and agencies -state institutions. So the presence of the convention has been enrich knowledge in practice and a source of state administration as well as cover the weaknesses of a written constitution.
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Konsumen Produk Makanan yang Tidak Berlabel Halal di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Tahun 2015 Umdah Aulia Rohmah; Iswantoro Iswantoro
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Vol 5, No 2 (2016): Supremasi Hukum
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/sh.v5i2.2015

Abstract

The results showed that the majority of manufacturers micro and kecildi Special RegionYogyakartabelum have a halal certificate, some others even labeled halal themselves without acertificate of kosher and halal label does not list an official of BPJPH (Halal Product SecurityAgency). Efforts legal protection of the consumer by the government in food products that are notlabeled halal is to set up surveillance guarantees halal products, the issuance of an Act to regulate thecertification and labeling of halal, socializing, appeals or withdrawal of products that violate theprovisions of halal labeling, the establishment of the agency organizing halal product assurance, theestablishment of halal audit institution, formed auditor kosher, halal label the presence of officialand criminal sanctions for violating the provisions stipulated in the Act. Obstacles faced by foodmanufacturers in labeled halal is halal labels mandatory, but only a small part for businesses whoare conscious about the importance of label kosher, halal certification process complicated, difficult,cost factors and conditions and process that takes time old makes businesses reluctant to take care ofit. It is suggested to producers or businesses to pay attention to consumer rights. to consumers to bemore careful in buying food that is not labeled halal, to the government to seriously address the issueof halal labeling so that consumers' rights guaranteed.
Studi Kritis Pasal 51 Ayat (1) UU Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 Juncto UU Nomor 8 Tahun 2011 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap Perlindungan Hak Warga Negara Asing di Indonesia Proborini Hastututi
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Vol 5, No 2 (2016): Supremasi Hukum
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/sh.v5i2.2014

Abstract

The results showed that the test of a law submitted by one or more foreigners are nominallythey are not allowed to submit the test. It was grounded because of the applicant's judicial review isonly allowed for the individual citizen, even if the foreign national has reason violated hisconstitutional rights and existing laws are considered contrary or inconsistent with the 1945Constitution, but they are in formal examinations can not be used as an applicant. Thus, theexamination material also can not be examined by the Constitutional Court. Important to knowthat the constitutional rights originating from 1945 is not only owned by the citizen but alsoforeigners. Therefore, constitusional loss can also be experienced by foreigners. Additionally, refer tothe practices of the International that the constitutional and judicial practices of other countries donot close access to the constitutionality of laws concerning human rights which are universallyrecognized and protected, although limited to the rights which by their nature do not involve therelationship of citizens to the State.
Diskursus Pemikiran Fikih Lingkungan Ali Yafie dan Mujiono Abdillah Rifqiya Hidayatul Mufidah
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Vol 5, No 1 (2016): Supremasi Hukum
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/sh.v5i1.1998

Abstract

The results of the study, showed that Ali Yafie believes that environmental conservation is a social obligation. Has a sense for the completion of the problems of the environment, the preservation must be implemented by every element of society without aborting other groups although there are already one of the implement. Similarly, analysis of birth control that is where he is as kemadaratan wasilah to prevent the environmental, as well as a social obligation to do all of society for environmental damage caused by population growth continue. Abdillah Mujiono disagree that protecting the environment is an individual obligation which gave rise to ecological merit and sin for any mukallaf. Between the two there is a common thread theory that the juristic environment built for the need to provide environmental awareness of religious approach derived from the Quran and Hadith to achieve the benefit of the environment.
Analisis Yuridis Cabang Pemerintahan Keempat “The Fourth Branch Of Government” dalam Struktur Ketatanegaraan di Indonesia Tri Suhendra Arbani
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Vol 5, No 2 (2016): Supremasi Hukum
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/sh.v5i2.2013

Abstract

The development of the modern state system is also followed by the establishmentof new institutions as a support of the institutions that have been there before. The mostsignificant event in the development and establishment of institutions is the new powerbranch, which is called by the experts in constitutional as an independent statecommission. Independent state commission institution which, if seen from the characterand the authority, the agency in some literature in American constitutional law isreferred to as the fourth branch of power (The Fourth Branch of Government). Somethings that make this institution called the fourth branch of government (The FourthBranch of Government) is the fact that the agency, or commission or the state body runmore than one function of government as well. The existence of a fourth branch ofgovernment (The Fourth Branch of Government) with the characteristics of stateinstitutions whose authorities are quasi, combinations, as well as the accumulation ofthree existing government functions and make this institution to be difficult to identifyin thought Trias Politica. The phenomenon of the rise of an institution with a newconcept that has influenced the constitutional system in many countries.
Kebijakan Tarif Poligami ( Studi Atas Peraturan Bupati Lombok Timur Nomor 26 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pelaksanaan Peraturaan Daerah Nomor 3 Tahun 2013 Tentang Lain-Lain Pendapatan Asli Daerah Yang Sah) Sahuddin Sahuddin
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Vol 4, No 2 (2015): Supremasi Hukum
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/sh.v4i2.2009

Abstract

This study discusses polygamy rate policy set by the Regent of East Lombok asone revenue. It is known that Republk Unitary State of Indonesia based on Pancasilaand the Constitution of 1945, both of which are the basis of the highest in the stateconstitution Indonesia. After the reform in 1998, was born the Law No. 22 of 1999and Law No. 32 Year 2004 on Regional Government. This Act gives effect to theregions in Indonesia. So there is a new law called local regulations (Perda). The presenceof the executive branch and the legislature named regent named DPRD. The localgovernment tried to create legislation that is based on Pancasila and the 1945Constitution which considers the potential and regional interests necessarily. After doingresearch, we concluded that the East Lombok decree No. 26 of 2014 on theImplementation of Regional Regulation No. 3 of 2013 in accordance with the purposeof siyasah jurisprudence. Because the East Lombok Regent Regulation contains thevalues the benefit of society and the prevention of damage which are elements in thesiyasah jurisprudence. The regulation protects against women who do not want topolygamy
Pelaksanaan Tugas Hakim Pengawas dan Pengamat Pengadilan Negeri Yogyakarta bagi Narapidana Penjara di Lapas Wirogunan dan Lapas Narkotika Asep Ilham Taufiq
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Vol 5, No 2 (2016): Supremasi Hukum
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/sh.v5i2.2012

Abstract

The results showed that the implementation of the supervision and observation of some notexercised pursuant to Article 277-283 of Law No. 8 of 1981 on the Law of Criminal ProcedureCode (Criminal Code) and SEMA No. 7 of 1985 regarding Implementation Guidelines tasksSupervisory Judge and Observer, as well as with the provision that the exclusion of JudgeWASMAT in ketentua Act No. 12 of 1995 concerning Corrections, making Judge WASMATless performance. The pattern of coordination and support between law enforcement partners in theimplementation of the Yogyakarta District Court was minimal, forms of cooperation between theagencies in implementing the mandate to be not optimal and there has been no implementation of therules governing the monitoring mechanism on sanctions rehabilitation. The Supreme Court as thejudiciary function organizes the judicial authorities with the aim of enforcing the law and justiceshould immediately issue a policy that can be used as a legal basis for Judge supervisors and observers(WASMAT) in carrying out the supervision of the enforcement of rehabilitation, not to tendarrangement only serves to verdict judge to imprisonment only.

Page 8 of 23 | Total Record : 223

 6   7   8   9   10 

Filter by Year

2012 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 14 No. 2 (2025): Supremasi Hukum Vol. 14 No. 1 (2025): Supremasi Hukum Vol. 13 No. 2 (2024): Supremasi Hukum Vol. 13 No. 1 (2024): Supremasi Hukum Vol. 12 No. 2 (2023): Supremasi Hukum Vol. 12 No. 1 (2023): Supremasi Hukum Vol. 11 No. 2 (2022): Supremasi Hukum Vol. 11 No. 1 (2022): Supremasi Hukum Vol 10, No 2 (2021): Supremasi Hukum Vol 10, No 1 (2021): Supremasi Hukum Vol 9, No 2 (2020): Supremasi Hukum Vol 9, No 1 (2020): Supremasi Hukum Vol 8, No 2 (2019): Supremasi Hukum Vol 8, No 1 (2019): Supremasi Hukum Vol 7, No 2 (2018): Supremasi Hukum Vol 7, No 1 (2018): Supremasi Hukum Vol 6, No 2 (2017): Supremasi Hukum Vol 5, No 2 (2016): Supremasi Hukum Vol 5, No 1 (2016): Supremasi Hukum Vol 4, No 2 (2015): Supremasi Hukum Vol 4, No 1 (2015): Supremasi Hukum Vol 3, No 2 (2014): Supremasi Hukum Vol 3, No 1 (2014): Supremasi Hukum Vol 2, No 2 (2013): Supremasi Hukum Vol 2, No 1 (2013): Supremasi Hukum Vol 1, No 2 (2012): Supremasi Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2012): Supremasi Hukum Vol. 1 No. 1 (2012): Supremasi Hukum Vol 1, No 1 (2012): Supremasi Hukum More Issue