cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Narita Adityaningrum
Contact Email
narita.a@trisakti.ac.id
Phone
+6281528282851
Journal Mail Official
reformasihukum@trisakti.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Kyai Tapa No 1, Grogol Jakarta Barat
Location
Kota adm. jakarta barat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Published by Universitas Trisakti
ISSN : -     EISSN : 2657182X     DOI : https://doi.org/10.25105/refor
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
The scope of this journal is in the field of legal science for case studies in Indonesia and also other regions of the world. Jurnal Reformasi Hukum Trisakti comes from a half of the results of the sudents undergraduate thesis of the Faculty of Law Trisakti University, in subjects : Business Law International Law Labour Law Family Law Land Law Constitutional Law Criminal Law Etc
Arjuna Subject : Seni dan Humaniora - Seni dan Humaniora (Lain-Lain)
Articles 1,070 Documents
 49   50   51   52   53 
PRAKTIK DISKRIMINASI PT GARUDA INDONESIA (PERSERO) TERKAIT PROGRAM WHOLESALER Alfiyyah Inayah Taqyuddin; Anna Maria Tri Anggraini
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 3 No 3 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i3.13821

Abstract

In March, PT Garuda Indonesia (Persero) issued GA Info which appointed six wholesalers in the distribution of direct sales of Jeddah - Medina umrah tickets and resulted in market barriers for 301 PPIUs to gain access to Garuda Indonesia tickets. The formulation of the problem is; how is the activity or behavior of PT Garuda Indonesia (Persero) in carrying out discriminatory practices resulting in losses to other business actors based on Article 19 letter d of Law Number 5 Year 1999? and whether the considerations of the KPPU Panel in deciding case Number 06/KPPU-L/2020 are in accordance with Law No. 5/1999 and applicable laws and regulations in the field of competition law? Research method is normative, descriptive in nature using secondary data obtained through literature studies and interviews. The data is qualitatively with deductive inference. The results of the research, discussion and conclusions of the author are; that Garuda Indonesia's activities in carrying out discriminatory practices are by appointing six wholesalers, resulting in 301 wholesalers not being able to access airplane tickets directly through Garuda Indonesia and the consideration the KPPU Panel in deciding case Number 06/KPPU-L/2020 is in accordance with Law No. 5/1999 and regulations in field competition law.
PENDAFTARAN TAGIHAN ATAS JAMINAN CROSS COLLATERAL DALAM PROSES PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG Nadia Nursantih; Heru Pringgodani Sanusi
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 3 No 3 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i3.13822

Abstract

Cross Collateral in a Bank Credit is a guarantee derived from one legal relationship or for one or more debts derived from several legal relationships, provided by the debtor and accepted by the bank which can reduce the risk in lending, this is in accordance with the principle of prudential banking. The formulation of the problem discussed, how is the Treatment of Cross Collateral Collateral for the Recording of Bill Registration in the Accounts Receivable List in the PKPU Process and how is the Position of Bank Creditors as Holders of Cross Collateral in the Receivables Matching Phase in the PKPU Process according to UUK-PKPU. Normative writing method, descriptive writing nature, type of data using secondary data, qualitative data analysis. And conclusion making is done with deductive logic. Based on the results of the study, Cross Collateral in the PKPU process can be divided pari passu pro rata and the position of Creditors holding Cross Collateral as a privileged separatist Creditor based on Article 55 paragraph (1) UUK-PKPU, and applies mutatis mutandis to the PKPU process based on Article 246 UUK-PKPU so that the right to confiscation and execution in PKPU is suspended until PKPU ends.
ANALISIS HUKUM PERLINDUNGAN PENCIPTA ATAS KOMERSIALISASI LAGU YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH TELEVISI INDOSIAR Fadyah Suci Wulandari; Simona Bustani
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 3 No 3 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i3.13828

Abstract

Protection of Intellectual Property Rights on copyright which includes economic rights and moral rights of the creator and/or copyright holder is needed, with the violation of the announcement and/or reproduction of copyrighted works that are not done with permission or license agreement. The formulation of this problem is how the arrangement of the legal protection of songwriters Bukan Pengemis Cinta based on the Copyright Act and how the role of LMK and LMKN in copyright protection. The research method used is normative, this research is descriptive, the type of data used is primary and secondary data, qualitative data analysis, and methods to draw conclusions using deductive logic. The results of this research, discussion and conclusion are the legal protection arrangements of creators and / or copyright holders have been regulated in UUHC in 2014 and PP No. 56 of 2021 this confirms the mandate of UUHC 2014 regarding royalty payments, LMK and LMKN play an important role for that, the establishment of this Institution is a way of solving problems experienced by creators and/or copyright holders who often experience obstacles in maintaining their economic rights to the commercialization of their copyrighted works.
PENGAMBILALIHAN SAHAM PERUSAHAAN MENURUT UU ANTIMONOPOLI (PERBANDINGAN HUKUM INDONESIA DENGAN KOREA SELATAN) Nadya Angelina; Anna Maria Tri Anggraini
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 3 No 3 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i3.13829

Abstract

Competition law regulates the obligation to report the acquisition of company shares with certain requirements. However, each country regulates the reporting requirements with a different system, as well as Indonesia and South Korea. The problem formulation is how the regulation of the submission of share takeover reports according to Law No. 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition and the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act in South Korea, as well as differences in the application of reporting delays in takeovers in Indonesia and South Korea. Normative juridical research method using secondary data, analyzed using qualitative methods with deductive inference. The results of research, discussion and conclusion that the submission of a share takeover report in Indonesia is regulated in Article 29 of the Antimonopoly Law jo. Article 5 of Government Regulation No. 57 of 2010 and South Korea in Article 12 of the MRFTA. Both countries use a post notification reporting system, but South Korea stipulates mandatory pre-notification with certain limitations. The sanction for late reporting in South Korea is relatively smaller, which is ₩100,000,000.00, while the late fine in Indonesia is calculated daily up to a maximum of Rp 25,000,000,000.
PERBANDINGAN HAK PENGUASAAN ATAS TANAH ANTARA NEGARA INDONESIA DENGAN NEGARA KEPULAUAN SOLOMON Dhea Nadhifa Vrily Pontoh; Dinda Keumala
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 3 No 3 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i3.13830

Abstract

Comparative Law is the confrontation of comparable elements of two legal systems to find their differences and similarities. Land tenure rights in Indonesia and Solomon Islands. The formulation of the problem is; what are the similarities and differences between the Land Tenure Rights between the State of Indonesia and the Solomon Islands? and what are the factors causing differences in Land Tenure Rights between the State of Indonesia and the Solomon Islands? The method of legal research is normative and is descriptive-comparitive, secondary data which is analyzed qualitatively, and the conclusion is drawn using the deductive method. The results of this research, discussion and conclusion are, there are similarities in Indonesia and the Solomon Islands regarding land tenure rights, namely the meaning of land tenure rights, the existence of customary land tenure rights, individual rights to land in the form of property rights & perpetual estate, and arrangements for the subject of land rights holders. In addition to similarities, differences arise in the form of regulation of land tenure rights, the use of hierarchy in land tenure rights, systematics in land tenure rights in the form of state control rights with public (crown) land.
PRINSIP ITIKAD BAIK DALAM PENDAFTARAN MEREK TYPE R MILIK HONDA MOTOR CO. LTD (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 42/PDT.SUS-MEREK/2019/PN.NIAGA.JKT.PST) Widya Ananda; Simona Bustani
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 3 No 3 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i3.13837

Abstract

The case of cancellation of registered trademark Handy Wijaya related to the element of bad faith in the registration of the trademark is similar in essence to the famous trademark of Honda Motor Co., Ltd. The problem is: how is the regulation of the principle of good faith in the registration of the TYPE R trademark owned by Honda Motor Co., Ltd. based on Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning trademarks and why the principle of good faith is not used as one of the legal considerations based on decision Number 42/Pdt.Sus-Merek/2019/PN.Niaga.Jkt Pusat. It is normative and qualitatively. The results of research, discussion and conclusion that the TYPE R Trademark owned by Handy Wijaya, proven to have similarities in essence with the Type R Trademark owned by Honda Motor Co., Ltd. regarding the shape, way of placement, way of writing, combination of elements or similarity of speech sounds which violates the principle of good faith in trademark registration in accordance with Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications, where Handy Wijaya has been proven to register his trademark in bad faith which causes Handy Wijaya's TYPE R trademark to be canceled with all its consequences.
TANGGUNG JAWAB MERCHANT SHOPEE DALAM TRANSAKSI COD MENURUT HUKUM PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN Stella Trixie Jane; Anna Maria Tri Anggraini
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 3 No 3 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i3.13840

Abstract

One of the fast-growing e-commerce sites in Indonesia is Shopee. Shopee provides a Cash on Delivery (COD) payment method. The application of COD in fact gets a lot of public attention, because many consumers vent their anger at the courier because the goods sent do not match the order. The formulation of this problem is How are the legal consequences of business actors in Shopee application-based buying and selling transactions through Cash on Delivery (COD) for goods sent that are not in accordance with orders according to Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection and related regulations? And how is the responsibility of business actors in buying and selling transactions based on the Shopee application through Cash on Delivery (COD) for goods that are sent not in accordance with the order according to Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection and related regulations? Normative research method, analyzed using qualitative methods with deductive inference. The results of the research, discussion and conclusion, that the legal consequences of the Shopee application-based buying and selling transaction through COD, the business actor provides compensation and consumers can make complaints, and the responsibility of the business actor is contractual responsibility.
PENDAFTARAN PERALIHAN HAK ATAS TANAH KARENA JUAL BELI YANG DIBUAT DIBAWAH TANGAN (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NO. 116/PDT.G/2019/BKN) Rurrie Putri Mutiara Sari; Dinda Keumala
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 3 No 3 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i3.13841

Abstract

The transfer of land rights in a sale and purchase must be carried out in front of an authorized official (PPAT) by making a Sale and Purchase Deed as evidence for the process of transferring land rights/title at the Land Office. The formulation of this research problem is how is the validity of the transfer of land rights due to the sale and purchase of land made under the hand? What must the buyer do to register the transfer of land rights made under the hand based on Decision No. 116/Pdt.G/2019/Bkn? Normative juridical research method. Secondary data collection technique. The nature of the research used is descriptive analytical. This research is analyzed qualitatively. The method of drawing conclusions with the deductive logic method. The results of research, discussion and conclusions, especially in the case of Decision No.116/Pdt.G/2019/Bkn Bangkinang that the sale and purchase of land under the hand is valid because it has fulfilled the material requirements in buying and selling, but has not fulfilled the formal requirements because the sale and purchase is carried out only with a letter under the hand, a Sale and Purchase Deed has not been made before a PPAT.
PERBANDINGAN KEPEMILIKAN SRS DENGAN APARTEMEN UNTUK ORANG ASING DI INDONESIA DAN THAILAND Intan Monika; Dinda Keumala
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 3 No 3 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i3.13842

Abstract

High population growth is the reason people choose to live in vertical housing because land in big cities is increasingly limited and land prices are getting higher. The large number of foreign workers in Indonesia also adds to the density of housing in big cities. The problem formulation is the ownership similarity of flats and apartments for foreigners in Indonesia and Thailand, what are the differences in ownership of flats with ownership of apartments for foreigners in Indonesia and Thailand, what causes similarities and differences in ownership of flats with ownership of apartments for foreigners in Indonesia and Thailand. Normative juridical research method, descriptive research nature, conclusion drawing using deductive logic. The results of the research, discussion and conclusions, similarities: land ownership, both countries prohibit foreigners from owning land; The difference: the term mentioning the unit, Indonesia uses the unit of flats and Thailand uses the term of Apartment; quota limit of unit ownership, Thailand regulates foreigners may not own apartments more than 49% of the total units while Indonesia is not regulated. The cause of the similarities between the two countries is the increasing demand for residential needs for foreigners.
PEMBAGIAN HARTA WARISAN ALMARHUM MARABEN DAN MEIDA SM M PANGGABEAN MENURUT KUHPERDATA (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 151/PDT.G/2020/PN JKT PST) Tantri Benaz Cindy Siregar; Dinda Keumala
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 3 No 3 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i3.13843

Abstract

Regarding Decision Number 151/Pdt.G/2020/PN Jkt Pst where there was a dispute over the inheritance of the late Retired General Maraben and Meida SM M Panggabean, thus making the author to conduct further research with the formulation of the problem of how the distribution of the inheritance of the late Retired General Maraben and Meida SM M Panggabean to their heirs according to the Civil Code, and whether the contents of Decision Number 151/Pdt. G/2020/PN Jkt Pst regarding the division of the estate of the late Retired General Maraben and Meida SM M Panggabean is in accordance/not according to the Civil Code. The research was normative legal method, descriptive analytical, secondary data type, conducted qualitatively, deductive logic inference. The results of research, discussion and conclusions: the distribution of the estate of the late Retired General Maraben and Meida SM M Panggabean to their heirs according to the Civil Code, namely Duma (3/16) part, Musida (3/16) part, Tetty (3/16) part and Baringin (7/16) part and the contents of Court Decision Number 151/Pdt.G/2020/PN Jkt Pst regarding the distribution of the estate of the late Retired General Maraben and Meida SM M Panggabean to their heirs are not in accordance with the Civil Code.

Page 51 of 107 | Total Record : 1070

 49   50   51   52   53 

Filter by Year

2019 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 7 No 4 (2025): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 7 No 3 (2025): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 7 No 2 (2025): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 7 No 1 (2025): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 4 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 3 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 2 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 1 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 5 No 4 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 5 No 3 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 5 No 2 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 5 No 1 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 4 No 4 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 4 No 3 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 4 No 2 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 4 No. 2 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 4 No 1 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 3 No 4 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 3 No 3 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 3 No 2 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 3 No 1 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 3 No. 1 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 2 No. 2 (2020): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 1 No. 2 (2019): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 1 No. 1 (2019): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti More Issue