cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Sultoni Fikri
Contact Email
sultonifikri@untag-sby.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
mengkaji.indonesia@gmail.com
Editorial Address
https://jurnal.erapublikasi.id/index.php/JMI/about/editorialTeam
Location
Kota tangerang,
Banten
INDONESIA
Jurnal Mengkaji Indonesia
Published by CV. Era Digital Nusantara
ISSN : -     EISSN : 29636787     DOI : 10.59066/jmi
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Articles published in the Jurnal Mengkaji Indonesia are based on research or thoughts focusing on recent or contemporary studies on Indonesia from social sciences, political sciences, and legal studies approach. Jurnal Mengkaji Indonesia prioritizes works related to issues and challenges that exist in Indonesia which can be discussed and explained through various perspectives, and paradigms, and can be written in Indonesian or English. The contents of Jurnal Mengkaji Indonesia include scientific articles and summaries of theses/dissertations.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Ilmu Sosial (Lain-Lain)
Articles 64 Documents
 3   4   5   6   7 
Criticism of the LMKN–LMK Dualism in Music Royalties Management in Indonesia Amelia, Mays
Jurnal Mengkaji Indonesia Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): December (In Press)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jmi.v4i2.1824

Abstract

Abstract: The management of music royalties in Indonesia through the mechanisms of the National Collective Management Institution (LMKN) and the Collective Management Institution (LMK) shows serious problems in the context of copyright protection. Normatively, Article 9 paragraph (1) of Law No. 28 of 2014 grants creators exclusive rights to enjoy the economic benefits of their creations. However, the bureaucratic practices of LMKN-LMK actually reduce the meaning of these exclusive rights and shift the orientation of protection from creators to the managing institutions. This condition creates injustice because the legal system prioritizes institutional legitimacy over fulfilling the economic rights of creators. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to reconstruct the legal model for managing music royalties so that it returns to the core of copyright, namely justice for creators. Design/Methodology/Approach: This study is a normative legal study using a legislative approach, a conceptual approach, and a comparative approach. Findings: The results of the study indicate that the management model in Indonesia needs to be reformed through a revision of Law No. 28 of 2014 by eliminating the dualism of LMKN-LMK, strengthening an independent institution that is strictly supervised, and implementing technology-based digital transparency such as blockchain. Originality/value: The main finding is that the current legal system renders royalties an administrative-repressive instrument, rather than an instrument of distributive justice. Therefore, a legal reconstruction is needed that prioritizes transparency, accountability, and strengthens the position of creators as the primary subjects of copyright protection. This way, royalty distribution can function fairly, proportionally, and align with the principles of distributive justice.
Understanding Local Governance in the Circle of Interest: A Literature Review Prasetyo Adi, Muhammad Wahyu
Jurnal Mengkaji Indonesia Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): December (In Press)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jmi.v4i2.1857

Abstract

Abstract: Local public administration is a field that positively reflects organizational needs. As a result, public administration is required to provide concrete representation of its suitability to be called a public organization. Paradoxically, when local government public administration emphasizes representation, it has no substantive meaning. Purpose: This is the result of the interests of actors who have carved out administrative boundaries. Design/Methodology/Approach: This study uses a literature review that raises local issues conditioned in the form of specific subheadings with limitations. Maximizing data based on relevant research and sources forces this study to extract metadata from the data. To maximize metadata conditions, this study limits several relevant notes to support the main focus on public governance in the arena of interest. Findings: The results of the study show that pragmatic governance under pressure from capital owners has defeated senior policy experts, intellectual groups, and even political actors themselves. This existence is reflected in selective diction. This confirms the next finding, a shift from potential policies to administrative violations. The procurement of goods and services has become the most distributive consequence, ensuring that the basis for selective implementation is accommodated in concrete terms. Restoring the spirit of independence of supervisory institutions and involving external civil society-based institutions are areas that need to be considered in both the process and implementation. Originality/value: The conditioning of public governance does not ensure that it has been addressed by different actors with diverse focuses.
Multi-Stressor Analysis of Climate Vulnerability in Indonesia: A Study on Environmental Policy Ethics and Maladaptation Risk Zahra Nabila, Alya
Jurnal Mengkaji Indonesia Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): December (In Press)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jmi.v4i2.1862

Abstract

Abstract: This article aims to explore climate change multi-stressors through the development of environmental policies in Indonesia. Over time, this tropical country has been increasingly exposed to global warming and climate change phenomena that generate significant national vulnerabilities. In addressing these challenges, policy attention has predominantly focused on climatic factors. However, vulnerability is not solely a climatic issue; rather, it reflects collective systemic incapacity, which is further exacerbated by extreme weather events. Vulnerability constitutes a core concept in environmental social sciences, yet existing discussions often remain climate-centric, with limited engagement with other contributing dimensions that intensify vulnerability. Purpose: This article seeks to analyze climate vulnerability multi-stressors in Indonesia, including an examination of environmental policy ethics and the risks of maladaptation. It aims to provide a foundational reference and contribute to broader knowledge and understanding of Indonesia’s vulnerability context for future research and policy applications. Design/Methodology/Approach: This study employs a secondary research methodology, drawing upon the analysis and synthesis of existing sources, particularly qualitative data related to environmental policies, climate vulnerability cases in Indonesia, and the implementation of relevant policies in addressing these challenges. Findings: Climate vulnerability in Indonesia remains relatively high. Efforts to address multiple stressors, particularly through policy formulation and implementation, continue to face significant obstacles and institutional stalling. Comprehensive and carefully designed planning is therefore essential to minimize maladaptation risks and to foster ethically grounded climate resilience. Originality/value: This study contributes to the field of environmental policy by addressing research gaps in existing literature concerning climate vulnerability in Indonesia, particularly about the role of multi-stressors and maladaptation risks in shaping vulnerability outcomes.
The Dismissal of Constitutional Court Judges by the House of Representatives from the Perspective of Separation of Powers Satria, Rama
Jurnal Mengkaji Indonesia Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): December (In Press)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jmi.v4i2.1869

Abstract

Abstract: The power of the House of Representatives to remove constitutional judges is discussed and analyzed in this article. It examines how the House of Representatives carries out its oversight role and if that includes assessing constitutional judges. The House of Representatives' dismissal of constitutional judges is also demonstrated by actual examples in this article. Purpose: From the perspective of the separation of powers, this research aims to investigate and evaluate the House of Representatives' action in dismissing constitutional judges. Design/Methodology/Approach: A legislative, conceptual, and case approach using a legal research technique is employed in this analysis. Primary and secondary legal resources constitute the legal materials utilized. Findings: The findings of this investigation demonstrate that the DPR lacks the authority to fire Constitutional Court judges, regardless of whether it be via an evaluation or via any other method. Constitutional Court judges, who are chosen and appointed by the President, must continue in their role until their term expires, unless they are no longer qualified as per the Law on the Constitutional Court. The model of DPR supervision of Constitutional Court Judges, as described in Article 228A of DPR Regulation No. 1 of 2025, is unconstitutional. The oversight model violates the 1945 Indonesian Republic Constitution, the Constitutional Court Law, Constitutional Court Decision 103/PUU-XX/2022, the separation of powers, the lawmaking, independence, and authority principles. Originality/value: This research is highly original and innovative. This is because the author explores the issue from the perspective of separation of powers. The findings of this article contribute to the implementation of constitutional judges' independence.

Page 7 of 7 | Total Record : 64

 3   4   5   6   7 

Filter by Year

2022 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): December (In Press) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): July Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): December Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): July Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): December Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): July Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): December Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): July