cover
Contact Name
Danang
Contact Email
lpkdgeneration2022@gmail.com
Phone
+6285726173515
Journal Mail Official
danang@stekom.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Majapahit No.605, Pedurungan Kidul, Kec. Pedurungan, Semarang, Provinsi Jawa Tengah
Location
Kab. demak,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora (JURRISH)
ISSN : 28287630     EISSN : 28287622     DOI : https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v1i1
Core Subject : Social,
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora adalah jurnal yang ditujukan untuk publikasi artikel ilmiah yang diterbitkan oleh Pusat riset dan Inovasi Nasional, Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer. Jurnal ini adalah jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora yang bersifat peer-review dan terbuka. Bidang kajian dalam jurnal ini termasuk sub rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora. Jurnal ini menerima artikel dalam bahasa Inggris dan bahasa Indonesia dan diterbitkan 2 kali setahun: Januari dan Juli.
Articles 602 Documents
Pembatasan Tanggung Jawab Shopee terhadap Kerugian Konsumen Dihubungkan dengan UU Perlindungan Konsumen
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v4i4.9635

Abstract

The transformation of digital technology has changed people's transaction patterns, especially through e-commerce platforms  such as Shopee which has experienced a significant increase in Indonesia. This study aims to analyze the application of exoneration clauses in Shopee's terms and conditions and its conformity with consumer protection laws in Indonesia. The research method used is normative law with a statutory and conceptual approach, using primary legal sources in the form of the Consumer Protection Law, Civil Code, and the Electronic Information and Transaction Law, as well as secondary legal materials from journals and academic literature. The results of the study show that the standard clause that limits liability is not absolutely valid because it has the potential to eliminate the rights of consumers who are protected by law, so that it can be considered null and void according to Article 18 paragraph (3) of the Consumer Protection Law. Shopee's liability is proportional, depending on proof of negligence in identity verification, complaint handling, and system security. Therefore, it is necessary to reconstruct a fairer accountability mechanism through improving dispute resolution mechanisms, stricter government supervision, and strengthening consumer protection in electronic transactions. This research confirms the importance of balancing the business interests of the platform and the protection of consumer rights.
Mekanisme Penundaan Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara Ditinjau dari Prinsip Perlindungan Hukum
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v4i4.9875

Abstract

This research aims to examine the postponement mechanism in State Administrative Court (TUN) disputes, particularly the legal basis and practice of determining postponements by panels of judges, and to formulate an ideal mechanism for postponement requests based on the principles of legal protection. This study employs a qualitative method with a normative juridical legal research approach, involving the analysis of legal concepts, normative structures, comparisons of legal norms, and the legal implications of regulations. The research analyzes regulations governing the postponement of State Administrative Decisions (KTUN) under the State Administrative Court Law (Law No. 5 of 1986, Law No. 9 of 2004, and Law No. 51 of 2009) and the Government Administration Law. The existing regulatory framework reflects normative stagnation, as it has not been substantially revised through the amendments to the PTUN Law. The current mechanism remains rigid and restrictive, particularly due to the requirement of “extremely urgent circumstances,” which is open to multiple interpretations and difficult to prove, as well as the absence of provisions on sanctions and execution supervision. An ideal mechanism requires progressive, rapid, flexible, and balanced procedural reform based on three pillars: substantive criteria reform, procedural law reform, and execution and supervision reform.