cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Buyung Solihin Hasugian
Contact Email
sps@dharmawangsa.ac.id
Phone
+6281376767017
Journal Mail Official
sps@dharmawangsa.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. K. L. Yos Sudarso No. 224 Medan
Location
Unknown,
Unknown
INDONESIA
Legalpreneur Journal
Published by Universitas Dharmawangsa
ISSN : 29620961     EISSN : 29649889     DOI : https://doi.org/10.46576/lpj.v1i1
Core Subject : Humanities, Education, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other
We provide editors and reviewers on topics related to legal issues globally. The scope of articles published in this journal is related to the Department of Law available in the Master Of Law at Dharmawangsa University, where the purpose of this journal is to provide a forum for academics, practitioners and researchers to publish research manuscripts or conceptual manuscripts. The scope of articles published in this journal deals with topics in the fields of Comparative Law, Customary Law, Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, Criminal Law, Civil Law, International Law, Islamic Law, Environmental Law, Economic Law, Medical Law and other discussions related to the study of law.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 84 Documents
 5   6   7   8   9 
Juridical Analysis Of The Application For Cancellation Of The Arbitration Award Of The Indonesian National Arbitration Board (Decision Study Number 531 / Pdt.Sus-Arb/2023 / PN Bks) Hasbi, Mhd; Safnul, Dody
Legalpreneur Journal Volume 4, No. 1 October 2025
Publisher : Universitas Dharmawangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46576/lpj.v4i1.7950

Abstract

This paper examines the juridical application for cancellation of the arbitration award of the Indonesian National Arbitration Board (BANI) Surabaya in the case between PT Adhi Persada Properti against Haryono Soebagio and Budi Said. This dispute stems from default in the implementation of the deed of binding agreement of sale and purchase (PPJB) No. 008/2017, which was then terminated through the BANI Surabaya Arbitration forum. The applicant filed a cancellation of the arbitration award under Articles 70 and 71 of Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution, on the grounds of alleged fraud and violation of the principle of due process of law. This study uses normative juridical methods, with a legal and conceptual approach, and examines the relevance of this decision to the protection of legal certainty in arbitration practice in Indonesia.
Theory And Practice Of Mediation In The Indigenous Peoples Of Aceh Gayo, Sabela
Legalpreneur Journal Volume 4, No. 1 October 2025
Publisher : Universitas Dharmawangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46576/lpj.v4i1.7949

Abstract

This paper discusses the theory and practice of mediation in the indigenous peoples of Aceh, which is known to have a dispute resolution system based on deliberation and kinship. This study uses a qualitative approach to the method of literature study and observation of mediation practices in several villages in Aceh. It was found that customary mediation practices in Aceh not only promote conflict resolution, but also restore social relations. This local wisdom has historically grown out of the social structure of Acehnese society and has a meeting point with the national legal system, especially in the settlement of civil and minor criminal cases. This article also examines the challenges of harmonization between customary law and national law.
The Role Of The Prosecutor's Office And The BPK In The Process Of Returning State Losses Between Dominus Litis And Justice Sitompul, Ariman
Legalpreneur Journal Volume 4, No. 2 April 2026
Publisher : Universitas Dharmawangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46576/lpj.v4i2.8645

Abstract

This study examines the role of the prosecutor's office and the Supreme Audit Agency (BPK) in the process of returning state losses due to corruption, especially in relation to the dominus litis principle and the dimension of Justice. The method used is juridical normative approach to legislation and conceptual through the study of literature (library research). The results showed that the relationship of authority between the prosecutor's office and the BPK is complementary but has not been coordinated systematically, resulting in normative gaps that weaken the effectiveness of state asset recovery. The dominus litis principle that gives prosecutorial authority to prosecutors is in practice limited by the principle of functional differentiation that separates investigation and prosecution. The restorative justice approach and the establishment of an Asset Recovery Agency is a positive institutional breakthrough, but requires strengthening interagency coordination regulations so that the goal of returning state losses can be optimally achieved. This study concludes the need for special regulations that regulate formal coordination between the prosecutor's office and the BPK as the foundation for fair and measurable recovery of State losses.
Justice And Legal Certainty In The Imposition Of Narcotics (Bekasi District Court Decision Study number 217/Pid.Sus / 2025 / PN Bks) Maswandi, Maswandi
Legalpreneur Journal Volume 4, No. 1 October 2025
Publisher : Universitas Dharmawangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46576/lpj.v4i1.7948

Abstract

Law enforcement against narcotics crime requires a balance between legal certainty, justice, and expediency. This study aims to analyze how the principle of justice and legal certainty is applied in the Bekasi District Court decision number 217/Pid.Sus/2025 / PN Bks against two defendants, namely Bayu Setiawan alias Bontot and Ayub Ferdiansyah alias Ayub, who were proven to have committed the crime of conspiracy to sell Class I narcotics. This research uses normative juridical method with case approach. Based on the analysis, the panel of judges sentenced the defendants to imprisonment for eleven years in accordance with Article 114 paragraph (2) in conjunction with Article 132 paragraph (1) of Law No. 35 of 2009 on narcotics. The decision reflects the application of the principle of legal certainty because it is based on valid evidence and the elements of the offense are met. However, from the aspect of substantive justice, the verdict does not fully reflect the rehabilitative approach for users and intermediaries, so the repressive approach is still dominant.

Page 9 of 9 | Total Record : 84

 5   6   7   8   9 

Filter by Year

2022 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Volume 4, No. 2 April 2026 Volume 4, No. 1 October 2025 Volume 3, No. 2 April 2025 Volume 3, No. 1 October 2024 Volume 2, No. 2 April 2024 Volume 2, No. 1 October 2023 Volume 1, No. 2 April 2023 Volume 1, No. 1 October 2022