cover
Contact Name
Abdul Razaq Cangara
Contact Email
acacangara@unhas.ac.id
Phone
+6281343999957
Journal Mail Official
editorial.hjsis@unhas.ac.id
Editorial Address
Kampus Unhas Tamalanrea Jln. Perintis Kemerdekaan KM.10. Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia
Location
Kota makassar,
Sulawesi selatan
INDONESIA
Hasanuddin Journal of Strategic and International Studies
Published by Universitas Hasanuddin
ISSN : -     EISSN : 29631394     DOI : https://doi.org/10.20956/hjsis
Core Subject : Social,
Hasanuddin Journal of Strategic and International Studies (HJSIS) is an open access and international peer reviewed journal. Our main objective is to disseminate current and original articles from researchers and practitioners that enrich understanding and contributes to the past, current, and future discourse and issues of strategic and international studies relevant to the Indo Pacific region. The article should address multidisciplinary research on theoretical and empirical questions in the topic around strategic studies, international relations, international politics and security, international political economy, transnational society, international diplomacy and negotiation, international and regional organization, governance and democracy, terrorism and transnational organized crimes. HJSIS encourage a robust analysis and rigorous methodologies (quantitative or qualitative or mix method) written in an engaging and analytical article style so that it promotes new ideas, discourse, controversy, and solid reflection theoretically or practically toward strategic and international studies issues of Indo Pacific. HJSIS is published twice a year, in June and December, by Hasanuddin University. All submitted articles shall never be published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. Articles submitted to HJSIS will undergo a thorough single blind peer review process. Editorial Board decides the acceptance of articles based on the recommendation of reviewer.
Articles 44 Documents
Analysis of British and German Foreign Policy in the Russian-Ukrainian Conflict 2023-2024 Laode Muhamad Fathun; Alfiyah Nur Rahmalia; Audrey Chairunnisa; Patrice Lumumba
Hasanuddin Journal of Strategic and International Studies (HJSIS) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20956/hjsis.v4i2.51183

Abstract

Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022, reshaped European security and prompted divergent responses among Western powers. This study examines the foreign policy responses of the United Kingdom and Germany to the Russia-Ukraine conflict during 2023-2024, asking: what factors account for the differences in their approaches despite a shared commitment to supporting Ukraine? Employing Poliheuristic Theory and Rational Choice Theory, the study analyses how decision-makers in both countries evaluated policy alternatives across political, economic, security, and international dimensions. The findings reveal stark contrasts in decision-making processes and outcomes. The UK adopted a proactive, assertive stance, rapidly delivering military assistance, implementing broad economic sanctions, and maintaining consistent political support for Ukraine. British policy was driven by NATO alignment, post-Brexit strategic repositioning, and domestic political incentives favouring decisive action. Germany, by contrast, followed a cautious and incremental path, constrained by deep energy dependence on Russia, longstanding economic ties, and a diplomatic foreign policy culture. While Chancellor Scholz's Zeitenwende declaration signalled a historic shift in German defence policy, implementation was slowed by domestic political divisions and competing strategic priorities. The poliheuristic analysis shows that both states employed non-compensatory elimination strategies, rejecting options threatening core national interests, before optimising remaining alternatives based on strategic benefit and domestic political costs. The study concludes that foreign policy responses to security crises are fundamentally shaped by historical context, structural dependencies, domestic politics, and leadership style. While both nations ultimately supported Ukraine, their pathways differed significantly. These findings underscore that analysing decision-making processes, not merely outcomes, is essential for understanding how democratic states navigate shared security threats under competing constraints.
The Implementation of the Indonesia-Germany Cooperation: A Case Study of the Community Economic Development Program in Mamasa Subdistrict Through Forest Program IV Nataniel; Sriwiyata Ismail; Krisman Heriamsal; St. Amaliah Ramli
Hasanuddin Journal of Strategic and International Studies (HJSIS) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20956/hjsis.v4i2.51802

Abstract

This study aims to analyse the implementation of the Forest Programme IV (FP IV) as a form of Indonesia–Germany cooperation to support community empowerment and environmental management in the buffer zone of Gandang Dewata National Park (TNGD), Mamasa Subdistrict, Mamasa Regency, West Sulawesi Province. This program is part of community-based forest and land rehabilitation efforts in the Mamasa Watershed (DAS) area. The research focuses on the program’s implementation in improving community livelihoods and the challenges encountered during its implementation. This study employs a qualitative case study design. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, field observations, and document analysis. The research analysis employs concepts of international cooperation and community development to understand the relationships among stakeholders and the community empowerment process in the program’s implementation. The results indicate that Forest Program IV in Mamasa Subdistrict was implemented through the provision of business capital support, production tools, and assistance to Forest Farmer Groups (KTH). This program contributed to increasing community economic activities, particularly in agriculture, plantations, honey enterprises, handicrafts, and agroforestry. In addition to increasing community income, the program encouraged community involvement in forest management and environmental conservation within the TNGD buffer zone. However, the program’s implementation still faces several challenges, including limited market access, limited community understanding of the program, mismatches between some activities and community needs, low community participation, and the impact of climate change on the sustainability of community enterprises.
The Silent Crises: The Future of Population in East Asia’s Leading Economies Frisca Alexandra
Hasanuddin Journal of Strategic and International Studies (HJSIS) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20956/hjsis.v4i2.51963

Abstract

Declining fertility has become one of the most significant demographic challenges facing advanced economies in East Asia. This article examines the dynamics of declining birth rates in China, Japan, and South Korea and their implications for long-term economic sustainability and social stability from a Non-Traditional Security perspective. This study employs a comparative qualitative approach using secondary data derived from international reports, national statistics, and relevant academic literature. The findings suggest that declining fertility in these countries is driven by a combination of economic pressures, shifting social values, and the limited effectiveness of pro-natalist policies. In the long term, persistent low fertility is likely to accelerate population ageing, reduce the size of the labour force, and increase pressure on welfare systems. Therefore, the fertility crisis in East Asia should be understood as a multidimensional challenge that requires comprehensive and long-term policy responses.  
Hybrid Threats in the South China Sea: A Neoclassical Realist Comparative Response Analysis of Indonesia, the Philippines, and Malaysia Alif Asy'ari; Aulia Akmalina; Fauzia Gustarina Cempaka Timur
Hasanuddin Journal of Strategic and International Studies (HJSIS) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20956/hjsis.v4i2.52067

Abstract

This article examines why Indonesia, the Philippines, and Malaysia respond differently to broadly similar hybrid threats from China in the South China Sea. It adopts a qualitative, most-similar-systems design and applies a neoclassical realist framework in which hybrid pressure is treated as a common systemic stimulus filtered through three domestic dimensions: elite perception, institutional capacity and integration, and state-society relations. The analysis shows that the Philippines has shifted toward denial, backed by formal alliance ties and a deliberate strategy of public transparency; Indonesia relies on diversification, combining legal firmness with diplomatic and operational choices that avoid overdependence on any single partner; and Malaysia maintains soft balancing oriented around the protection of offshore economic interests. These divergent outcomes cannot be explained by material asymmetry alone. By applying a neoclassical realist framework to these three cases, this article links hybrid coercion at sea to the domestic filters that turn similar external pressure into distinct policy paths.