cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Usman Jayadi
Contact Email
ujayadi@gmail.com
Phone
+6281238426727
Journal Mail Official
ujayadi@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Melati VIII No.2 BTN Rembiga, Kecamatan Selaparang, Kota Mataram, NTB, Indonesia 83124
Location
Kota mataram,
Nusa tenggara barat
INDONESIA
International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting
Published by CV. LAFADZ JAYA
ISSN : -     EISSN : 29887615     DOI : -
Core Subject : Economy, Science,
Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance
International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting (IJEMA) | ISSN (e): 2988-7615 publishes research articles related to Economics, Management and Finance. The research studies that are acceptable for publication in this journal are: Economics: development economics, applied economics, monetary economics, public economics, industrial economics, international and regional economics, natural resource economics, human resource economics, and sharia economics). Management: Strategic Management, Marketing Management, Public Relations Management, Sales Management, Procurement Management, Finance and Accounting Management, Human Resources Management, Technology and Information Management, R&D Management, Engineering Management, Project Management, Risk Management, Change Management). Accounting: Financial Accounting, Auditing, Management Accounting, Cost Accounting, Tax Accounting, Budgeting, Governmental Accounting, and Accounting System.
Arjuna Subject : Bisnis, Menejemen, dan Akutansi (semua kategori) - Bisnis, Menejemen, dan Akutansi (Lain-Lain)
Articles 234 Documents
 20   21   22   23   24 
Globalization Dimensions and Poverty Dynamics in Indonesia: Evidence from a Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) Qurrota Ayu Nindien; Arivina Ratih Yulihar Taher; Asih Murwiati; I Wayan Suparta; Neli Aida
International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting (IJEMA) Vol. 3 No. 7 (2025): December
Publisher : Lafadz Jaya Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47353/ijema.v3i7.157

Abstract

This study investigates the long-run and short-run relationships between globalization dimensions, economic growth, income inequality, and poverty in Indonesia. While globalization is widely considered a driver of economic development, its impact on poverty remains theoretically ambiguous and empirically mixed, particularly in developing countries. This study addresses this gap by examining multiple dimensions of globalization—economic globalization, social globalization, and economic cooperation—within a unified econometric framework. Using annual time series data from 1984 to 2020, this study employs the Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) to capture both short-term dynamics and long-term equilibrium relationships among variables. The results confirm the existence of cointegration, indicating a stable long-run relationship between poverty and its determinants. In the long run, economic growth, economic globalization, social globalization, and economic cooperation are found to significantly reduce poverty. In contrast, income inequality has a positive and statistically significant effect, suggesting that unequal income distribution remains a key structural barrier to poverty reduction. However, the short-run results reveal that none of the explanatory variables significantly influence poverty, highlighting the delayed transmission mechanism of globalization and macroeconomic factors. These findings suggest that the benefits of globalization are not immediate but materialize over time through structural transformation processes. From a policy perspective, the study emphasizes that globalization alone is insufficient to alleviate poverty without inclusive growth policies. Reducing inequality, improving human capital, and strengthening sectoral productivity—particularly in agriculture—are essential to ensuring that globalization contributes to sustainable poverty reduction in Indonesia.
The Economics of Uncertainty: A New Theoretical Framework for Decision-Making in a Volatile World Nti Frank Paul Mathews; George Kushiator
International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting (IJEMA) Vol. 3 No. 8 (2026): January
Publisher : Lafadz Jaya Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47353/ijema.v3i8.236

Abstract

This study develops a new theoretical framework for understanding economic decision-making under conditions of persistent uncertainty. Traditional economic models largely assume rational agents operating in stable environments with predictable risks, thereby limiting their applicability in today’s volatile and complex global economy. Increasing economic turbulence—driven by financial instability, technological disruption, and geopolitical uncertainty—has exposed the limitations of risk-based models and highlighted the need for a broader conceptualization of uncertainty. Adopting a qualitative conceptual approach, this study synthesizes insights from behavioral economics, institutional theory, and complexity economics to construct an integrative framework. The proposed model distinguishes between risk, ambiguity, and deep uncertainty, emphasizing that decision-making processes vary significantly across these conditions. It conceptualizes economic agents as adaptive decision-makers who rely not only on optimization but also on heuristics, learning, and institutional context. The framework identifies three key dimensions influencing decision-making under uncertainty: cognitive adaptation, structural constraints, and institutional guidance. These dimensions interact dynamically, shaping both individual and organizational responses to uncertainty. The study argues that uncertainty is not merely a constraint but also a driver of innovation, strategic flexibility, and systemic transformation. This research contributes to the literature by advancing a unified theory of economic decision-making under uncertainty, moving beyond traditional equilibrium-based models. It provides a foundation for future empirical research and offers policy-relevant insights for managing uncertainty in an increasingly volatile global economy.
Resilient Organizations in Turbulent Economies: A Conceptual Model of Adaptive Strategy Riinawati Riinawati
International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting (IJEMA) Vol. 3 No. 7 (2025): December
Publisher : Lafadz Jaya Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47353/ijema.v3i7.281

Abstract

This study develops a conceptual model of adaptive strategy to explain how organizations build resilience in turbulent economic environments. Increasing global uncertainty—driven by economic volatility, technological disruption, and geopolitical instability—has challenged traditional strategic management approaches that rely on stability and predictability. Existing frameworks often treat resilience and strategy as separate constructs, limiting their explanatory power in dynamic contexts. This study addresses this gap by integrating resilience theory and adaptive strategy into a unified conceptual framework. Using a qualitative conceptual approach, this research synthesizes insights from strategic management, organizational theory, and complexity theory. The proposed model conceptualizes resilience as a dynamic capability that enables organizations to anticipate, absorb, and adapt to external shocks. Adaptive strategy is framed as an iterative process shaped by environmental uncertainty, organizational learning, and resource reconfiguration. The study identifies three core dimensions of organizational resilience: strategic flexibility, adaptive capacity, and institutional alignment. These dimensions interact to form a feedback-driven system that enhances organizational survival and long-term performance. The findings suggest that resilience is not a static attribute but a continuous process of strategic adaptation. This study contributes to the literature by offering an integrative framework that bridges resilience and strategy, providing a foundation for future empirical research. From a managerial perspective, the model highlights the importance of agility, learning, and institutional responsiveness in navigating turbulent economic environments.
Rethinking Global Economic Systems: A Unified Framework of Inequality, Sustainability, and Institutional Evolution Raden Rudi Alhempi; Supaphorn Akkapin
International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting (IJEMA) Vol. 3 No. 7 (2025): December
Publisher : Lafadz Jaya Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47353/ijema.v3i7.310

Abstract

This study develops a unified conceptual framework to rethink global economic systems by integrating three critical dimensions: inequality, sustainability, and institutional evolution. Existing economic paradigms have largely treated these dimensions in isolation, resulting in fragmented policy approaches and limited explanatory power in addressing contemporary global challenges. This paper argues that the persistent rise in inequality, coupled with environmental degradation and institutional inefficiencies, reflects a systemic imbalance embedded within the current global economic architecture. Drawing on interdisciplinary insights from economics, institutional theory, and sustainability studies, this research adopts a qualitative conceptual approach to synthesize existing theoretical perspectives. The proposed framework conceptualizes global economic systems as dynamic and co-evolving structures in which distributional outcomes, environmental constraints, and institutional arrangements are interdependent. The analysis highlights how unequal resource allocation undermines sustainability goals, while weak institutional evolution constrains inclusive economic transformation. The study contributes to the literature by offering a holistic and integrative model that bridges the gap between growth-oriented and sustainability-oriented paradigms. It further provides a foundation for rethinking policy design by emphasizing the need for systemic alignment across economic, environmental, and institutional dimensions. The findings suggest that achieving long-term global stability requires a transition toward inclusive, adaptive, and sustainability-driven economic systems..

Page 24 of 24 | Total Record : 234

 20   21   22   23   24 

Filter by Year

2023 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 3 No. 8 (2026): January Vol. 2 No. 12 (2025): May Vol. 2 No. 11 (2025): April Vol. 2 No. 10 (2025): March Vol. 3 No. 7 (2025): December Vol. 3 No. 6 (2025): November Vol. 3 No. 5 (2025): October Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): September Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): August Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): July Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): June Vol. 2 No. 9 (2025): February Vol. 2 No. 8 (2025): January Vol. 1 No. 12 (2024): May Vol. 1 No. 11 (2024): April Vol. 1 No. 10 (2024): March Vol. 2 No. 7 (2024): December Vol. 2 No. 6 (2024): November Vol. 2 No. 5 (2024): October Vol. 2 No. 4 (2024): September Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): August Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): July Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): June Vol. 1 No. 9 (2024): February Vol. 1 No. 8 (2024): January Vol. 1 No. 7 (2023): December Vol. 1 No. 6 (2023): November Vol. 1 No. 5 (2023): October Vol. 1 No. 4 (2023): September Vol. 1 No. 3 (2023): August Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): July Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): June More Issue