cover
Contact Name
Abdul Hafid Hasim
Contact Email
abdulhafidhasim@gmail.com
Phone
+628116112965
Journal Mail Official
editor.ijeedu@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Phinisi Residence Complex E1 A.P. Pettarani Road Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia, 90222
Location
Unknown,
Unknown
INDONESIA
International Journal of Environment, Engineering, and Education
ISSN : -     EISSN : 26568039     DOI : https://doi.org/10.55151/ijeedu
The International Journal of Environment, Engineering, and Education [e-ISSN: 2656-8039] is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal that is published three times a year [in April, August, and December]; this journal provides the right platform for authors to update their knowledge, information, and share their research results with the more significant scientific community publishing research articles explaining the ecological, technical, and educational impact of research from various disciplines publishing research articles explaining the environmental, technical, and educational implications of research from multiple disciplines publishing research As an interdisciplinary scientific publication, this journal encourages collaboration between researchers, academics, practitioners, and policymakers in various sectors to develop sustainable solutions to address environmental, engineering, and educational problems and promote sustainable development.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 4 Documents
Search results for , issue "vol. 8 no. 3 (2026)" : 4 Documents clear
The Persistence Architecture of E-Learning: Linking Quality, Acceptance, and Student Satisfaction Fitria Fitria; Muhammad Yahya; Muh. Ichsan Ali
International Journal of Environment, Engineering and Education Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Three E Science Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55151/ijeedu.v8i3.485

Abstract

E-learning sustainability depends on students’ post-adoption evaluations of platform performance, information quality, usefulness, satisfaction, and continued use. This study examines students’ continuance intention toward institutional e-learning systems by integrating the Technology Acceptance Model and the Information Systems Success Model. A quantitative explanatory survey was conducted with 470 students from five Indonesian universities. Data were analyzed using covariance-based structural equation modeling with IBM SPSS and AMOS. The final model showed excellent fit (CMIN/DF = 1.036, CFI = 0.999, TLI = 0.999, RMSEA = 0.009). The results reveal that information quality was the dominant driver of perceived usefulness (β = 0.824, p < 0.001) and also significantly improved perceived ease of use (β = 0.321, p < 0.001). User satisfaction strongly predicted continuance intention (β = 0.612, p < 0.001), while perceived usefulness substantially increased satisfaction (β = 0.475, p < 0.001). By contrast, system quality had only weak effects on perceived ease of use (β = 0.164) and perceived usefulness (β = 0.072), and perceived ease of use had a negligible effect on satisfaction (β = 0.019). These findings show that sustained e-learning use is shaped primarily by the quality and academic value of information rather than by technical functionality alone. The study refines TAM–ISSM integration by identifying a clear information quality–usefulness–satisfaction–continuance pathway in post-adoption settings. Universities should therefore prioritize relevant, accurate, well-organized, and timely learning content, while maintaining reliable system performance, to strengthen student satisfaction and long-term engagement.
Machine-Learning Classification of Archived Employability-Readiness Ratings: Performance, Calibration, and Internal Validation Tonglu Men; Premsuree Chaumthong
International Journal of Environment, Engineering and Education Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Three E Science Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55151/ijeedu.v8i3.503

Abstract

This study examined the explanatory structure and predictive reproducibility of an end-of-program administrative score used to assess graduate preparedness in vocational education. A cross-sectional secondary analysis was conducted using 450 de-identified learner records collected from four anonymized polytechnic-style institutions during the 2023–2024 academic year. The outcome was a 0–100 composite score analyzed continuously and as three prespecified categories: low (<60), moderate (60–79), and high (≥80). Candidate predictors comprised practical skills, digital competence, soft skills, internship intensity, project performance, and an industry–education integration index treated as an institution-linked contextual proxy. Pearson correlations, heteroskedasticity-consistent ordinary least-squares regression, criterion-overlap sensitivity analysis, and leakage-controlled model development were applied. Six algorithms were compared against a majority-class baseline using a stratified 70:30 development-test split. Bootstrap intervals, ordinal-error measures, and probability-calibration indices were used to quantify uncertainty and performance. The full regression model explained 76% of outcome variance (adjusted R² = 0.75), whereas the reduced model retained an adjusted R² of 0.58 after removal of predictors susceptible to shared rubric content. In the untouched test partition (n = 135), the back-propagation neural network achieved an accuracy of 0.904 and a macro-F1 of 0.903; all 13 errors occurred between adjacent categories. These findings indicate a coherent within-system scoring structure and strong reproducibility across analytical approaches. However, they do not establish causal effects, transportability across institutions, fairness, operational utility, or prediction of subsequent labor-market outcomes. The model should therefore be restricted to low-stakes auditing, data-quality review, and identification of borderline records pending prospective multi-institutional evaluation.
Educational Position and Moral–Civic Values among Tertiary-Educated Young Adults: A Bayesian Mundlak Analysis across 66 World Values Survey Samples Wenxin Zu; Jie Yang; Li Yin; Zhyldyz Takenova
International Journal of Environment, Engineering and Education Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Three E Science Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55151/ijeedu.v8i3.509

Abstract

Higher education institutions have a dual purpose: to educate and to socialise moral and civic citizens. While this mandate is widely acknowledged, empirical studies of value formation are often limited to single-case studies or use concepts that are difficult to compare across national contexts. In this study, we propose and test a data-based model of moral and civic value formation using the World Values Survey (WVS) Wave 7. A sample of 9,589 tertiary-educated individuals aged from 18 to 30 in 66 countries was used for the analyses. We used a systematic pre-processing protocol to recode WVS special missing categories, exclude completely missing variables, and build six theoretically-informed, normalized indicators of prosocial values, achievement-responsibility values, moral rejection, institutional trust, gender-equitable education values and social trust. These were then combined into a formative Moral-Civic Value Formation Index (MCVFI). HC3 robust standard error regression models were estimated at the individual level and with country fixed effects. The individual-level model identified education level (β = 0.099, p < 0.001), female gender (β = 0.046, p < 0.001), and family-religious socialization (β = 0.267, p < 0.001) as significant positive predictors. Country fixed effects substantially improved model fit, raising adjusted R² from 0.084 to 0.306. This confirms that moral and civic value formation is context-sensitive and embedded in wider cultural-national environments. The study contributes a reproducible, open-data framework for integrating cross-national public values data into educational research on civic and moral development.
Electrode-Level EEG Assessment of Sequential Taste and Packaging Exposure in Processed Foods: An Exploratory Study Harish Velingkar; Roopa R. Kulkarni; Prashant P. Patavardhan
International Journal of Environment, Engineering and Education Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Three E Science Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55151/ijeedu.v8i3.557

Abstract

This study examined whether sustained electrode-level neural signals differentiate successive stages of a commercial food encounter and whether response patterns vary by gender. Fifty adults (25 male, 25 female; 20–40 years) completed a fixed protocol comprising a composite baseline, post-ingestive viewing of a branded product while residual flavor remained, later viewing of the same product under a recall instruction, and viewing of an unrelated snack product. Signals were acquired from eight scalp channels using a portable system, filtered at 0.5–45 Hz, notch-filtered at 50 Hz, common-average referenced, and aggregated into participant-level mean device-native amplitudes. Electrode-specific 4 × 2 mixed-design repeated-measures ANOVAs tested Condition, Gender, and their interaction; Greenhouse–Geisser correction addressed sphericity violations, and Benjamini–Hochberg adjustment controlled the false discovery rate. Condition effects were significant at all eight electrodes (all q ≤ 0.028), with partial ηp² ranging from 0.073 at O1 to 0.523 at C3 and the largest effects at C3, C4, and F4. Baseline-to-post-ingestive viewing yielded the broadest adjusted paired differences. Neither the Gender main effect nor the Condition × Gender interaction remained significant after correction, while individual trajectories showed marked heterogeneity. Portable low-density recordings therefore detected sequence-associated sensor-level differentiation across the protocol. Because condition was confounded with serial position, the baseline combined eye states, package stimuli were unmatched, amplitudes were uncalibrated, and behavioral validation was absent, the findings do not establish causal effects of flavor, product identity, recall, preference, cortical source, or consumer choice. Randomized, counterbalanced, behaviorally validated, and higher-density replication is required.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 4