cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Maman Suparman
Contact Email
advokasihukumdemokrasi@gmail.com
Phone
+6281294652477
Journal Mail Official
advokasihukumdemokrasi@gmail.com
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota adm. jakarta selatan,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Advokasi Hukum & Demokrasi
Published by Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Prof Gayus Lumbuun
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30250862     DOI : 10.61234
Core Subject : Humanities, Education, Social,
Humanities Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other
Advokasi Hukum & Demokrasi (AHD) adalah Jurnal ilmiah dengan fokus dan skop penelitian dan pengabdian masyrakat bidang ilmu hukum, hukum pidana, hukum perdata, politik dan demokrasi, hukum bisnis dan hukum lingkungan. Diterbitkan oleh Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Prof Gayus Lumbuun. Jurnal ini diterbitkan dua kali dalam satu tahun yaitu pada bulan Agustus dan Februari. Jurnal Advokasi Hukum & Demokrasi (AHD) melakukan proses peer review secara tertutup pada naskah yang diterima. E-ISSN 3025-0862
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 43 Documents
 1   2   3   4   5 
Peran Pemerintah dalam Regulasi dan Pengawasan Kriptokurensi di Indonesia Sebagai Upaya Menjaga Stabilitas Ekonomi Digital Steven Bredabu
Advokasi Hukum & Demokrasi (AHD) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Advokasi Hukum & Demokrasi (AHD)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Prof Gayus Lumbuun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61234/ahd.v4i1.111

Abstract

The development of cryptocurrency as part of digital financial assets has brought significant changes to the economic system, including in Indonesia. The increase in the number of investors and the value of crypto transactions indicates its growing importance in the digital economy. However, the volatile and decentralized nature of cryptocurrencies poses challenges for the government in maintaining economic stability and protecting the public. This study aims to analyze the role of the government in the regulation and supervision of cryptocurrencies in Indonesia. The method used is a normative juridical approach by examining statutory regulations and the latest policies related to digital financial assets. The results show that the government has strengthened regulation through the transfer of crypto supervision to the Financial Services Authority (Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, OJK) since 2025, as well as the issuance of Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 23 of 2025. This policy marks the recognition of crypto as a digital financial asset within the national financial system and strengthens the integration of financial sector supervision in a more comprehensive manner. Nevertheless, challenges remain, such as regulatory gaps, the risk of money laundering, low public literacy, and the potential misuse of digital technology. Therefore, adaptive policies, effective supervision, and continuous public education are required to maintain the stability of the national digital economy amid the rapid development of financial technology.
Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Perjanjian Waralaba (Franchise) dalam Perspektif Keadilan Kontraktual di Indonesia Daniela Rica Bairam
Advokasi Hukum & Demokrasi (AHD) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Advokasi Hukum & Demokrasi (AHD)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Prof Gayus Lumbuun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61234/ahd.v4i1.112

Abstract

A franchise agreement is a form of contractual legal relationship that is strategically significant in the development of businesses in Indonesia, particularly in the retail, service, and food and beverage sectors. This relationship binds the franchisor and franchisee in managing interrelated rights and obligations. Although the number of franchise businesses has increased significantly, the practice of standard agreements unilaterally drafted by franchisors often creates contractual injustice, where franchisees have weaker bargaining positions. This phenomenon is further exacerbated by the lack of harmony between the older regulation, Government Regulation No. 42 of 2007, and newer regulations, namely Government Regulation No. 35 of 2024 on Franchising and Government Regulation No. 28 of 2025 on risk-based licensing, which introduce more detailed mechanisms of supervision and legal protection but still pose implementation challenges in practice. This study employs a normative juridical approach through analysis of statutory regulations, recent legal literature, and franchise contract documents as data sources. The analysis focuses on the principles of contractual justice, the balance of rights and obligations of the parties, and the effectiveness of the latest regulations in protecting franchisees from unfair contractual practices. The results indicate that although the new regulations clarify the rights and obligations of franchisors and franchisees, as well as procedures for termination and compensation, contractual imbalances still occur, particularly in SME franchise businesses. Therefore, strengthening legal literacy among franchise actors, increasing contract transparency, and active government supervision are strategic solutions to achieve effective contractual justice.
Penyitaan Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi oleh Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi terhadap Aparatur Sipil Negara sebagai Upaya Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia Tubagus Ahmad Suhendar
Advokasi Hukum & Demokrasi (AHD) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Advokasi Hukum & Demokrasi (AHD)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Prof Gayus Lumbuun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61234/ahd.v3i2.113

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study aims to analyze the confiscation of assets derived from corruption by the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) against Civil Servants (ASN) as an effort to combat corruption in Indonesia. Corruption is categorized as an extraordinary crime that not only causes financial losses to the state but also hinders national development and reduces public trust in government institutions. Therefore, a comprehensive approach is required to eradicate corruption, one of which is through asset recovery mechanisms. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches. The data used are secondary data obtained through library research, including primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The data are analyzed qualitatively using a descriptive-analytical method to provide a comprehensive understanding of asset confiscation in corruption cases. The results indicate that asset confiscation plays a crucial role in recovering state losses caused by corruption. However, in practice, asset confiscation faces various challenges, including difficulties in evidence collection, regulatory limitations, and weak coordination among law enforcement agencies. Furthermore, the Indonesian legal system, which still relies on an in personam approach, requires a final court decision before asset confiscation can be executed. As an alternative, the concepts of Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture (NCB) and the follow the money approach are considered more effective in supporting asset recovery. Therefore, comprehensive legal reform, strengthening of regulations, and enhancement of law enforcement capacity are necessary. In conclusion, asset confiscation can serve as an effective instrument in combating corruption and promoting a fair and integrity-based legal system in Indonesia.

Page 5 of 5 | Total Record : 43

 1   2   3   4   5 

Filter by Year

2023 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Advokasi Hukum & Demokrasi (AHD) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Advokasi Hukum & Demokrasi (AHD) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Advokasi Hukum & Demokrasi (AHD) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Advokasi Hukum & Demokrasi (AHD) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Advokasi Hukum & Demokrasi (AHD) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Advokasi Hukum & Demokrasi (AHD) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): Advokasi Hukum dan Demokrasi (AHD)