cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Agus Budianto
Contact Email
agus.budianto@uph.edu
Phone
+622125535168
Journal Mail Official
lexprospiciteditor@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Kampus Pascasarjana Universitas Pelita Harapan Plaza Semanggi lt. 16, Jl. Jend. Sudirman No. 50, RT.1/RW.4, Karet Semanggi, Kecamatan Setiabudi, Kota Jakarta Selatan, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 12930
Location
Kota tangerang,
Banten
INDONESIA
Lex Prospicit
Published by Universitas Pelita Harapan
ISSN : 29881781     EISSN : 29881773     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Lex Prospicit is a scientific journal published by the Master of Law Study Program, Faculty of Law, Universitas Pelita Harapan in collaboration with Asosiasi Advokat Indonesia (AAI) and serves as a venue for scientific information in the field of law resulting from scientific research or research-based scientific law writing. The articles published in this journal cover a broad range of topics, including Business Law, Antitrust and Competition Law, Intellectual Property Rights Law, Criminal Law, International Law, Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, Agrarian Law, Health Law, Adat Law, Environmental Law, Banking Law, Cyber Law, Bankruptcy Law, WTO Law, Investment Law, Tax Law, Human Rights Law, ADR and Arbitration Law, and Labor Law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 43 Documents
 1   2   3   4   5 
REGULATION FOR E-COMMERCE PLATFORM PROVIDERS IN INDONESIA: IMPORTANCE AND EFFECTIVENESS Confido, Jemy Vestius
Lex Prospicit Vol. 1 No. 1: February 2023
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lp.v1i1.6703

Abstract

Indonesia is a country with the largest digital economy potential in Southeast Asia as indicated by number of its internet user especially through mobile access. This huge potential begins to realize with the presence of electronic commerce (e-Commerce) services which grow very fast and very vastly. The presence of e-Commerce has stimulated many new social phenomena, which are mainly triggered by e-Commerce platform providers who intensively perform marketing activities. This situation will become the real law (das sein) if it is not governed by law.The purpose of this research is to analyze the importance and effectiveness of existing regulations regarding e-Commerce platform providers in Indonesia. The research applies normative juridical method that uses applicable laws and regulations relevant to the issues as the primary sources supported by empirical cases as the secondary sources. From theoretical perspective, responsive law theory and the principle of lex specialis derogat legi generali are applied in this research. The applied positive laws must be assured for their responsiveness toward social needs while the specific characteristics of e-Commerce are entirely considered. Legal comparisons with international laws and other countries are also included to enrich the analysis.The research concludes that the Government Regulation Number 80 of year 2019 regarding Trading through Electronic System is very important to regulate e-Commerce environment in Indonesia. However, the enforcement of this regulation is not fully effective. The government of Indonesia could apply the regulation to facilitate healthy e-Commerce growth with comprehension towards business perspective and building trust to stimulate expected responses. Effective implementation of comprehensive e-Commerce regulation will strengthen the nation’s digital economy and overall economic resilience. Specific legal arrangements for e-Commerce platform providers should not paralyze the business. Instead, more persuasive approaches with good communication and trust will stimulate positive benefits to all related parties.Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Indonesia merupakan negara dengan potensi ekonomi digital terbesar di Asia Tenggara sebagaimana diindikasikan oleh jumlah pengguna internet khususnya yang menggunakan akses seluler. Potensi yang besar ini mulai terwujud menjadi nyata dengan kehadiran layanan perdagangan elektronik atau e-Commerce yang tumbuh secara cepat dan besar. Kehadiran e-Commerce telah memicu fenomena-fenomena sosial yang utamanya didorong oleh penyedia layanan platform e-Commerce yang secara intensif melakukan aktivitas pemasaran. Situasi ini akan menjadi hukum yang digunakan (das sein) jika tidak ditata oleh regulasi hukum.Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisa pentingnya dan keefektifan dari regulasi yang sudah ada mengenai penyedia platform e-Commerce di Indonesia.  Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif yang bertumpu kepada hukum dan regulasi yang diberlakukan sesuai dengan isu tersebut sebagai sumber utama dengan didukung kasus-kasus empiris sebagai sumber pelengkap. Dari sudut pandang teoritis, teori hukum responsif dan asas lex specialis derogat legi generali digunakan sebagai alat analisis dalam penelitian ini. Hukum positif yang diberlakukan harus dipastikan  bersifat responsif terhadap kebutuhan masyarakat sedangkan karakteristik khusus dari e-Commerce harus seluruhnya dipertimbangkan. Perbandingan dengan hukum international dan negara-negara lain juga digunakan untuk memperkaya analisis.Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 80 Tahun 2019 tentang Perdagangan Melalui Sistem Elektronik sangatlah penting untuk mengatur lingkungan e-Commerce di Indonesia. Namun demikian, penegakan dari peraturan ini tidak sepenuhnya efektif. Pemerintah Indonesia bisa menerapkan peraturan ini untuk memfasilitasi pertumbuhan e-Commerce yang sehat dengan pemahaman terhadap perspektif bisnis dan pembentukan kepercayaan untuk merangsang response yang diharapkan. Implementasi yang efektif dari peraturan e-Commerce yang komprehensif akan memperkuat ekonomi digital dan keseluruhan daya tahan ekonomi nasional. Pengaturan khusus terhadap penyedia platform e-Commerce seyogyanya tidak melumpuhkan bisnis. Sebaliknya, pendekatan yang lebih persuasif dengan komunikasi yang baik dan kepercayaan akan mendorong manfaat positif baik semua pihak terkait.
Criminological Examination of The Premeditated Murder Perpetrated by Richard Eliezer in Case Law Number 798/Pid.B/2022/PN JKT.SEL Sungkar, Adzholla Hadzna; Heriman, Amanda Regina Pallas; Caroline, Caroline; Efendi, Muhammad Afif
Lex Prospicit Vol. 1 No. 2: July 2023
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lp.v1i2.6941

Abstract

Murder cases in Indonesia often occur but there is one murder case committed by law enforcers. This harms the public view of law enforcement officials. On the other hand, we must be able to see this murder case from the perspective of the murderer, one of whom is Richard Eliezer in the murder case of Brigadier Joshua Hutabarat. Richard Eliezer was a policeman who killed another policeman, Joshua. In this murder we must be able to see from different perspectives such as the perspective of psychology, sociology and society so that everyone can judge whether the penalty that Richard Eliezer recevied was proper or not. The purpose of this research is to examine from the criminological perspective the premeditated murder perpetrated by law enforcement officers against their aides who should be under their guidance. The methodology used is normative, reinforced by primary data, especially in the material of Court Decision no. 798/Pid.B/2022, statements from witnesses in this premeditated murder case. Then, analyze with secondary data and the law system in the police. It is found that psychology of abuse of power often involves analyzing the motivations and behaviors of individuals who abuse power, as well as the factors that influence and prevent such behavior related to the penalty imposed in the case law, seen from perspectives such as the psychology, sociology and society.
Obstruction of Justice by Lawyer Fredrich Yunadi in the Corruption Case of the E-KTP (Electronic Identity Card) Procurement Project Involving Former People's Representative Council Chairman Setya Novanto Halomoan, Daniel; Hidayat, Figo Edsel; Pahlevi, Jaya; Tama A.P, Rezki; Arta, Rofik Cahya; Bayakta, William Rando
Lex Prospicit Vol. 1 No. 2: July 2023
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lp.v1i2.6947

Abstract

Many lawyers have encountered cases of legal obstruction, which raises concerns since advocates are a respected profession within law enforcement. This paper aims to: (1) provide examples of cases and explain the modus operandi and working system in the case of Fredrich Yunadi's legal obstruction; (2) examine how legal obstacles have become phenomena within the legal profession; (3) offer sociological and psychological perspectives from criminologists; and (4) investigate the implementation and process of punishment for the perpetrators. This research falls under the category of normative research, as the author examines library and secondary materials. The study reviews positive law and legal principles. Primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials serve as the data sources. The data collection method employed is library research or documentary studies. Based on the research findings, two main conclusions can be drawn. First, law enforcement actions in Indonesia have not effectively prevented advocates from being prosecuted for corruption, as not all legal subjects comply with relevant legal norms. This is influenced by three components of law enforcement: legal substance, law enforcement, and legal culture. Second, the connection between law enforcement and lawyers accused of obstructing justice with advocates' right to immunity is related to the fact that the position of advocates is vulnerable to intersect with obstruction of justice when advocates define their right to immunity without considering the limitations stipulated in laws and regulations. This highlights the importance of advocating a code of ethics for advocates.

Page 5 of 5 | Total Record : 43

 1   2   3   4   5 

Filter by Year

2023 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 3 No. 2: July 2025 Vol. 3 No. 1: February 2025 Vol. 2 No. 2: July 2024 Vol 2, No 1: February 2024 Vol. 2 No. 1: February 2024 Vol. 1 No. 2: July 2023 Vol 1, No 2: July 2023 Vol 1, No 1: February 2023 Vol. 1 No. 1: February 2023