cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Agus Budianto
Contact Email
agus.budianto@uph.edu
Phone
+622125535168
Journal Mail Official
lexprospiciteditor@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Kampus Pascasarjana Universitas Pelita Harapan Plaza Semanggi lt. 16, Jl. Jend. Sudirman No. 50, RT.1/RW.4, Karet Semanggi, Kecamatan Setiabudi, Kota Jakarta Selatan, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 12930
Location
Kota tangerang,
Banten
INDONESIA
Lex Prospicit
Published by Universitas Pelita Harapan
ISSN : 29881781     EISSN : 29881773     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Lex Prospicit is a scientific journal published by the Master of Law Study Program, Faculty of Law, Universitas Pelita Harapan in collaboration with Asosiasi Advokat Indonesia (AAI) and serves as a venue for scientific information in the field of law resulting from scientific research or research-based scientific law writing. The articles published in this journal cover a broad range of topics, including Business Law, Antitrust and Competition Law, Intellectual Property Rights Law, Criminal Law, International Law, Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, Agrarian Law, Health Law, Adat Law, Environmental Law, Banking Law, Cyber Law, Bankruptcy Law, WTO Law, Investment Law, Tax Law, Human Rights Law, ADR and Arbitration Law, and Labor Law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 43 Documents
 1   2   3   4   5 
Mechanism of Share Transfer Through Court Decision for Shareholders in a State of Absence (Afwezigheid) Effendy, Edrick Edwardina; Octaviara, Talia
Lex Prospicit Vol. 3 No. 2: July 2025
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lp.v3i2.8399

Abstract

There are many problems found in the civil aspect these days, which are diverse and complex, so comprehensive arrangements are needed to fulfil all civil rights in humans as one of the subjects of civil law. This research will specifically discuss the state of Afwezigheid as a shareholder of a limited liability company where the assets owned are in the form of shares. To carry out the civil rights of an absent person (Afwezig), a determination of Afwezigheid is required by the local District Court, which then appoints Balai Harta Peninggalan (BHP) as a Special Manager (Bewindvoerder) to carry out management of the absent person's assets. This research is a normative legal study using secondary data, applying statute approach, conceptual approach, and historical approach. The data were collected through literature review of books, laws, and regulations relating to the state of Afwezigheid and its position under the Civil Code and Law Number 40 of 2007 on Limited Liability Company. The findings indicate that the absence (Afwezigheid) of a shareholder must be established by a court ruling, with BHP managing the shareholder’s rights and assets. However, the lack of clear technical procedures for share transfer creates legal uncertainty in practice.
Legal Compliance of Indonesian Marriage Law with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights Kennedy, Alexander
Lex Prospicit Vol. 3 No. 1: February 2025
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lp.v3i1.8937

Abstract

The Indonesian Marriage Law Number 1 of 1974 requires marriages to follow the religious laws of both parties, creating challenges for couples from different faiths. These legal constraints often complicate marriage registration, affecting the legal status, inheritance rights, and recognition of children from such unions. The tension between individual rights and religious conformity results in a legal paradox, as Indonesia seeks to balance constitutional freedoms with religious harmony. This article explores the complexities of interfaith marriage in Indonesia, focusing on the interplay between religious doctrines, legal frameworks, and societal attitudes. Using a normative juridical approach, this study analyzes statutory regulations, court decisions, and legal literature to assess the alignment of Indonesia’s laws with international human rights standards, especially Article 16 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). Case studies show that while some court rulings have supported interfaith marriage, broader legal reforms and social acceptance remain necessary. The article concludes with recommendations for reform, emphasizing the need for legal provisions to accommodate interfaith unions, foster social acceptance, and create a balanced framework that respects religious values and individual freedoms. By promoting open dialogue and a more inclusive legal environment, Indonesia can navigate the complexities of interfaith marriage, balancing tradition with modernity. These efforts could contribute to a society that respects diversity and the evolving aspirations of its people.
Aspek Hukum Pemanfaatan Barang Milik Negara Perwakilan Republik Indonesia di Luar Negeri Pratidina, Khania Nirmala
Lex Prospicit Vol. 3 No. 2: July 2025
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lp.v3i2.9079

Abstract

The utilization of State Property owned by ministries/institutions is not a new thing in the national asset management system, but in its development, a problem was found that there are State Properties owned by Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia abroad that have not been utilized optimally in matters outside their duties and functions to support diplomatic activities abroad. This research is a normative juridical research that focuses on literature study regarding the regulation of the use of state property by Representatives of Foreign Countries in international law provisions and how Indonesian national law provisions regulate the utilization of State Properties owned by Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia abroad for commercial activities. Based on the research, it can be concluded that the utilization of State Properties owned by Representatives of Foreign Countries for commercial activities is contrary to international law, especially the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations 1961 and the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations 1963. However, there are exceptions that provide space for Representatives of Foreign Countries, namely if of course with the consequence that the State Properties releases its privileges such as immunity and tax exemption. In national legal provisions, the management of State Properties abroad is regulated in Minister of Finance Regulation Number 271/PMK.06/2015 and Minister of Foreign Affairs Regulation Number 5 of 2016, but both regulations have not accommodated the use of State Properties for Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia abroad. Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Pemanfaatan Barang Milik Negara (BMN) yang dimiliki oleh kementerian/lembaga bukan merupakan hal baru dalam sistem tata kelola aset nasional, namun pada perkembangannya ditemukan permasalahan bahwa terdapat BMN yang dimiliki oleh Perwakilan Republik Indonesia di luar negeri yang belum dimanfaatkan secara maksimal dalam hal di luar tugas dan fungsinya mendukung kegiatan diplomasi di luar negeri. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis normatif yang berpusat pada studi kepustakaan mengenai pengaturan penggunaan BMN oleh Perwakilan Negara Asing dalam ketentuan hukum internasional serta bagaimana ketentuan hukum nasional Indonesia mengatur mengenai pemanfaatan BMN yang dimiliki oleh Perwakilan Republik Indonesia di luar negeri untuk kegiatan yang bersifat komersial. Berdasarkan penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa pemanfaatan BMN milik Perwakilan Negara Asing untuk kegiatan komersial merupakan hal yang bertentangan dengan hukum internasional khususnya Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relation 1961 dan Vienna Convention on Consular Relation 1963. Namun terdapat pengecualian yang memberikan ruang kepada Perwakilan Negara Asing, yaitu apabila tentunya dengan konsekuensi bahwa BMN tersebut melepaskan privileges yang dimiliki seperti imunitas dan pembebasan pajak. Dalam ketentuan hukum nasional, pengelolaan BMN di luar negeri diatur dalam Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 271/PMK.06/2015 dan Peraturan Menteri Luar Negeri Nomor 5 Tahun 2016, namun kedua peraturan tersebut belum mengakomodir pemanfaatan BMN bagi Perwakilan Republik Indonesia di luar negeri.
Pemenuhan Pemenang Lelang Hak Tanggungan Aset Cessie Setelah Proses Lelang di Kantor Pelayanan Kekayaan Negara Lelang Bogor Rambing, Donny Sulistio; Nugraha, Dwi Putra
Lex Prospicit Vol. 3 No. 2: July 2025
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lp.v3i2.9111

Abstract

The economic development in Indonesia has emphasized the importance of guarantee institutions that provide legal certainty, including the implementation of security rights auctions through the State Asset Management and Auction Office (KPKNL). Security rights auctions serve as a mechanism to resolve debtor defaults against creditors, conducted through public auctions in accordance with Law Number 4 of 1996. However, this process often encounters challenges such as unsold assets, legal disputes, or administrative obstacles. This study aims to analyze the implementation of security rights auctions at KPKNL Bogor and post-auction legal efforts for auction winners at KPKNL. This study employs a qualitative method with a descriptive-analytical approach. Data were collected through interviews with KPKNL officials, auction houses, and reviews of relevant legal documents. The findings indicate that the auction process adheres to applicable regulations but is frequently hindered by administrative issues, lack of transparency, and post-auction disputes. These challenges impede legal certainty for auction winners and often require time-consuming legal resolutions. The study concludes by recommending the strengthening of more specific auction regulations, increasing transparency in auction processes, and educating the public to understand auction procedures. Synergy between KPKNL, auction houses, and related authorities is also necessary to ensure the smooth execution of auctions and the protection of auction winners' rights. These efforts can make security rights auctions a more efficient mechanism for resolving debt disputes. Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Perkembangan ekonomi di Indonesia telah mendorong pentingnya lembaga jaminan hak yang memberikan kepastian hukum, termasuk dalam pelaksanaan lelang hak tanggungan melalui Kantor Pelayanan Kekayaan Negara dan Lelang (KPKNL). Lelang hak tanggungan merupakan mekanisme penyelesaian wanprestasi debitur terhadap kreditur, yang dilakukan melalui pelelangan umum sesuai dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1996. Namun, proses ini tidak jarang menghadapi tantangan, seperti aset yang tidak laku, sengketa hukum, atau kendala administrasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pelaksanaan lelang hak tanggungan di KPKNL Bogor dan upaya hukum pasca lelang Hak Tanggungan asset Cessie bagi pemenang lelang di KPKNL. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif-analitis. Data diperoleh melalui wawancara dengan pihak KPKNL, balai lelang, dan tinjauan dokumen hukum terkait. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pelaksanaan lelang telah sesuai dengan peraturan yang berlaku, tetapi sering terkendala oleh faktor administrasi, kurangnya transparansi, dan sengketa pasca-lelang. Kendala ini menghambat kepastian hukum bagi pemenang lelang dan memerlukan penyelesaian melalui jalur hukum yang sering memakan waktu. Kesimpulan penelitian menyarankan penguatan regulasi lelang yang lebih spesifik, peningkatan transparansi dalam proses lelang, dan edukasi kepada masyarakat untuk memahami prosedur lelang. Sinergi antara KPKNL, balai lelang, dan otoritas terkait juga diperlukan untuk memastikan kelancaran pelaksanaan lelang dan perlindungan hak pemenang lelang. Dengan upaya ini, lelang hak tanggungan dapat menjadi mekanisme yang lebih efisien dalam menyelesaikan sengketa utang-piutang.
Implementasi Hukum Terhadap Buzzer Politik yang Menimbulkan Kerusuhan di Masyarakat Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 Soegiarto, Angelica Christyanto
Lex Prospicit Vol. 3 No. 1: February 2025
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lp.v3i1.9112

Abstract

The presence of political buzzers on social media has a significant impact on the political map in Indonesia, especially in terms of spreading hoaxes and misleading information that can damage the reputation of certain individuals or groups. This phenomenon has the potential to cause unrest in the community, especially in the context of elections and democratic stability. This research aims to analyze the application of law against political buzzers in Indonesia, as well as identify the elements of political buzzer actions that can cause public unrest. The research method used is normative-empirical legal research, by collecting secondary data in the form of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, which are then reinforced by interviews with relevant sources. The results showed that although there are laws and regulations, such as Law Number 1 of 2024 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions, the application of law against political buzzers has not been effective. This is due to the ineffective application of the offense of complaint which depends on the initiative of the aggrieved party, as well as the complexity of political dynamics. This research also found that political buzzers can be categorized based on the rewards received and the purpose of disseminating controversial and damaging information. Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Kehadiran buzzer politik di media sosial memberikan dampak yang cukup signifikan terhadap peta politik di Indonesia, terutama dalam hal penyebaran hoaks dan informasi yang menyesatkan yang dapat merusak reputasi individu atau kelompok tertentu. Fenomena ini berpotensi menimbulkan keresahan di masyarakat, terutama dalam konteks pemilu dan stabilitas demokrasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penerapan hukum terhadap buzzer politik di Indonesia, serta mengidentifikasi unsur-unsur perbuatan buzzer politik yang dapat menimbulkan keresahan masyarakat. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif-empiris, dengan mengumpulkan data sekunder berupa bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier, yang kemudian diperkuat dengan wawancara dengan narasumber terkait. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun telah ada peraturan perundang-undangan, seperti Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik, namun penerapan hukum terhadap buzzer politik belum efektif. Hal ini disebabkan oleh belum efektifnya penerapan delik aduan yang bergantung pada inisiatif dari pihak yang dirugikan, serta kompleksitas dinamika politik. Penelitian ini juga menemukan bahwa buzzer politik dapat dikategorikan berdasarkan imbalan yang diterima dan tujuan penyebaran informasi yang bersifat kontroversial dan merusak. 
DOUBLE PUNISHMENT IN THE WAITING TIME FOR DEATH PENALTY: A STUDY OF HUMAN RIGHTS PROTECTION IN INDONESIA Sidabukke, Sahat Marulitua
Lex Prospicit Vol. 1 No. 1: February 2023
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lp.v1i1.6634

Abstract

In Indonesia, until 2022 there were 428 people who have been sentenced with death penalty by anaesthetics and were still waiting for their execution to be carried out. Among those people, 101 have been sitting in the death row for more than 10 years. This means that those who are sentenced to death by the court (inkracht van gewijsde) were imprisoned for life until their execution. They had to carry out two kinds of punishments, videlicet death penalty and imprisonment. There is a lengthy waiting time, which results in the neglect of death row convicts' rights. This is a normative juridical research with data collected through literature study, court decision analysis, and concept test in focus group discussion attended by Supreme Prosecutor, Supreme Court, National Narcotics Agency, State Police of Republic of Indonesia and National Commission of Human Rights. The result of this research shows that such waiting period creates distrust between judicial institutions. It also creates uncertainty and becomes a loophole for death row inmates to apply for unlimited legal remedies which causes delay of the execution of the death penalty. On the other hand, the role of the Public Prosecutor as the executioner of death penalty is not yet optimal. Because of the two reasons above (legal remedies and political will), they worry about potentially being considered as violating human rights. 
REPOSISI KEDUDUKAN DAN KEWENANGAN PENYIDIK PEGAWAI NEGERI SIPIL (PPNS) DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA INDONESIA [REPOSITION OF POSITION AND AUTHORITY OF PPNS IN THE INDONESIAN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM] Marpaung, Oloan C. H.
Lex Prospicit Vol. 1 No. 1: February 2023
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lp.v1i1.6635

Abstract

PPNS in its position and authority as the embodiment of law enforcement, it can be seen that there is subordination of other law enforcement sub-systems. The purpose of this paper is to reposition the position and authority of the PPNS in the Criminal Justice System so they are not seen as subordinate and placed as assistants to Police Investigators. The formulation of the problem in this study are the position and authority of PPNS in the Indonesian criminal justice system and legal certainty about the position and authority of PPNS in the criminal justice system in Indonesia. This research is a normative-empirical research conducted by analyzing the implementation of normative legal provisions (laws) with a case study approach, then in analyzing the data using a deductive method, namely drawing conclusions from a problem faced that is specific. The results of this study are that the existence of PPNS is very much needed in conducting investigations due to the complexity of the investigation, the existence of special crimes, and the limitations of Polri investigators. Regarding the implementation of the duties of civil servants so that there is no overlap between Polri investigators and PPNS, the government has set various regulations regarding the mechanism for the appointment and dismissal of PPNS, as well as the implementation of coordination and supervision carried out by Polri investigators against PPNS.Bahasa Abstrak Indonesia: PPNS dalam kedudukan maupun kewenangannya sebagai perwujudan dari penegak hukum, dapat diketahui terjadinya sub-ordinasi atas sub-sistem penegak hukum yang lain. Tujuan dari penulisan ini adalah menempatkan kembali (reposisi) kedudukan dan kewenangan PPNS dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana sehingga tidak terlihat sebagai subordinasi dan ditempatkan sebagai pembantu Penyidik Kepolisian. Rumusan masalah dalam penelitian mengangkat hal kedudukan dan kewenangan PPNS dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia dan kepastian hukum terhadap kedudukan dan kewenangan PPNS dalam sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian Normatif-Empiris yang dilakukan dengan menganalisis implementasi ketentuan hukum normatif (undang-undang) dengan pendekatan Pendekatan terhadap kasus hukum (case study), kemudian dalam penganalisian data menggunakan metode deduktif, yakni menarik kesimpulan dari suatu permasalahan yang dihadapi yang bersifat khusus.Hasil penelitian ini adalah keberadaan PPNS sangat dibutuhkan dalam melakukan penyidikan dikarenakan kompleksnya penyidikan, adanya tindak pidana yang bersifat khusus, dan keterbatasan dari Penyidik Polri. Terkait pelaksanaan tugas PNS agar harmonis dan tidak terjadi tumpang tindih antara Penyidik Polri dan PPNS, pemerintah telah menetapkan berbagai peraturan mengenai mekanisme pengangkatan dan pemberhentian PPNS, serta pelaksanaan koordinasi dan pengawasan yang dilakukan Penyidik Polri terhadap PPNS.
IMPLEMENTASI KEBIJAKAN HUKUM PERDAGANGAN DI INDONESIA PADA SAAT TERJADINYA KOMPETISI DAGANG AMERIKA DENGAN CHINA [IMPLEMENTATION OF TRADE LAW POLICY IN INDONESIA AT THE TIME OF THE OCCURRENCE OF TRADE COMPETITION BETWEEN AMERICA AND CHINA] Hadawang, M. Rusdyanto
Lex Prospicit Vol. 1 No. 1: February 2023
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lp.v1i1.6671

Abstract

This research examines the policies issued by the Government of Indonesia, especially in trade law policies at the time of trade wars or trade competition between America and China. This study uses a type of normative research through a legal history approach, a conceptual approach, an approach to legal principles, and a legal political approach in order to achieve the research objectives, namely to present legal facts and examine the impact of trade competition between America and China on Indonesia in the field of trade law at the time of the occurrence of trade competition between America and China with conformity to the principles stipulated in Article 2 of Law Number 7 of 2014 concerning Trade. The results of the study show that the impact that is felt by Indonesia is illustrated in the presentation of data on Indonesia's fluctuating export-import activities and also exposure regarding regulations and policies resulting from negotiations between countries as stipulated in international trade agreements that have been ratified and applied to the people of Indonesia. The resulting conclusion is that due to trade competition between America and China, Indonesia has issued regulatory changes related to export-import activities and also provisions in the defense industry which regulate the involvement of the private sector in the manufacture of defense equipment, through changes in Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation and Law Number 16 of 2012 concerning the Defense Industry. Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Penelitian ini mengkaji tentang kebijakan yang dikeluarkan oleh Pemerintah Indonesia khususnya dalam kebijakan hukum perdagangan pada saat terjadinya perang dagang atau kompetisi dagang antara Amerika dengan China. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian normatif melalui pendekatan sejarah hukum, pendekatan konseptual, pendekatan asas-asas hukum, serta pendekatan politik hukum guna mencapai tujuan penelitian yaitu untuk menyajikan fakta hukum dan mengkaji dampak kompetisi dagang antara Amerika dengan China terhadap Indonesia di bidang hukum perdagangan pada saat terjadinya kompetisi dagang antara Amerika dengan China dengan kesesuaian asas-asas yang diatur dalam Pasal 2 Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2014 tentang Perdagangan. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa dampak yang dirasakan Indonesia, tergambarkan dalam sajian data tentang kegiatan ekspor impor Indonesia yang fluktuatif dan juga pemaparan terkait regulasi dan kebijakan hasil perundingan antar negara yang dituang dalam perjanjian perdagangan internasional yang telah diratifikasi dan diberlakukan kepada masyarakat Indonesia. Kesimpulan yang dihasilkan bahwa dampak kompetisi dagang antara Amerika dengan China, Indonesia telah mengeluarkan perubahan regulasi terkait dengan kegiatan ekspor impor dan juga ketentuan dalam industri pertahanan yang mengatur keterlibatan pihak swasta dalam pembuatan alutsista, melalui perubahan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja dan Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2012 tentang Industri Pertahanan.
Optimalization of the Application of Act Number 22 of 2022 Concerning Companies in Overcoming Problems of Management of Corporate Institutions (Lapas) in Indonesia Sheiba, Tasya Einakrisda
Lex Prospicit Vol. 1 No. 2: July 2023
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lp.v1i2.6672

Abstract

The purpose of correctional systems is to improve the quality of personality and independence of inmates so that they are aware of their mistakes, improve themselves, and not repeat criminal acts, so that they can be accepted again by the community, can live normally as good citizens, obey the law, be responsible, and can play an active role in development. However, this correctional goal cannot be realized properly and optimally if the problems that exist in prisons are still not resolved properly. The type of research used in this paper is a type of empirical normative research. Collecting data using literature study methods and also interviews through the Forum Group Discussion (FGD), with the type of approach to legal systematics and Non-Judicial Case Study as well as data analysis in the form of qualitative research. Based on the research that the author did, can conclude that problems related to overcapacity, prison facilities and infrastructure, and human resources (prison officers) can be overcome by the establishment of Law Number 22 of 2022, but problems related to halinar cannot yet be resolved by Law No. 22 of 2022. The form of optimization strategy that can be done to overcome problems in prisons is to optimize the coaching activities provided to inmates, where prisoners become more active, not just as observers, apply restorative justice in prisons and one example is by providing a special room for mothers and children, as well as forming the National Correctional Agency (BAPASNAS).
PERSYARATAN E-COMMERCE MERUGIKAN KONSUMEN PADA TRANSAKSI BARANG ELEKTRONIK DI MARKETPLACE [E-COMMERCE REQUIREMENTS HARMING CONSUMERS IN ELECTRONIC GOODS TRANSACTIONS IN THE MARKETPLACE] Adilia, Widya Fitri
Lex Prospicit Vol. 1 No. 1: February 2023
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lp.v1i1.6680

Abstract

Issues related to consumer rights are often neglected in the era of digital technology and the laws and regulations of Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection are felt to be increasingly irrelevant. Many are still found in e-commerce transactions through marketplaces, which ignore consumer rights through digital requirements made unilaterally by business actors. This writing is focused on the purchase of electronic goods by consumers in e-commerce transactions through marketplaces, so that a formulation of the problem is compiled about how the forms of e-commerce requirements are burdensome and detrimental to consumers in electronic goods transactions in the marketplace, and how are consumers' efforts to obtain rights to goods electronics purchased in the marketplace when viewed from a review of Indonesian law. The writing methodology is carried out by using empirical normative research to assist in solving problems in the field of consumer protection law and assisting in the discovery of ideas for the development of legal science in providing protection for consumer rights in the digital technology era. E-commerce requirements that are burdensome and detrimental to consumers in electronic goods transactions in the marketplace are in the form of standard clauses in which there are still many provisions that violate the contents of Article 18 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. Efforts by consumers to obtain rights to electronic goods purchased in the marketplace within existing regulatory provisions, that law in Indonesia still does not have specific standard requirements, and a form of supervision to take firm action against marketplace business actors who violate the provisions prohibiting the standard clauses included in the requirements e-commerce transactions.  Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Permasalahan terkait hak konsumen yang sering terabaikan di era teknologi digital, peraturan perundang-undangan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen dirasa sudah semakin kurang relevan. Masih banyak ditemukan dalam transaksi e-commerce melalui marketplace, yang mengabaikan hak-hak konsumen melalui persyaratan digital yang dibuat sepihak oleh pelaku usaha. Penulisan ini difokuskan pada pembelian barang elektronik oleh konsumen dalam transasksi e-commerce melalui marketplace, sehingga disusun sebuah rumusan masalah tentang bagaimanakah bentuk persyaratan e-commerce yang memberatkan dan merugikan konsumen pada transaksi barang elektronik di marketplace, serta bagaimana upaya konsumen untuk mendapatkan hak atas barang elektronik yang dibeli di marketplace bila dilihat dari tinjauan hukum Indonesia. Metodologi penulisan dilakukan dengan menggunakan jenis penelitian normatif empiris guna membantu dalam memecahan persoalan di bidang hukum perlindungan konsumen dan membantu penemuan gagasan pengembangan ilmu hukum dalam memberikan perlindungan hak konsumen di era teknologi digital. Persyaratan e-commerce yang memberatkan dan merugikan konsumen pada transaksi barang elektronik di marketplace ialah berupa klausula baku yang isinya masih banyak ditemukan ketentuan yang melanggar isi Pasal 18 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Upaya konsumen untuk mendapatkan hak atas barang elektronik yang dibeli di marketplace dalam ketentuan regulasi yang ada, bahwa hukum di Indonesia masih belum memiliki standar persyaratan khusus, dan bentuk pengawasan untuk menindak tegas para pelaku usaha marketplace yang melanggar ketentuan larangan klausula baku yang dicantumkan di dalam persyaratan transaksi e-commerce.

Page 4 of 5 | Total Record : 43

 1   2   3   4   5 

Filter by Year

2023 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 3 No. 2: July 2025 Vol. 3 No. 1: February 2025 Vol. 2 No. 2: July 2024 Vol 2, No 1: February 2024 Vol. 2 No. 1: February 2024 Vol. 1 No. 2: July 2023 Vol 1, No 2: July 2023 Vol 1, No 1: February 2023 Vol. 1 No. 1: February 2023