cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda
Contact Email
penerbitdarulhuda@gmail.com
Phone
+6285280459234
Journal Mail Official
penerbitdarulhuda@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jln Pendidikan No. 1, Cot Seurani, Muara Batu, Aceh Utara,
Location
Kab. aceh utara,
Aceh
INDONESIA
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI)
Published by Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30326591     DOI : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10995150
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
The aims of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers, and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deals with a broad range of topics in the fields of Criminal Law, Civil Law, International Law, Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, Islamic Law, Economic Law, Medical Law, Adat Law, Environmental Law and another section related contemporary issues in law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Ilmu Sosial (Lain-Lain)
Articles 1,052 Documents
 102   103   104   105   106 
The Failure of Lex Temporalis to Protect Medical Professionals: An Analysis of Reactive Law in the Palembang Medical Intern Case and the Augustinian Demand for Justice Muhamad Abdul Aziz Hasibuan; Muhamad Yaseer Zaydan
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 4, No 3 (2026): September 2026
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23658921

Abstract

Medical clerkship doctors occupy a structurally vulnerable position because they are students who provide health services without holding a Registration Certificate or Practice License. This study examines the legal protection afforded to a clerkship doctor who was physically assaulted in Palembang on 10 December 2024, before and after the case attracted public attention, and evaluates post-viral law enforcement through Augustine’s maxim lex iniusta non est lex. It employs a normative juridical method with a legal philosophy approach, drawing on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The findings reveal a gap between the protections provided in Law Number 17 of 2023 on Health (das sollen) and their enforcement in practice (das sein), which accelerated only after public pressure intensified. Procedurally, post-viral enforcement did proceed. Substantively, however, it fails to satisfy moral justice in the Augustinian sense, because it was driven by the need to restore institutional image rather than to fulfil the victim’s rights. Justice conditioned on virality also produces structural inequality for victims whose cases never go viral.
Penyembunyian Aset Hasil Korupsi Melalui Nominee Pada Perkara Jiwasraya dalam Perspektif Moralitas dan Legitimasi Kepemilikan Amanda Fitra Hamzah; Junita Marsyabillah
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 4, No 3 (2026): September 2026
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23529611

Abstract

 The concealment of assets derived from corruption through the use of nominees raises questions regarding the morality of such actions and the legitimacy of ownership over assets acquired via criminal conduct. This study aims to analyze the concealment of corruption-derived assets through nominees—drawing upon Immanuel Kant’s deontology as well as the legitimacy of asset possession and transfer, based on Robert Nozick’s entitlement theory, within the context of the Jiwasraya case. The research employs a normative legal methodology, utilizing case-based, conceptual, and statutory approaches. Legal materials are analyzed qualitatively through a prescriptive-analytical method, linking the legal facts of the Jiwasraya case with Kant’s principles of moral duty and Nozick’s theory of justice in holdings. The findings indicate that the use of nominees to obscure the origins of assets derived from corruption—and to evade accountability—violates the principles of universality and the treatment of human beings as ends in themselves, as posited in Kantian deontology. According to Nozick’s entitlement theory, the legitimacy of the possession and transfer of assets is determined by the history of their acquisition; assets proven to originate from criminal activity do not become legitimate simply by being registered under a nominee’s name. The principle of "justice in rectification of injustice" provides a basis for asset recovery as a corrective measure against historical injustices in ownership. Any assessment of a nominee’s role must necessarily take into account the individual’s level of knowledge and degree of involvement.

Page 106 of 106 | Total Record : 1052

 102   103   104   105   106 

Filter by Year

2024 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 4, No 3 (2026): September 2026 Vol 4, No 4 (2026): December Vol 4, No 2 (2026): June Vol 4, No 1 (2026): March Vol 3, No 4 (2025): December Vol 3, No 3 (2025): September Vol 3, No 2 (2025): June Vol 3, No 1 (2025): March Vol 2, No 4 (2024): December Vol 2, No 3 (2024): September Vol 2, No 2 (2024): June Vol 2, No 1 (2024): March More Issue