cover
Contact Name
Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda
Contact Email
penerbitdarulhuda@gmail.com
Phone
+6285280459234
Journal Mail Official
penerbitdarulhuda@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jln Pendidikan No. 1, Cot Seurani, Muara Batu, Aceh Utara,
Location
Kab. aceh utara,
Aceh
INDONESIA
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI)
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30326591     DOI : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10995150
Core Subject : Social,
The aims of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers, and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deals with a broad range of topics in the fields of Criminal Law, Civil Law, International Law, Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, Islamic Law, Economic Law, Medical Law, Adat Law, Environmental Law and another section related contemporary issues in law.
Articles 1,052 Documents
Peran KPU dalam Menjamin Pemenuhan Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara untuk Memilih dalam Pemilihan Umum Yoas Setiawan
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 4, No 3 (2026): September 2026
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23398337

Abstract

This study aims to examine the role of the General Elections Commission (KPU) in ensuring the fulfillment of citizens’ constitutional right to vote and to identify the obstacles encountered in its implementation. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that the fulfillment of the right to vote requires electoral administration that is accurate, transparent, inclusive, and sustainable. Voter data updating, the dissemination of information to the public, the provision of mechanisms for correcting voter data, and enhanced coordination with relevant institutions are essential measures to ensure that citizens’ voting rights are not hindered by administrative issues. Therefore, the KPU holds a strategic position in ensuring the exercise of the right to vote as an integral part of citizens’ constitutional rights.
A Juridical Analysis of the Exception of Incomplete Parties (Plurium Litis Consortium) in a Fire Insurance Claim Dispute (A Study of Court Decision Number 947/Pdt.G/2020/PNJKT.SEL) Pradana Adji Setyo; Suwarsit S; Neil Aldrin E. Foeh
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 4, No 3 (2026): September 2026
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23906941

Abstract

Insurance claim disputes involving collateral often raise formal problems in civil procedural law, particularly regarding the principle of complete parties. This study aims to analyze the application of the plurium litis consortium principle in insurance disputes containing a Banker's Clause, as well as to examine the legal consequences of a breach of contract lawsuit if the collateral-holding bank is not included as a party to the case. Through a normative juridical research method with case and statutory approaches, the results of the study indicate that the collateral clause grants absolute rights to the bank over the object of the dispute, thus transforming its position into a directly interested party. The plaintiff's negligence in including the bank is proven to violate the audi et alteram partem principle and results in the lawsuit's construction becoming formally defective as an error in persona classified as plurium litis consortium. The legal consequence arising from this procedural defect is the issuance of a Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard (N.O) decision by the panel of judges, which immediately halts the examination process without touching upon the evidentiary aspects of the main case. The rendering of this N.O decision represents the dominance of legal certainty over substantive justice, where the decision lacks material binding force (res judicata) and the ne bis in idem principle does not apply. 
Expansion of The Business Judgment Rule Doctrine for Regional Development Bank Employees In Non-Performing Loan Cases Nelty Salviani; Ryzky Yan Deriza
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 4, No 3 (2026): September 2026
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23636891

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the determinant factors causing the legal vacuum in BJR-based protection for BPD employees in anti-corruption cases and to formulate a legal construction expanding the BJR doctrine as a material testing parameter in criminal proceedings. Employing normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, this article introduces a novel concept termed derivative business judgment protection. The findings reveal that the legal vacuum stems from a formalistic reduction of fiduciary duty exclusively attached to the structural Board of Directors and the lack of synchronization between the regional public finance regime and banking business risk. This study constructs a derivative expansion of BJR for BPD credit-line employees through five cumulative material testing parameters—validity of delegated authority, compliance with Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) and prudential banking principles, absence of mens rea (fraud, bribery, or conflict of interest), ex-ante rationality, and external causality of default—to demarcate credit business risks from the unlawfulness of corruption.
A Legal-Philosophical Perspective on the Resolution of Minor Criminal Offenses through restorative justice: An Analysis of the Values of Justice, Legal Certainty, and Utility Syahla Pridehan; Riovaldi Paruntungan Silalahi
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 4, No 3 (2026): September 2026
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23433719

Abstract

Resolving minor criminal offenses through the conventional criminal justice process is often disproportionate to the harm caused and burdens law enforcement institutions, which is why restorative justice is regarded as an alternative. This study aims to describe the regulation of restorative justice in resolving minor criminal offenses in Indonesia and to assess the extent to which that regulation reflects the values of justice, legal certainty, and utility from the perspective of legal philosophy. The study employs a normative juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches, with qualitative analysis of primary and secondary legal materials. The findings show that restorative justice has a regulatory basis at the investigation, prosecution, and court examination stages, among others through Indonesian National Police Regulation Number 8 of 2021, Indonesian Attorney General's Office Regulation Number 15 of 2020, and Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2024. These regulations can reflect justice when agreements are reached voluntarily and victims' rights are protected, can reflect legal certainty when the requirements and authority at each stage are applied consistently, and are beneficial when they produce real and proportionate recovery. The study concludes that restorative justice is consistent with the aims of law when the balance among these three values is maintained.
An Analysis of the Forced Eviction Policy under the Ciliwung River Normalization Program in Bukit Duri from the Perspective of Jeremy Bentham’s Theory of Utilitarianism Dian Anggi Rahayu; Widya Tri Lestari
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 4, No 3 (2026): September 2026
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23756787

Abstract

The eviction of Bukit Duri residents in South Jakarta in September 2016 was carried out as part of the Ciliwung River normalization program aimed at reducing flood risk. The policy raised legal and social issues because it affected the constitutional right to adequate housing. This article analyzes the implementation of the eviction policy under applicable law and assesses the balance between the benefits of the normalization program and the losses suffered by affected residents through Jeremy Bentham’s utilitarian theory. This study employs normative legal research with statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. The research materials are secondary data analyzed using a descriptive-prescriptive qualitative technique, with the felicific calculus as the assessment standard. The findings show that the objective of normalization can be justified on utilitarian grounds because it protects many residents from flooding. However, its implementation does not fully satisfy Bentham’s calculus, since the residents’ losses were intense, certain, and long-lasting, and the demolition proceeded before the legal process was concluded. This suffering was avoidable, as demonstrated by the later construction of Kampung Susun Produktif Tumbuh Cakung for former Bukit Duri residents. 
Potential Legal Violations in the Conduct of Elections and the Legal Accountability of the Semarang City General Election Commission (KPU) Bahrul Khilmi
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 4, No 3 (2026): September 2026
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23608138

Abstract

The conduct of democratic elections depends on election organizers who demonstrate integrity and can be held accountable. The General Election Commission (Komisi Pemilihan Umum or KPU) of Semarang City directly implements the technical stages of elections, making it vulnerable to procedural errors, alleged ethical violations, and even criminal issues. This study aims to (1) identify potential forms of legal violations in the conduct of elections at the municipal level, (2) explain the legal status and framework of legal accountability of the Semarang City General Election Commission, and (3) analyze the challenges of enforcing accountability, using the 2024 General Election as an illustration. This study employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and limited case approaches. The findings indicate that potential violations can be classified into three categories: administrative violations, violations of the code of ethics, and electoral crimes. Legal accountability operates through four channels: administrative, ethical, criminal, and constitutional. The primary weakness lies in the mismatch between individually imposed sanctions and the structural causes of violations. Other weaknesses include defensive institutional responses and the risk of criminal prosecution for technical negligence. This study recommends simulation-based training, an ethical early warning system, data transparency, and a clear distinction between administrative errors and criminal offenses.
Keadilan dalam Pengelolaan Pertambangan Nikel di Halmahera: Analisis Filsafat Hukum terhadap Hak Masyarakat Adat O’Hongana Manyawa Raditya Irawan; Ika Fadillah
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 4, No 3 (2026): September 2026
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23399676

Abstract

The management of nickel mining in Halmahera raises legal issues concerning the balance between the utilization of natural resources, environmental protection, and the fulfillment of the rights of the O’Hongana Manyawa Indigenous Community. This study aims to analyze environmental justice in nickel mining management and to assess the legal protection of the rights of the O’Hongana Manyawa Indigenous Community from the perspective of legal philosophy. This study employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and legal philosophical approaches. The analysis focuses on the principles of environmental justice, the rights of Indigenous communities, and the state’s obligations in the management of natural resources. From the perspective of legal philosophy, justice in natural resource management should not be measured solely by economic benefits and administrative compliance, but must also ensure environmental sustainability and respect for the rights of Indigenous communities. Therefore, nickel mining management needs to be directed toward more just, participatory, and sustainable governance.
Recognition of Local Wisdom in the Formation of Environmental Law: An Analysis of West Kalimantan Regional Regulation Number 1 of 2022 Based on the Theory of Legal Pluralism Artikasari A; Desy Natalia
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 4, No 3 (2026): September 2026
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23910985

Abstract

This research is motivated by the relationship between state recognition of local wisdom and the obligation to protect the environment, particularly in the practice of land clearing for shifting cultivation based on local wisdom in West Kalimantan. This study employs a normative juridical method using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The legal materials consist of primary and secondary legal sources, which are analyzed qualitatively. The findings indicate that the recognition of local wisdom under West Kalimantan Regional Regulation Number 1 of 2022 reflects an interactive relationship between state law and the norms prevailing within local communities. From the perspective of legal pluralism, this relationship is manifested through the recognition, accommodation, and regulation of traditional farming practices within the formal legal framework. Furthermore, the limits of recognition of customary practices are determined by Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management, as well as the principles of environmental protection.
Fatwa Muhammad Yusuf Al-Qardhawi tentang Nikah Misyar dalam Perspektif Maqashid Asy-Syari'ah Muhamad Zulfikar; Farida Ulvi Na’imah
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 4, No 3 (2026): September 2026
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23637272

Abstract

Misyar marriage is a contract whose pillars and conditions are fulfilled, yet in which the wife waives part of her rights, such as financial maintenance, a shared residence, and her night share. The practice stirs debate among Muslim jurists because it shifts the usual balance of spousal rights and duties. This study examines the fatwa of Muhammad Yusuf Al-Qardhawi on misyar marriage and evaluates it through maqashid al-shariah. It asks two questions: what Al-Qardhawi's fatwa on misyar marriage says, and how that fatwa fares when read through the objectives of Islamic law. The study is qualitative library research that applies content analysis to Zawaj al-Misyar: Haqiqatuhu wa Hukmuhu, Al-Halal wa al-Haram fi al-Islam, and Fiqh al-Zakah, using Al-Shatibi's Al-Muwafaqat and Jasser Auda's systems approach as analytical lenses. The findings show that Al-Qardhawi holds misyar marriage to be valid so long as its pillars and conditions are met, but treats it as a limited concession that is far from ideal and should not become common custom. From the maqashid perspective, the practice can support the protection of religion and lineage by closing the door to unlawful relations and preserving descent, yet it risks weakening the protection of life, dignity, property, and gender justice when carried out without responsibility. The fatwa remains defensible as a case-by-case solution under strict moral and social supervision.
Deconstructing Algorithmic Bias in Criminal Sentencing from the Perspective of Utilitarianism Theory Cheryl Gladisya Kafka; Nazwa Fatimah Az-Zahra
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 4, No 3 (2026): September 2026
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23450932

Abstract

Integrasi teknologi Kecerdasan Buatan (Artificial Intelligence/AI) dan machine learning ke dalam sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia menghadirkan perdebatan mendasar terkait keadilan, legitimasi etis, dan kepastian hukum. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bahaya algorithmic bias terhadap asas keadilan utilitarian serta merumuskan rekonstruksi diskresi hakim dalam menjaga prinsip due process of law. Menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif-filosofis melalui pendekatan Utilitarianisme, hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ketergantungan pada algoritma peradilan berpotensi merelokasi historical bias dari data masukan ke dalam keputusan hukum modern. Hal ini melanggar kalkulasi kebahagiaan kualitatif Utilitarianisme karena mereproduksi penderitaan diskriminatif pada kelompok marginal serta mereduksi martabat manusia menjadi sekadar angka probabilitas statistik. Fenomena Black Box AI dan automation bias juga mengancam independensi hakim, asas praduga tidak bersalah (presumption of innocence), serta memicu pergeseran berbahaya menuju Crime Control Model yang mengagungkan efisiensi teknis di atas prosedur hukum. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini merekomendasikan rekonstruksi diskresi hakim berbasis prinsip "kendali bermakna" (meaningful public control), yang menegaskan kedudukan AI murni sebagai alat bantu analitis (decision-support system) berbasis Explainable AI (XAI). Pusat pertimbangan normatif dan tanggung jawab moral pemidanaan harus tetap berada sepenuhnya di tangan hakim manusia guna menjamin transparansi, martabat terdakwa, dan keadilan substantif di era digital.