cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Muchtar A H Labetubun
Contact Email
mahlabetubun@gmail.com
Phone
+6285243175321
Journal Mail Official
jurnalpalasrev@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Ruang PATTIMURA Law Study Review, Lantai 2 Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Kampus Unpatti, Jl. Ir. M. Putuhena Kampus Poka, Ambon, Maluku 97233, Indonesia.
Location
Kota ambon,
Maluku
INDONESIA
PATTIMURA Law Study Review
Published by Universitas Pattimura
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30252245     DOI : https://doi.org/10.47268/palasrev
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
PATTIMURA Law Study Review yang dsingkat (PALASRev) adalah media peer-review yang dikelola dan diterbitkan oleh Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura. PATTIMURA Law Study Review menerbitkan karya ilmiah di bidang hukum, terbit tiga kali setahun pada bulan April, Agustus dan Desember. Tujuan jurnal ini adalah untuk menyediakan tempat bagi Mahasiswa untuk mempublikasikan artikel ilmiah dari luaran Skripsi dan atau sebagain dari Skripsi Mahasiswa Strata Satu (S1). Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura mewajibkan mahasiswa menggunggah karya ilmiah sebagai syarat ujian sarjana. Jurnal ini memberikan akses terbuka langsung ke kontennya berdasarkan prinsip bahwa membuat penelitian tersedia secara bebas untuk publik mendukung pertukaran pengetahuan global yang lebih besar. PATTIMURA Law Study Review tersedia secara online. Bahasa yang digunakan dalam jurnal ini adalah Bahasa Indonesia dan Bahasa Inggris. Ruang lingkup artikel yang dimuat dalam jurnal ini membahas berbagai isu di bidang Ilmu Hukum (Hukum Perdata, Hukum Islam, Hukum Bisnis/Ekonomi, Hukum Tata Negara, Hukum Administrasi Negara, Hukum Pidana, Hukum Internasional.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 253 Documents
 22   23   24   25   26 
Politik Hukum Pemulihan Aset Tindak Pidana Ekonomi: Sinkronisasi Norma Asset Recovery demi Menjaga Stabilitas Keuangan Negara Nadia Nabela; Andi Srikandi MPB
PATTIMURA Law Study Review Vol 4 No 1 (2026): April 2026 PATTIMURA Law Study Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/palasrev.v4i1.27060

Abstract

Economic crimes have triggered massive illicit capital flight, undermining the state's fiscal capacity and financial stability. Although asset recovery has become a global priority, Indonesia's legal framework remains ineffective in confiscating and recovering illicit assets. This study analyzes the structural fragmentation of Indonesia's asset recovery regulatory framework and evaluates its macroeconomic implications for the country's financial stability. Employing doctrinal legal research, the study applies statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, integrated with the Economic Analysis of Law framework. The findings reveal a severe disharmony between the in personam (conviction-based) and in rem (property-based) asset recovery regimes embedded in various sectoral laws, resulting in institutional fragmentation and sectoral rivalry. From an economic perspective, these normative conflicts generate high transaction and asset maintenance costs, leading to significant asset depreciation and a low asset recovery rate, ultimately imposing substantial losses on the State Budget (APBN). The study highlights the urgent need for a coherent and integrated asset recovery framework to enhance legal effectiveness, safeguard state finances, and strengthen Indonesia's fiscal resilience.
Penyelesaian Sengketa Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Pembangunan Pelabuhan Proyek Strategis Nasional Dora Alida Kalajukin; Adonia Ivone Laturette; Pieter Radjawane
PATTIMURA Law Study Review Vol 4 No 1 (2026): April 2026 PATTIMURA Law Study Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/palasrev.v4i1.27570

Abstract

A legal action carried out by the government to obtain land for development purposes by providing compensation to those who have rights to the land. who have rights to the land, as stipulated in Law Number 2 of 2012 on Land Acquisition for Development for the Public Interest. In terms of settlement Disputes over land for the public interest as well as in connection with the construction of national strategic project infrastructure, one of which is related to compensation to the ownership of the right to the object (land). which relates to compensation for ownership of rights to the object (land)for such development sometimes causes problems so that the compensation process causes problems between parties who claim to be the owner of the land (object or land). owner of the land (object or land). The research method used in writing this thesis is normative juridical research method. Based on the discussion in this paper by the author, the land acquisition procedure is always guided by existing laws and regulations, then in relation to the settlement of land acquisition disputes for the benefit of the construction of oil refinery port infrastructure which is a national strategic project in the Tanimbar Islands Regency, the settlement can be carried out in 2 ways, namely through non-litigation and litigation channels, thus, the land acquisition procedure is always based on the applicable laws and regulations and in resolving disputes over the issues studied, the procedure is in accordance with the Legislation. Furthermore, in relation to the settlement of land acquisition disputes for the benefit of the development of oil refinery port infrastructure which is a national strategic project in the Tanimbar Islands Regency, the settlement can be carried out in 2 ways, namely through non-litigation and litigation channels, thus, the land acquisition procedure in question is always based on applicable laws and regulations and in resolving disputes over the issues studied, the procedure is in accordance with the Legislation. Furthermore, in the case of the settlement of compensation for land acquisition based on the existing position case, if it has not yet obtained a court decision with permanent legal force, it can be pursued through non-litigation channels either in a family manner with the assistance of the Village Government and the local District Government facilitated by the Provincial Government so that the process of compensation for land and plants on it can be carried out properly and fairly,
Perlindungan Hukum Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah Melalui Lembaga Rechtsverwerking Kim Ahlam; Adonia Ivonne Laturette; Pieter Radjawane
PATTIMURA Law Study Review Vol 4 No 1 (2026): April 2026 PATTIMURA Law Study Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/palasrev.v4i1.27571

Abstract

Disputes related to land continue to increase, resulting in numerous cases, one of which involves land ownership rights through the concept of rechtsverwerking (Waiver of Rights) for those who have already obtained land ownership certificates. Although this concept has been accommodated in legislation and in several Supreme Court jurisprudences, those who acquire land rights through this concept have not yet received legal protection in its application. This is due to differing perceptions among various parties, including the National Land Agency and the judiciary, with some believing that applying this concept could undermine the rights of landowners. This issue has drawn the author’s attention for further examination in this thesis. The research methodology employed in this thesis is normative juridical research with a descriptive-analytical approach to legislation. The study utilizes primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources through a procedure for gathering and analyzing legal materials to draw conclusions. The research findings indicate that the principle of good faith in land ownership through the concept of rechtsverwerking can be applied to land possession by a party who has held the land openly and in good faith for an extended period. Such possession allows the party to register the land to obtain a property certificate after more than five years since issuance. In this case, the previous owner cannot object or reclaim their rights, as, based on the concept of rechtsverwerking, they are considered to have waived or relinquished their rights, thus resulting in the loss or cancellation of their rights. Therefore, land ownership through the rechtsverwerking concept should receive legal protection. Legal protection for land ownership rights based on the rechtsverwerking concept is closely linked to the issue of justice in legal implementation. Protection for land rights holders under rechtsverwerking consists of preventive and repressive measures. Therefore, the government, specifically the relevant institutions, should conduct socialization regarding the application of the rechtsverwerking concept in obtaining land ownership rights.

Page 26 of 26 | Total Record : 253

 22   23   24   25   26 

Filter by Year

2023 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 4 No 1 (2026): April 2026 PATTIMURA Law Study Review Vol 3 No 3 (2025): Desember 2025 PATTIMURA Law Study Review Vol 3 No 2 (2025): Agustus 2025 PATTIMURA Law Study Review Vol 3 No 1 (2025): April 2025 PATTIMURA Law Study Review Vol 2 No 3 (2024): Desember 2024 PATTIMURA Law Study Review Vol 2 No 2 (2024): Agustus 2024 PATTIMURA Law Study Review Vol 2 No 1 (2024): April 2024 PATTIMURA Law Study Review Vol 1 No 2 (2023): Desember 2023 PATTIMURA Law Study Review Vol 1 No 1 (2023): Agustus 2023 PATTIMURA Law Study Review