cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Siska Diana Sari
Contact Email
siskadianasari@unipma.ac.id
Phone
+6283851737795
Journal Mail Official
activayuris@unipma.ac.id
Editorial Address
Program Studi Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas PGRI Madiun Jl. Setiabudi No. 85 Kota Madiun 63118
Location
Kota madiun,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Activa Yuris: Jurnal Hukum
Published by Universitas PGRI Madiun
ISSN : -     EISSN : 27756211     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
The scope of articles that can be accepted in this journal are: Constitutional law Administrative law Criminal law Civil law Contract law Customary law Islamic law Business law Agrarian law Human rights Anti Corruption law Arbitration law and Alternative Dispute Resolution Environmental law Company law Health law Legal Profession International law Air and Space Law Law of the Sea Procedural law Bankruptcy law Tax law Labor law Information Technology and Electronics law / ITE Law Legal education
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 92 Documents
 6   7   8   9   10 
Legal Protection for Victims of Defamation by Journalists Anshar, Muhammad Rafi Naufal; Ruslie, Ahmad Sholikhin
Activa Yuris: Jurnal Hukum Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas PGRI Madiun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Mass media in Indonesia plays a significant role in disseminating information and influencing society. Information can spread widely to various corners of the world and be accessed by millions of readers simultaneously. Journalists are prohibited from carrying out actions that harm other people, spreading false news or slander, or taking sides with the intention of inciting. Legal protection for victims of defamation is necessary to maintain a balance between press freedom and individual rights. The problem in this research is how is the legal protection for victims of defamation committed by journalists? This type of research is normative research with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The technique for collecting legal materials is carried out through searching and collecting legal materials, researching legal issues, as well as case studies from statutory regulations, legal journals, literature books, news and other materials relevant to the research topic. The results of this research show changes in the rules for defamation by journalists in the old and new Criminal Codes, reflecting a firmer response to the challenges of the digital era and the protection of individual rights. Article 310 of the old Criminal Code provides light sanctions while Article 433 of the 2022 RKUHP provides heavier sanctions and detailed regulations. The main focus is legal protection for victims in the era of social media with the Indonesian Journalist Code of Ethics (KEWI) as a guide. The importance of the Press Law as a lex specialis ensures a balance between press freedom and the protection of individuals who are disadvantaged.
Legal Response to the Decision of the Business Competition Supervisory Commission Through Additional Examination Based on Supreme Court Regulation Number 3 of 2021 Santosa, Palest Agista
Activa Yuris: Jurnal Hukum Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas PGRI Madiun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to find out about legal efforts to object to KPPU decisions through additional examinations based on Supreme Court Regulation Number 3 of 2021. The problem discussed in this study is the violation of the principle of justice in legal efforts to object to KPPU decisions that occur in the District Court. The data analysis method used in this study is the normative legal analysis method and comparative law. The normative legal method is used to analyze data that refers to legal norms contained in laws and regulations. The results of the data analysis in this study indicate a violation of the principle of justice in legal efforts to object to KPPU decisions. In practice, the burden of proof is carried out in an unbalanced manner, where the applicant cannot provide new evidence while the KPPU can strengthen and clarify the evidence through additional examinations ordered by the judge if the judge feels it is unclear. As a result, the objection applicant cannot strengthen his defense because he cannot add new evidence that can relieve the applicant

Page 10 of 10 | Total Record : 92

 6   7   8   9   10 

Filter by Year

2021 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024) Vol 4, No 2 (2024) Vol 4, No 1 (2024) Vol 3, No 2 (2023) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023) Vol 2, No 2 (2022) Vol 2, No 1 (2022) Vol 1, No 2 (2021) Vol 1, No 1 (2021)