cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
cle.journal@mail.unnes.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
cle.journal@mail.unnes.ac.id
Editorial Address
Sekaran, Gunung Pati, Semarang City, Central Java 50229
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education
Published by Universitas Negeri Semarang
ISSN : -     EISSN : 27218368     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
The journal also supported and supervised by Law Clinics at Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang, such as Anti-Corruption Law Clinic, Women and Gender Law Clinic, Human Rights Clinic, Employment Law Clinic, Land Law Clinic, Statutory Law Clinic, Environmental Law Clinic, and some Research Centers.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 195 Documents
 16   17   18   19   20 
Legal Education and Child-Responsive Digital Reporting Systems for School Bullying Victims Anis Widyawati; Diyah Satya Retnani
The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026): Contemporary Issues in Legal Education and Law Enforcement
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijicle.v8i3.55963

Abstract

School bullying remains a significant challenge in educational institutions, affecting children's psychological well-being, academic performance, and access to justice. Despite the existence of legal protection frameworks and anti-bullying policies, many cases remain unreported due to fear of retaliation, limited legal awareness, social stigma, and the absence of child-friendly reporting mechanisms. This study aims to examine the role of legal education as the foundation for developing child-responsive digital reporting systems and to analyze the implementation of SI GETAK as an innovative mechanism for protecting school bullying victims. Employing a qualitative empirical socio-legal approach, the study combines regulatory analysis, literature review, and empirical findings obtained through interviews with educational stakeholders, including school administrators, teachers, students, and local education authorities. The findings reveal that legal education enhances students' understanding of their rights, encourages reporting behavior, and strengthens access to justice for bullying victims. Furthermore, the implementation of SI GETAK demonstrates that digital reporting systems can provide accessible, confidential, and child-friendly channels for reporting bullying incidents while facilitating coordination among schools, parents, counselors, and relevant authorities. Based on these findings, this study proposes a Legal Education-Based Child-Responsive Digital Reporting Framework consisting of five interconnected dimensions: legal education and rights awareness, child-friendly digital reporting access, integrated protection and case management, restorative justice and victim recovery, and institutional accountability and monitoring. The study contributes to the existing literature by integrating legal education, child protection principles, and digital reporting technologies into a comprehensive framework that strengthens child protection and promotes safer educational environments in the digital era.
Dirty Broom Theory: A Conceptual Framework for Law Enforcement Integrity Kurniawan Tri Wibowo
The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026): Contemporary Issues in Legal Education and Law Enforcement
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijicle.v8i3.62405

Abstract

The integrity of law enforcement officials is fundamental to the effectiveness, fairness, and legitimacy of law enforcement. However, existing legal theories have not adequately conceptualized how integrity violations may contaminate legal procedures and undermine the legitimacy of judicial outcomes. This study aims to examine the normative relationship between official integrity and the legitimacy of law enforcement outcomes, formulate the Dirty Broom Theory as a conceptual framework, and assess its implications for law enforcement reform in Indonesia. This study employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, doctrinal, and comparative approaches. Primary and secondary legal materials, including legislation, jurisprudence, legal doctrines, and scholarly literature, are analyzed through systematic legal interpretation. The findings demonstrate that official integrity constitutes an essential condition for maintaining procedural fairness and substantive legitimacy in legal decision-making. The study formulates the Dirty Broom Theory, premised on the proposition that “a dirty broom cannot produce clean justice.” The theory explains that corruption, bribery, evidence manipulation, case fabrication, abuse of authority, conflicts of interest, and other integrity violations can contaminate the law enforcement process and compromise the legitimacy of its outcomes. Furthermore, the Chain of Integrity Principle conceptualizes criminal justice as an interconnected process in which integrity at each stage contributes to the legitimacy of the final decision. The theory provides a conceptual foundation for integrity-based law enforcement reform in Indonesia.
Legal Education in Bangladesh: Assessing the Gap Between Pre-Tertiary and Tertiary Learning Md Mehedi Hasan Himel
The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026): Contemporary Issues in Legal Education and Law Enforcement
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijicle.v8i3.63527

Abstract

Education is the pillar of individual and social development, as it equips individuals with the knowledge and skills necessary to create a sustainable future. In addition, legal education empowers people with knowledge regarding their rights and duties and how the justice system works. The Latin maxim, ‘Ignorantia juris non excusat’ meaning ignorance of the law is not an excuse, also emphasizes the importance of legal awareness. However, in Bangladesh, legal education is confined only to tertiary levels, with limited opportunities for students to acquire basic legal knowledge during pre-tertiary education. This study examines the gap between pre-tertiary and tertiary legal education in Bangladesh using a mixed-method approach that combines survey data with documentary and comparative analysis. Data were collected from 100 LLB students and 12 law faculty members across four universities in Bangladesh. The survey data were analyzed descriptively to examine respondents’ exposure to pre-tertiary legal education and their perceptions of its relevance to LLB studies, while documentary and comparative analysis was used to examine selected approaches to pre-tertiary legal education in other jurisdictions. The findings indicate that 83% of the student respondents had received no legal education at the school or college level, while 93% believed that prior legal education would make LLB study easier. Moreover, 92% supported introducing basic legal education at the pre-tertiary level. The study also explores selected international practices of pre-tertiary legal education to identify relevant policy insights for Bangladesh. The findings suggest that introducing basic legal education at the pre-tertiary level may help students develop foundational legal knowledge and better prepare them for tertiary legal studies. The study therefore recommends introducing age-appropriate legal education in the pre-tertiary curriculum.
Women’s Educational Rights after Marriage in Qatar Family Law: Toward an Educational Partnership through Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah Muhammad Nasrulloh; Miftahurrohman Miftahurrohman; Novita Dwi Lestari; Rafeah Saidon
The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026): Contemporary Issues in Legal Education and Law Enforcement
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijicle.v8i3.54933

Abstract

The protection of women’s educational rights after marriage raises a critical question in Islamic family law: how can educational continuity be reconciled with family obligations without making the former automatically subordinate to the latter? This study examines Article 68 of Qatar’s Family Law No. 22 of 2006 through a normative legal method employing statutory and conceptual approaches. It analyzes the provision alongside related rules on reciprocal marital rights and family welfare, using contemporary maqāṣid al-sharīʿah scholarship to assess the relationship between educational protection and family responsibilities. The findings indicate that Article 68 expressly recognizes a wife’s right to complete compulsory education and continue university education in Qatar, but leaves the criteria for determining conflicts with family obligations insufficiently specified. The study argues that this qualification should be interpreted proportionately, taking into account both the wife’s educational continuity and the spouses’ reciprocal responsibilities, rather than treating domestic obligations as an automatic ground for restricting education. To develop this interpretation, the article proposes Educational Partnership in Marriage as a normative framework grounded in reciprocal support, negotiation, and shared accommodation of educational and family needs. By connecting the protection of intellect (ḥifẓ al-ʿaql) with family welfare and the protection of offspring (ḥifẓ al-nasl), the study demonstrates how maqāṣid can inform the interpretation of a specific family-law provision. The framework offers a conceptual reference for further legal research and comparative discussions on protecting women’s educational continuity after marriage, including in Indonesia.
Access to Justice for Deepfake Victims in Indonesia: A Normative Analysis of Privacy Rights Protection Arini Salsabila; Ali Masyhar Mursyid
The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026): Contemporary Issues in Legal Education and Law Enforcement
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijicle.v8i3.63169

Abstract

Deepfake technology poses growing threats to privacy and personal dignity in Indonesia, particularly through the creation and dissemination of non-consensual synthetic intimate imagery. This study examines the extent to which Indonesia’s legal framework facilitates or constrains access to justice for victims of such practices and identifies the normative, procedural, institutional, and sociocultural barriers to effective legal protection. Employing normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches, the study analyzes primary and secondary legal materials, institutional reports, and selected comparative legal sources. The analysis draws primarily on the Access to Justice framework, complemented by Satjipto Rahardjo’s Progressive Law theory to assess how existing legal provisions can be interpreted responsively to technological developments. The findings indicate that Indonesian law provides partial protection through the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, the Sexual Violence Crimes Law, the Personal Data Protection Law, the Pornography Law, and the new Criminal Code. However, these legal instruments remain fragmented and do not adequately address the specific challenges associated with the creation, identity misuse, and dissemination of synthetic intimate imagery. In particular, gaps in legal characterization, procedural mechanisms, digital evidence management, and institutional coordination may impede victims’ access to effective remedies. This study proposes a victim-centred interim framework encompassing prompt content removal, privacy restoration, accessible reporting mechanisms, reliable digital evidence preservation, and enhanced institutional capacity. These measures should be complemented by legislative reform that expressly addresses deepfake-related harms and clarifies the responsibilities of digital platforms. Comparative experiences from South Korea, the United Kingdom, and Australia are examined selectively to identify regulatory approaches that may be adapted to Indonesia’s legal and institutional context. The study contributes to the development of a more coherent and responsive legal framework for protecting deepfake victims and strengthening access to justice in Indonesia.

Page 20 of 20 | Total Record : 195

 16   17   18   19   20 

Filter by Year

2019 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026): Contemporary Issues in Legal Education and Law Enforcement Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): Legal Education, Social Empowerment, and Legal Policy Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Development Law and Social Engineering Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025): December Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025): September Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): June Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): March Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): December Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): September Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): June Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): March Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): Sustainable Development and Legal Innovations: Exploring Environmental Conserva Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): Critical Perspectives on Contemporary Policy and Legal Issues: A Multifaceted E Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023): Legal Education in Current Development: Problems and Challenges Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023): Various Aspect of Justice and Crimes Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): Contemporary Issues on Law, Governance, and Regulations Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022): Development of Legal Education in Various Contexts Vol. 4 No. 2 (2022): Access to Justice: Problems and Challenges Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022): Justice and Human Rights: Between Theories and Practices Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021): December Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021): June Vol. 3 No. 1 (2021): March Vol. 2 No. 4 (2020): December Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020): September Vol. 2 No. 2 (2020): June Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): March Vol. 1 No. 4 (2019): December Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019): September Vol. 1 No. 2 (2019): June Vol. 1 No. 1 (2019): March More Issue