Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Is it Possible to do Legal Revolution in Indonesia Kurniawan Tri Wibowo
Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 5, No 3 (2022): Budapest International Research and Critics Institute August
Publisher : Budapest International Research and Critics University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/birci.v5i3.6006

Is it possible to conduct a revolution in criminal procedure law in Indonesia, the answer is possible, but whether or not to come back again becomes a debate in the discussion of the Criminal Procedure Code Bill. Displacement of legal traditions is not prohibited. Humans and the complexity of their legal culture continue to grow, so the law is there for humans, not the developing human being forced in such a way as to enter into certain legal schemes, which of course are incompatible and will always be left behind from civilization. When there is a problem in criminal procedure, the law must be reviewed and corrected, not humans who are forced to be included in the criminal procedure law scheme in certain legal traditions. Japan, France and Italy are examples of countries that have revolutionized the procedural law for speeches to get the right formula and be close to the truth. The revolution is carried out in a flowing way, not limited to a certain form and not stop at a certain point. For example, Japan does not directly apply the adversarial system, but it first applies continental European laws that are inquisitive and akusatoir. Likewise Italy where the Constitutional Court that was formed at that time actually ruffled the concept of the speech justice system, but Italy still found a format of criminal justice that was suitable for the country.

Managing the Spread of Radicalism through Social Media in Indonesian Criminal Law Wahyu Hadiningrat; Kurniawan Tri Wibowo
Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 5, No 3 (2022): Budapest International Research and Critics Institute August
Publisher : Budapest International Research and Critics University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/birci.v5i3.6043

Social media is now an important factor in the spread of radicalism in Indonesia, this is supported by the use of the internet which shows an increasing trend in Indonesia. This study aims to examine the regulation of the spread of radicalism in Indonesian criminal law, analyze policies to counter radicalism carried out through social media in Indonesia. In addition, it also builds the concept of a criminal policy to combat the spread of radicalism through social media in Indonesia. The results of the study state that the regulation of the spread of radicalism carried out through social media has not been comprehensively regulated in Indonesian positive law. Efforts to combat radicalism carried out through social media in Indonesia are currently focused on repressive law enforcement. The concept of criminal policy to combat the spread of radicalism carried out through social media in Indonesia is carried out through three points of overcoming radicalism through social media, namely supervision, action and collaboration between platforms and the community. The action taken is of course not only limited to taking down content on social media but also an assessment to determine the level of radicalization of the perpetrators.

Penanggulangan Penyebaran Radikalisme Melalui Media Sosial dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia Kurniawan Tri WIbowo; Wahyu Hadiningrat
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 4 No 2 (2023): Tema Hukum Keamanan Negara
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v4i2.304

Social media is now an important factor in the spread of radicalism in Indonesia, this is supported by the use of the internet which shows an increasing trend in Indonesia. This study aims to examine the regulation of the spread of radicalism in Indonesian criminal law, analyze policies to counter radicalism carried out through social media in Indonesia. In addition, it also builds the concept of a criminal policy to combat the spread of radicalism through social media in Indonesia. The results of the study state that the regulation of the spread of radicalism carried out through social media has not been comprehensively regulated in Indonesian positive law. Efforts to combat radicalism carried out through social media in Indonesia are currently focused on repressive law enforcement. The concept of criminal policy to combat the spread of radicalism carried out through social media in Indonesia is carried out through three points of overcoming radicalism through social media, namely supervision, action and collaboration between platforms and the community. The action taken is of course not only limited to taking down content on social media but also an assessment to determine the level of radicalization of the perpetrators.

Challenges And Obstacles To The Application Of Restorative Justice On The Criminal Justice System In Indonesia Tri Wibowo, Kurniawan; ., Sunarko
International Journal of Law Policy and Governance Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Asosiasi Dosen Peneliti Ilmu Ekonomi dan Bisnis Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54099/ijlpg.v2i1.203

The practice of enforcing the law of restorative justice, as an out-of-court settlement mechanism based on the principle of justice, has also been reflected in several court decisions. Challenges and obstacles to the application of restorative justice in the criminal justice system in Indonesia are the settlement of cases in the spirit of restorative justice, must be the ability to find a fair and mutually beneficial solution ( win-win solution ) for both parties, both victims and perpetrators. The admission of guilt of the perpetrator of a crime is a prerequisite for restorative justice. Based on these challenges and obstacles, it is necessary to regulate the laws and regulations governing the implementation of restorative justice, the existence of an element of confession of guilt from the perpetrators of the crime as a prerequisite for restorative justice

REKONSTRUKSI PEMBERI GRATIFIKASI SEBAGAI SUBYEK TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Sulastri, Lusia; Tri Wibowo, Kurniawan
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 1 No. 3 (2021): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Gratification has not yet been regulated by laws and regulations as a criminal act. This happened in the Samin Tan case, where the judges of the Jakarta Corruption Court released Samin Tan from granting a gratuity of IDR 5 billion to Eni Maulani Saragih as a member of Commission VII DPR for the 2014-2019 period. The current formulation of policies regarding gratification in Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Corruption requires restructuring, especially in the substance of the meaning of gratification, reporting on receipt of gratification to the KPK, criminal sanctions, and qualifications of the giver and recipient of gratification. so that the optimization of the application and enforcement of appropriate laws is achieved, namely certainty and justice. Reconstruction of the gratification provider for corruption must be based on a low level of gratification and bribery according to its definition. Bribery has the definition of a relationship due to the consequences of actions that result in or influence a person in his position as a state administrator to the interests of the bribe giver. While gratification should only be a gift, without having to be associated with any reciprocal actions. With a clear distinction between bribery and pure gratification that does not lead to bribery, the weight of the punishment is determined. Likewise, the gratuity giver, if it is said to be a bribe, must explain how much punishment was given to him. For example, the giver of gratuities as referred to in Article 12 B of Law no. 31 of 1999 as amended by Law no. 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes is the same as receiving gratuities. Thus the effect can be felt in a balanced way because it destroys requests and requests for prohibited acts.

TANTANGAN DAN HAMBATAN PENERAPAN KEADILAN RESTORATIF PADA SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA DI INDONESIA Tri Wibowo, Kurniawan; Hadingrat, Wahyu
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v2i3.95

Media sosial kini menjadi faktor penting dalam penyebaran radikalisme di Indonesia, hal ini didukung oleh pemakaian internet yang menunjukkan tren peningkatan di Indonesia. Penelitian ini ditujukan untuk mengkaji pengaturan penyebaran radikalisme dalam hukum pidana Indonesia, menganalisis kebijakan penanggulangan radikalisme yang dilakukan melalui media sosial di Indonesia. Selain itu juga membangun konsep kebijakan kriminal penanggulangan penyebaran radikalisme melalui media sosial di Indonesia. Hasil penelitian menyatakan bahwa, pengaturan penyebaran radikalisme yang dilakukan melalui media sosial belum diatur secara komprehensif dalam hukum positif Indonesia. Upaya penanggulangan radikalisme yang dilakukan melalui media sosial di Indonesia saat ini difokuskan pada penegakan hukum represif. Konsep kebijakan kriminal penanggulangan penyebaran radikalisme yang dilakukan melalui media sosial di Indonesia dilakukan melalui tiga poin penanggulangan radikalisme melalui media sosial yaitu pengawasan, penindakan dan kerjasama platform dan masyarakat. Penindakan yang dilakukan tentunya bukan hanya sebatas take down conten di media sosial namun juga assasment untuk menentukan tingkat radikalisasi dari pelaku.

Enforcement of Applicable Laws in Society in The Context of National Criminal Law in Indonesia Happy Sunaryanto; Kurniawan Tri Wibowo
Journal Of Legal Studies Judex Praetor Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): Journal Of Legal Studies Judex Praetor, Volume 1, No. 2, December 2025
Publisher : Universitas Amikom Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35671/judex.v1i2.112

Executive intervention in criminal justice arises as a result of a constitutional design that places the President in a strategic position in the chain of law enforcement, including through prerogative powers such as amnesty, abolition, clemency, and rehabilitation, as well as administrative control over the police and prosecutor's office. This study examines the intervention of executive power in the criminal justice process in Indonesia and its impact on the independence and integrity of judicial institutions. The analysis shows that this authority opens up legal and political space for the executive to influence the process of investigation, prosecution, and correction of court decisions. The cases of Hasto Kristiyanto, Tom Lembong, and Ira Puspadewi show how intervention can cause controversy, create inequality in legal treatment, and create precedents that threaten the principle of the rule of law. The impact not only undermines the due process of law, but also lowers public trust, weakens the morality of the judiciary, and strengthens the perception that the law is in favor of power. These findings encourage the need for stricter, more transparent, and accountable normative restrictions on the use of prerogative authority, as well as the strengthening of oversight mechanisms and the integrity of law enforcement agencies so that the judiciary remains a bastion of justice that is free from political influence.

Intervensi Kekuasaan Eksekutif Dalam Peradilan Pidana: Tantangan Terhadap Independensi Kekuasaan Peradilan Pidana Kurniawan Tri Wibowo; Happy Sunaryanto
Jurnal Hukum Sasana Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Hukum Sasana: June 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/sasana.v12i1.4824

Intervensi eksekutif terhadap peradilan pidana muncul akibat desain konstitusional yang menempatkan Presiden pada posisi strategis dalam rantai penegakan hukum, termasuk melalui kewenangan prerogatif seperti amnesti, abolisi, grasi, dan rehabilitasi, serta kontrol administratif atas kepolisian dan kejaksaan. Penelitian ini mengkaji intervensi kekuasaan eksekutif dalam proses peradilan pidana di Indonesia serta dampaknya terhadap independensi dan integritas lembaga yudisial. Analisis menunjukkan bahwa kewenangan tersebut membuka ruang legal maupun politis bagi eksekutif untuk memengaruhi proses penyidikan, penuntutan, hingga koreksi putusan pengadilan. Kasus Hasto Kristiyanto, Tom Lembong, dan Ira Puspadewi memperlihatkan bagaimana intervensi dapat menimbulkan kontroversi, menciptakan ketimpangan perlakuan hukum, dan melahirkan preseden yang mengancam prinsip negara hukum. Dampaknya tidak hanya merusak due process of law, tetapi juga menurunkan kepercayaan publik, melemahkan moralitas peradilan, serta memperkuat persepsi bahwa hukum berpihak pada kekuasaan. Temuan ini mendorong perlunya pembatasan normatif yang lebih ketat, transparan, dan akuntabel dalam penggunaan kewenangan prerogatif, serta penguatan mekanisme pengawasan dan integritas lembaga penegak hukum agar peradilan tetap menjadi benteng keadilan yang bebas dari pengaruh politik.

Peningkatan Literasi Hukum Mengenai Transformasi Due Process of Law melalui Sosialisasi KUHAP Baru bagi Akademisi dan Praktisi Hukum Kurniawan Tri Wibowo; Happy Sunaryanto
BERBAKTI: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Vol. 2 No. 05 (2026): ISSUE JUNI
Publisher : PT. Mifandi Mandiri Digital

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63401/berbakti.v2i05.1185

Perubahan hukum acara pidana melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2025 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP Baru) memerlukan peningkatan pemahaman akademisi dan praktisi hukum mengenai prinsip due process of law serta substansi pembaruannya. Kegiatan pengabdian kepada masyarakat ini bertujuan meningkatkan literasi hukum peserta melalui webinar nasional bertema Transformasi Due Process of Law melalui Sosialisasi KUHAP Baru bagi Akademisi dan Praktisi Hukum. Metode pelaksanaan meliputi penyampaian materi, diskusi interaktif, serta evaluasi menggunakan instrumen pre-test, post-test, dan kuesioner kepuasan peserta. Materi yang dibahas mencakup perlindungan hak tersangka, penguatan peran advokat, restorative justice, plea bargaining, perluasan objek praperadilan, dan alat bukti elektronik. Hasil evaluasi menunjukkan peningkatan rata-rata pemahaman peserta dari 53,4% menjadi 88,0% atau meningkat 34,6 poin persentase. Tingkat kepuasan peserta juga mencapai skor rata-rata 4,39 dari skala 5. Kegiatan ini efektif sebagai sarana diseminasi dan penguatan pemahaman implementasi KUHAP Baru di Indonesia.

Rekonstruksi Konsep Pemaafan Hakim dalam Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia Kurniawan Tri Wibowo
Punggawa Law Review Vol. 1 No. 4 (2026): Punggawa Law Review
Publisher : Punggawa Legacy Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.67707/plr.v1i4.241

Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2026 tentang Putusan Pemaafan Hakim merupakan instrumen hukum yang memberikan pedoman bagi hakim untuk tidak menjatuhkan pidana terhadap terdakwa yang telah terbukti bersalah berdasarkan pertimbangan keadilan dan kemanusiaan. Namun, pengaturan tersebut masih mengandung kelemahan konseptual dan inkonsistensi normatif karena mengadopsi indikator restorative justice, seperti permintaan maaf kepada korban, pemberian maaf oleh korban, dan pemulihan kerugian, yang bertentangan dengan karakteristik judicial pardon sebagai bentuk diskresi yudisial. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis kelemahan konseptual dan inkonsistensi normatif dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2026 serta merekonstruksi konsep Putusan Pemaafan Hakim yang berorientasi pada diskresi hakim, proporsionalitas pemidanaan, dan keadilan substantif. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan perbandingan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya empat kontradiksi utama, yaitu inkonsistensi antara definisi Putusan Pemaafan Hakim dengan norma operasionalnya, adopsi indikator restorative justice dalam syarat pemberian pemaafan, tumpang tindih antara Putusan Pemaafan Hakim dan restorative justice, serta ketidakjelasan batas konseptual kedua lembaga tersebut. Rekonstruksi yang ditawarkan dilakukan melalui penghapusan parameter yang berorientasi pada sikap korban, penyempurnaan ketentuan mengenai pemulihan kerugian berdasarkan kemampuan ekonomi pelaku, penegasan bahwa Putusan Pemaafan Hakim merupakan kewenangan diskresioner hakim yang berdiri sendiri, serta penambahan mekanisme pemberian kompensasi oleh negara kepada korban apabila pelaku benar-benar tidak mampu melakukan pemulihan. Rekonstruksi tersebut menghasilkan model Putusan Pemaafan Hakim yang menempatkan hakim sebagai pusat legitimasi pemberian pemaafan, sekaligus mewujudkan keseimbangan antara kepastian hukum, keadilan substantif, perlindungan korban, dan tanggung jawab negara dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia.

Title

Found 15 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 15 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 15 Documents
Search