cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Andri Agus Rahman
Contact Email
jurnal@rmpi.brin.go.id
Phone
+6281381462765
Journal Mail Official
reinwardtia@brin.go.id
Editorial Address
Organisasi Riset Hayati dan Lingkungan Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional Gedung Administrasi, Kawasan Sains Teknologi Dr. (H.C) Ir. H. Soekarno Jl. Raya Bogor KM. 46, Cibinong 16911, Jawa Barat - Indonesia
Location
Kota tangerang selatan,
Banten
INDONESIA
Reinwardtia
Published by BRIN Publishing
ISSN : 0034365X     EISSN : 23378824     DOI : https://doi.org/10.55981/reinwardtia
Core Subject : Science,
Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Immunology & microbiology
Reinwardtia is a peer-reviewed scientific journal dedicated to advancing the understanding of plant science, with a particular emphasis on three core areas: plant taxonomy, plant ecology, and ethnobotany. The journal serves as a vital platform for disseminating research that explores the classification, identification, and relationships of plant species (taxonomy), the interactions between plants and their environments (ecology), and the traditional knowledge and cultural significance of plants (ethnobotany). Reinwardtia places a strong focus on the flora of Southeast Asia, a region known for its rich biodiversity and complex ecosystems. It extends its coverage to neighboring regions, including the tropical areas of Northern Australia, providing insights into the plant life of these biologically diverse areas. The journal seeks to contribute to the global scientific community by publishing original research articles, reviews, and notes that deepen the understanding of plant species in these regions and their ecological and cultural contexts.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Pertanian dan Biologi (Semua) - Ilmu Tumbuhan
Articles 1,031 Documents
 100   101   102   103   104 
NOTIZ USER EIN GNETUM VON BORNEO Fr. Markgraf
Reinwardtia Vol. 1 No. 4 (1952)
Publisher : BRIN Publishing (Penerbit BRIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Diese Varietat,die ich friiher nach unvollstandigem Material zu G.diminutum gerechnet habe, besitzt in beiden Geschlechtern verzweigte Blutenstande.Dieses Merkmal kommt in der Gruppe mit sitzenden Fruch-ten (Subsection Sessiles) nur bei G.leptostachyum, vor, zu dem auch die Friichte der neuen Varietat gut passen.Sie ist eine Nebelwaldpflanze grosserer Hohen und hat bei reduzierten Massen der Blatter und Bliitenstande die schmalen,kurzen mannlichen Katzchen der Tieflands-Varietat leptostachyum mit den kurzgliedrigen, grossfriichtigen weiblichen Bluten-standen der Tieflands-Varietat robustum vereinigt.In Indochina und Siam lebt eine zweite Berg-Varietat -entsprechend der weiteren Ent-fernung vom Aquator in etwas geringeren Hohen die umgekehrt die dicken mannlichen Katzchen von der Varietat robustum mit den lang-gliedrigen weiblichen Bliitenstanden von der Varietat leptostachyum vereinigt.In beiden Fallen sind die Verkiirzungs- und Verlangerungs-Tenden-zen bei den Berg-Varietaten starker als bei denen des Tieflandes.
A NEGLECTED INDIAN SPECIES OF CYPERUS J. H. KERN
Reinwardtia Vol. 1 No. 4 (1952)
Publisher : BRIN Publishing (Penerbit BRIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Cyperus iria var. rectangularis Ktikenth. in Engl., Pflanzenr., Heft 101: 152.1935. — Lectotypus: Duthie 23284 (Herb. Kew.).Cyperus iria (non L.) sensu Clarke, Illustr. Cyper. pi. H f. 1. 1909, non al. Duthie 4480. Subgen. Cyperus; sect. Iriae Kunth. — Annuus. Culmi erecti, tenues,triquetri, laeves, 1—7 dm alti, 1—2 mm crassi, inferne paucifoliati.Folia culmo breviora vel aequilonga, plana, flaccida, longe acuminata, in supe riore parte scabra, 1—5 mm lata. Anthela simplex vel subcomposita, laxa.Bracteae oblique patentes, 2—4 longissimae, foliis consimiles, anthelam valde superantes. Anthelae radii 3—9, e cladoprophyllis tubulosis ore oblique truncatis postice cuspidatis vel bidentatis basi bruneis 0.5—1.5 cm longis emergentes, inaequales, oblique patentes, graciles,compressi,laeves vel apice hispiduli, ad 16 cm longi,longiores nonnunquam apice pauci ramosi;radioli brevissimi ab ochreolo caudato suffulti. Spicae ovatae vel oblonga-ovatae, laxae vel subdensae, 1—3 cm longae, 8—25(—30) mm latae,5—20-spiculosae, rhachi flexuosa angulis hispida.Spiculae compressae,rectangule divaricatae vel imae subreflexae, ovatae usque ad oblongo-lineares, 3—12 mm longae, 2—2.5 mm latae, 4—18-f lorae, basi saepe a seta subuliformi suffultae. Rhachilla obscure brunea, recta, subexalata, internodiis 0.6—1 mm longis. Glumae membranaceae,1/3—1/2 parte imbricatae, patulae,concavae, fere orbiculatae, (1.75—)2mm longae ac latae, sub apice emarginato mucronulatae, dorso viridi 7-nerviae, lateribus fulvae purpureo notatae uninerviae, carina acuta arcuata superne angustissime alata,spinuloso-ciliata. Stamina 2; antherae breves, oblongae, interdum lineares; connectivum in appendicem brevem productum. Stylus fere nullus;stigmata 3, achenio multo breviora. Achenium ambitu obovatum, triquetrum, lateribus concavis, basi late stipitatum, apice mucronatum, atrobruneum, nitidum, dense puncticulatum, 1.5 mm longum, 0.8—0.9 mm latum.
MISCELLANEOUS BOTANICAL NOTES-IV C. G. G. J. VAN STEENIS
Reinwardtia Vol. 1 No. 4 (1952)
Publisher : BRIN Publishing (Penerbit BRIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

1. In connection with the first record from Malaysia (Atjeh, North Sumatra)of a species of Schoepfia (Olacaceae), viz. S. fragrans Wall, in Roxb., some notes on the genus are given, including a key to the species of section Schoepfiopsis (emended) and to the two Indian species of Schoepfia.The specimens of the Kew and Leyden Herbaria of these two species are listed. The name Schoepfia ffriffithii Tiegh. is validly published in the present paper, if this was not done before. 2. Smilax pygmaea Merr. (Liliaceae) is recorded from Atjeh, Sumatra. 3. The first indigenous species of Mivmlus (Scrophulariaceae), M. tenellus Bunge,is recorded for Malaysia from Atjeh, Sumatra. 4. A new species of Macadamia (Proteaceae) is described from Celebes: Macadamia hildebrandii Van Steenis. It belongs to the same genus as the common Australian bush nut, M. ternifolia, with edible seeds. 5. Some information, additional to a previous paper on Biophytum (Oxalidaceae)in Malaysia, is given. 6. Some records of plants new to Mount Pangrango, West Java, are mentioned. 7. The recent introduction and the present distribution in Malaysia of the weed Eupatorium odoratum L. (Compositae) is discussed. 8. Some additional records of the liana Hollrungia aurantioides K. Schum.(Passifloraceae) from New Guinea and from outside this island (Ternate, Moluccas)are published.
ON GENERIC TYPE SPECIES INDICATED BY MISAPPLIED NAMES M. A. DONK
Reinwardtia Vol. 1 No. 4 (1952)
Publisher : BRIN Publishing (Penerbit BRIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

When the type method was introduced in the "International Rules of Botanical Nomenclature," it was stated that "a nomenclatural type is that constituent element to which the name of a group is permanently attached" and, further, that "the type of ..a generic name is a species and that of a species ..is usually a specimen or preparation. In some species, however, the type is a description or figure given by a previous 1 author" (Art. 18).No doubt, the type of a generic name is a species and that of a specific name a specimen (or its substitute). A species may be variously interpreted as to its limits; it may be narrowly or broadly conceived. It may receive a name, but it remains a species even if it has no name. It frequently occurs that a specific name is misapplied to a quite different species. Hence it is also evident that a species and a specific name are two intrinsically different notions, not at all identical and interchangeable. As quoted above, Art. 18 positively says that the type of a generic name is a species and does not refer to specific names. I believe this article really states what it wanted to convey in this respect, and is not an instance of unfortunate wording. A species comprises a vast number of 'individuals plants' and of these some are preserved often only in part, or are subject to taxonomic study without preservation,and represent the 'specimens' of the Rules; when the species is given a name, one of these is or afterwards becomes the 'type specimen.' Thus a (type) species and a (type) specimen are different notions. In the binomial system a specific name is a combination of two words. The first part, or generic appellation, stands for a generic description,2 the second part, or specific epithet, for a specific description : a specific name roots in two different descriptions.Far more often than not these two are published on different occasions by different authors.
NOTES ON MALESIAN FUNGI-II* On the genera Auricularia, Hirneola, and Laschia M. A. DONK
Reinwardtia Vol. 1 No. 4 (1952)
Publisher : BRIN Publishing (Penerbit BRIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

1. After discussing the outer characters of the three genera Auricularia Bull,ex Merat, Hirneola Fr. (1848), and Laschia Fr., now often combined into a single genus, the author concludes that there is every reason to follow Bresadola and to keep Auricularia and Hirneola apart as distinct genera, and to enter Laschia into Hirneola. 2. It is pointed out that in Hirneola the hymenophore is not invariably inferior. 3. The author once more discusses the desirability of conserving the name Hirneola Fr. 1848. He withdraws his previous proposal for conservation of Auricularia Bull, ex Brongn. 1824. 4. The new combination Hirneola nigricans (Sw. ex Fr.) Donk is proposed. 5. It is possible that the correct name for the Judas' ear is Hirneola auricula(L. ex Mexat) H. Karst.
SERTULUM DIPTEROCARPACEARUM MALAYENSIUM-”V* D. F. VAN SLOOTEN
Reinwardtia Vol. 2 No. 1 (1952)
Publisher : BRIN Publishing (Penerbit BRIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Some 70 years ago Thiselton Dyer showed Dipterocarpaceae from New Guinea to the Linnean Society of London. This event is referred to in the "Journal of Botany"1"Mr Tbiselton Dyer exhibited the Dipterocarpaceae collected by Beccari on his visit to New Guinea in 1872. These were only three in number, an extremely poor result compared with the extraordinary abundance and variety in the forms belonging to this family previously collected by the same botanist in the adjacent island of Borneo, . . The Dipterocarpaceae being, perhaps, the most characteristic family of the IndoMalayan Flora,the poverty of its representation in New Guinea was a conclusive proof that its vegetation was not a markedly Malayan type.
A REVISION OF THE GENUS ARCHIDENDRON F. MUELL. (MIMOSACEAE) H. C. D. DE WIT
Reinwardtia Vol. 2 No. 1 (1952)
Publisher : BRIN Publishing (Penerbit BRIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

1. The present paper is the author's second revision of the genus Archidendron. The validity of the genus is briefly discussed. 2. The genus has its centre of speciation in New Guinea. The number of species treated is 31, not counting a few insufficiently known species. A key is given to the species and varieties, which are described. 3. The following are new species or varieties: Archidendron affine De Wit, A. calliandrum De Wit, A. dies-Christi De Wit, A. nervosum De Wit, A. parviflorum var. longipes De Wit, and A. trifoliolatum De Wit. 4. New combinations are: Archidendron gogolense (K. Schum. & Laut.) De Wit (basonym: Hansemannia gogolense K. Schum. & Laut.) and A.lucyi var. schleohterii (Harms) De Wit (basonym: Archidendron schlechterii Harms). .
NOTES ON MALAYSIAN CYPERACEAE J. H. KERN
Reinwardtia Vol. 2 No. 1 (1952)
Publisher : BRIN Publishing (Penerbit BRIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This is the first paper of a series, in which preparatory to a more comprehensive treatment for "Flora Malesiana," some noteworthy Malaysian Cyperaceae will be dealt with. It is based on the material of this family in the Herbaria at Bogor (BO), Leiden (L), and Singapore (S).My sincere thanks are extended to the Directors of these institutions for giving me the opportunity to study their rich collections.In 1935—36 Kiikenthal's excellent monograph on the genus Cyperus in Engler's "Pflanzenreich" appeared.Unfortunately that author revised only a few specimens of the herbaria already mentioned,so that the basis for the distribution of the genus in Malaysia, as given in his invaluable work, compares unfavourably with that of the species of other regions.Kiikenthal's delimitation of the genus is readily accepted; in general his arrangement of the species is also followed, although I cannot agree with Kiikenthal's assertion that his system should be in close accordance with the genetic development of the genus.On the whole only the synonymy important for the Malaysian region is given below. For a more complete account the reader is referred to Kiikenthal's monograph, in which of course the literature of merely regional interest could not always be fully considered.The accompanying plates are part of a series, drawn under mysupervision by two of the draughtsmen of Herbarium Bogoriense, Sukirno and Md. Anwar.
AN ADDITIONAL NOTE ON VIBURNUM CLEMENSAE KERN J. H. KERN
Reinwardtia Vol. 2 No. 1 (1952)
Publisher : BRIN Publishing (Penerbit BRIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In "Reinwardtia" (1: 157. 1951) I published a new species of Viburnum from Mount Kinabalu, Borneo, under the name of V. clemensae.The description was drawn up after fruiting specimens in the Herbarium of the Arnold Arboretum. Unfortunately flowers were wanting in the specimens available.Some time ago Dr. A. J. G. H. Kostermans came across much more complete material among the indeterminata of the Bogor Herbarium, profusely flowering as well as fruiting. This enables the amplification of the description.
A CRITICAL STUDY IN THE COMPLEX-POLYMORPHOUS GENUS SCHIMA (THEACEAE) S. BLOEMBERGEN
Reinwardtia Vol. 2 No. 1 (1952)
Publisher : BRIN Publishing (Penerbit BRIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

1. The author considers the genus Schima monotypic. Its only species, Schima wallichii (DC.) Korth., is subdivided into nine geographically separated subspecies and three varieties.These may be recognised sometimes by one dominating chax*acter,mostly, however, by a complex of characters.Several new combinations are made. 2. Yet the variability of most of the subspecies is still often enormous and at first sight appears complex. Thus we may often encounter the polymorphy of the whole species in its subspecies again. It was the striking different percentage-numbers of(phenotypically) about the same characters which turned the scale in favour of the recognition of the subspecies, besides their geographic separation.The attempts made by the author to divide certain resulting complex-polymorphous subspecies into units of still lower rank and to trace correlations with peculiarities of environment such as different heights above sealevel, or with different stages in the age of the trees, failed. 3. On account of these negative results and the above mentioned different percentage-numbers for phenotypically about the same characters, the author came to the conclusion that the most probable explanation is that the variability within the subspecies is just due to Mendel-segregation and nothing else.It looks very much as if one is dealing here with the inheriting of striking characters, each caused by one or only a few polymeric factors, characters which hold their own, just as in panmictlcally propagated populations (by cross-pollination). This explanation, too,makes the striking fact that in some subspecies we find back phenotypically the whole, or part, of the polymorphy of the entire species more understandable, as well as the fact that individuals of different subspecies may agree phenotypically, whereas genotypically they belong to different races (subspecies), Moreover, all these phenomena strongly support the monotypic conception of the genus. 4. The author saw few examples from the area outside Indonesia. However,this does neither influence his monotypic conception of the genus, nor his method of dividing it into units of lower ranks. The study of the scanty amount of specimens,literature, and the drawings seen appeared more than sufficiently convincing. Yet he is not quite certain whether the correct rank was ascribed to some of the lower taxa involved. It would perhaps have been advisable to consider the variety superba and the continental parts of the subspecies oblata and monticola as distinct subspecies.Future consideration of this matter shall have to decide.

Page 102 of 104 | Total Record : 1031

 100   101   102   103   104 

Filter by Year

1950 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 24 No. 2 (2025): Reinwardtia Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Reinwardtia Vol 23, No 1 (2024): Volume 23, No 1 (2024): Reinwardtia Vol. 23 No. 2 (2024) Vol 23, No 2 (2024): Reinwardtia Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024) Vol 22, No 2 (2023): Volume 22, No 2 (2023): Reinwardtia Vol 22, No 1 (2023): Volume 22, No 1 (2023): Reinwardtia Vol. 22 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 22 No. 1 (2023) Vol 21, No 2 (2022): Vol 21, No 2 (2022): Reinwardtia Vol. 21 No. 2 (2022) Vol 21, No 1 (2022): Reinwardtia Vol. 21 No. 1 (2022) Vol 20, No 1 (2021): Vol. 20 No. 1 Vol 20, No 2 (2021): Reinwardtia Vol. 20 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 20 No. 1 (2021) Vol 19, No 2 (2020): Vol.19 No.2 Vol 19, No 1 (2020): Vol.19 No.1 Vol. 19 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 19 No. 1 (2020) Vol 18, No 2 (2019): Vol.18 No.2 Vol 18, No 1 (2019): Vol.18 No.1 Vol. 18 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 18 No. 1 (2019) Vol 17, No 2 (2018): Vol.17 No.2 Vol 17, No 1 (2018): Vol.17 No.1 Vol. 17 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 17 No. 1 (2018) Vol 16, No 2 (2017): Vol 16 No. 2 Vol 16, No 1 (2017): Vol.16 No.1 Vol. 16 No. 2 (2017) Vol. 16 No. 1 (2017) Vol 15, No 2 (2016): Vol.15 No.2 Vol 15, No 1 (2016): Vol.15 No.1 Vol. 15 No. 2 (2016) Vol. 15 No. 1 (2016) Vol 14, No 2 (2015): Vol.14 No.2 Vol. 14 No. 2 (2015) Vol 14, No 1 (2014): Vol. 14 No. 1 Vol. 14 No. 1 (2014) Vol 13, No 5 (2013): Vol. 13, No. 5 Vol. 13 No. 5 (2013) Vol 13, No 4 (2012): Vol. 13 no. 4 Vol 13, No 3 (2012): Vol. 13 No. 3 Vol. 13 No. 4 (2012) Vol. 13 No. 3 (2012) Vol 13, No 2 (2010): Vol. 13 No. 2 Vol. 13 No. 2 (2010) Vol 13, No 1 (2009): Vol. 13 No. 1 Vol 12, No 5 (2009): Vol. 12, No. 5 Vol. 13 No. 1 (2009) Vol. 12 No. 5 (2009) Vol 12, No 4 (2008): Vol. 12, No. 4 Vol. 12 No. 4 (2008) Vol 12, No 3 (2006): Vol. 12, No. 3 Vol. 12 No. 3 (2006) Vol 12, No 2 (2004): Vol. 12, No. 2 Vol. 12 No. 2 (2004) Vol 12, No 1 (2002): Vol. 12, No. 1 Vol. 12 No. 1 (2002) Vol 11, No 5 (2000): Vol. 11 No. 5 Vol. 11 No. 5 (2000) Vol 11, No 4 (1999): Vol. 11 No. 4 Vol. 11 No. 4 (1999) Vol 11, No 3 (1998): Vol. 11 No. 3 Vol. 11 No. 3 (1998) Vol 11, No 2 (1997): Vol. 11 No. 2 Vol. 11 No. 2 (1997) Vol 11, No 1 (1992): Vol. 11 No. 1 Vol. 11 No. 1 (1992) Vol 10, No 5 (1988): vol. 10 No.5 Vol 10, No 4 (1988): vol. 10 No.4 Vol. 10 No. 5 (1988) Vol. 10 No. 4 (1988) Vol 10, No 3 (1987): vol. 10 No.3 Vol. 10 No. 3 (1987) Vol 10, No 2 (1984): vol. 10 No.2 Vol. 10 No. 2 (1984) Vol 10, No 1 (1982): vol. 10 No.1 Vol. 10 No. 1 (1982) Vol 9, No 4 (1980): vol.9 no.4 Vol. 9 No. 4 (1980) Vol 9, No 3 (1977): vol.9 no.3 Vol. 9 No. 3 (1977) Vol 9, No 2 (1975): vol.9 no.2 Vol. 9 No. 2 (1975) Vol 9, No 1 (1974): Vol.9 no.1 Vol 8, No 4 (1974): vol.8 no.4 Vol. 9 No. 1 (1974) Vol. 8 No. 4 (1974) Vol 8, No 3 (1972): vol.8 no.3 Vol 8, No 2 (1972): vol.8 no.2 Vol. 8 No. 3 (1972) Vol. 8 No. 2 (1972) Vol 8, No 1 (1970): vol.8 no.1 Vol. 8 No. 1 (1970) Vol 7, No 5 (1969): vol 7.no.5 Vol. 7 No. 5 (1969) Vol 7, No 4 (1968): vol.7 no.4 Vol. 7 No. 4 (1968) Vol 7, No 3 (1966): vol.7 no.3 Vol. 7 No. 3 (1966) Vol 7, No 2 (1965): vol.7 no.2 Vol 7, No 1 (1965): vol.7 no.1 Vol. 7 No. 2 (1965) Vol. 7 No. 1 (1965) Vol 6, No 4 (1963): vol.6 no. 4 Vol. 6 No. 4 (1963) Vol 6, No 3 (1962): vol.6 no. 3 Vol 6, No 2 (1962): vol.6 no. 2 Vol. 6 No. 3 (1962) Vol. 6 No. 2 (1962) Vol 6, No 1 (1961): vol.6 no. 1 Vol 5, No 4 (1961): vol.5 no.4 Vol. 6 No. 1 (1961) Vol. 5 No. 4 (1961) Vol 5, No 3 (1960): vol.5 no.3 Vol 5, No 2 (1960): vol.5 no.2 Vol. 5 No. 3 (1960) Vol. 5 No. 2 (1960) Vol 5, No 1 (1959): vol.5 no.1 Vol 4, No 4 (1959): vol.4 no.4 Vol. 5 No. 1 (1959) Vol. 4 No. 4 (1959) Vol 4, No 3 (1958): vol.4 no.3 Vol. 4 No. 3 (1958) Vol 4, No 2 (1957): vol.4 no.2 Vol. 4 No. 2 (1957) Vol 4, No 1 (1956): vol.4 no.1 Vol 3, No 4 (1956): vol.3 no.4 Vol 3, No 3 (1956): vol.3 no.3 Vol. 4 No. 1 (1956) Vol. 3 No. 4 (1956) Vol. 3 No. 3 (1956) Vol 3, No 2 (1955): vol.3 no.2 Vol. 3 No. 2 (1955) Vol 3, No 1 (1954): vol.3 no.1 Vol 2, No 3 (1954): vol.2 no.3 Vol. 3 No. 1 (1954) Vol. 2 No. 3 (1954) Vol 2, No 2 (1953): vol.2 no.2 Vol. 2 No. 2 (1953) Vol 2, No 1 (1952): vol.2 no.1 Vol 1, No 4 (1952): vol.1 no.4 Vol. 2 No. 1 (1952) Vol. 1 No. 4 (1952) Vol 1, No 3 (1951): vol.1 no.3 Vol 1, No 2 (1951): vol.1 no.2 Vol. 1 No. 3 (1951) Vol. 1 No. 2 (1951) Vol 1, No 1 (1950): vol.1 no.1 Vol. 1 No. 1 (1950) More Issue