cover
Contact Name
Andri Agus Rahman
Contact Email
jurnal@rmpi.brin.go.id
Phone
+6281381462765
Journal Mail Official
reinwardtia@brin.go.id
Editorial Address
Organisasi Riset Hayati dan Lingkungan Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional Gedung Administrasi, Kawasan Sains Teknologi Dr. (H.C) Ir. H. Soekarno Jl. Raya Bogor KM. 46, Cibinong 16911, Jawa Barat - Indonesia
Location
Kota tangerang selatan,
Banten
INDONESIA
Reinwardtia
Published by BRIN Publishing
ISSN : 0034365X     EISSN : 23378824     DOI : https://doi.org/10.55981/reinwardtia
Core Subject : Science,
Reinwardtia is a peer-reviewed scientific journal dedicated to advancing the understanding of plant science, with a particular emphasis on three core areas: plant taxonomy, plant ecology, and ethnobotany. The journal serves as a vital platform for disseminating research that explores the classification, identification, and relationships of plant species (taxonomy), the interactions between plants and their environments (ecology), and the traditional knowledge and cultural significance of plants (ethnobotany). Reinwardtia places a strong focus on the flora of Southeast Asia, a region known for its rich biodiversity and complex ecosystems. It extends its coverage to neighboring regions, including the tropical areas of Northern Australia, providing insights into the plant life of these biologically diverse areas. The journal seeks to contribute to the global scientific community by publishing original research articles, reviews, and notes that deepen the understanding of plant species in these regions and their ecological and cultural contexts.
Articles 1,031 Documents
THE SECTION CLEMENSIA OF CHISOCHETON (MELIACEAE) M. Jacobs
Reinwardtia Vol. 3 No. 2 (1955)
Publisher : BRIN Publishing (Penerbit BRIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Clemensia Merr.is considered a section of Chisocheton Bl.Two species are distinguished and described, Chisocheton medusae f.hiascens Jacobs is published as a new form.
THE GENERIC NAMES PROPOSED FOR HYMENOMYCETES-IV*(Boletaceae) M. A. DONK
Reinwardtia Vol. 3 No. 2 (1955)
Publisher : BRIN Publishing (Penerbit BRIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This fourth part deals with the family of Boletaceae as currently delimited, with the exclusion of the frankly lamellate groups.The commonly accepted typification of Boletus Fr.by B. edulis Bull, ex Fr. is not that which would be arrived at by strict adherence to the recommendations for the selection of types.It is, however, desirable to find a way of accepting B.edvlis as the type species of Boletus.The correct name for the genus generally called Gyrodon Opat. seems to be Uloporus Quel.
SERTULUM DIPTEROCARPACEARUM MALAYENSIUM-VI D. F. VAN SLOOTEN
Reinwardtia Vol. 3 No. 3 (1956)
Publisher : BRIN Publishing (Penerbit BRIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The genus Balanocarpus has been regarded as distinct by reason of its calyx lobes, which do not exceed the wooden nut but which enclose the very base of it,forming a five-lobed wooden cup by the equally though slightly enlarged strongly imbricate segments of the flowering calyx.Symington has called particular attention to the fact that it seemed to lack natural generic characters,viz.satisfactory and sharply marked distinctions from other groups, as was already superficially realised by his predecessorsIn agreement with earlier suggestions by Symington, Balanocarpus is.given up,it being an artificial genus.Many of its species are referable to Shorea.Of the latter,12 species are treated,7 of which are described as new.Editor's Note.-Dr D. F. van Slooten was steadily continuing his revision of the Dipterocarpaceae when his untimely death put a stop to this most useful and painstaking task. During the last few years of his life I had the privilege to be consulted by Dr van Slooten regarding certain aspects of his work and this has made me somewhat familiar with the present paper and some of its problems. As this valuable contribution was not yet ready for the press, I ventured to put it into a definite shape to make it available rather than to leave it unpublished. Therefore, the errors that it may contain are wholly my own responsibility.-M. A. Donk.
NOTES ON INDONESIAN FRESHWATER ALGAE-I Arthur M. Scott, Gerald W. Prescott
Reinwardtia Vol. 3 No. 3 (1956)
Publisher : BRIN Publishing (Penerbit BRIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

At various times during the last four years Mr.M.Sachlan,of the Laboratory for Inland Fisheries at Bogor, Java, has sent us collections of freshwater algae from the larger islands of the Indonesian Archipelago,-Borneo, Java and Sumatra.To him we express our sincere thanks for his care and effort in obtaining this material,and for affording us the opportunity of studying it.A report on the algae is in course of preparation, and will be published on completion.During our examination we have encountered some curious cases of dichotypy in a species of Staurastrum, involving four different forms, which, if considered separately, might be thought to belong to four different species. They throw a new light upon the relationship between St. wildemani Gutw.and St. subtrifurcatum var. majus West & West, whose similarity has been noted and commented upon by other authors.(Schmidle, 1902, p. 73; Gutwinski, 1902, p. 605; West & West, 1907, p. 215; Krieger, 1933, p. 209; Rich, 1935, p. 151; Fritsch & Rich, 1937, p. 213).
NOTES ON RESUPINATE HYMENOMYCETES - II* The tulasnelloid fungi M. A. DONK
Reinwardtia Vol. 3 No. 3 (1956)
Publisher : BRIN Publishing (Penerbit BRIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

1. Discussed are the tulasnelloid fungi, i.e. Tulasnella and other groups considered related by the author and also possessing spores capable of exhibiting repetition and not becoming septate. 2. The author rejects the designation epibasidia and considers the sterigmata in Tulasnella and Gloeotulasnella as being merely strongly inflated, a view already widely accepted. 3. He rejects the families Tulasnellaceae and Ceratobasidiaceae and includes them and the other tulasnelloid fungi in the Corticiaceae, which is still a heterogeneous group. Possible relations with other families are discussed.
A REVISION OF MALAYSIAN BAUHINIEAE H. C. D. de Wit
Reinwardtia Vol. 3 No. 4 (1956)
Publisher : BRIN Publishing (Penerbit BRIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This revision deals with the tribus Bauhinieae(Caesalpiniaceae)as occurring in Malaysia.The tribe includes the genera Bauhinia L. s.str., Bracteolanthus de Wit gen. nov., Gigasiphon Drake del Cast.,Lasiobema (Korth.) Miq., Lysiphyllum (Benth.)de Wit gen. & stat. nov., Phanera Lour.,and Piliostigma Hochst. Bauhinia is reduced to the original Lin-nean delimitation; 9 species are treated (inclusive of a number of varieties) ; 2 species are reduced to the rank of varieties and 3 new varieties are described, accounting for 3 new varietal combinations and 3 new varietal names.Bracteolanthus contains a single species for which a new combination is proposed. Gigasiphon is represented by 3 species; 3 new specific combinations are made.Lasiobema is represented by 5 species; in this ge- nus 1 new species is described, 4 new combinations and 1 new varietal combination are proposed,and a new but insufficiently represented species is recorded.Some new combinations for extra-Malaysian species are also proposed.Of Lysiphyllum 2 species are treated; 2 new combinations and some new combinations for extra-Malaysian species were necessary.Pha-nera is by far the largest genus:44 species,many of which are divided into subspecies and/or varieties.The genus is subdivided into three sub-genera, Phanera,Biporina de Wit, and Austrocercis de Wit.Of these,subgenus Phanera, in its turn, contains 3 sections, all new, viz Pha.nero-siphon, Meganthera, and Micranthera.Subgenus Biporina comprises the 3 new sections Bifoliola, Palmatifolia,and Cinnamomifolia. Subgenus Austrocercis consists of a single species.The recognition of Phanera as a genus, as well as the description of new taxa and the revaluation of some previously described ones made necessary a large number of new names and new combinations.
Partial north-northwestern Australian origin of the Malesian flora MOSMAN, JASPER MARTIJN; PETER CORNELIS VAN WELZEN
Reinwardtia Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Reinwardtia
Publisher : BRIN Publishing (Penerbit BRIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55981/reinwardtia.2025.101

Abstract

The current study aims to see if a dispersal pathway existed between northern/ northwestern Australia and the Lesser Sunda Islands and Southern Moluccas by using distributional data of plants, dated phylogenies and historical biogeography. Dispersal between Asia and Australia has already been shown to exist, especially through Northern Queensland and New Guinea into the Malay Archipelago (Malesia). Taxa occurring in the Northern Territory and Western Australia were compared to taxa present in the Lesser Sunda Islands and Southern Moluccas as a means to explain the origin of part of the Malesian flora. Distribution data of taxa were collected from the Global Biodiversity Information Centre and the database of Naturalis Biodiversity Center, reviewed for accepted names and distribution data via Kew Gardens’ Plants of The World Online and dated phylogenies were traced via Google Scholar. The resemblance in genus and species lists between Western Australia/Northern Territory and the Lesser Sunda Islands/southern Moluccas indicates a floral exchange, likely, mainly from Australia to Malesia. Historical biogeographic data were found in only two instances, showing a dispersal to the Lesser Sunda Islands/southern Moluccas around 5 Ma. The conclusion is that this pathway did not result in a major influx of flora into the Malesian area.
MALAYSIAN LICHENS-IV P. GROENHART
Reinwardtia Vol. 2 No. 3 (1954)
Publisher : BRIN Publishing (Penerbit BRIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

1. The first part deals with and illustrates 4 species of which one, from Java,is described as new. 2. In the second part 26 new species from Java are described.
ON STAUDE' S NEW GENERIC NAMES FOR AGARICS M. A. DONK
Reinwardtia Vol. 2 No. 3 (1954)
Publisher : BRIN Publishing (Penerbit BRIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The author concludes that the generic names for agarics first introduced by Staude (1857) have been validly published.When I drew attention to Staude's forgotten "Die Schwamme Mittel deutschlands" (1857), I felt obliged to conclude that the new generic names for agarics appearing in that work were validly published (Donk, 1949: 319-320), and I still am fully convinced that this conclusion must be upheld. Rogers (1950: 22) submitted that Staude, although referring to Collybia and other genera as G [attungen], did not definitely accept them as genera, since he continued to refer species under them to Agaricus, thereby implying that they were only subgenera or sections; and that Staude, therefore, dit not validly publish these generic names. Rogers's conclusion is untenable for several reasons. If his argument became generally accepted, quite a lot of generic names might be murdered by it: the number of generic names established without simultaneously published new combinations with the new generic name, like those without any mention of species, is considerable. Such an attitude would not only be undesirable from a practical point of view, but would also disregard the declared object of the Code to promote stability of nomenclature. The Code has deliberately and carefully avoided the stipulation that a new generic name requires simultaneously published new combinations; it has even refused to rule that new generic names ought to be associated with binomials, as was stipulated by the former American code! Certainly this was not done solely to accomodate such special cases as, for example, Tournefortian generic names published after 1753 as an overflow from the pre-binomial period: the decision was for general application. Staude emphatically marked the names in question as generic ones; not only in the introductory pages, but also throughout his more detailed treatment of the agarics he preceded these generic names with "G[attung]" and added generic descriptions.He supplied the information that, "the genera to follow are all according to Fries. Cp. Systema mycologicum
NEW AND CRITICAL MALAYSIAN PLANTS-II A. J. G. H. KOSTERMANS
Reinwardtia Vol. 3 No. 1 (1954)
Publisher : BRIN Publishing (Penerbit BRIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In the present paper 14 new species of Pithecellobium Mart, are described and 3 new combinations are made with that name.Notes on several species of the related genus Archidendron F. Muell, are added.

Page 56 of 104 | Total Record : 1031


Filter by Year

1950 2025


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 24 No. 2 (2025): Reinwardtia Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Reinwardtia Vol 23, No 1 (2024): Volume 23, No 1 (2024): Reinwardtia Vol. 23 No. 2 (2024) Vol 23, No 2 (2024): Reinwardtia Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024) Vol 22, No 2 (2023): Volume 22, No 2 (2023): Reinwardtia Vol 22, No 1 (2023): Volume 22, No 1 (2023): Reinwardtia Vol. 22 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 22 No. 1 (2023) Vol 21, No 2 (2022): Vol 21, No 2 (2022): Reinwardtia Vol. 21 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 21 No. 1 (2022) Vol 21, No 1 (2022): Reinwardtia Vol 20, No 1 (2021): Vol. 20 No. 1 Vol 20, No 2 (2021): Reinwardtia Vol. 20 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 20 No. 1 (2021) Vol 19, No 2 (2020): Vol.19 No.2 Vol 19, No 1 (2020): Vol.19 No.1 Vol. 19 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 19 No. 1 (2020) Vol 18, No 2 (2019): Vol.18 No.2 Vol 18, No 1 (2019): Vol.18 No.1 Vol. 18 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 18 No. 1 (2019) Vol 17, No 2 (2018): Vol.17 No.2 Vol 17, No 1 (2018): Vol.17 No.1 Vol. 17 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 17 No. 1 (2018) Vol 16, No 2 (2017): Vol 16 No. 2 Vol 16, No 1 (2017): Vol.16 No.1 Vol. 16 No. 2 (2017) Vol. 16 No. 1 (2017) Vol 15, No 2 (2016): Vol.15 No.2 Vol 15, No 1 (2016): Vol.15 No.1 Vol. 15 No. 2 (2016) Vol. 15 No. 1 (2016) Vol 14, No 2 (2015): Vol.14 No.2 Vol. 14 No. 2 (2015) Vol 14, No 1 (2014): Vol. 14 No. 1 Vol. 14 No. 1 (2014) Vol 13, No 5 (2013): Vol. 13, No. 5 Vol. 13 No. 5 (2013) Vol 13, No 4 (2012): Vol. 13 no. 4 Vol 13, No 3 (2012): Vol. 13 No. 3 Vol. 13 No. 4 (2012) Vol. 13 No. 3 (2012) Vol 13, No 2 (2010): Vol. 13 No. 2 Vol. 13 No. 2 (2010) Vol 13, No 1 (2009): Vol. 13 No. 1 Vol 12, No 5 (2009): Vol. 12, No. 5 Vol. 13 No. 1 (2009) Vol. 12 No. 5 (2009) Vol 12, No 4 (2008): Vol. 12, No. 4 Vol. 12 No. 4 (2008) Vol 12, No 3 (2006): Vol. 12, No. 3 Vol. 12 No. 3 (2006) Vol 12, No 2 (2004): Vol. 12, No. 2 Vol. 12 No. 2 (2004) Vol 12, No 1 (2002): Vol. 12, No. 1 Vol. 12 No. 1 (2002) Vol 11, No 5 (2000): Vol. 11 No. 5 Vol. 11 No. 5 (2000) Vol 11, No 4 (1999): Vol. 11 No. 4 Vol. 11 No. 4 (1999) Vol 11, No 3 (1998): Vol. 11 No. 3 Vol. 11 No. 3 (1998) Vol 11, No 2 (1997): Vol. 11 No. 2 Vol. 11 No. 2 (1997) Vol 11, No 1 (1992): Vol. 11 No. 1 Vol. 11 No. 1 (1992) Vol 10, No 5 (1988): vol. 10 No.5 Vol 10, No 4 (1988): vol. 10 No.4 Vol. 10 No. 5 (1988) Vol. 10 No. 4 (1988) Vol 10, No 3 (1987): vol. 10 No.3 Vol. 10 No. 3 (1987) Vol 10, No 2 (1984): vol. 10 No.2 Vol. 10 No. 2 (1984) Vol 10, No 1 (1982): vol. 10 No.1 Vol. 10 No. 1 (1982) Vol 9, No 4 (1980): vol.9 no.4 Vol. 9 No. 4 (1980) Vol 9, No 3 (1977): vol.9 no.3 Vol. 9 No. 3 (1977) Vol 9, No 2 (1975): vol.9 no.2 Vol. 9 No. 2 (1975) Vol 9, No 1 (1974): Vol.9 no.1 Vol 8, No 4 (1974): vol.8 no.4 Vol. 9 No. 1 (1974) Vol. 8 No. 4 (1974) Vol 8, No 3 (1972): vol.8 no.3 Vol 8, No 2 (1972): vol.8 no.2 Vol. 8 No. 3 (1972) Vol. 8 No. 2 (1972) Vol 8, No 1 (1970): vol.8 no.1 Vol. 8 No. 1 (1970) Vol 7, No 5 (1969): vol 7.no.5 Vol. 7 No. 5 (1969) Vol 7, No 4 (1968): vol.7 no.4 Vol. 7 No. 4 (1968) Vol 7, No 3 (1966): vol.7 no.3 Vol. 7 No. 3 (1966) Vol 7, No 2 (1965): vol.7 no.2 Vol 7, No 1 (1965): vol.7 no.1 Vol. 7 No. 2 (1965) Vol. 7 No. 1 (1965) Vol 6, No 4 (1963): vol.6 no. 4 Vol. 6 No. 4 (1963) Vol 6, No 3 (1962): vol.6 no. 3 Vol 6, No 2 (1962): vol.6 no. 2 Vol. 6 No. 3 (1962) Vol. 6 No. 2 (1962) Vol 6, No 1 (1961): vol.6 no. 1 Vol 5, No 4 (1961): vol.5 no.4 Vol. 6 No. 1 (1961) Vol. 5 No. 4 (1961) Vol 5, No 3 (1960): vol.5 no.3 Vol 5, No 2 (1960): vol.5 no.2 Vol. 5 No. 3 (1960) Vol. 5 No. 2 (1960) Vol 5, No 1 (1959): vol.5 no.1 Vol 4, No 4 (1959): vol.4 no.4 Vol. 5 No. 1 (1959) Vol. 4 No. 4 (1959) Vol 4, No 3 (1958): vol.4 no.3 Vol. 4 No. 3 (1958) Vol 4, No 2 (1957): vol.4 no.2 Vol. 4 No. 2 (1957) Vol 4, No 1 (1956): vol.4 no.1 Vol 3, No 4 (1956): vol.3 no.4 Vol 3, No 3 (1956): vol.3 no.3 Vol. 4 No. 1 (1956) Vol. 3 No. 4 (1956) Vol. 3 No. 3 (1956) Vol 3, No 2 (1955): vol.3 no.2 Vol. 3 No. 2 (1955) Vol 3, No 1 (1954): vol.3 no.1 Vol 2, No 3 (1954): vol.2 no.3 Vol. 3 No. 1 (1954) Vol. 2 No. 3 (1954) Vol 2, No 2 (1953): vol.2 no.2 Vol. 2 No. 2 (1953) Vol 2, No 1 (1952): vol.2 no.1 Vol 1, No 4 (1952): vol.1 no.4 Vol. 2 No. 1 (1952) Vol. 1 No. 4 (1952) Vol 1, No 3 (1951): vol.1 no.3 Vol 1, No 2 (1951): vol.1 no.2 Vol. 1 No. 3 (1951) Vol. 1 No. 2 (1951) Vol 1, No 1 (1950): vol.1 no.1 Vol. 1 No. 1 (1950) More Issue