cover
Contact Name
Feby Adzkari
Contact Email
febyadzkari729@gmail.com
Phone
+6289626169257
Journal Mail Official
malainsejurnal@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Raya Darma No.13, Darma, Kuningan, Jawa Barat.
Location
Kab. kuningan,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
MALA IN SE : JURNAL HUKUM PIDANA, KRIMINOLOGI DAN VIKTIMOLOGI
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30632293     DOI : 10.08221/malainse
Core Subject : Social,
The aims of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers, and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deals with a broad range of topics in the fields of Material Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure Law, Corruption, Money Laundering, Terrorism. Narcotics, Serious Human Rights Violations, Reform of Criminal Law, Criminal Justice System, Criminology, Victimology and various other criminal law issues.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 56 Documents
THE DYNAMICS OF CENTRALISM BEHIND THE CLOAK OF AUTONOMY: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE LEGAL PHILOSOPHY OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT Hendro Tri Subiyantoro; Afdhal Mahatta
MALA IN SE: Jurnal Hukum Pidana, Kriminologi, dan Viktimologi Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): MALA IN SE: Jurnal Hukum Pidana, Kriminologi Dan Viktimologi (April)
Publisher : YAYASAN PENDIDIKAN DAN PELAYANAN KESEHATAN RAHMAT HUSADA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.08221/mis.v3i1.263

Abstract

Indonesia's regional self-governance, launched post-1998 reformasi, rests on subsidiarity and decentralization as core tenets of local administration. Yet, emergent realities expose a stark contradiction between nominal affirmation of provincial sovereignty and pervasive curbs imposed via regulatory frameworks. Utilizing a normative juridical methodology featuring systematic and purposive hermeneutics, this inquiry dissects disparities between statutory designs of autonomy and practical execution. Outcomes reveal that Law No. 1 of 2022 on Inter-Governmental Fiscal Ties fosters financial reliance undermining provincial self-determination, whereas Law No. 3 of 2022 on the New Capital City imposes administrative structures bypassing local democratic norms. Together with tacit recentralizing devices, these enactments engender a facade of autonomy, granting procedural leeway amid substantive curtailment. Imperative juridical realignment of local governance philosophy demands bolstering subsidiarity, overhauling fiscal linkages, and reorienting central-local dynamics toward equitable, partnership-oriented distributive justice.
THE LEGAL POLICY ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AD HOC AGRARIAN COURTS AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR RESOLVING AGRARIAN CONFLICTS IN INDONESIA Hermawan; Andi Muhammad Rusdi
MALA IN SE: Jurnal Hukum Pidana, Kriminologi, dan Viktimologi Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): MALA IN SE: Jurnal Hukum Pidana, Kriminologi Dan Viktimologi (April)
Publisher : YAYASAN PENDIDIKAN DAN PELAYANAN KESEHATAN RAHMAT HUSADA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.08221/mis.v3i1.264

Abstract

Agrarian disputes in Indonesia persist as a multifaceted and persistent challenge, entangling stakeholders including communities, authorities, and businesses. Existing mechanisms for resolving such conflicts remain disjointed, dispersed across forums like general courts and state administrative tribunals, frequently yielding juridical ambiguity and suboptimal outcomes. This inquiry evaluates the necessity and optimal juridical architecture for instituting an ad hoc agrarian tribunal as a pathway to holistic conflict adjudication. Employing normative legal methodology with statutory and conceptual emphases, it draws upon pertinent legislation, monographs, and scholarly publications. Findings affirm the imperative for an ad hoc agrarian court to rectify systemic fragmentation in dispute resolution, delivering equitable verdicts via specialized ad hoc judges expert in agrarian matters. Optimally, this tribunal should function as a specialized entity subordinate to the Supreme Court, wielding unified jurisdiction over agrarian contentions and bolstered by alternative resolution tools like mediation. Accordingly, such a court promises to enhance juridical predictability, uphold communal entitlements, and advance agrarian reform toward equitable social outcomes in land affairs.
BANKRUPTCY OF FOREIGN COMPANIES IN INDONESIA: A JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF THE JURISDICTION AND RECOGNITION OF FOREIGN BANKRUPTCY JUDGMENTS Patar Bronson Sitinjak; Lucky Ferdiles
MALA IN SE: Jurnal Hukum Pidana, Kriminologi, dan Viktimologi Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): MALA IN SE: Jurnal Hukum Pidana, Kriminologi Dan Viktimologi (April)
Publisher : YAYASAN PENDIDIKAN DAN PELAYANAN KESEHATAN RAHMAT HUSADA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.08221/mis.v3i1.265

Abstract

The increasing penetration of multinational enterprises into the Indonesian market poses intricate legal dilemmas, especially in cases of corporate insolvency. This investigation assesses the authority of Indonesia's Commercial Courts in adjudicating the bankruptcy proceedings of overseas firms and evaluates the acknowledgment of extraterritorial bankruptcy rulings under private international law principles. Employing a normative juridical methodology that incorporates statutory and conceptual analyses, the inquiry relies on primary legal sources such as statutes, supplemented by secondary materials including academic literature. The results reveal that Commercial Courts exercise jurisdiction over foreign debtors predicated on their conduct of business operations within Indonesia. Nonetheless, this authority is confined to territorial boundaries, rendering the recovery of assets situated overseas effectively impossible. Moreover, prevailing Indonesian legislation lacks explicit provisions for recognizing foreign bankruptcy judgments. Consequently, these rulings serve merely as supportive evidence and lack direct enforceability absent an international treaty or the doctrine of reciprocity. This legislative shortfall substantially undermines safeguards for creditors in transnational dealings, underscoring the pressing imperative for Indonesia to enact the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency as a pivotal reform measure.
RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF REGIONAL WEALTH SEPARATED FROM REGIONAL OWNED ENTERPRISES IN INDONESIA Nurakhman; Richard
MALA IN SE: Jurnal Hukum Pidana, Kriminologi, dan Viktimologi Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): MALA IN SE: Jurnal Hukum Pidana, Kriminologi Dan Viktimologi (April)
Publisher : YAYASAN PENDIDIKAN DAN PELAYANAN KESEHATAN RAHMAT HUSADA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.08221/mis.v3i1.266

Abstract

The administration of segregated local assets within Regional-Owned Enterprises (BUMD) serves as a vital mechanism for attaining fiscal autonomy at the regional level; yet, its inherent intricacies often precipitate grave concerns over responsibility and openness. This investigation seeks to evaluate the responsibility framework governing segregated local assets in BUMD, pinpoint discrepancies between statutory mandates and implementation realities, and propose an optimal responsibility paradigm. Adopting a normative juridical methodology incorporating statutory and conceptual perspectives, the study relies on library-based inquiry for data gathering. Key discoveries highlight three core issues: firstly, deficiencies in BUMD's internal control apparatus permit irregularities to evade early detection; secondly, notable inconsistencies prevail between BUMD responsibility rules and financial disclosure routines, fostering juridical vulnerabilities; thirdly, an inadequate assessment process reliant on quantifiable metrics results in subdued and erratic contributions from segregated local assets to Regional Original Revenue. Enhancing internal controls, aligning regulatory standards, and developing a holistic performance appraisal structure emerge as the foremost remedies to foster responsible and fair BUMD administration.
LEGAL POLICY ON COPYRIGHT OF DIGITAL WORKS BASED ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE CREATIVE ECONOMY ERA IN INDONESIA Rara Amalia Cendhayanie; Megawati Barthos
MALA IN SE: Jurnal Hukum Pidana, Kriminologi, dan Viktimologi Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): MALA IN SE: Jurnal Hukum Pidana, Kriminologi Dan Viktimologi (April)
Publisher : YAYASAN PENDIDIKAN DAN PELAYANAN KESEHATAN RAHMAT HUSADA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.08221/mis.v3i1.267

Abstract

The swift evolution of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has facilitated the production of digital creations via computational algorithms, prompting juridical questions about authorship, novelty, and safeguards under copyright law. In Indonesia, the copyright system—chiefly regulated by Law No. 28 of 2014—upholds humans exclusively as eligible creators. This stance engenders difficulties in providing juridical predictability for outputs produced by or with AI assistance, especially amid the burgeoning digital creative sector. This research seeks to analyze the policy dynamics underpinning the governance of AI-driven digital copyright within Indonesia. It employs a normative juridical methodology, incorporating statutory, conceptual, and comparative lenses drawn from legislative texts, doctrinal principles, and pertinent academic sources. The results demonstrate that Indonesia's prevailing copyright structure fails to expressly encompass AI-generated content. Hence, a flexible regulatory strategy is essential, achieved via the revision of normative provisions that preserve human oversight in creation while delineating a precise protective regime for AI-assisted works, thereby fostering expansion in the domestic creative economy.
DIGITAL JUSTICE AND THE FUTURE OF CIVIL MEDIATION: A NORMATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE RECOGNITION OF ELECTRONIC MEDIATION AGREEMENTS Saur Oloan Hamonangan Situngkir; Binsar Jon Vic
MALA IN SE: Jurnal Hukum Pidana, Kriminologi, dan Viktimologi Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): MALA IN SE: Jurnal Hukum Pidana, Kriminologi Dan Viktimologi (April)
Publisher : YAYASAN PENDIDIKAN DAN PELAYANAN KESEHATAN RAHMAT HUSADA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.08221/mis.v3i1.268

Abstract

The development of information technology has encouraged the transformation of the justice system towards the concept of digital justice, which utilizes digital technology to improve efficiency, transparency, and access to justice. In the context of civil dispute resolution in Indonesia, this transformation has encouraged the emergence of electronic mediation practices, which are the mediation process carried out through digital media. However, these developments raise legal issues related to the position and legal recognition of mediation agreements made electronically, especially regarding their evidentiary and executory power in the civil procedure law system. This research aims to analyse the concept of digital justice in civil mediation, examine the legal position of electronic mediation agreements in the civil law system, and formulate a model for legal recognition of these agreements in the judicial system. This research uses normative legal research methods with a legislative and conceptual approach through literature studies on relevant laws and regulations, books, and scientific journal articles. The results of the study show that electronic mediation agreements in principle meet the legal requirements of the agreement and can be recognized as legal documents based on the provisions regarding electronic documents, but there is still uncertainty about its executory power. Therefore, a legal recognition model is needed that integrates electronic mediation agreements with the digital justice system through registration, verification, and ratification mechanisms by the courts so that it can obtain the status of an electronic peace deed.