cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Rahmat Gaho
Contact Email
rahmatgaho27des@gmail.com
Phone
+6281362941120
Journal Mail Official
verdict.jls@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Terompong, Sumerta Kelod, Denpasar Timur, Kota Denpasar, Bali 80239, Indonesia
Location
Kota denpasar,
Bali
INDONESIA
Verdict: Journal of Law Science
Published by CV Wahana Publikasi
ISSN : -     EISSN : 29853680     DOI : https://doi.org/10.59011/vjlaws
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Verdict: Journal of Law Science (E-ISSN: 2985-3680) is an open-access, anonymous peer-reviewed journal published by CV Wahana Publikasi. This journal publishes articles on all aspects of law, covering international, national, and local levels. It aims to provide a platform for researchers, academics, practitioners, students, teachers, judges, and administrators to publish original research articles or review articles, and offers opportunities for them to stay abreast of new ideas and advances in legal reform. The topics covered by this journal are diverse, including criminal law, civil law, commercial law, health law, environmental law, agrarian law, maritime law, international law, tax law, consumer protection law, medical law, spatial planning law, labor law, transportation law, mining law, energy law, administration, and legal justice. However, it is also open to interdisciplinary legal research. The journal warmly welcomes contributions from scholars in related disciplines, with a priority on new and current issues for publication. Verdict: Journal of Law Science is published twice a year.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 113 Documents
 8   9   10   11   12 
Implementasi Pemberian Remisi bagi Narapidana Tindak Pidana Pencurian di Lapas Kelas IIA Rantauprapat: Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam Rahma Fitri Amelia Hasibuan; Syaddan Dintara Lubis
Verdict: Journal of Law Science Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): Verdict: Journal of Law Science
Publisher : CV WAHANA PUBLIKASI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59011/vjlaws.5.3.2026.430-446

Abstract

The granting of remission is one of the rights of prisoners provided as a form of recognition for behavioral improvement during their incarceration in correctional institutions. This study aims to analyze the implementation of remission for prisoners convicted of theft at the Class IIA Rantauprapat Correctional Institution, identify the factors influencing its implementation, and examine the policy from the perspective of Islamic Criminal Law. This study employs an empirical legal research method with a qualitative approach. Data were obtained through interviews with officers of the Class IIA Rantauprapat Correctional Institution, observations, and documentary studies, and were subsequently analyzed using qualitative descriptive analysis. The findings indicate that the implementation of remission has been carried out in accordance with Law Number 22 of 2022 concerning Corrections and Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 7 of 2022. Supporting factors in the implementation of remission include good prisoner behavior, active participation in correctional programs, fulfillment of administrative requirements, and the use of the Correctional Database System (Sistem Database Pemasyarakatan/SDP). Meanwhile, the main inhibiting factor is disciplinary violations recorded in Register F. From the perspective of Islamic Criminal Law, the granting of remission is consistent with the concept of jarīmah taʿzīr and maqāṣid al-sharīʿah, as it constitutes an authority of the government (ulil amri) aimed at achieving public welfare through rehabilitation, preventing recidivism, and facilitating the social reintegration of prisoners.
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Anak sebagai Korban Pelecehan Seksual di Wilayah Polrestabes Medan Zulamin Ginting; Rasina Padeni Nasution
Verdict: Journal of Law Science Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): Verdict: Journal of Law Science
Publisher : CV WAHANA PUBLIKASI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59011/vjlaws.5.3.2026.477-493

Abstract

Legal protection for children who are victims of sexual abuse is a state obligation that focuses not only on prosecuting perpetrators but also on upholding victims' rights and facilitating their recovery. Although child protection is mandated by Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection, its implementation in the field faces various obstacles. This study aims to analyze the implementation of legal protection for child victims of sexual abuse within the jurisdiction of the Medan City Police (Polrestabes Medan), identify the challenges involved, and formulate strategic solutions to enhance the effectiveness of legal protection for victims. The study employs an empirical-juridical method with a qualitative descriptive approach. Data were collected through interviews, observation, and document analysis, and subsequently analyzed qualitatively through the stages of data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The findings indicate that legal protection measures have been implemented, including report intake, child-friendly questioning, investigation, victim support, identity confidentiality, coordination with relevant agencies (such as DP3A, UPTD PPA, hospitals, psychologists, and other institutions), as well as victim rehabilitation and recovery. However, implementation remains suboptimal due to challenges such as victims' reluctance to open up, limited evidence, inconsistencies in victims' statements, and a lack of optimal coordination during the rehabilitation and recovery processes. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen child-friendly questioning procedures, multidisciplinary approaches to evidence gathering, inter-agency synergy, public and family education, and the capacity building of law enforcement officers. This study underscores the importance of integrated protection through preventive, repressive, and restorative approaches.
Analisis Yuridis Penerapan Asas Equality Before the Law dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Pemerasan Yusuf Hatorangan; M. Rizal
Verdict: Journal of Law Science Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): Verdict: Journal of Law Science
Publisher : CV WAHANA PUBLIKASI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59011/vjlaws.5.3.2026.539-552

Abstract

The principle of equality before the law is a fundamental principle of the rule of law that guarantees equal legal status and treatment for every person regardless of social status, position, or profession. However, its implementation in criminal law enforcement may face challenges, particularly when the alleged perpetrator is a law enforcement officer. This study aims to analyze the legal regulation and implementation of the principle of equality before the law in handling the crime of extortion involving members of the Indonesian National Police and civil society, as well as to identify factors that influence its implementation. This study employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. Legal materials consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary sources were collected through library research and analyzed qualitatively and normatively. The findings indicate that the principle of equality before the law has a strong constitutional and legal basis and requires criminal proceedings to be conducted objectively, professionally, transparently, and without discrimination. In handling extortion cases, both police officers and civilians are subject to general criminal proceedings. Police officers, however, are additionally subject to professional ethical and disciplinary mechanisms, which constitute supplementary responsibilities and cannot replace criminal liability. The analysis further shows that differences in treatment may arise from law enforcement integrity, institutional culture, transparency, supervision, and the potential influence of institutional status. Therefore, consistent and accountable law enforcement is necessary to ensure that the handling of extortion cases is determined by the alleged criminal conduct and applicable legal standards rather than the perpetrator’s institutional position.

Page 12 of 12 | Total Record : 113

 8   9   10   11   12 

Filter by Year

2022 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): Verdict: Journal of Law Science Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Verdict: Journal of Law Science Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Verdict: Journal of Law Science Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Verdict: Journal of Law Science Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Verdict: Journal of Law Science Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): Verdict: Journal of Law Science Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): Verdict: Journal of Law Science Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): Verdict: Journal of Law Science Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): Verdict: Journal of Law Science Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): Verdict: Journal of Law Science Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): Verdict: Journal of Law Science More Issue