cover
Contact Name
Rahmat Gaho
Contact Email
rahmatgaho27des@gmail.com
Phone
+6281362941120
Journal Mail Official
verdict.jls@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Terompong, Sumerta Kelod, Denpasar Timur, Kota Denpasar, Bali 80239, Indonesia
Location
Kota denpasar,
Bali
INDONESIA
Verdict: Journal of Law Science
Published by CV Wahana Publikasi
ISSN : -     EISSN : 29853680     DOI : https://doi.org/10.59011/vjlaws
Core Subject : Social,
Verdict: Journal of Law Science (E-ISSN: 2985-3680) is an open-access, anonymous peer-reviewed journal published by CV Wahana Publikasi. This journal publishes articles on all aspects of law, covering international, national, and local levels. It aims to provide a platform for researchers, academics, practitioners, students, teachers, judges, and administrators to publish original research articles or review articles, and offers opportunities for them to stay abreast of new ideas and advances in legal reform. The topics covered by this journal are diverse, including criminal law, civil law, commercial law, health law, environmental law, agrarian law, maritime law, international law, tax law, consumer protection law, medical law, spatial planning law, labor law, transportation law, mining law, energy law, administration, and legal justice. However, it is also open to interdisciplinary legal research. The journal warmly welcomes contributions from scholars in related disciplines, with a priority on new and current issues for publication. Verdict: Journal of Law Science is published twice a year.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 83 Documents
Legal Analysis of Default in Credit Agreement (Decision No. 25/Pdt. G. S/2024/PN. Pct.) Marlina Elisabeth Pakpahan; Elkana Dasilva Ginting; Claudya Yolanda Putri Manalu; Clara Brigitta Jap
Verdict: Journal of Law Science Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Verdict: Journal of Law Science
Publisher : CV WAHANA PUBLIKASI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59011/vjlaws.5.1.2026.124-138

Abstract

Credit agreements have become one of the principal financing instruments in the Indonesian financial system and hold a strategic position in supporting both consumer and productive sectors. Therefore, credit agreements must comply with Civil Code and Law Number 10 of 1998 concerning Banking to ensure legal certainty and protection for all parties involved. However, in practice, debtors may fail to fulfill repayment obligations, resulting in breach of contract (default). This issue is reflected in Decision Number 25/Pdt.G.S/2024/PN Pacitan, where Bank Rakyat Indonesia Pacitan Branch sued the debtors for non-performance of contractual obligations. This study aims to analyze the regulation of breach of credit agreements, to examine the legal provisions regarding credit agreements, and to analyze the judge’s considerations in deciding Case Number 25/Pdt.G.S/2024/PN Pct. This study applies normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches through library research on legal materials. The result showed that breach of contract in judicial practice is interpreted not only as contractual non-compliance but also as civil liability requiring proportional legal remedies, compensation, and judicial balance between creditor protection and debtor rights.
Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Pembatalan Merek dengan Persamaan pada Pokoknya: Kasus Gudang Garam VS Gudang Baru di Indonesia(Studi Putusan Nomor 4/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2021/PN Niaga Sby) Pilihan Fredrick Johannes Tanjung; Venia Utami Keliat
Verdict: Journal of Law Science Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Verdict: Journal of Law Science
Publisher : CV WAHANA PUBLIKASI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59011/vjlaws.5.1.2026.99-108

Abstract

This study aims to examine the application of the principle of similarity in essential elements as a basis for trademark cancellation in a dispute involving prominent cigarette trademarks in Indonesia, in accordance with Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications. The research employed a normative juridical method using a case study approach centered on the decision of the Surabaya Commercial Court Number 4/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2021/PN Niaga Sby. The findings indicate that the judges adopted a substantive approach in assessing trademark similarity based on the overall impression created in the minds of consumers. Although the decision strengthens protection for trademark owners, the analysis reveals weaknesses in the juridical reasoning, as the parameters for visual, phonetic, and conceptual assessment were not explicitly formulated. This study concludes that there is a need for the standardization of assessment parameters by judges in order to create legal certainty for business actors in Indonesia.
Analisis Yuridis Kebijakan Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) dalam Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat pada PT Perkebunan Nusantara IV Regional I Medan Atika Sunarto; Yunri Matondang; Muhammad Ali Adnan
Verdict: Journal of Law Science Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Verdict: Journal of Law Science
Publisher : CV WAHANA PUBLIKASI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59011/vjlaws.5.1.2026.161-176

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the policy and implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility in improving community welfare at PT Perkebunan Nusantara IV Regional I Medan. The research method employed is empirical juridical with a descriptive-analytical approach, examining both legal aspects and implementation practices in the field. Data were obtained through interviews, documentation studies, and reviews of legislation and relevant literature. The results indicate that the Corporate Social Responsibility policy of PT Perkebunan Nusantara IV has a strong legal basis, referring to the Limited Liability Company Law, Government Regulations, and other related regulations. The implementation of the policy is carried out through Corporate Social and Environmental Responsibility (CSER) programs covering education, health, social affairs, environmental sustainability, and community economic empowerment. These programs have made a tangible contribution to improving the quality of life of surrounding communities from economic, social, and environmental perspectives. Nevertheless, the implementation still faces several obstacles, such as limited community participation in program planning, inaccurate targeting of assistance, and constraints in coordination among stakeholders. To address these challenges, greater transparency, accountability, and collaboration among the company, government, and community are required. Accordingly, it can be concluded that Corporate Social Responsibility plays an important role in improving community welfare; however, optimization in its planning and implementation is necessary to ensure greater effectiveness and sustainability.