cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Hadrianus Tedjoworo
Contact Email
htedjo@unpar.ac.id
Phone
+6222420476
Journal Mail Official
melintas@unpar.ac.id
Editorial Address
Department of Philosophy, Parahyangan Catholic University, Jl. Nias 2, Bandung 40117, Indonesia
Location
Kota bandung,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Melintas An International Journal of Philosophy and Religion
Published by Universitas Katolik Parahyangan
ISSN : 08520089     EISSN : 24068098     DOI : https://doi.org/10.26593
Core Subject : Religion, Humanities, Education, Art, Social,
Religion Arts Humanities Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences
The aim of this Journal is to promote a righteous approach to exploration, analysis, and research on philosophy, humanities, culture and anthropology, phenomenology, ethics, religious studies, philosophy of religion, and theology. The scope of this journal allows for philosophy, humanities, philosophy of culture and anthropology, phenomenological philosophy, epistemology, ethics, business ethics, philosophy of religion, religious studies, theology, dogmatic theology, systematic theology, theology of sacrament, moral theology, biblical theology, and pastoral theology.
Arjuna Subject : Seni dan Humaniora - Filsafat
Articles 12 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 38 No. 3 (2022)" : 12 Documents clear
Problem Argumen Improbabilitas dalam The God Delusion: Kritik terhadap New Atheism Dawkins Alfarizi, Reza; Asnawi, Naupal
MELINTAS An International Journal of Philosophy and Religion (MIJPR) Vol. 38 No. 3 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Philosophy, Parahyangan Catholic University, Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26593/mel.v38i3.7409

Abstract

This article aims to criticize the improbability argument put forth by Dawkins, which serves as the central thesis in the new atheism. Dawkins uses this thesis to justify religion as the root of evil and violence, while also forms the basis for the denial of the existence of God. The improbability argument fundamentally has some issues ontologically, epistemologically, and ethically. Dawkins constructs the improbability argument by referring to his explanation in “The Ultimate Boeing 747” and the theory of natural selection, in which he considers creation from nothingness to be as improbable as the spontaneous formation of a Boeing 747 from a tornado’s debris. Dawkins also criticizes the NOMA perspective that positions Science and Theology as equals. Through the framework of critical realism, this article demonstrates the philosophical problems in Dawkins’ improbability argument, which reduces reality (ontology) based on subjective perception (epistemology), and thus obscuring the uniqueness of natural phenomenon and negating the existence of God. Alternative ethical perspectives regarding religion and God are presented to address Dawkins’ accusations to religion as a source of evil and violence.
Book & Film Reviews Bawono, Haryo Tejo
MELINTAS An International Journal of Philosophy and Religion (MIJPR) Vol. 38 No. 3 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Philosophy, Parahyangan Catholic University, Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26593/mel.v38i3.7410

Abstract

Book & Film Reviews is a column in "MELINTAS" containing reviews of books and films published recently that bring different interpretation and inspiration to the fields of philosophy and religion.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 12

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2022 2022


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 40 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 40 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 40 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 39 No. 3 (2023) Vol. 39 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 39 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 38 No. 3 (2022) Vol. 38 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 38 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 37 No. 3 (2021) Vol. 37 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 37 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 36 No. 3 (2020) Vol. 36 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 36 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 35 No. 3 (2019) Vol. 35 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 35 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 34 No. 3 (2018) Vol. 34 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 34 No. 1 (2018) Vol. 33 No. 3 (2017) Vol. 33 No. 2 (2017) Vol. 33 No. 1 (2017) Vol. 32 No. 3 (2016) Vol. 32 No. 2 (2016) Vol. 32 No. 1 (2016) Vol. 31 No. 3 (2015) Vol. 31 No. 2 (2015) Vol. 31 No. 1 (2015) Vol. 30 No. 3 (2014) Vol. 30 No. 2 (2014) Vol. 30 No. 1 (2014) Vol. 29 No. 3 (2013) Vol. 29 No. 2 (2013) Vol. 29 No. 1 (2013) Vol. 28 No. 3 (2012) Vol. 28 No. 2 (2012) Vol. 28 No. 1 (2012) Vol. 27 No. 3 (2011) Vol. 27 No. 2 (2011) Vol. 27 No. 1 (2011) Vol. 26 No. 3 (2010) Vol. 26 No. 2 (2010) Vol. 26 No. 1 (2010) Vol. 25 No. 3 (2009) Vol. 25 No. 2 (2009) Vol. 25 No. 1 (2009) Vol. 24 No. 3 (2008) Vol. 24 No. 2 (2008) Vol. 24 No. 1 (2008) Vol. 23 No. 3 (2007) Vol. 23 No. 2 (2007) Vol. 23 No. 1 (2007) Vol. 22 No. 3 (2006) Vol. 22 No. 2 (2006) Vol. 22 No. 1 (2006) Vol. 21 No. 3 (2005) Vol. 21 No. 2 (2005) Vol. 21 No. 1 (2005) More Issue