cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Andrian Saputra
Contact Email
andriansaputra@fkip.unila.ac.id
Phone
+6285768233166
Journal Mail Official
jpmipa@fkip.unila.ac.id
Editorial Address
FKIP Universitas Lampung Jl. Prof. Dr. Ir. Sumantri Brojonegoro, Gedong Meneng, Kec. Rajabasa, Kota Bandar Lampung
Location
Kota bandar lampung,
Lampung
INDONESIA
Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA
Published by Universitas Lampung
ISSN : 14112531     EISSN : 26855488     DOI : http://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa
Core Subject : Education,
Education
Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA (JPMIPA) focused on mathematics education, science education, and the use of technology in the educational field. In more detail, the scope of interest are, but not limited to: STEM/STEAM Education Environmental and Sustainability Education Scientific Literacy Computer-based Education and Digital Competence Higher Order Thinking Skills Multicultural and Inclusive Education Attitude towards Mathematics and Science Learning Models, Methods, Strategies of Math & Science Learning Virtual and Blended Learning Teacher Education
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Pendidikan
Articles 1 Documents
 1 
Search results for "Towards a Typology of Inquiry-Based Learning Syntax in Science Education" : 1 Documents clear
Towards a Typology of Inquiry-Based Learning Syntax in Science Education: A Systematic Literature Review (2016–2025) Annisa, Rifaul; Winarno, Nanang; Rochintaniawati, Diana; Rahman, Taufik; Paltep, Jefelson M.
Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Vol 27, No 1 (2026): Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA
Publisher : FKIP Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23960/jpmipa.v27i1.pp152-174

Abstract

This study reviewed 41 articles published between 2016 and 2025 that addressed the implementation of Inquiry-Based Learning (IBL) in science education. While several previous studies have discussed inquiry learning models and their relevance to various science disciplines, few have systematically examined the variation of IBL syntax across models and how its implementation aligns with educational contexts and developmental levels. The purpose of this study is to map and analyze the use of IBL syntax across models, learning environments, educational levels, and technology integration, thereby providing a clearer framework for teachers and curriculum developers. This study employed a systematic literature review method. Article characteristics were described based on year of publication, publication type, research method, country of origin, educational level, and scientific content. The analysis revealed that IBL syntax varies depending on context, learning model, educational level, and technology use. In elementary school settings, inquiry activities generally focus on initial engagement, observation, and simple exploration. At the secondary school level, IBL emphasizes more complex investigative skills, data analysis, and interpretation. In secondary and higher education, syntax often encompasses elaboration, evaluation, reflection, collaboration, and technology-supported activities such as virtual laboratories, simulations, or project-based investigations. Based on these findings, a practical typology of IBL syntax is proposed that organizes instructional steps by frequency of use, learning objectives, and alignment with students' developmental stages. This typology can serve as a methodological framework to guide teachers and curriculum developers in adapting IBL models to classroom contexts and student characteristics. This study provides theoretical insights and practical guidance for designing structured and context-sensitive inquiry activities. Future research is recommended to explore underutilized syntax, validate the proposed typology in classroom settings, and examine strategies to support teacher readiness and resource availability, thereby encouraging a more systematic and context-appropriate implementation of inquiry-based learning in science education. Keywords: systematic literature review, science education, learning syntax, and inquiry-based learning.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 1

 1 

Filter by Year

2026 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 27, No 1 (2026): Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Vol 26, No 4 (2025): Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Vol 26, No 3 (2025): Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Vol 26, No 2 (2025): Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Vol 26, No 1 (2025): Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Vol 25, No 4 (2024): Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Vol 25, No 3 (2024): Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Vol 25, No 2 (2024): Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Vol 25, No 1 (2024): Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Vol 24, No 4 (2023): Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Vol 24, No 3 (2023): Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Vol 24, No 2 (2023): Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Vol 24, No 1 (2023): Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Vol 23, No 4 (2022): Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Vol 23, No 3 (2022): Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Vol 23, No 2 (2022): Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Vol 23, No 1 (2022): Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Vol 22, No 2 (2021): Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Vol 22, No 1 (2021): Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Vol 21, No 2 (2020): Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Vol 21, No 1 (2020): Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Vol 20, No 2 (2019): Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Vol 20, No 1 (2019): Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Vol 19, No 2 (2018): Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Vol 19, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Vol 18, No 2 (2017): Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA More Issue