cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Heni Purwati
Contact Email
hunilaiainfmpapua@gmail.com
Phone
081247792376
Journal Mail Official
hunilaiainfmpapua@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Fakultas Syariah IAIN Fattahul Muluk Papua, Indonesia Jl. Merah Putih Buper Waena, Distrik Heram, Kota Jayapura, Provinsi Papua, 99351
Location
Kota jayapura,
P a p u a
INDONESIA
HUNILA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Integrasi Peradilan
Published by Institut Agama Islam Negeri Fattahul Muluk Papua
ISSN : -     EISSN : 29630487     DOI : https://doi.org/10.53491/hunila.v1i2
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
HUNILA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Integrasi Peradilan adalah jurnal yang diterbitkan oleh Fakultas Syariah IAIN Fattahul Muluk Papua. Jurnal ini memuat kajian-kajian di bidang ilmu hukum baik secara teoritik maupun empirik. Fokus jurnal ini tentang kajian-kajian hukum perdata, hukum pidana, hukum tata negara, hukum internasional, hukum acara dan hukum adat.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): HUNILA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum " : 5 Documents clear
NALAR KRITIS POLIGAMI SEBAGAI KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA: (Analisis Terhadap Undang-Undang KDRT Nomor 23 Tahun 2004) Sugitanata, Arif; Karimullah, Suud Sarim
HUNILA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Integrasi Peradilan Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): HUNILA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum & Integrasi Peradilan
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Fattahul Muluk Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53491/hunila.v1i2.515

Abstract

In this paper, the researcher analyses and explains polygamy as a form of domestic violence from the perspective of positive Indonesian law and how it critiques Law No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage by examining Law No. 23 of 2004 on the Elimination of Domestic Violence in Indonesia. Using a literature review, this study found that polygamy carried out without fulfilling the conditions stipulated in the marriage law and Islamic Law Compilation (KHI) can be a form of domestic violence. This is because polygamy committed without the first wife's consent and without regard to the family's welfare can cause injustice and imbalance in the husband-wife relationship and damage the family concerned. Polygamy cases, if associated with Law No. 23 of 2004 concerning the elimination of domestic violence, are a form of psychological violence that can be criminalised and charged with Domestic Violence Law No. 23 of 2004, specifically Article five, which states that "every person is prohibited from committing acts of domestic violence against persons within the scope of their household, whether committed directly or indirectly, to cause pain or misery or suffer physically, sexually, psychologically, and or domestic neglect, including domestic neglect". The criminal penalty can be imprisonment of up to three years or a fine of up to 9 million rupiahs. Suppose the psychological attack causes illness or prevents the victim from doing their job to the extent that their daily activities are disrupted. In that case, they can face imprisonment of up to four months or a fine of three million rupiahs.
ALASAN MENDESAK SEBAGAI SYARAT DISPENSASI NIKAH DALAM UU NO. 16 TAHUN 2019: (Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Agama Sentani No.16/Pdt.P/2021/PA.Stn) Suherman, Heru Andryana; Marwah, Marwah
HUNILA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Integrasi Peradilan Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): HUNILA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum & Integrasi Peradilan
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Fattahul Muluk Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53491/hunila.v1i2.518

Abstract

The institution of marriage plays a significant role in the human experience. Law No. 16 of 2019 lays forth the general principles that will govern marriage law. Religious courts have the authority to waive or reduce the minimum age limit for marriage for those who are less than 19 years old for males and 16 years old for women. For the purpose of this study, we use a normative juridical method to investigate questions about the relationship between statutory and regulatory frameworks. Notwithstanding this, the courts often make exceptions when it comes to weddings. There is a critical need, as well as strong evidence, to redouble our efforts to limit the number of marriages that take place between children.
KEWENANGAN PENGADILAN NEGERI MEMUTUS SENGKETA ANTARA PARTAI POLITIK DAN KOMISI PEMILIHAN UMUM Mahmudi, Mohammad
HUNILA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Integrasi Peradilan Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): HUNILA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum & Integrasi Peradilan
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Fattahul Muluk Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53491/hunila.v1i2.526

Abstract

The District Court is a general court institution that handles criminal and civil cases which is domiciled at the district or city level, while a state institution is a body that has the authority and duties for certain matters and is specific in nature, such as the KPU which functions as an organizer of general elections that cannot be separated from conflicts or disputes in the stages of holding elections, in this case there are issues that cause dynamics, namely the result of a lawsuit filed by the just and prosperous people's party in suing the KPU because the Prima party did not pass as a political party candidate for the 2024 election. This type of research is normative research. (legal research), namely placing law into a system of norms. This research uses a statutory approach (statute approach) and an analytical approach (analitycal approach). The authority of the district court in deciding disputes over the general election process that occurred as a result of the failure of political parties participating in the election with the KPU is beyond the competence of the general court and claims cannot be accepted. The election law regulates three matters relating to election dispute resolution: first, settlement Election process disputes are conducted through the election supervisory body (Bawaslu). Second, the settlement of election disputes is carried out by legal means through the State Administrative Court (PTUN) because every decision issued by the KPU is a State Administrative decision. Third, the settlement of disputes over the results of general elections is carried out through the Constitutional Court as regulated by the 1945 Constitution.
PROPOSAL WAKAI SECARA EX-OFFICIO DAN IMPLEMENTASINYA DALAM MEDIASI BERDASARKAN PERMA NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2016 Huda, Dwi Sakti Muhammad; Wahyuni, Desi; Parwanto, Wendi
HUNILA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Integrasi Peradilan Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): HUNILA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum & Integrasi Peradilan
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Fattahul Muluk Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53491/hunila.v1i2.533

Abstract

Court mediation procedures in Indonesia are regulated in the Regulation of the Supreme Court (PERMA) of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2016 (Perma Nomor 01 Tahun 2016). If we compare it with other countries, such as Japan, even since the 1980s the concept of mediation has been popular among the people regarding how to resolve disputes by wakai. If viewed philosophically, the concept of mediation in Indonesia and wakai in Japan must have the same principle, because the value is the same, namely peace. This study aims to provide an overview of integrating the civil law judicial mediation process in Indonesia which is heavily influenced by the wakai system in Japan. The unification was carried out due to the reduced pile of cases in Japan caused by the implementation of the wakai system. However, the author also wants to show that the wakai proposal can also be implemented in the practice of Mediation based on Perma Number 1 of 2016. This research is a normative juridical research with library research method which includes research on legal principles and comparative law research. The approach used in this research is a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of this study indicate that Perma Number 1 of 2016 which is applied to the State of Indonesia with wakai used in Japan materially, has similarities. However, formally or in practice there are some differences, especially regarding the status of the mediator. Several things from the practice of implementing wakai proposals that are considered suitable and in accordance with the character of Indonesia and do not conflict with the provisions of Perma Number 1 of 2016 are related to the practice of ex-officio mediators in formulating wakai proposals in assisting parties in formulating peace agreements.
PUTUSAN HAKIM ATAS PEMENUHAN HAK-HAK ISTRI PADA KASUS CERAI GUGAT DALAM PERSPEKTIF CEDAW Islamy, Athoillah; Abduh, Muhammad
HUNILA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Integrasi Peradilan Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): HUNILA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum & Integrasi Peradilan
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Fattahul Muluk Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53491/hunila.v1i2.535

Abstract

This study aims to identify the dimension of gender justice in the judge's decision on the divorce case in the Tasikmalaya City Religious Court Decision No. 2000/Pdt. G/2021/PA Tmk which requires the husband (defendant) to pay 'iddah, mut'ah, and madhliyah to the wife (plaintiff). This normative-empirical legal research uses a philosophical approach. The principle of gender equality in CEDAW becomes the theory of analysis of the subject matter of this study. The results of the study show that there is a dimension of gender justice in the judge's decision at the Tasikmalaya City Religious Court No. 2000/Pdt.G/2021/Pa.Tm which is in line with the three principles of the CEDAW convention.  First, the principle of substantive equality in the judge's gender-fair decision for the rights of plaintiffs is manifested juridically in the decision of the Tasikmalaya City Religious Court. Second, the principle of non-discrimination in the judge's decision that is gender fair to the plaintiff's rights based on the defendant has no longer provided a living. Third, the principle of state obligation on gender-fair judges' decisions for plaintiffs' rights based on gender-responsive laws on women's rights after divorce. The theoretical implications of this study show that the principle of gender mainstreaming in the CEDAW convention can be transformed into the decision of a Religious Court judge regarding a lawsuit case. The limitation of this study has not examined the variety of factors that often make judges passive, so that if the plaintiff does not demand a grant from the defendant, then the plaintiff does not get material rights from the plaintiff.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2023 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): HUNILA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Integrasi Peradilan Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): HUNILA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Integrasi Peradilan Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): HUNILA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Integrasi Peradilan Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): HUNILA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum & Integrasi Peradilan Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): HUNILA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum & Integrasi Peradilan Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): HUNILA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum & Integrasi Peradilan