cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota medan,
Sumatera utara
INDONESIA
PREMISE LAW JURNAL
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 10 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 2 (2016): Volume II Tahun 2016" : 10 Documents clear
KEDUDUKAN UANG JEMPUTAN DALAM PERKAWINAN BAJAPUIK PADA MASYARAKAT MINANGKABAU PARIAMAN DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 1 TAHUN 1974 TENTANG HIJRATUL MUSLIM
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 2 (2016): Volume II Tahun 2016
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (267.701 KB)

Abstract

DOSEN PEMBIMBING:1. Runtung 2. Idha Aprilyana 3. Muhd Yamin Adat Marriage  Law is an inseparable part of the Indonesian Customary Law. In Marriage Customary Law, that of Minangkabau Pariaman in particular, is a form of marriage known as bajapuik marriage, which is taking marapulai (the prospective son in law) to the wedding held in the bride’s house by bringing certain condition namely proposal money. Nowadays, the development of bajapuik marriage has changed into consideration for the advantages and disadvantages in its implementation causing prosecution and proposal money repayment to either Religious Court or District Court. By the occurrence of these lawsuits, a study is required on proposal money as the marriage property as stipulated in Article 35 Section 1 and 2 the Law No. 1/ 1974 on Marriage that there is a classification of marital property namely joint  property and pre-marriage property. The results based on the respondents comprehension and the interviews with LKAAM Padang Pariaman showed that the proposal money is essentially the initial capital for the couples in undergoing their marriage. Viewed from the process as stipulated in the Marriage Law No. 1/ 1974 defining pre-marriage property and joint property, the proposal money is classified into the pre-marriage property, yet viewed from the function, the proposal money belongs to joint property that is used for the sake of the couples. Over the time, bajapuik marriage nowadays influences the meaning and essence of the proposal money so that some grooms were found to only expect the proposal money from the marriage, as they thought considered the money their pre-marriage property. In fact, viewed from the adat (tradition), meaning and essence of the giving of the proposal money, it was given with aim to be their joint property. Keywords: Marriage property, Bajapuik Marriage, Proposal Money
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN NOTARIS DALAM MELAKSANAKAN TUGASNYA SEBAGAI PEJABAT PUBLIK TERHADAP AKTA YANG DITERBITKAN MENIMBULKAN PERKARA PIDANA (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 1014 K/PID/2013) PARULIAN H SITOMPUL
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 2 (2016): Volume II Tahun 2016
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (280.033 KB)

Abstract

In reality, a Notary, in performing his duty, is not usually guided by UUJN (Notarial Act) as what has occurred in the Ruling of the Supreme Court No. 1014 K/PID/2013 in which Ninoek Poernomo, the Notary, is charged with criminal act, that is, falsifying a deed. Public prosecutor prosecuted the defendant 1 (one) year imprisonment. The research used judicial normative method. The gathered data were analyzed by using qualitative data analysis. The result of the research showed that the defendant had violated UUJN and Notarial Code of Ethics and was consciously violated Article 264 of the Penal Code so that he was responsible for what he had done. Concerning the deed, it is not automatically cancelled but it becomes an underhanded deed; it can only be cancelled by judge’s verdict through civil complaint. Some factors which cause a Notary to be involved in a criminal act are notarial ethics and taking the side of one of the parties, the truth of the data filed by the parties concerned to a Notary, supervision on a Notary, and incorrect rules. Keywords : Notary, Public Official
ANALISIS YURIDIS ATAS TUKAR GULING (RUILSLAG) ANTARA TANAH ASET MILIK KODAM I/BUKIT BARISAN DENGAN PT CITRA AGUNG SEJAHTERA DAN PT GLOBALINDO ANUGERAH LESTARI SLAMET RIYADI
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 2 (2016): Volume II Tahun 2016
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (340.873 KB)

Abstract

DOSEN PEMBIMBING:1. Muhd Yamin 2. Syafruddin Kalo 3. T Keizerina Devi A Land and building exchanging or swap owned by the State (ruilslag) is one of the alternatives made by the government agency; in this case, Kodam I/Bukit Barisan, in order to meet the needs of unit facilities in which the asset of Kodam I/Bukit Barisan is part of the State’s property so that the swap should be based on the Directive of the Finance Minister No. 96/PMK.06/2007 on the Procedure of the Implementation of using, utilizing, eliminating, and transferring State-owned property which regulates the procedure of swap (ruilslag). BMN (State-owned property) can be conducted when; a. State-owned property like land and/or building is not in accordance with territorial and urban layout b. State-owned property is not used optimallyc. Scattered State-owned properties are assembledd. Implementation of the government/State strategic plan, ore. State-owned property besides land and/or building which is technologically left behind according to the need/condition/legal provisions Keywords : Swap (ruilslag), Kodam I/Bukit Barisan
SANKSI ADMINISTRATIF TERHADAP PPAT ATAS KELALAIAN PENGAWASAN PEMBAYARAN BPHTB DALAM PEMBUATAN AKTA PERALIHAN HAK ATAS TANAH SRI YUMEINAR SITOMPUL
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 2 (2016): Volume II Tahun 2016
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (155.813 KB)

Abstract

Government Regulation No. 37/1998 on PPAT (Official Empowered to Draw up Land Deeds) states that in the case of transferring of title on land and building, PPAT/Notary has the authority to draw up a certificate and validates the rights, and he also has the authority to examine and supervise, as well as to enforce law on the responsibility to pay BPHTB (Income Tax on Land and Building). Article 91 of Law No. 28/2009 on PDRD states that PPAT/Notary oinly has the right to sign the transfer of right certificate on building after the taxpayer has submitted tax quittance. PPAT/Notary who violates the provision on signing certificate (after taxpayer has submitted tax quittance), will be imposed on administrative sanction by paying the fine of Rp.7,500,000 (seven million five hundred thousand rupiahs) for each violation as it is stipulated in Article 93, paragraph 1 of  Law No. 28/2009 on PDRD. The problems of the research are as follows: what type of administrative sanction which will be imposed on PPAT/Notary who has violated Article 91, paragraph 1, who has the authority to give the sanction on Article 91, paragraph 1 of Law No. 28/2009 on PDRD, how about fulfilling the principle of justice in imposing the sanction on Article 91, paragraph 1 of Law   No. 28/2009 on PDRD, and what legal remedy in getting legal protection for PPAT/Notary about the sanction in Article 91, paragraph 1 of Law No. 28/2009 on PDRD. Keywords: Administrative Sanction, PPAT/Notary, Supervision
ANALISIS YURIDIS PENYELESAIAN KREDIT MACET OBJEK HAK TANGGUNGAN YANG DIEKSEKUSI MELALUI PENJUALAN DIBAWAH TANGAN DALAM PRAKTEK PERBANKAN ( Studi di PT. Bank Tabungan Negara Lhokseumawe dan PT. Bank Danamon Indonesia Unit Simpan Pinjam Lhokseumawe ) SUGENG HARTONO
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 2 (2016): Volume II Tahun 2016
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (305.519 KB)

Abstract

In a banking credit contract, the Bank as the creditor usually performs tasks for collateral in order to secure the channeling of its credit according to Law on Hypothecation No. 4/1996 which states that the specific characteristics of hypothecation are firm, simple, and positive in the implementation of its execution when debtors breach the contract (default). The result of the research shows that the legal domicile and process of settling nonperforming loan executed through underhanded sale can only be done when it is estimated that the auction process does not yield the highest price according to Article 20 of Law on Hypothecation No. 4/1996 with all its requirements. The implementation of settling nonperforming loan executed through underhanded sale should regard the right and obligation of debtors and creditors so that legal protection can be made and it does not harm any parties in implementing the execution. Keywords: Execution through Underhanded Sale, Nonperforming Loan, Hypothecation
PENGURUSAN HARTA WARISAN ANAK DI BAWAH UMUR YANG BERADA DI BAWAH PERWALIAN (STUDI PENETAPAN PENGADILAN AGAMA MEDAN NOMOR 4 PDT.P/2015/PA. MDN) WINDHA AULIANA YUSRA
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 2 (2016): Volume II Tahun 2016
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (316.814 KB)

Abstract

DOSEN PEMBIMBING:1. Hasballah Thaib 2. Muhd Yamin 3. T. Keizerina Devi A Basically the guardianship authority is given to a person to represent the child's immature in performing legal actions in the interest of the child and kindness, which includes custody against myself also treasure his wealth. At its core is the guardianship supervision over people as set in the act, and the management of goods from immature children. Placement of caregivers is very important, especially on the issue of succession. If the child's parents who are immature died then the child will get the treasure inherited from his master's people were then the child must be represented by his guardian, so by consequence the treasure relics obtained a child over the events of his legacy is his parents can meet the sense of fairness and legal certainty. With regard to custody, including therein the guardian appointed or designated by the judge through the determination of the court. Keywords: Management, Inheritance, Child Custody
ANALISIS YURIDIS TENTANG PEMBUATAN SURAT KETERANGAN AHLI WARIS BAGI PERKAWINAN POLIGAMI OLEH PEJABAT YANG BERWENANG (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Agama Medan Nomor 314/Pdt.G/2014/PA.Mdn) CAHAYA HASANAH
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 2 (2016): Volume II Tahun 2016
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (277.712 KB)

Abstract

DOSEN PEMBIMBING:1. Hasballah Thaib 2. Syahril Sofyan 3. Utary Maharany An heir cannot automatically have control over and transfer title of the inheritance to become his rights by ignoring the testator. He has to provide SKAW (notification of heir) which states who the heir is and who the testator is. An heir is a person who, at the time of his death, is kin or a bond of matrimony to a testator, a moslem, and legally becomes an heir. SKAW is one of the documents which become of the references for distributing inheritance. It is adjusted to the authority of the official who makes it and adjusted to the group of people that are affective for the Indonesian citizen. It is made underhandedly and validated by village head and subdistrict head without any scuritiny so that it becomes uncertain about the number  of heirs because it is made based on Family card. The result of the research shows that there is no specifc regulation on drawing up SKAW because it is made based on the three groups. The responsibility of the official who draws it up is devided into the categories: first, according to the state administration, by revising or canceling it, secondly,  when there is an indication that it harms other people, and thirdly, according to criminal act, when there is evidence that there is a forged information in the authentic certificate. The religious court has the authority to examine, decide, and settle the case of a moslem when there is a dispute in inheritance. Keywords        :                      Letter of notification of Heirs, Polygamy, Authorized Official
ANALISIS YURIDIS AKTA KETERANGAN WARIS YANG DIBUAT OLEH NOTARIS DALAM KETENTUAN PEMBUATAN AKTA OTENTIK BERDASARKAN UUJN NO. 2 TAHUN 2014 MIA IRIANDINI
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 2 (2016): Volume II Tahun 2016
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (248.533 KB)

Abstract

The result of this study showed that the authority of Notary to make and issue the Letter of Certification of Inheritance is not regulated in detail because this is only the habitual activity of the previous Notaries which is then followed by the next and current Notaries. Basides, based on the habitual action, in the making of the Letter of Certification of Inheritance, Notaries also refer to the Circular Letter of Legal Development Board, Directorate General of Agraria, Department of Domestic Affairs No: 44DP/12/63/12/69 dated December 20, 1969 on Letter of Certification of Inheritance and the Evidence of Citizenship as their legal base. It is regulated that for the Indonesian citizen of the indigeneous people origin, the Certification of Inheritance is made by the heir(s) witnessed by 2 (two) witnesses which is then approved and certified by Lurah (Head of Urban Village) and Camat (Head of Subdistrict). For the Indonesia Citizen of foreign eastern descent origin, the Certification of Inheritance should be obtained from BalaiHartaPeninggalan (the Office of Inheritance Affairs). The categorization of population and the existing law for every category of population should have been eliminated. The practice of this stipulation is regarded as a discriminative action as well as rasialism and of course it is on the contrary with the principles of human rights. So, this kind of regulation stuipulation must be ended immediately by determining the authority of Notary as the only official who makes and issues the Certification of Inheritance and regulated in the the UUJN (Law on Notary’s Position).
KEWENANGAN NOTARIS DALAM PENJUALAN SAHAM PERSEROAN TERBATAS YANG PEMEGANG SAHAM MERUPAKAN PERUSAHAAN ASING YENNY YENNY
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 2 (2016): Volume II Tahun 2016
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (266.038 KB)

Abstract

A notary must notarize an authentic notarial document in accordance with the provisions of the laws. Therefore, the transfer of the shares should be made in compliance with valid laws. The foreign companies under a joint venture agreement choosing the law of other country should obey the laws of Indonesia in the purchase of shares based on the principle of freedom of contract and it must not applied against the propriety, customs, and laws. In this case the law applied was the local law where the contract was made. The way of the purchase shares of foreign investment limited liability company catagorized as company types under established requirements must obtain permission from the authorities first. The authority of the notary in the purchase of shares of a foreign investment limited liability company of waarmerking general meeting of shareholders are managing the changes of equity and/or shareholders’ structure, making a deed of transfer of rights over shares in the form of authentic deed and deed under the hand and making a change to the data bank by filling Changes Format in the Legal Entity Administration System. Keywords: Notary Authority, Sale and Purchase Shares, Foreign Companies
ANALISIS YURIDIS ATAS PUTUSAN NOMOR: 014/Pdt.P/2014/PA-LPK TENTANG PENETAPAN AHLI WARIS DZAWIL ARHAM YANG MENDAPATKAN SELURUH HARTA WARISAN SI PEWARIS TAUFIQ TAHIR YUSUF LUBIS
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 2 (2016): Volume II Tahun 2016
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (338.016 KB)

Abstract

Dzawil Arham in the Compilation of the Islamic Law is not included in the category of an heir because, according to the Compilation of the Islamic Law, there are three categories of heir: dzul fardin (dzawil furudh), asahabah, and substituting heir (Plasverfulling), while in the verdict No. 014/Pdt.P/2014/PA-LPK, the panel of judges in the hearing of the case appointed an heir that was not dzawil arham who had the right for the inheritance.   Keywords: Dzawil Arham, Heir, Court’s Verdict

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 10


Filter by Year

2016 2016


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 18 (2019): VOLUME 18 TAHUN 2019 Vol 17 (2019): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2019 Vol 16 (2019): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2019 Vol 15 (2019): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2019 Vol 14 (2019): VOLUME 14 TAHUN 2019 Vol 13 (2019): VOLUME 13 TAHUN 2019 Vol 12 (2019): VOLUME 12 TAHUN 2019 Vol 11 (2019): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2019 Vol 10 (2019): VOLUME 10 TAHUN 2019 Vol 9 (2019): VOLUME 9 TAHUN 2019 Vol 8 (2019): VOLUME 8 TAHUN 2019 Vol 7 (2019): VOLUME 7 TAHUN 2019 Vol 6 (2019): VOLUME 6 TAHUN 2019 Vol 5 (2019): VOLUME 5 TAHUN 2019 Vol 4 (2019): VOLUME 4 TAHUN 2019 Vol 3 (2019): VOLUME 3 TAHUN 2019 Vol 2 (2019): VOLUME 2 TAHUN 2019 Vol 1 (2019): VOLUME 1 TAHUN 2019 Vol 17 (2018): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2018 Vol 16 (2018): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2018 Vol 15 (2018): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2018 Vol 14 (2018): VOLUME 14 TAHUN 2018 Vol 13 (2018): VOLUME 13 TAHUN 2018 Vol 12 (2018): VOLUME 12 TAHUN 2018 Vol 11 (2018): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2018 Vol 10 (2018): VOLUME 10 TAHUN 2018 Vol 9 (2018): VOLUME 9 TAHUN 2018 Vol 8 (2018): VOLUME 8 TAHUN 2018 Vol 7 (2018): VOLUME 7 TAHUN 2018 Vol 6 (2018): VOLUME 6 TAHUN 2018 Vol 5 (2018): VOLUME 5 TAHUN 2018 Vol 4 (2018): VOLUME 4 TAHUN 2018 Vol 3 (2018): VOLUME 3 TAHUN 2018 Vol 2 (2018): VOLUME 2 TAHUN 2018 Vol 1 (2018): VOLUME 1 TAHUN 2018 Vol 24 (2017): VOLUME 24 TAHUN 2017 Vol 23 (2017): VOLUME 23 TAHUN 2017 Vol 22 (2017): VOLUME 22 TAHUN 2017 Vol 21 (2017): VOLUME 21 TAHUN 2017 Vol 20 (2017): VOLUME 20 TAHUN 2017 Vol 19 (2017): VOLUME 19 TAHUN 2017 Vol 18 (2017): VOLUME 18 TAHUN 2017 Vol 17 (2017): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2017 Vol 16 (2017): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2017 Vol 15 (2017): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2017 Vol 14 (2017): VOLUME XIV TAHUN 2017 Vol 13 (2017): Volume XIII Tahun 2017 Vol 12 (2017): VOLUME XII TAHUN 2017 Vol 11 (2017): Volume XI Tahun 2017 Vol 10 (2017): VOLUME X TAHUN 2017 Vol 9 (2017): vol IX Tahun 2017 Vol 8 (2017): Volume VIII Tahun 2017 Vol 7 (2017): Volume VII Tahun 2017 Vol 6 (2017): VOLUME VI TAHUN 2017 Vol 5 (2017): VOLUME V TAHUN 2017 Vol 4 (2017): VOLUME IV TAHUN 2017 Vol 3 (2017): VOLUME III TAHUN 2017 Vol 2 (2017): VOLUME II TAHUN 2017 Vol 1 (2017): VOLUME I TAHUN 2017 Vol 21 (2016): VOLUME XXI TAHUN 2016 Vol 20 (2016): VOLUME XX TAHUN 2016 Vol 19 (2016): VOLUME XIX TAHUN 2016 Vol 18 (2016): VOLUME XVIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 17 (2016): VOLUME XVII TAHUN 2016 Vol 16 (2016): VOLUME XVI TAHUN 2016 Vol 15 (2016): VOLUME XV TAHUN 2016 Vol 14 (2016): VOLUME XIV TAHUN 2016 Vol 13 (2016): VOLUME XIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 12 (2016): VOLUME XII TAHUN 2016 Vol 11 (2016): VOLUME XI TAHUN 2016 Vol 10 (2016): VOLUME X TAHUN 2016 Vol 9 (2016): VOLUME IX TAHUN 2016 Vol 8 (2016): VOLUME VIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 7 (2016): VOLUME VII TAHUN 2016 Vol 6 (2016): VOLUME VI TAHUN 2016 Vol 5 (2016): Volume V Tahun 2016 Vol 4 (2016): Volume IV Tahun 2016 Vol 3 (2016): Volume III Tahun 2016 Vol 2 (2016): Volume II Tahun 2016 Vol 1 (2016): Volume I Tahun 2016 Vol 14 (2015): Volume XIV Tahun 2015 Vol 13 (2015): Volume XIII Tahun 2015 Vol 12 (2015): Volume XII Tahun 2015 Vol 11 (2015): Volume XI Tahun 2015 Vol 9 (2015): Volume IX Tahun 2015 Vol 8 (2015): Volume VIII Tahun 2015 Vol 7 (2015): Volume VII Tahun 2015 Vol 6 (2015): Volume VI Tahun 2015 Vol 5 (2015): Volume V Tahun 2015 Vol 4 (2015): Volume IV Tahun 2015 Vol 3 (2015): Volume III Tahun 2015 Vol 2 (2015): Volume II Tahun 2015 Vol 1 (2015): Volume I Tahun 2015 Vol 10 (2015) Vol 4: Volume 4 (2014) : Volume IV Tahun 2014 Vol 3 (2014): Volume III Tahun 2014 Vol 2 (2014) Vol 1: Volume I Tahun 2014 Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Volume II Tahun 2013 Vol 3: Volume III tahun 2013 Vol 1 (2013) More Issue