cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota medan,
Sumatera utara
INDONESIA
PREMISE LAW JURNAL
Published by Universitas Sumatera Utara
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 812 Documents
 15   16   17   18   19 
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM KEPENTINGAN ANAK DI BAWAH UMUR TERHADAP HIBAH YANG MELANGGAR LEGITIEME PORTIE NITA NILAN SRY REZKI PULUNGAN
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 9 (2015): Volume IX Tahun 2015
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (147.39 KB)

Abstract

In practice, the grant giver always grants his/her property to the grant recipient with the greater amount than the part available in the property to be granted or in fact a part of the grant received by the grant recepient absolutely belongs to the legitimaries heirs that the dispute of inheritance occurs among the heirs. To prove whether or not the grant given by the grant giver has violated the legitieme portie, and does not inform the total amount of all boedel of the inheritance. The attempt to protect thr ight to inherite of the underage heirs in terms of granting by the grant giver violating the legitieme portie is that it is a must to obtain a decision in relation to the transfer of the property of the underage from the court of law, the existence of representative instution towards the legal action for the property of the underage, the action of control or monitoring the property containing the right of the underage heirs with the condition that transferring the property owned by the underage heirs that should be allowed get license from the court of law in order to prevent the violation that might be done by the guardian of the underage heirs or other parties who can inflict loss to the underage heirs. Keywords: Legal Protection, Legitieme Portie, Underage Heir
PENETAPAN HAK PERWALIAN ANAK DIBAWAH UMUR PADA KASUS PERCERAIAN DALAM PERKAWINAN CAMPURAN WARGA NEGARA INDONESIA DAN WARGA NEGARA ASING TIURLAN SIHALOHO
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 9 (2015): Volume IX Tahun 2015
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (224.022 KB)

Abstract

Guardianship can accur in marriage when there is a divorce or the death of  one of the couple who is bound in wedlock. Before it occurs, the children are under their parents’ care, but if the parents are not responsible for them or do not take their repsponsibility to take care of them, the parents’ rights in the children are abolished. The requirements for the receiver of guardianship right are stipulated in the Civil Code, in the Marrieage Law, and in the Child Protection Law. The guardianship for children is in the hand of the judge when it is caused by a divorce. The consideration upon a guardianship right will be given. The right and the authority of a guardian on a child are equal to biological parents. The right includes the child personally and his property. The right of guardianship does not stop by determining who will have the right to be the guardian, either his biological father or his biological mother, through the Court’s valid verdict (inkracht). The task and the obligation of the Court in executing guardianship right do not only hand over the child to the guardian but also considers the child’s subsistence. Keywords: Mixed Marriage, Divorce, Citizenship, Guardianship Right, Guardian’s Responsibility, Execution of Guardianship
TINJAUAN YURIDIS KEDUDUKAN BENDA JAMINAN HAK TANGGUNGAN KEPADA BANK YANG TERKAIT KASUS KORUPSI YENNY YUSTISI YANTI
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 9 (2015): Volume IX Tahun 2015
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (213.037 KB)

Abstract

Immovable properties such as land and buildings which are bound in hypothecation give the privilege to preferred creditor as the receiver of the hypothecation to execute the collateral when debtors are not able to pay off their debts. The research used judicial normative method. The confiscation of the collateral by the Court can be opposed by the third party that believed to be harmed and is contradictory to the principle of legal protection for preferred creditor because every movable and immovable property which has been mortgaged cannot be confiscated since it has been the authority of the creditor as the receiver of the collateral. A creditor who has bound in the collateral with good faith must be legally protected, and every immovable property such as land and building which been bound in collateral becomes the full authority of the creditor as the mortgagee as the security from the debtor as the mortgagor. Keywords: Hypothecation, Bank, Confiscation, Criminal Act, Corruption
TINJAUAN YURIDIS ATAS TUGAS-TUGAS NOTARIS SEBELUM PELAKSANAAN PERJANJIAN KREDIT DI PERBANKAN HISKIA MEIKO AUNAMULA PANGGABEAN
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 9 (2015): Volume IX Tahun 2015
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (264.676 KB)

Abstract

Nowadays, notarial profession develops rapidly which indicates that it is highly needed by the Indonesian people. Not only individuals, but also corporations need Notaries’ services. One of the corporations is banking financial institution. In its management, a Bank needs a Notary for giving legal certainty to its debtors and to the Bank itself; it means that a Notary becomes a Bank’s partner. In the regulation on a Notary’s duty and authority as it is stipulated in Law No. 2/2014 on the Amendment of Law No. 30/2004 on the Regulation of Notaries Profession, states about the authority and automatically becomes the duty of a Notary in doing his profession. In order that the process of pre-credit contract and legal certainty can run smoothly, it is recommended that Notary should be able to examine and ask for all supporting documents from the parties concerned in order to obtain an administrative legal basis on whatever is needed to make a complete credit contract a law which can be obeyed by both parties with the minimum legal loophole or even to be eliminated. Keywords: Judicial Review, Implementation of Notary’s Duty in Pre-Credit Contract
KEKUATAN PEMBUATAN AKTA OTENTIK YANG MEMBATALKAN AKTA NOTARIS (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI MEDAN NOMOR 347/PDT.G/2012/PN-MDN) YANTI MALA
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 6 (2015): Volume VI Tahun 2015
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (342.36 KB)

Abstract

The authenticity of a Notary is found in Article 1, paragraph 1 of Notarial Act No. 2/2014 in which a Notary is regarded as a “ public official empowered to draw up authentic deeds and other authorities as it is intended by this law/ or by other laws” so that the deeds drawn up by a Notary is authentic. Therefore, the authentic deeds can be cancelled when they are physically, materially, and formally legally defective. In this case, the research on the Evidentiary Value of Drawing up Authentic Deeds which Cancels Notarial Deeds (A Case Study on the Verdict of Medan District Court No. 347/PDT.G/2012/PN-MDN) needs to be conducted. The conclusion of the research was that a Notary’s attempt to forestall the breach of the parties concerned in Notarial deeds was by performing his obligation as a Notary as it is stipulated in Notarial Act No. 2/2014 and notarial Code of Ethics. In practice, a Notary has to read the content of the deed and explain to the person appearing about the content before some witnesses, either from the Notary himself or from the person appearing, provide a special pages for finger prints as evidence, in case of any dispute in the future. A Notary’s attempt to deter civil sanction on notarial deeds which have evidentiary value as underhanded deeds and the cancelation by law is by proving that the deeds have complete evidentiary value and do not violate Article 84 of Notarial Act. He has to fight and explain that the deeds are made upon the request of the parties concerned according to the procedures. If he can prove it from the physical, formal, and material viewpoints, he can counter sue in order to defend his rights and obligation in performing his profession. Keywords:Notary, Drawing up Authentic Deeds, Canceling Authentic Deeds
TINJAUAN YURIDIS PERJANJIAN POLA KEMITRAAN PERKEBUNAN KELAPA SAWIT INTI-PLASMA ANTARA PT. BOSWA MEGALOPOLIS DENGAN MASYARAKAT (SUATU PENELITIAN DI KABUPATEN ACEH JAYA) MUHAMMAD MILSA
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 4 (2015): Volume IV Tahun 2015
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (396.298 KB)

Abstract

Business partnership is one of business partnership patterns stipulated in PP No. 24/1997 on Partnership, in Kepmentan No. 40/kpts/OT.120/10/97, and in Permentan No. 26/Permentan/OT.140/2/2007. Although the technical requirement has been regulated, in reality, the provisions cannot accommodate all requirements in business partnership agreement between companies and the public. Partnership pattern is stipulated in Law No. 20/2008 on Micro, Small, and Medium Businesses, in PP No. 44/1997 on Partnership, in Kepmentan No. 940/kpts/OT.210/10/97 on Guidance for Partnership in Agricultural Business, and in Permentan No. 29/Permentan/OT.140/2/2007. In general, the plantation business partnership agreement between PT. Boswa Megalopolis and the people has implemented the above Kepmentan and Permentan. In practice, however, there are still many defects, especially about the content of the contract related to the mechanism of the allocation of profit, about the business partnership requirements which are not arranged in detail, and about the opportunity to make underhanded contract.The regulation of plantation business partnership has not yet provided legal certainty and legal protection for the people. It is recommended that the Government revise the substance of Kepmentan and Permentan, particularly which are related to the partnership of plant standardization and the assertion in making the contract in an authentic deed. Keywords : Judicial Review on Partnership Pattern Agreement
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM KEPADA PEMBELI YANG BERITIKAD BAIK DALAM HAL DILAKUKANNYA PENCATATAN BLOKIR DAN SITA PADA SERTIPIKAT HAK ATAS TANAH OLEH KANTOR PERTANAHAN KOTA MEDAN CAHRYA HALOHO
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 10 (2015)
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (283.281 KB)

Abstract

Land registration, required by the government and in line with Article 19 of UUPA, is aimed to guarantee legal certainty on land rights by the issuance of land rights certificates. The legal problems arises when the action of suspension and confiscation registration done by an applicant is not correct because at the time of the registration the certificate is not in the name of the real owner, or the certificate has been transferred to another party (good faith buyer). The result of the research showed that the registration procedure of suspension and confiscation on land rights certificates at the Land Office had to fulfill the requirement of suspension and confiscation stipulated by the Regulation of the Head of BPN (National Land Board) No. 1/2010 on Service Standard and Regulation on Land. Some factors which cause the case of the registration of suspension and confiscation are legal provisions which implies that there is no fixed regulation about legal protection for good faith buyers, and law enforcements that are directly related to the process of legal enforcement are District Court and the National Land Board of the Land Office which plays an important role in conducting the registration of suspension and confiscation. In this case, the judge who stipulates the Verdict of Foreclosure ignores the legal protection for good faith buyers and the Land Office pays attention only to their own interest or to parties concerned in carrying out the registration of suspension and confiscation. Keywords:   Legal Protection, Good Faith Buyers, Suspension and Confiscation Certificate
ANALISIS HUKUM WAKAF ATAS PEMBANGUNAN MASJID DI ATAS HAK GUNA USAHA PTPN IV KEBUN PABATU KABUPATEN SERDANG BEDAGAI N U R M A U L I N U R M A U L I
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 10 (2015)
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (366.842 KB)

Abstract

The leasehold which can be used for wakaf is as follows. The leasehold owned by corporation is not peformed by the corporation itself such as the State-owned company, PTPN IV. The company has several estates and one of them is Unit Kebun Pabatu at Pabatu, Serdang Bedagai Disrict. Each afdeling (unit) of PTPN IV, including Unit Kebun Pabatu, has a mosque. The mosque is on the leaseholld of PTPN IV, whereas according to Law No. 41/2004 on Wakaf, its implementing regulation, the Government Regulation No. 42/2006, and Book III of the Presidential Decree No. 1/1991 on the Compilation of the Islamic Law, the mosque in the leasehold of PTPN  IV Unit Kebun Pabatu should and can be used as a wakaf object. It means that the land, where the mosque is located, should be taken out from the leasehold of PTPN IV Unit Kebun Pabatu. Keywords: Wakaf on Leasehold Land
TINJAUAN YURIDIS ATAS TINDAKAN DEBITUR YANG MENOLAK PENGOSONGAN BARANG JAMINAN YANG DIEKSEKUSI OLEH BANK YOICE IRENE LAMTIUR P
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 10 (2015)
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (208.93 KB)

Abstract

In a banking credit, the bank as creditor usually do the collateral binding in which in this research is a commitment right to save the credit distribution according to UUHT No. 4 of 1996. If debtor  is in default, the creditor has a right on execution of the quarantee object based on the applied rule. This research is a normative low study in descriptive analytic design. Based on the result of research it indicates that the procedure of execution of quarantee object  is if the debtor is in default in payment the debt that indicated by the warning letter by creditor for 3 times and somation of the legal representative of creditor for 3 times. The implementation of the execution of the guarantee object  gain the opposed of debtir so the creditor to the enforcement  by flat execution from the district court of Batam by ask the bailiff of the court of Batam and the police of Batam. The creditor before the execution must do the negotiation to the creditor to avoid the resistance in the execution of the object
TINJAUAN YURIDIS KUASA MUTLAK DALAM PEMBUATAN AKTA NOTARIS MENURUT PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN DI INDONESIA EMA EMELIA
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 10 (2015)
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (138.3 KB)

Abstract

Based on the Instruction of the Internal Affairs Minister No. 14/1982 on the Prohibition to use Irrevocable Power of Attorney as the Transfer on Land Rights on March 6, 1982, there was a prohibited Power of Attorney in which it contained the element which could not be withdrawn by the principal since it is the transfer of land rights. In its development, the Instruction of the Internal Affairs Minister was changed: the Decree of the Agrarian Director General, on behalf of the Internal Affairs Minister No. 594/1492/AGR regulates the use irrevocable power of attorney, not as prohibited irrevocable power attorney as stipulated in sales certificate, sales agreement, and APHT. ). Deviation in irrevocable power of attorney occurred after being revised on March 30, 1982; if it was not revised or rectified, the land would returned to the heir when the seller died, and it would be chaos because the buyer was harmed financially. Therefore, the Circular Letter of the Directorate of Agrarian Affairs No. 594/1492/AGR on March 30, 1982 has been amended by the Government. The legal domicile of the parties concerned in the irrevocable power of attorney can actually be implemented provided that it is united with purchase agreement. Every buy and sell with irrevocable power of attorney is approved by the Supreme Court, and purchase agreement still exists. Keywords: Irrevocable Power of Attorney, Drawing up Deed, Notary/PPAT

Page 17 of 82 | Total Record : 812

 15   16   17   18   19 

Filter by Year

2013 2019


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 18 (2019): VOLUME 18 TAHUN 2019 Vol 17 (2019): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2019 Vol 16 (2019): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2019 Vol 15 (2019): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2019 Vol 14 (2019): VOLUME 14 TAHUN 2019 Vol 13 (2019): VOLUME 13 TAHUN 2019 Vol 12 (2019): VOLUME 12 TAHUN 2019 Vol 11 (2019): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2019 Vol 10 (2019): VOLUME 10 TAHUN 2019 Vol 9 (2019): VOLUME 9 TAHUN 2019 Vol 8 (2019): VOLUME 8 TAHUN 2019 Vol 7 (2019): VOLUME 7 TAHUN 2019 Vol 6 (2019): VOLUME 6 TAHUN 2019 Vol 5 (2019): VOLUME 5 TAHUN 2019 Vol 4 (2019): VOLUME 4 TAHUN 2019 Vol 3 (2019): VOLUME 3 TAHUN 2019 Vol 2 (2019): VOLUME 2 TAHUN 2019 Vol 1 (2019): VOLUME 1 TAHUN 2019 Vol 17 (2018): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2018 Vol 16 (2018): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2018 Vol 15 (2018): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2018 Vol 14 (2018): VOLUME 14 TAHUN 2018 Vol 13 (2018): VOLUME 13 TAHUN 2018 Vol 12 (2018): VOLUME 12 TAHUN 2018 Vol 11 (2018): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2018 Vol 10 (2018): VOLUME 10 TAHUN 2018 Vol 9 (2018): VOLUME 9 TAHUN 2018 Vol 8 (2018): VOLUME 8 TAHUN 2018 Vol 7 (2018): VOLUME 7 TAHUN 2018 Vol 6 (2018): VOLUME 6 TAHUN 2018 Vol 5 (2018): VOLUME 5 TAHUN 2018 Vol 4 (2018): VOLUME 4 TAHUN 2018 Vol 3 (2018): VOLUME 3 TAHUN 2018 Vol 2 (2018): VOLUME 2 TAHUN 2018 Vol 1 (2018): VOLUME 1 TAHUN 2018 Vol 24 (2017): VOLUME 24 TAHUN 2017 Vol 23 (2017): VOLUME 23 TAHUN 2017 Vol 22 (2017): VOLUME 22 TAHUN 2017 Vol 21 (2017): VOLUME 21 TAHUN 2017 Vol 20 (2017): VOLUME 20 TAHUN 2017 Vol 19 (2017): VOLUME 19 TAHUN 2017 Vol 18 (2017): VOLUME 18 TAHUN 2017 Vol 17 (2017): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2017 Vol 16 (2017): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2017 Vol 15 (2017): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2017 Vol 14 (2017): VOLUME XIV TAHUN 2017 Vol 13 (2017): Volume XIII Tahun 2017 Vol 12 (2017): VOLUME XII TAHUN 2017 Vol 11 (2017): Volume XI Tahun 2017 Vol 10 (2017): VOLUME X TAHUN 2017 Vol 9 (2017): vol IX Tahun 2017 Vol 8 (2017): Volume VIII Tahun 2017 Vol 7 (2017): Volume VII Tahun 2017 Vol 6 (2017): VOLUME VI TAHUN 2017 Vol 5 (2017): VOLUME V TAHUN 2017 Vol 4 (2017): VOLUME IV TAHUN 2017 Vol 3 (2017): VOLUME III TAHUN 2017 Vol 2 (2017): VOLUME II TAHUN 2017 Vol 1 (2017): VOLUME I TAHUN 2017 Vol 21 (2016): VOLUME XXI TAHUN 2016 Vol 20 (2016): VOLUME XX TAHUN 2016 Vol 19 (2016): VOLUME XIX TAHUN 2016 Vol 18 (2016): VOLUME XVIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 17 (2016): VOLUME XVII TAHUN 2016 Vol 16 (2016): VOLUME XVI TAHUN 2016 Vol 15 (2016): VOLUME XV TAHUN 2016 Vol 14 (2016): VOLUME XIV TAHUN 2016 Vol 13 (2016): VOLUME XIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 12 (2016): VOLUME XII TAHUN 2016 Vol 11 (2016): VOLUME XI TAHUN 2016 Vol 10 (2016): VOLUME X TAHUN 2016 Vol 9 (2016): VOLUME IX TAHUN 2016 Vol 8 (2016): VOLUME VIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 7 (2016): VOLUME VII TAHUN 2016 Vol 6 (2016): VOLUME VI TAHUN 2016 Vol 5 (2016): Volume V Tahun 2016 Vol 4 (2016): Volume IV Tahun 2016 Vol 3 (2016): Volume III Tahun 2016 Vol 2 (2016): Volume II Tahun 2016 Vol 1 (2016): Volume I Tahun 2016 Vol 14 (2015): Volume XIV Tahun 2015 Vol 13 (2015): Volume XIII Tahun 2015 Vol 12 (2015): Volume XII Tahun 2015 Vol 11 (2015): Volume XI Tahun 2015 Vol 9 (2015): Volume IX Tahun 2015 Vol 8 (2015): Volume VIII Tahun 2015 Vol 7 (2015): Volume VII Tahun 2015 Vol 6 (2015): Volume VI Tahun 2015 Vol 5 (2015): Volume V Tahun 2015 Vol 4 (2015): Volume IV Tahun 2015 Vol 3 (2015): Volume III Tahun 2015 Vol 2 (2015): Volume II Tahun 2015 Vol 1 (2015): Volume I Tahun 2015 Vol 10 (2015) Vol 4: Volume 4 (2014) : Volume IV Tahun 2014 Vol 3 (2014): Volume III Tahun 2014 Vol 2 (2014) Vol 1: Volume I Tahun 2014 Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Volume II Tahun 2013 Vol 3: Volume III tahun 2013 Vol 1 (2013) More Issue